(Thread IKs:
fart simpson)
|
Maybe nms: https://www.instagram.com/p/B7yySDdgVVM/?igshid=1dxxfp1mj2km3 I don’t know what I expected Wuhan to look like, but yikes The Great Autismo! has issued a correction as of 05:49 on Jan 27, 2020 |
# ? Jan 27, 2020 05:46 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 02:42 |
|
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 06:06 |
|
Extremely smart Hong kongers assassinated a hospital toilet with a bomb causing the emergency room to be evacuated. Revolution of our time https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3047744/home-made-bomb-explodes-hong-kong-caritas-medical
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 09:01 |
|
Excuse me, I just had too much yum cha on Sunday night and needed to make an emergency pit stop, the hospital assured me they had seen much worse before and that they would keep this OUT of the papers, this is all so very embarrassing
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 09:11 |
|
https://twitter.com/stungusbungus/status/1221645141686906882 https://twitter.com/stungusbungus/status/1221646495138533376 Typo winning over more converts
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 10:00 |
|
that doesn't seem new from what i've read of harvey
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 10:35 |
|
I don't really get the use of "developmentalist" as a pejorative. That's a kind of attitude you can only get from people from the Global North, who can't imagine poverty even as an academic exercise.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 12:23 |
|
Prince Myshkin posted:I don't really get the use of "developmentalist" as a pejorative. That's a kind of attitude you can only get from people from the Global North, who can't imagine poverty even as an academic exercise. Developmentalism is an entire doctrine with pretty major issues. It's not just about having autocentered economic development, it's fetishizing it as the core policy target of a state. Don't forget, for example, that expanding production and distributing more goods to the people are contradictory goals, and fetishizing the former is bad for the latter, even though obviously more production leads to having more to distribute on the aggregate. In this case, I got the feeling that the twitter person attacked Harvey for being so high on economics that he forgets to be socialist, much like Xi. Representing bourgeois marxism.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 16:45 |
|
https://twitter.com/catcontentonly/status/1221157730381107201 https://twitter.com/profwolff/status/1221132626012114944
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 17:08 |
|
Did Wolff take the China Pill too? The faster western leftists bend the knee to Xi, the better...
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 17:21 |
|
Wolff's been on that china good beat for a while
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 17:21 |
|
uncop posted:Don't forget, for example, that expanding production and distributing more goods to the people are contradictory goals, and fetishizing the former is bad for the latter, even though obviously more production leads to having more to distribute on the aggregate. It does not have to be contradictory.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 17:34 |
|
wolff's been a china tankie for as long as i've paid attention to him and has heralded them as a massive success story of socialism seemingly every time he talks about china his biggest "criticism" is that china is state capitalist since he really likes to focus on the workplace democracy aspect
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 17:40 |
|
Honestly the Chinese model with democratic coops for the private section would be pretty baller. I know Huawei is technically a coop but it doesn't really operate like one.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 17:55 |
gradenko_2000 posted:Lmfao can you imagine any other country being able to pull this off They’ve had practice building extermination camps for the Uighurs.
|
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 18:48 |
|
Which is why Germany builds the best hospitals to this day.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 19:12 |
|
lol
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 19:13 |
|
https://supchina.com/2017/01/06/mao-painting-vatican/ The New York Times reported on a odd case of mistaken identity: Vatican officials had, in November that year, hung a painting of a man in a tunic who looked like a priest “a few yards from a portrait of John Paul VI in the Vatican’s press room.” However, someone had noticed that the painting was a copy of one of the most important propaganda images of the Cultural Revolution: Chairman Mao Goes to Anyuan (pictured above).
