|
It would appear that CryTek were first to touch the poop. cat(astrophic) tax: 
EmesiS fucked around with this message at 01:18 on Jan 20, 2020 |
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 01:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 12:17 |
|
|
shrach posted:I'm surprised anyone sees it as anything other than this. Crytek are the first people to "invest" in Star Citizen and not embrace sunk cost fallacy. There’s always more. I rest my case
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 01:14
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 01:21
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 01:29
|
|
|
Landing succsfl
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 01:37
|
|
|
Quavers posted:
looks like you chase a little white dot around your screen, thrilling combat
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 02:01
|
|
SDC vs TURBOR 40 man wing fight. 12 vs 27. Biggest fight in SC History
|
How could you run star citizen client on a console to launch this SQ42? How can it be remotely reasonable to advertise publicly you going to defiey a contract. Then years after the upset party has been dragging you to court dribble that your own public statements are not true and you made secret deal with a third party that makes your first agreement null and void but only decided to let that slip now? Oh and pay the legal fees for driving a car through my shop window and doing donughts. The whole thing seams absurd. The release of SQ42 is obviously needed for any financial remedy to crytek I can understand announcing you are going to break a contract immenitly and breaking a contracting are two different things... It seams absurd you are allowed to reap the benefits of the contract breaking announcements while not having to pay he costs. Maybe this is top tier legal trickery at work.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 02:36
|
|
|
This batch of legal updates is boring. Some investor drop another misinformed wad of cash on crobberts so he can hire back the youtube crew!Beet Wagon posted:Well yeah I mean why get six inches of failure when a footlong is only $5 Can I use this to cross-sandwich upgrade to a footlong and retain my lettuce/tomato insurance?
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 02:47
|
|
|
Mailer posted:This batch of legal updates is boring. Some investor drop another misinformed wad of cash on crobberts so he can hire back the youtube crew! New money only please.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 04:13
|
|
|
I'm glad that the ELE didn't occur, this train wreck is too precious to end at this point. It has to go out slowly, an implosion wouldn't do it justice. It has to go away like a fart.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 04:16
|
|
|
Don't dox my catte!
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 04:25
|
|
|
no_recall posted:I'm glad that the ELE didn't occur, this train wreck is too precious to end at this point. I'd argue it already has. Outside this thread, there are three types of people: those who laugh at SC, those who don't care, and the zealots. The zealots matter least because they're no different than any other cult - if you just forget the compound exists, it doesn't really matter who's inside. Star Citizen failed years ago. Whatever the gently caress CIG is cobbling together right now is certainly not what their website was advertising all those years ago. The broken mess they punish themselves in is the purgatory their supporters deserve.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 05:04
|
|
|
I love that CIG not actually changing to lumberyard means it really did take a few days for multiple devs to just update the license information inside of their nightmare spaghetti code. I bet making the change caused compiling errors or at least some amazing bugs. Like, a line number changed and caused argon to instantly kill the player or somehow they had active if/then statements stuck in a block that's normally commented out.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 06:07
|
|
|
Quavers posted:
As a KSP player, all I could think about was "In all this time, why haven't they done any significant amount of orbiting around that planet? They're probably decently far away. How long did it take to get their orbits synchronized to get into this dog fight in the first place? Why haven't they drifted apart? How are they turning and changing vectors that quickly? Their rotational acceleration is ridiculous." I guess realistic orbital mechanics and rotational inertia would cut down on the fun of it all though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 07:35
|
|
|
Junk Puncher posted:As a KSP player, all I could think about was "In all this time, why haven't they done any significant amount of orbiting around that planet? They're probably decently far away. How long did it take to get their orbits synchronized to get into this dog fight in the first place? Why haven't they drifted apart? How are they turning and changing vectors that quickly? Their rotational acceleration is ridiculous." I guess realistic orbital mechanics and rotational inertia would cut down on the fun of it all though. Doesn't sound very fidelitous tbh.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 09:32
|
|
|
Those brussels sprouts look mouldy
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 10:20
|
|
|
I see that the catnip black market is flourishing more than ever! Better stock up on it with my BMM!
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 12:46
|
|
|
khy posted:So I haven't checked on Star Citizen in like, a year or two. Yes it's remarkably close to completion.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 13:12
|
|
|
I can only hope that more locations, either procedural or far from high population areas, are made for criminals to "hack" their wanted level away. The current state of affairs couldn't be any more unfriendly to the incidental criminal trying to become lawful again.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 13:15
|
|
|
Refunktory posted:The current state of affairs couldn't be any more unfriendly to the incidental gamer trying to play.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 14:14
|
|
|
shrach posted:I guess we will find out soon enough on the motion to dismiss but I find the argument that the claim is not yet ripe as funny as the CIG lawyers apparently, because no one (apart from Crytek apparently) needed discovery to know that the game doesn't even exist yet and CIG have admitted that since the start, even using it as a defence. The courts mentioned ripeness at the start, but you’re mistaking ‘common knowledge’ for evidence. Edit: that may have sounded snippy, I apologize; I remembered I had a Doctor’s appointment while I was replying. Hav fucked around with this message at 17:39 on Jan 20, 2020 |
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 15:50
|
|
|
If Common Knowledge had the same weight as evidence nobody would have funded Star Citizen
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 15:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 15:59
|
|
|
shrach posted:I guess we will find out soon enough on the motion to dismiss but I find the argument that the claim is not yet ripe as funny as the CIG lawyers apparently, because no one (apart from Crytek apparently) needed discovery to know that the game doesn't even exist yet and CIG have admitted that since the start, even using it as a defence. Cry was probably hoping for an injunction against releasing the game before SQ42 was published. Seems far fetched to me, but  .
