|
LOL what a terrible tweet. One butt supporter complained and the pollster was like "yeah it'll be released tonight"
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 02:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 20:55 |
|
|
joepinetree posted:You do realize that there are other positions other than congress, right? Such as, i don't know, the judiciary? Something that, as a faculty member of Harvard law, she'd be on a lot of short lists for? The Federalist Society has had folks from the Clinton and Obama administrations speak at their events, so I don’t think it’s a stretch to think Warren wouldn’t have been trying to hide some of her speeches. I’m not sure you need to go through those mental gymnastics when there’s a much easier explanation: The Democratic Party looked a lot like the Republican Party in many ways if you go back a decade or two. Who’s got that support for gay marriage comic handy? The one where all the politicians start saying they’re for it when polls hit like 60% or something? That’s a pretty apt depiction of the evolution of a lot of folks in the Democratic Party.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 02:49
|
|
|
What. This is my whole evening you fucks!!! E: oh, nothingburger
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 02:50
|
|
|
oxsnard posted:LOL what a terrible tweet. One butt supporter complained and the pollster was like "yeah it'll be released tonight" where did you see the pollster saying it's coming out tonight?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 02:53
|
|
|
generic one posted:The Federalist Society has had folks from the Clinton and Obama administrations speak at their events, so I don’t think it’s a stretch to think Warren wouldn’t have been trying to hide some of her speeches. I’m not sure you need to go through those mental gymnastics when there’s a much easier explanation: The Democratic Party looked a lot like the Republican Party in many ways if you go back a decade or two. I mean, you're not wrong overall, but keep in mind how the Reagan administration handled the AIDS crisis.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 02:54
|
|
|
Mayo Pete getting ahead of bad numbers
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 02:54
|
|
|
AAAAAND https://twitter.com/jmartNYT/status/1223786294867873792?s=19
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 02:54
|
|
|
FizFashizzle posted:Mayo Pete getting ahead of bad numbers Anecdotal but from my experience in eastern Iowa, the main Bernie organizer in my county is very very concerned about the number of Pete voters that keep popping up. Also, haven't met a single Biden voter in person. They just exist in some weird shadow realm and pop out when a pollster calls
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 02:56
|
|
|
Really? Okay then.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 02:57
|
|
|
https://youtu.be/IMjPL-sGLkM Bernie chillin in Cedar Rapids.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 02:57
|
|
|
That poll is definitely extremely good for Bernie, lmao
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 02:57
|
|
|
FUCKkkkkkkfdas;;dgasfhaw i have like 20 tabs open for predictit!!!!!
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 02:58
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/mollyhc/status/1223787385554599936?s=19
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 02:59
|
|
|
Lemming posted:That poll is definitely extremely good for Bernie, lmao
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 02:59
|
|
|
BIGLY RIGGED!
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:01
|
|
|
Hahaha, nothing to see here, no sir!
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:02
|
|
|
Lmao so it shows Bernie winning big got it
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:03
|
|
|
"conspiracy to suppress a good bernie poll" seems like A Take since dmr literally already released a poll with him up
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:04
|
|
|
lol what the gently caress? why not release the poll? I had a great conversation with a very clean-cut college prep looking Pete campaign worker today and, uh, he did not have an answer for why he was in with Pete other than "we need to unify the country" so there you go. e: he did not have an answer when I asked what sort of across-the-aisle compromise could possibly be realistic under a presidency of any of the candidates. Nice kid, but not ready for prime time.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:04
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:"conspiracy to suppress a good bernie poll" seems like A Take since dmr literally already released a poll with him up What a credulous baby lmao
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:04
|
|
|
CNN refused to stream it? I guess we can conclude Bernie is ahead.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:05
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:"conspiracy to suppress a good bernie poll" seems like A Take since dmr literally already released a poll with him up Bernie is up by 100 points.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:06
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:"conspiracy to suppress a good bernie poll" seems like A Take since dmr literally already released a poll with him up Yea idk what I was thinking it's not like the media and CNN in particular has been blatantly and openly conspiring against Bernie or anything my bad
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:06
|
|
|
Lemming posted:What a credulous baby lmao nah it's cool, now that the poll wasn't released you can just pretend it's whatever you wanted it to be. that's the magic of imagination!
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:06
|
|
|
empty whippet box posted:Yea idk what I was thinking it's not like the media and CNN in particular has been blatantly and openly conspiring against Bernie or anything my bad they literally just released two good polls for bernie in like a week
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:07
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:nah it's cool, now that the poll wasn't released you can just pretend it's whatever you wanted it to be. that's the magic of imagination! Avatar (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:07
|
|
|
Lemming posted:Avatar please don't advocate self-harm on this forum
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:08
|
|
|
Will someone else air the poll result?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:08
|
|
|
I think they're just throwing it out
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:09
|
|
|
PerniciousKnid posted:Bernie is up by 100 points. Yeah this
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:09
|
|
|
Grouchio posted:Will someone else air the poll result? i just assume someone is going to leak it at some point, there is no shortage of people who got to see it (including, almost certainly, the buttigieg campaign)
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:09
|
|
|
If they really did somehow leave Pete's name out they'll scuttle the whole thing and we'll never see it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:09
|
|
|
Somebody should leak the poll IMO
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:09
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:please don't advocate self-harm on this forum I'm not, you earned a stupid a avatar for being a dipshit, and there's no possible argument I can have with you more effective than pointing out what a dipshit you are
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:09
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:"conspiracy to suppress a good bernie poll" seems like A Take since dmr literally already released a poll with him up seems like a pretty big difference between dropping a bernie +3 poll and a bernie +30 poll, though
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:09
|
|
|
Eminai posted:seems like a pretty big difference between dropping a bernie +3 poll and a bernie +30 poll, though Especially considering how much he's been surging, they want to suppress that
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:10
|
|
|
It was a good poll result for Bernie that would have certainly led to even MORE support because voters/caucus goers like voting for winners, so they just threw it out.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:10
|
|
|
generic one posted:The Federalist Society has had folks from the Clinton and Obama administrations speak at their events, so I don’t think it’s a stretch to think Warren wouldn’t have been trying to hide some of her speeches. I’m not sure you need to go through those mental gymnastics when there’s a much easier explanation: The Democratic Party looked a lot like the Republican Party in many ways if you go back a decade or two. This is a dumb and pedantic argument to have. My argument is not that i can read Warren's mind. My point is that every single one of her conversions came at a moment that was advantageous to her career. Such as leaving the republican party when she moved from a state that almost exclusively had republican senators to one that almost exclusively had Democratic ones, at a time when a democratic president went from looking like a fluke to a long term prospect. Was this the one conversion that was sincere? Don't know and don't care, because it wasn't my point.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:11
|
|
|
Grouchio posted:Will someone else air the poll result? They're already saying DMR is also pulling it from the front page they're running tomorrow so i guess not. I dunno what they think they're doing by not airing the poll results. Do they think elections are like some kind of Schrodinger's Box? https://twitter.com/CNNPR/status/1223789646989144065 lol "we don't even know if it's true but we'll do it"
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 20:55 |
|
|
Wicked Them Beats posted:If they really did somehow leave Pete's name out they'll scuttle the whole thing and we'll never see it. It sounds like one person who was a respondent to the poll got mad and called the newspaper to say it was biased because they didn't like the wording of the questions or Pete want an answer in every question or something
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 03:13
|
|