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 19:28 |
|
They subconsciously recognized his authority
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 19:32 |
|
Typo posted:
lmao
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 19:35 |
|
1969 was a funny year alright
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 19:36 |
|
Typo posted:
That’s a cool painting
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 20:01 |
|
Im glad the racist gbs freaks have all flocked to the Chinee Bioweapon Trying To Kill Glorious White Man thread so we can all look at nice paintings together
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 20:02 |
|
BrutalistMcDonalds posted:that doesn't seem new from what i've read of harvey He's been talking about how impressive and well-managed China's growth in the last 3 decades has been for a while now, but whenever I've seen it, it's always been in the context of discussing environmental and social limits on growth in the long run. Dropping the second part would be a funny development for him.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 20:17 |
|
Typo posted:
Wow Francis is more third worldist than I thought
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 20:37 |
|
Typo posted:
it's a really good painting, hell, i'd hang it on my wall if i had it too
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 21:47 |
|
this reminds me of a painting I saw of Thomas sankara done in Mexican Catholic mural style, it was fuckin rad
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 22:02 |
|
after spending 9 years in china, I was certain that the next plague like epidemic was going to start there. I just figured I would be a lot older and it would happen a lot much later in my life, not like a year and a half after I left, lol
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 23:32 |
|
Mantis42 posted:Did Wolff take the China Pill too? The faster western leftists bend the knee to Xi, the better... I've never known if the Thatcherite take of 'the government can't pick winners' was meant to be moral or practical but turns out it's okay for the government to pick some winners.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2020 23:49 |
|
Typo posted:
They're right to do it, that painting is sick
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 15:55 |
|
uncop posted:Developmentalism is an entire doctrine with pretty major issues. It's not just about having autocentered economic development, it's fetishizing it as the core policy target of a state. Don't forget, for example, that expanding production and distributing more goods to the people are contradictory goals, and fetishizing the former is bad for the latter, even though obviously more production leads to having more to distribute on the aggregate. Yes and that characterization is wrong when it comes to China, or Cuba. I doubt their sincerity. The fact one of the people replying "oh noooo" to that tweet is a Foreign Policy writer obsessed with Carl Zha tells me quite a lot.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2020 02:14 |
|
You can watch the 2 hospitals being built livequote:火神山 Edit, actually just watch the youtube link https://youtu.be/BTxIjVOfqc4 stephenthinkpad has issued a correction as of 02:55 on Jan 29, 2020 |
# ? Jan 29, 2020 02:43 |
|
stephenthinkpad posted:You can watch the 2 hospitals being built live Isn't youtube blocked tho?
|
# ? Jan 29, 2020 03:41 |
|
comedyblissoption posted:https://twitter.com/catcontentonly/status/1221157730381107201 The unnamed country is very jealous of Chinese accomplishments
|
# ? Jan 29, 2020 03:49 |
|
Prince Myshkin posted:Yes and that characterization is wrong when it comes to China, or Cuba. I doubt their sincerity. The fact one of the people replying "oh noooo" to that tweet is a Foreign Policy writer obsessed with Carl Zha tells me quite a lot. advancing productive forces through economic development also increases well-being of both workers and peasants? who would have thought
|
# ? Jan 29, 2020 04:14 |
|
I would urge reading of "three represents" theory, which is vital to understand modern Xi jiping thoughtquote:This experience and the historical experiences gained by the Party since its founding can be summarized as follows: Our Party must always represent the requirements for developing China's advanced productive forces, the orientation of China's advanced culture and the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the Chinese people. These are the inexorable requirements for maintaining and developing socialism, and the logical conclusion our Party has reached through hard exploration and great praxis.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2020 04:17 |
|
etalian posted:The unnamed country is very jealous of Chinese accomplishments Cool GBS catchphrase.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2020 04:32 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:https://twitter.com/stungusbungus/status/1221645141686906882 im confused on why this is supposed to be controversial or bad
|
# ? Jan 29, 2020 15:52 |
|
mila kunis posted:im confused on why this is supposed to be controversial or bad They’re not doing communism the way the state department says they should
|
# ? Jan 29, 2020 16:26 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 02:42 |
|
mila kunis posted:im confused on why this is supposed to be controversial or bad Liberals and conservatives don’t conceive of China as like, an actual country with people and a government that does good things and does bad things and is a real place with a real history. They view them as The Bad Guys, the cruel villains opposed to the heroic US in their vision of history as a fantasy story.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2020 16:34 |