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 16:25
|
|
|
Tane is just shitpost for Smoke Weed Every Day
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 16:43
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 16:44
|
|
|
Junk Puncher posted:As a KSP player, all I could think about was "In all this time, why haven't they done any significant amount of orbiting around that planet? They're probably decently far away. How long did it take to get their orbits synchronized to get into this dog fight in the first place? Why haven't they drifted apart? How are they turning and changing vectors that quickly? Their rotational acceleration is ridiculous." I guess realistic orbital mechanics and rotational inertia would cut down on the fun of it all though. Every space shooty game is ridiculous except Children of a dead earth.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 17:05
|
|
|
RabbitWizard posted:Every space shooty game is ridiculous except Children of a dead earth. this
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 17:12
|
|
|
RabbitWizard posted:Every space shooty game is ridiculous except Children of a dead earth. It’s not wrong to want Star Trek, but we’re going to get Red Dwarf. Culture vs Battlefield Earth if you’re wordy.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 17:44
|
|
|
DigitalPenny posted:I can understand announcing you are going to break a contract immenitly and breaking a contracting are two different things... It seams absurd you are allowed to reap the benefits of the contract breaking announcements while not having to pay he costs. The blame lies pretty heavily on Crytek. The last statement CIG ever made regarding access to SQ42 is that it would be through the Star Citizen client, thus not breaking any terms of the GLA. That statement was publicly available, so it was pretty weird for Crytek to try and sue them over their release of SQ42 when 1. It hasn't been released 2. Their announced release method doesn't contradict any terms Also, CIG has already paid all the costs required by their contract. They made a payment to get the license as well as including Crytek's work on the original prototype/demo thing. They also gave all their patches to the engine back to Crytek (eventually). As far as we know, CIG owes nothing to Crytek at this point.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 18:06
|
|
|
Question for people who still think there's some gotcha in the engine swap and Crytek have a good case relating to it. CIG: Originally they got an exclusive licence for CryEngine from Crytek. It's exclusive to CIG, they cannot resell it. Downloaded: Cryengine-source3.7.zip from Crytek which has Crytek headers and Crytek.licence.txt Amazon: They got a non-exclusive licence for CryEngine from Crytek. They can seemingly resell whatever they want and make whatever changes they want. Downloaded: CryEngine-source3.7.zip from Crytek which has Crytek headers and Crytek.licence.txt CryEngine-source3.8.zip from Crytek which has Crytek headers and Crytek.licence.txt Created: Lumberyard-source.zip which has whatever headers and Amazon.licence.txt Amazon email to Crytek posted:We can confirm that yes, Amazon did license Lumberyard to CIG in 2016, and we included Cryengine (what you CIG: Swapped from CryEngine-source3.7.zip to CryEngine-source3.7.zip which are actually identical, so there's no headers to be changed or anything to even swap. I don't understand what anyone who thinks there's some gotcha moment in the headers or whatever, actually thinks should have happened and how there can be a gotcha? I just don't even know where an alternative to CryEngine-source3.7.zip could come from that people still think CIG should have used to swap to? Eight months later CIG changed Crytek.licence.txt to Amazon.licence.txt which at this point, seems acceptable unless Crytek want to have a go at suing Amazon for their relicensing practices.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 18:26
|
|
|
Fidelitious posted:The blame lies pretty heavily on Crytek. The last statement CIG ever made regarding access to SQ42 is that it would be through the Star Citizen client, thus not breaking any terms of the GLA. That statement was publicly available, so it was pretty weird for Crytek to try and sue them over their release of SQ42 when This is all cool and good but for early buyers like what I am I got the games separately, you could buy just SQ68 at the time I am pretty sure Either way gently caress em all they are all imbeciles
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 18:27
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:This is all cool and good but for early buyers like what I am I got the games separately, you could buy just SQ68 at the time I am pretty sure How's your skull dancing cat?
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 18:28
|
|
C-Bangin' it 
|
Colostomy Bag posted:How's your skull dancing cat? Latest update on that, had a meeting with my surgeon dude a few days ago, it's all systems go for the operation, so just waiting for a date now. I am having the titanium screws put into my skull now, good poo poo imo. It's this, it's pretty cool how it works - and my cyborg status will be reinstated https://www.healthyhearing.com/help/hearing-aids/bone-anchored
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 18:41
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:Latest update on that, had a meeting with my surgeon dude a few days ago, it's all systems go for the operation, so just waiting for a date now. sweet. we're gonna have to add a glowing terminator eye to that dancey cat
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 18:51
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6snromQjhc
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 18:53
|
|
|
CRYREKT!
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 19:00
|
|
|
Hav posted:It’s not wrong to want Star Trek, but we’re going to get Red Dwarf. gently caress, i'd give good money for a fidelitous Red Dwarf experience. There again, probably can get that with a few beers, a trip to the curry house, and some bad guitar. Insignificant claim to fame: Used to drink in the same pub Craig Charles used to. I think he even once walked out after hearing me shout "ACTIVATE" in a drunken voice. Shame really, i always wanted to go over to him and thank him for years of laughter, but instead i behaved like a giant dick. I'm sure there is a morale there somewhere. Agony Aunt fucked around with this message at 19:03 on Jan 20, 2020 |
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 19:01
|
|
|
Beet Wagon posted:sweet. we're gonna have to add a glowing terminator eye to that dancey cat Hell yeah, I am looking forward to it now I have come to terms with it, it took a while to not shudder every time I thought about it but I am over that now and ready for my new life in Deus Ex
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 19:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 12:17 |
|
|
Refunktory posted:I can only hope that more locations, either procedural or far from high population areas, are made for criminals to "hack" their wanted level away. The current state of affairs couldn't be any more unfriendly to the incidental criminal trying to become lawful again. That's... well it's incredibly fidelitious and true to reality I guess.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2020 19:16
|
|
