|
Javid posted:> boiling? - I'm not actually sure what this means wrt spoon making so if it's gross and smells it might need to be a hot plate in the garage instead Unless you're drinking the boilings, it's not going to cause any problem.
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 04:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 16:06 |
|
|
pseudanonymous posted:lots of words Post the manifesto. If you're worried about legal repercussions just copy it with your non-dominant hand and send that.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 05:44
|
|
|
Kawasaki Nun posted:You don't boil your spoons when you carve them? Honestly I haven't done that specific sub-thing of woodworking so idfk what all is involved with crafting an artisanal wooden cooking utensil It sounds like that's a thing, though, so yeah OP's roommate is doing extremely normal stuff for Portland, if he's forking out his rent on time who cares
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 05:52
|
|
|
pseudanonymous posted:Sorry for making jokes on a comedy forum duder. Thanks for setting me straight I really value the insight you’ve given me. I appreciate you kramering in to this thread on a comedy forum and reminding me not to actually literally follow every joking suggestion a goon makes. Obviously I’m now we’ll advised that if I post something like “maybe if I” it’s “potentially incriminating”; I’ll place exactly the amount of value on your advice it merits. Lol ok like you weren't earnestly asking how to evict your roommate largely because you think he's mentally ill & you don't like the arrangement that existed before you "became landlord" I mean if you're going to "jokingly" ask how to harass a dude who's lived in the house for years without incident until he moves out, maybe don't get so butthurt if somebody points out that you're an idiot & rear end in a top hat (& that the laughter is at you, not with you)?  ulmont posted:Google “battle of the forms”. Also I'd like to say that this is hilarious. What other common legal issues have excellent names like this, besides CYA? BonerGhost fucked around with this message at 07:44 on Feb 29, 2020 |
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 07:42
|
|
|
Keep Portland Weird man. Haven't you seen all the bumper stickers and tee shirts and signs everywhere wtf?
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 08:09
|
|
|
BonerGhost posted:Also I'd like to say that this is hilarious. What other common legal issues have excellent names like this, besides CYA? The eggshell skull rule is a good one. Basically, if your negligence injures someone, and their injuries are much worse than would normally be expected because of a medical condition on their part, you're still fully liable. However, this can be modified by the crumbling skull rule, which states that if their condition was already getting worse on its own before the injury, you're only liable for the difference between how bad their condition is because of the injury and how bad it would have been without the injury. There's also the doctrine of the fertile octogenarian and the unborn widow, a set of unlikely scenarios that have to be taken into account when determining the validity of wills and trusts in some jurisdictions. Thuryl fucked around with this message at 09:31 on Feb 29, 2020 |
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 09:11
|
|
|
BonerGhost posted:Also I'd like to say that this is hilarious. What other common legal issues have excellent names like this, besides CYA? Though it isn’t used as much these days, demurrer is just a fun word to say. From my own practice area (patents), Blonder Tongue (not that commonly referred to anymore but it’s a hilarious case name). Final rejection is funny, but only because it’s a completely inaccurate name (applicants have at least 4 ways to continue after a “final” rejection.) And I don’t know how funny it is, but “self help eviction” is certainly relevant to the thread right now!
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 09:31
|
|
|
BonerGhost posted:Also I'd like to say that this is hilarious. What other common legal issues have excellent names like this, besides CYA? Evidence taken illegally is the fruit of the poisonous tree.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 14:41
|
|
|
Somebody posts the proximate cause/foreseeable case fact pattern, the lady versus the railroad company
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 14:46
|
|
|
echopapa posted:Evidence taken illegally is the fruit of the poisonous tree. There's something called "the deep pocket principle" which sounds very american.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 14:48
|
|
|
BonerGhost posted:Also I'd like to say that this is hilarious. What other common legal issues have excellent names like this, besides CYA? Unclean hands doctrine. You can't trick someone into doing something you want to sue them for.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 14:53
|
|
|
blarzgh posted:Somebody posts the proximate cause/foreseeable case fact pattern, the lady versus the railroad company This, and the the lego animation. Also the dead hand poison pill is the most metal of legal devices.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 15:31
|
|
|
blarzgh posted:Somebody posts the proximate cause/foreseeable case fact pattern, the lady versus the railroad company I pull the lever so the train only runs over one person. Right?
