|
numeracy This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| s*x n*mb*r |
|
69 | 0.22% |
| w@@d n_mb_r |
|
420 | 1.34% |
| Jeb! number |
|
538 | 1.72% |
| Biden numbr |
|
30330 | 96.72% |
| Total: | 31357 votes | ||
|
Radish posted:They are trying to see if they can pretend Pete is awesome enough to be a hindrance. Pete is weak as poo poo, right? I've lived my whole life in this stupid country and I've come to believe that bad things don't need a reason to happen. He could start sweeping all of the centrist votes out of nowhere for basically no reason other than: that would suck.
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 15:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 13:56 |
|
|
I rage sent him $27 like five times in January and I bet a bunch of other people did to.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 15:51
|
|
|
Limerick posted:Pete is weak as poo poo, right? I've lived my whole life in this stupid country and I've come to believe that bad things don't need a reason to happen. He could start sweeping all of the centrist votes out of nowhere for basically no reason other than: that would suck. Once people of color start voting in larger numbers, Pete's share is going to tank. His polling with black people, specifically, is somewhere around 0%.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 15:52
|
|
|
trump would obliterate mini mike
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 15:54
|
|
|
triple sulk posted:holy poo poo no one is actually gonna vote for bloomberg why do people keep running with this narrative I think the first test of this will be Nevada and how Steyer performs there. Obviously he spent like $15 million in Iowa and got nowhere, but Nevada and South Carolina are where his money has been most concentrated. If that translates into being viable in those states I'd say it's reason enough to worry about Bloomberg. The bigger thing I worry about is that Bloomberg will almost certainly spend hundreds of millions on attack ads against Sanders for as long as he needs to. So it's less about all this money resulting in votes for Bloomberg but that it could depress turnout for Sanders. Either way Bloomberg is a great foil for Bernie, and if Bloomberg does participate in the debates Bernie needs to drop the "my friend" poo poo and call Bloomberg a cocksucker
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 15:55
|
|
|
Cnidaria posted:trump would obliterate mini mike I will not vote for Mike Bloomberg under any circumstances.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 15:57
|
|
|
SpiderHyphenMan posted:I will not vote for Mike Bloomberg under any circumstances. I feel like Biden and Bloomberg are the nominees where i'll definitely write in AOC 2024 or some poo poo if they win, although mayo pete is on track to prove he's worse then both. From what I know of Deval Patrick he seems just as ghoulish, but lol at him getting past 1%.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:01
|
|
|
Im gonna be honest. I want Bernie to run and beat Trump for a few reasons. Mostly because he seems like a genuinely good person who wants to work for the little people instead of working them over. But a huge component is watching egg brained boomers and dumbass Ben Shapiros losing their minds as this crazy old man ruins their country by improving the lives of 99% of its citizens whether they want it or not.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:02
|
|
|
Outrail posted:Im gonna be honest. I want Bernie to run and beat Trump for a few reasons. Mostly because he seems like a genuinely good person who wants to work for the little people instead of working them over. But a huge component is watching egg brained boomers and dumbass Ben Shapiros losing their minds as this crazy old man ruins their country by improving the lives of 99% of its citizens whether they want it or not. I mean, yeah, who here doesn't want vengeance?
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:03
|
|
|
.
