|
there will never be more than 62%
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 12, 2024 02:20 |
|
|
christmas boots posted:Who gives a poo poo? I'm voting for Bernie in November whether he's on the ballot or not.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:10
|
|
|
Chuka Umana posted:Are we getting more than 62% today? just be grateful for the numbers we gave you, peasant
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:10
|
|
|
Chuka Umana posted:Are we getting more than 62% today? no.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:10
|
|
|
Raccooon posted:Does Pete have a second state he polls well in at all? i think he might see some older white voters who were tentatively biden go over to him. maybe enough to give him a boost a bit in the northeast. media will push him hard as well. but he will never get black vote, the black vote will either remain with biden or go bernie.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:10
|
|
|
I haven't been in CSPAM for 12hrs. How's it going here? What's the feel in the room? Me? Well I didn't sleep at all last night and today at work I was trying to hold in my laughter at how at loving stupid this is and how suspicious it is and how it's no wonder that faith in democratic institutions is eroding and conspiracy theories spread like wild fire. Also laughing at how half of Trump's slam dunks are from Democrats passing him the ball. Like I'm imagining Democrats passing the ball through the court, working up a sweat, then accidentally tossing it to Trump who is perched idly next to the hoop. Now I'm mad as hell and we don't even know if Bernie lost.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:10
|
|
|
kaleedity posted:there will never be more than 62%
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:10
|
|
|
Chuka Umana posted:Are we getting more than 62% today? We're getting 69
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:11
|
|
|
Just give me 7% more you pieces of poo poo
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:11
|
|
|
Im feeling good
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:12
|
|
|
Are more numbers really going out at 7 or did they just lie to us as usual
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:12
|
|
|
there is an argument to be made that it’s expected for these partial results to favor not-Bernie, since even on normal election nights the big urban areas tend to take longer to report of course this whole thing has been such a sketchy shitshow they don’t get the benefit of the doubt
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:12
|
|
|
wait, where are we at now
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:12
|
|
|
bawfuls posted:there is an argument to be made that it’s expected for these partial results to favor not-Bernie, since even on normal election nights the big urban areas tend to take longer to report Yeah that's the "this is fine" argument under these circumstances
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:13
|
|
|
Chuka Umana posted:Are we getting more than 62% today? We live in a three fifths democracy, it's what the founders wanted
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:13
|
|
|
Woodchip posted:wait, where are we at now *points at thread title*
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:13
|
|
|
christmas boots posted:Who gives a poo poo? I'm voting for Bernie in November whether he's on the ballot or not.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:13
|
|
|
Modest Mao posted:the coasts are the ones loving up the world no hillbilly in rural georgia ever made a dime off sanctioning Iran or crashing the housing market YOU DOLT I am in metro ATL so yes I guess I'm not rural
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:13
|
|
|
bawfuls posted:there is an argument to be made that it’s expected for these partial results to favor not-Bernie, since even on normal election nights the big urban areas tend to take longer to report The map of unreported counties is scattered out and matches the map of counties that polled strongly Bernie
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:14
|
|
|
bawfuls posted:there is an argument to be made that it’s expected for these partial results to favor not-Bernie, since even on normal election nights the big urban areas tend to take longer to report They literally stopped reporting at 62%, presumably indefinitely as we haven’t heard from the IDP.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:14
|
|
|
This is some atypical poo poo
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:14
|
|
|
Feldegast42 posted:Are more numbers really going out at 7 or did they just lie to us as usual It was a blurb from long before the results were posted that they forgot to remove until an hour or two after the results were posted, based on the https://www.archive.is history
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:14
|
|
|
Sheng-Ji Yang posted:i think he might see some older white voters who were tentatively biden go over to him. maybe enough to give him a boost a bit in the northeast. media will push him hard as well. but he will never get black vote, the black vote will either remain with biden or go bernie. Isn't their game just to sap delegates from Sanders in different ways in different states and then unite against him at the convention? It doesn't have to be an actual candidate who's viable against him everywhere, does it?
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:14
|
|
|
Feldegast42 posted:Are more numbers really going out at 7 or did they just lie to us as usual the website says "RESULTS WILL START AFTER 7 PM CST" but that pretty obviously means yesterday.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:14
|
|
|
man the dems look/are terrible
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:14
|
|
|
christmas boots posted:Who gives a poo poo? I'm voting for Bernie in November whether he's on the ballot or not. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:15
|
|
|
christmas boots posted:Who gives a poo poo? I'm voting for Bernie in November whether he's on the ballot or not.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:15
|
|
|
BeefThief posted:man the dems look/are terrible it really is something else
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:15
|
|
|
how does butt egg have more delegates when Bernie won the first and second allocations
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:15
|
|
|
Oh btw one of the conspiracy theories circulating around the ground in Iowa is that the dems did this on purpose in order to take away Iowa's first in the nation standing. While this is probably not true I'll imagine it will run far and wide due to the chaos, and given Iowa really cares about that its gonna reflect in the election. Long story short -- not only did the dems kill their last shred of legitimacy last night, they just ensured an already redding state goes blood red from now on.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:15
|
|
|
bawfuls posted:there is an argument to be made that it’s expected for these partial results to favor not-Bernie, since even on normal election nights the big urban areas tend to take longer to report But the votes were counted long ago. Unless you suppose it takes longer to add bigger numbers or something.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:15
|
|
|
bawfuls posted:there is an argument to be made that it’s expected for these partial results to favor not-Bernie, since even on normal election nights the big urban areas tend to take longer to report they shouldnt be reporting partial figured at all, frankly
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:16
|
|
|
Wraith of J.O.I. posted:seriously——gently caress this poo poo!! Yeah, two hours later and no update or any time line for an update. Presumably they should have at least another hundred or two precincts done now.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:17
|
|
|
NofrikinfuN posted:they shouldnt be reporting partial figured at all, frankly how would that help mayor buttmutt/stop sanders?
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:17
|
|
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/homo_demon/status/1224680605750710272
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:17
|
|
|
bernie is on
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:17
|
|
|
Getting redder. Getting madder. Shedding clothes as we speak
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:17
|
|
|
ex post facho posted:how does butt egg have more delegates when Bernie won the first and second allocations The Iowa caucuses are a state level electoral college system
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:17
|
|
|
lmfao
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 12, 2024 02:20 |
|
|
Feldegast42 posted:Oh btw one of the conspiracy theories circulating around the ground in Iowa is that the dems did this on purpose in order to take away Iowa's first in the nation standing. While this is probably not true I'll imagine it will run far and wide due to the chaos, and given Iowa really cares about that its gonna reflect in the election. that's the dumbest thing, who loving cares about iowa
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2020 01:18
|
|