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 20:32
|
|
|
Devor posted:I pull the lever so the train only runs over one person. Right? quote:The plaintiff, Helen Palsgraf, was waiting at a Long Island Rail Road station in August 1924 while taking her daughters to the beach. Two men attempted to board the train before hers; one (aided by railroad employees) dropped a package that exploded, causing a large coin-operated scale on the platform to hit her. She sued the railroad company because the railroad company employee pushed a guy, who was carrying a package, that happened to be an explosive, that went off, that shook the wooden platform, that tipped over a coin operated scale, that landed on her. blarzgh fucked around with this message at 22:05 on Feb 29, 2020 |
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 21:54
|
|
|
Just chiming in to say if this was my house and the guy said “I could have a gun in my room” or whatever I would say “I do have a gun in my room, let’s see whose works better” and then let the chips fall. Would solve the problem (but not without a lawyer probably)
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 22:34
|
|
|
Well, he set up a GoPro in the living room to tape us without our knowledge or consent today, so that's a fun development.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 22:41
|
|
|
Maybe because he doesn't want his landlord posting photos of his spoons on the internet or something?
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 22:43
|
|
|
blarzgh posted:She sued the railroad company because the railroad company employee pushed a guy, who was carrying a package, that happened to be an explosive, that went off, that shook the wooden platform, that tipped over a coin operated scale, that landed on her. Objective liability isn't a general thing in the US? Big company liability? Isn't it entirely reasonable that the accidental and negligent discarge of an explosive by a company employee could affect its immediate area in such a way that someone could get injured (flying stuff, shattering stuff, stuff falling over), thus causing a hazard the damage from which the company holds liability for primarily grounded in the very nature of its operation? Wait, no, I reread that. A loving random person had an explosive and the company employee pushed they guy and the company was held liable? What the loving hell. I mean I guess that could work under objective liability but the facts required to swing that would be, hoo boy. Yeah that's one for the textbooks.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 22:43
|
|
|
pseudanonymous posted:Well, he set up a GoPro in the living room to tape us without our knowledge or consent today, so that's a fun development. I was told by other posters itt this is extremely normal behavior.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 22:43
|
|
|
pseudanonymous posted:Well, he set up a GoPro in the living room to tape us without our knowledge or consent today, so that's a fun development. That's a great thing to document and show to your loving lawyer, that you have retained the services of.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 22:45
|
|
|
Seriously just shoot him OP
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 22:54
|
|
|
Nice piece of fish posted:Objective liability isn't a general thing in the US? Big company liability? Isn't it entirely reasonable that the accidental and negligent discarge of an explosive by a company employee could affect its immediate area in such a way that someone could get injured (flying stuff, shattering stuff, stuff falling over), thus causing a hazard the damage from which the company holds liability for primarily grounded in the very nature of its operation? now if the cow were carrying a bomb that'd be a different story
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 23:10
|
|
|
No, keep posting your saga of crazy. I don't think we blame you for not wanting to live with a crazy person, but getting rid of him is actually one of those things that's really complex and varies drastically from city-to-city so get a lawyer.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 23:12
|
|
|
Nice piece of fish posted:Objective liability isn't a general thing in the US? Big company liability? Isn't it entirely reasonable that the accidental and negligent discarge of an explosive by a company employee could affect its immediate area in such a way that someone could get injured (flying stuff, shattering stuff, stuff falling over), thus causing a hazard the damage from which the company holds liability for primarily grounded in the very nature of its operation? What? It said the holding was not liable after appeal. The railroad was awarded money from Pelsgraf (although apparently they didn't try to collect). quote:Defendant could not be held liable for an injury that could not be reasonably foreseen. New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, reversed and complaint dismissed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palsgraf_v._Long_Island_Railroad_Co.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 23:15
|
|
|
Devor posted:What? It said the holding was not liable after appeal. The railroad was awarded money from Pelsgraf (although apparently they didn't try to collect). How the hell should I know? You think I read anything Blarzgh links? I may be dumb, but I'm not loving brain dead/Republican.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 23:23
|
|
|
Arcturas posted:No, keep posting your saga of crazy. I am going to. I said this before but I'm going to get an actual contract with my mom then talk to a lawyer and see what the consequences and actions of various courses would be then make a decision. I'm also going to stash my dog with her for a while because I'm worried he'll lose his poo poo if he gets the eviction notice and she's tiny and could be easily hurt.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 23:35
|
|
|
Post the goddamn manifesto.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 23:36
|
|
|
Fish is loving a dead brain?