Eggplant Squire has issued a correction as of 23:26 on Mar 4, 2020 |
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:04
|
|
|
Azathoth posted:*tucks penis between legs, applies lipstick* would you vote for me, id vote for me id vote for me so hard Q Lazarrus plays in the background
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:09
|
|
|
Thoguh posted:I rage sent him $27 like five times in January and I bet a bunch of other people did to. I have a friend that will bake me bread every time I donate to Bernie. I've been eating a lot of bread lately.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:11
|
|
|
 https://twitter.com/ScottFConroy/status/1225435004873764865?s=19
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:13
|
|
|
ok listen up fat
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:13
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/JewishWorker/status/1225188211674103809
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:14
|
|
|
Frosted Flake posted:Clymer acting like she’s got a Ranger tab and CIB is so loving funny because she did nothing in her military “career” except bully a classmate at West Point for being an atheist. I mean, gently caress her, but it shouldn't be that surprising that someone who's in the closet and trying to overcompensate against her dysphoria by being a macho shithead. It is what it is and I feel sorry for her. But maybe don't be a shithead against the only candidate you can trust to pay for people's transitioning.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:15
|
|
|
the impeachment thread in dnd is absolute opening the ark of the covenant, face-melting whining. just the dumbest people on the site.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:16
|
|
|
papa horny michael posted:the impeachment thread in dnd is absolute opening the ark of the covenant, face-melting whining. just the dumbest people on the site. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:18
|
|
|
Probably Magic posted:trying to overcompensate against her dysphoria by being a macho shithead. It is what it is and I feel sorry for her. "This person is an rear end in a top hat but" needs to go.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:19
|
|
|
papa horny michael posted:the impeachment thread in dnd is absolute opening the ark of the covenant, face-melting whining. just the dumbest people on the site. yeah at the end of the day people need to realize that the impeachment was not really putting trump on trial. he is guilty, everyone knows he is guilty - even republicans, so they have to argue "he did it but so what - and while there is probably a marginal amount of people who wouldn't have realized he was a criminal without this, they're a tiny minority. we all know who trump is. we knew it before the trial and we knew it afterwards; and we knew there was no real chance the senate would actually remove him. what the impeachment was about was putting the republican party on trial. the republican party maintains power through elected officials who paint themselves as "one of the good ones" - i'm a republican, but i'm not like trump. collins, gardner, and others needed that. and there were a lot of people who believed it: that they hated trump but thought that trump was an abberation and that their republican wasn't like that. but that's not true - there are no "good ones" and what impeachment was about was showing that. every single republican, but one, failed that test. they brazenly covered up his crime by blocking witnesses who were going to testify about his crimes, and were forced on record to do that. they all, except one, cleared him and ratified his illegal conduct (whatever nonsense they tried to claim in their press releases doesn't matter). every single one (except romney) has made it abundantly clear to anyone watching that they are not one of "the good ones" they are not "a check on trump" they are trump's toadies. that's what impeachment was all about. we all know who and what trump is. a sizable minority of the country will vote for him anyway (or because of) his criminality. hopefully, it helped a little bit to reinforce for people who don't really want to vote for trump but aren't really democrats that no, you can't sit out the election or vote for trump "for the judges" but not being a trumpist. but that's not the real potential political benefit: it's to make clear to the people in maine, colorado, north carolina, arizona, and everywhere else that their senator is not one of the good ones. if they vote for their republican senator, they're voting for trump. they are not voting for someone who will call them like they see them, who will be a principled small government conservative, or whatever nonsense people use to vote for republicans. they are voting for trump, period. and if they don't want to do that, their only option is to vote for their democratic challenger.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:19
|
|
|
Salean posted:yeah at the end of the day people need to realize that the impeachment was not really putting trump on trial. he is guilty, everyone knows he is guilty - even republicans, so they have to argue "he did it but so what - and while there is probably a marginal amount of people who wouldn't have realized he was a criminal without this, they're a tiny minority. we all know who trump is. we knew it before the trial and we knew it afterwards; and we knew there was no real chance the senate would actually remove him. goo goo gaga
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:19
|
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:ok listen up fat hes just gonna go around smelling every woman's hair, standing uncomfortably close behind them, tongue kissing babies, mumbling about his time growing up a poor latino neighborhood in el paso, sharing stories about his sassy abuela
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:21
|
|
|
Salean posted:yeah at the end of the day people need to realize that the impeachment was not really putting trump on trial. he is guilty, everyone knows he is guilty - even republicans, so they have to argue "he did it but so what - and while there is probably a marginal amount of people who wouldn't have realized he was a criminal without this, they're a tiny minority. we all know who trump is. we knew it before the trial and we knew it afterwards; and we knew there was no real chance the senate would actually remove him. sir, please you are leaking decorum in the succ thread
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:21
|
|
|
https://www.baltimoresun.com/politics/bs-md-pol-ga-pollbooks-network-review-20200206-wqrcohmxgzcz5ivcyu2zwtfjeq-story.html lmao
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:22
|
|
|
ernie anders
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:22
|
|
|
I saw someone on Facebook (yeah, yeah, but bear with me here) say they didn't think "any Republicans were left" until Mitt Romney sided against Trump. Like, not even "hope in the party," no, their definition of Republicans was contingent upon there being something redeemable about them, and otherwise, it's no true Scotsman. This was a liberal too. And that's how a lot of people think, that the Republicans by their nature are good-natured because they're a necessary counterbalance (to what?) in the Republic. I guess to keep us from spending too much? Which the Democrats have been threatening to cut social security for decades, so not sure where that fear comes from? But it's that ardent belief that conservatives are not only forgivable but a necessity to this country, far far more than any socialist discourse is needed in it. They are the picture of David weeping over Absalom, who'd hosed his women and tried to coup David's entire kingdom, and David's general walks in and says, "You love those that hate you and hate those that love you." And that's your average Democrat voter. They're quick to look for toxicity in Bernie and quick to find forgiveness for an utterly unrepetentant Romney. They love those that hate them and hate those that love them.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:23
|
|
|
Salean posted:yeah at the end of the day people need to realize that the impeachment was not really putting trump on trial. he is guilty, everyone knows he is guilty - even republicans, so they have to argue "he did it but so what - and while there is probably a marginal amount of people who wouldn't have realized he was a criminal without this, they're a tiny minority. we all know who trump is. we knew it before the trial and we knew it afterwards; and we knew there was no real chance the senate would actually remove him. Shut the gently caress up.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:24
|
|
|
.
