|
GOP cannibalizing itself is good. Also the next round of illegal poo poo that Trump will do to try to abuse his office to destroy romney will drive home the abuse of power stuff
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 21:48 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 03:42 |
|
sexpig by night posted:the people who need loving healthcare and want to see people not getting blown up for being in the wrong part of desert, you ghoul. & a good number of bills that would do something about those issues are gathering dust on Majority Leader McConnell's desk that would be going up for a vote from Majority Leader Schumer's, should the Senate flip. Framboise posted:I don't mean to sound all "nothing matters" because it's not my intent, but what long run impact are a few GOP conviction votes going to have? It needs a 2/3 majority to happen, right? p much everything at this point is to increase D voter turnout and/or decrease R voter turnout. Being able to push that even some Rs are done with Trump and think he broke a law and should be removed does both.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 21:49 |
|
BigglesSWE posted:I think Romney was probably the last person that Team Trump wanted to break ranks. He's popular in his state, is probably one of the more well known senators in general, and him folding like this just makes every chuddy senator that was "on the fence" look utterly stupid. Won't change the end result of the votes, true, but I think we should take any victory we can at this point. i think the last person team trump wanted to break ranks was probably mitch, actually but yeah romney's worse for him than collins or any other vulnerable senator who could have been dismissed as pandering to their state for re-election, because all you can do is claim the republican presidential nominee for 2012 was a secret democrat
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 21:50 |
|
https://twitter.com/LauraLitvan/status/1225160871103598592
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 21:55 |
|
sexpig by night posted:ok even by Manchin standards if he buckles when Jones and Sinema stand strong he'd look pathetic. I think we may actually have a unified front https://twitter.com/Acosta/status/1225160507780423687?s=19 Edit: beaten, but hoo boy is Donny gonna be pissed.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 21:55 |
|
oldskool posted:& a good number of bills that would do something about those issues are gathering dust on Majority Leader McConnell's desk that would be going up for a vote from Majority Leader Schumer's, should the Senate flip. quote:Once a Congress adjourns, however, at the end of its two-year cycle, all bills that have been introduced in either the House or the Senate that have not made it through the entire legislative process and signed into law are dead.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 21:55 |
|
wow how courageous. I'm super inspired
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 21:55 |
|
If nothing else, this tweet alone justifies the entire impeachment process. It may even justify Twitter.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 21:55 |
|
Glad to see it. I count myself among the pleasantly surprised about Sinema. I find her Yes more shocking than Romney's in some ways.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 21:56 |
|
The best possible outcome without witnesses looks like it's within reach.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 21:56 |
|
Mummy Xzibit posted:The best possible outcome without witnesses looks like it's within reach. Dems did the best they reasonably could given the outcome was predetermined, with a bonus Mitch backstab that noone could've really predicted.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 21:57 |
|
Bipartisan vote to convict. There goes Trump’s perfect week.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 21:57 |
|
This is a victory for Schumer. He loving sucks and he's awful at his job but he should be given a lot of credit for holding the caucus together.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 21:57 |
|
NICE. eat poo poo donney. next illegal action is gonna be him trying to gently caress Romney.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 21:57 |
|
TyrantWD posted:Bipartisan vote to convict. There goes Trump’s perfect week. This is the best we could have reasonably hoped for: bipartisan support for conviction plus Republicans eating themselves.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 21:58 |
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:NICE. eat poo poo donney. next illegal action is gonna be him trying to gently caress Romney. He'll scream at McConnell to hold a vote to expel him from the Senate.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 21:59 |
|
Oracle posted:He'll scream at McConnell to hold a vote to expel him from the Senate. I see a tax audit in Romney's future.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:00 |
|
Oracle posted:That's not how it works. Bills die after the current 'class' is done and it has to start all over again. This is true, but with a Democratic House there's nothing stopping them from starting over & getting those bills right back into the Senate.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:01 |
|
Oracle posted:That's not how it works. Bills die after the current 'class' is done and it has to start all over again. yeah but given that the house rules are whatever the speaker says they are, effectively, getting those back to the senate would not be an arduous task
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:02 |
|
https://twitter.com/briantylercohen/status/1225157993865437184
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:03 |
https://twitter.com/kaitlancollins/status/1225162739422724097 this went exactly opposite how they thought just hours ago
|
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:04 |
|
oldskool posted:This is true, but with a Democratic House there's nothing stopping them from starting over & getting those bills right back into the Senate. I have zero doubt that they will pass everything all over again right away. The more they get passed and the longer Mitch ignores them it will be yet another cudgel to bash the GOP with. I have a feeling Mitch is going to get shellaced in the Fall and it will have a not insignificant part to do with it.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:04 |
|
I’m genuinely surprised, I guess he’s not running for Governor then.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:06 |
|
eke out posted:https://twitter.com/kaitlancollins/status/1225162739422724097 its worth pointing out that, like Romney, Manchin is as far away from an election as it is possible to be in the senate
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:06 |
|
drat https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/1225134163810045965?s=19
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:07 |
evilweasel posted:its worth pointing out that, like Romney, Manchin is as far away from an election as it is possible to be in the senate they obviously thought they had him to acquit on at least one article though between that and Romney doing successfully-embargoed interviews about this, there was clearly a lot of last-minute movement
|
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:07 |
|
Turned out pretty good then. Too bad we couldn’t get that Bolton testimony but it will all come out in the book anyway. House should still subpoena him as an oversight matter too.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:09 |
|
Lol Romney did an embargoed interview with the Atlantic a week ago explaining why he was voting to convict. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/02/romney-impeach-trump/606127/
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:09 |
|
yronic heroism posted:Turned out pretty good then. Too bad we couldn’t get that Bolton testimony but it will all come out in the book anyway. House should still subpoena him as an oversight matter too. i believe they have already announced they're going to do that
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:10 |
|
Assuming these votes hold, this is about as good as I could have hoped short of Collins and Gardner voting convict. If those two hang in November then I’ll be happy.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:10 |
|
mcmagic posted:This is a victory for Schumer. He loving sucks and he's awful at his job but he should be given a lot of credit for holding the caucus together. I've been saving this specifically for you mcmagic posted:You're going to clearly see how useless and weak Chuck Schumer is by how many D's vote to acquit.. But you admitted you were wrong and I can respect that. Takes a lot more honesty than people who make predictions as if they're already done and then disappear when they're wrong.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:10 |
|
I've lost track, is there a simple majority for conviction?
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:10 |
|
haveblue posted:I've lost track, is there a simple majority for conviction? 2/3rds, 67 votes.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:11 |
|
haveblue posted:I've lost track, is there a simple majority for conviction? 2/3s to convict. And here we go.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:11 |
|
haveblue posted:I've lost track, is there a simple majority for conviction? conviction requires a 2/3s majority
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:12 |
|
Well, glad to see I was wrong about Manchin and sinema. Happy to see Romney come to his senses for once, whatever reasoning he may have to do it.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:12 |
|
it's really striking how many randos there are in the senate you never hear from, on both sides. like 30 senators monopolize all the media time, and 70 people just sit around and vote party line on everything. must be a nice fuckin cushy job
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:12 |
|
Jaxyon posted:I've been saving this specifically for you I'm happy to be wrong.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:12 |
|
you can call him 'Mr Cray-po' all you want but the man's name is Senator Crapo
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:12 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 03:42 |
|
Collins officially has Not Guilty on the record.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 22:12 |