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 23:36
|
|
|
Remind us why you think he's a threat to your dog? Aside from "is weird" I have seen no justification for that.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 23:37
|
|
|
Javid posted:Remind us why you think he's a threat to your dog? Aside from "is weird" I have seen no justification for that. Things he’s said about dogs and pets and my past experiences with adults with severe and persistent mental illness and he mentioned pets in his manifesto. To be fair I’m overprotective of her and I don’t think he’s likely to hurt her, I just don’t want to be stressed about it or that he’ll burn down the house with his shenanigans and leave her. pseudanonymous fucked around with this message at 00:12 on Mar 1, 2020 |
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2020 00:02
|
|
|
to do list: tell mom post manifesto send dog to witness protection tell spoonman your gun is bigger than his post the gopro footage
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2020 00:39
|
|
|
nm posted:Post the goddamn manifesto.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2020 03:24
|
|
|
pseudanonymous posted:I am going to. I said this before but I'm going to get an actual contract with my mom then talk to a lawyer and see what the consequences and actions of various courses would be then make a decision. Maybe I'm misreading but why are you getting a contract first and then the lawyer?
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2020 04:40
|
|
|
Palsgraf is a route to the dark side Someone post that self defense case with the fire and the bow and arrow
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2020 05:01
|
|
|
EwokEntourage posted:Palsgraf is a route to the dark side PJ Stone had too much fun writing this opinion quote:May a person who enters the habitat of another at 3 o'clock in the morning for the announced purpose of killing him, and who commences to beat the startled sleeper's bed with a stick and set fires under him, be entitled to use deadly force in self defense after the intended victim shoots him in the back with an arrow? Upon the basis of these bizarre facts, we hold that he may not, and instead, must suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune (with apologies to William Shakespeare and Hamlet, Act III, sc. 1). https://law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/3d/193/196.html
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2020 05:03
|
|
|
Devor posted:PJ Stone had too much fun writing this opinion So many words but lol This case is a parable of the dangers of weaponry in the hands of unreasonable powers who become unduly provoked over minor irritations.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2020 05:21
|
|
|
That story is a wild ride.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2020 05:29
|
|
|
Carillon posted:Maybe I'm misreading but why are you getting a contract first and then the lawyer? My mom and brother and I never actually signed anything. So I'm worried that if he fights an eviction or gets crazier, I don't really have any proof on paper that I'm really the landlord.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2020 07:09
|
|
|
Maybe talk to a lawyer from the get go period. And post the manifesto.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2020 07:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 16:06 |
|
|
Eminent Domain posted:Maybe talk to a lawyer from the get go period. Well frankly if having an actual lease agreement with my mom will in some way hurt me it will magically not exist. Also my girlfriend texted me this while I was at the gym and I thought all my problems were solved: https://twitter.com/pdxalerts/status/1233871182333480960 pseudanonymous fucked around with this message at 07:22 on Mar 1, 2020 |
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2020 07:17
|
|