Eggplant Squire has issued a correction as of 23:27 on Mar 4, 2020 |
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:25
|
|
|
Salean posted:yeah at the end of the day people need to realize that the impeachment was not really putting trump on trial. he is guilty, everyone knows he is guilty - even republicans, so they have to argue "he did it but so what - and while there is probably a marginal amount of people who wouldn't have realized he was a criminal without this, they're a tiny minority. we all know who trump is. we knew it before the trial and we knew it afterwards; and we knew there was no real chance the senate would actually remove him. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:25
|
|
|
https://soundcloud.com/episode-one-868768631/113-joe-biden
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:26
|
|
|
FRINGE posted:No. Being a shithead is being a shithead. Enough with the special cases. I mean, I think there's a big difference between reacting in a very difficult situation where you're in heavy denial from the culture around you and you internalize it. She should probably apologize to the atheist guy, absolutely, and has a moral requirement to do that, but there's sympathy to be found there on her behalf. Her statements now, less so. There's no pressure there, it's just all, "gently caress you, got mine." Trust me, I hate her right now, but I also want to be fair.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:26
|
|
|
Im sorry that was cheating
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:27
|
|
|
Grown rear end man whining about ad homs https://twitter.com/AnandWrites/status/1225435290044637184 https://twitter.com/AnandWrites/status/1225438484028149760
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:27
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Politics_Polls/status/1225439932509851648 bidens lead falling but south still not looking great. would really suck if voters went to bloomberg.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:28
|
|
|
lmaooo please watch https://twitter.com/berniebrostar/status/1225432246921940992?s=21
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:28
|
|
|
I don't hate this post like everyone else, but at the same time, these people should've figured out Republicans were irredeemable a long time ago, they've not been anything short of toxic in our lifetimes. I'm pretty sure Watergate and the Southern Strategy predates most of us. So at what point is it, "This is the final straw!" and at what point is it like, "This time I'm leaving him! Unless, you know, he shows me he still loves me. Then I guess he can hit me some more."
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:28
|
|
|
Probably Magic posted:I saw someone on Facebook (yeah, yeah, but bear with me here) say they didn't think "any Republicans were left" until Mitt Romney sided against Trump. Like, not even "hope in the party," no, their definition of Republicans was contingent upon there being something redeemable about them, and otherwise, it's no true Scotsman. This was a liberal too. And that's how a lot of people think, that the Republicans by their nature are good-natured because they're a necessary counterbalance (to what?) in the Republic. I guess to keep us from spending too much? Which the Democrats have been threatening to cut social security for decades, so not sure where that fear comes from? But it's that ardent belief that conservatives are not only forgivable but a necessity to this country, far far more than any socialist discourse is needed in it. i grew up being taught that democrats need republicans to reign in their worst instincts and provide a check, and a lot of boomers have deeply internalized that mindset it stems a lot from the unbroken control that dems had over the house up until gingrich flipped it while the dixiecrats were dying off, but I saw it locally in minnesota too during the 90s. george w bush really blew up the narrative after 9/11 when he stopped even the pretense of fiscal conservancy, but the mindset still shambles on with everyone who internalized west wing style politics
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:29
|
|
|
SpiderHyphenMan posted:I mean, yeah, who here doesn't want vengeance? one of Bernie's strengths is definitely the weaponization of lib-owning, but for the good
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:30
|
|
|
Wraith of J.O.I. posted:lmaooo please watch Nooo Pete never go full imp mode.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 13:56 |
|
|
triple sulk posted:holy poo poo no one is actually gonna vote for bloomberg why do people keep running with this narrative 
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2020 16:32
|
|
