|
Arcsquad12 posted:If disney didn't want people thinking about Ariel's tits they wouldn't have given her a clamshell bikini. Ariel is literally a teenager in the disney movie. Subtle Movie Moment: prince eric is a pedophile.
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 22:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 23:32 |
|
|
Most Disney Princesses are 15 at best.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 23:02
|
|
|
value-brand cereal posted:Ariel is literally a teenager in the disney movie. That was his 18th birthday on the ship. So maybe barely a pedophile, but definitely the sad HS senior that has to date freshmen girls.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2020 23:15
|
|
|
That's why we have Romeo and Filet laws
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2020 00:30
|
|
|
marshmallow creep posted:Most Disney Princesses are 15 at best. Same but Mary in the Bible
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2020 00:46
|
|
|
RandomFerret posted:That's why we have Romeo and Filet laws 
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2020 00:58
|
|
|
Took me a sec but very nice.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2020 01:01
|
|
|
Ariel is explicitly stated to be 16 in the movie. according to an extremely cursory Google search they're all 16+ except snow white and we knew that one already trap sprung but Ariel and Eric is like...not weird at all? that's 16 and barely-18, that's high school. much more than that and it'd be pushing "ok no stop now" territory though, some of the other Disney movies are a lot weirder about it
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2020 03:56
|
|
|
TheKennedys posted:Ariel is explicitly stated to be 16 in the movie. according to an extremely cursory Google search they're all 16+ except snow white and we knew that one already But is she 16 in human years or in demi-fish years??? Edit: AND I WANT SOMETHING ELSE TO GET ME THROUGH THIS DEMI-FISH KIND OF LIFE BABY BABY
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2020 08:27
|
|
|
Well thanks guys. Now I just wondered if mermaids are born from eggs or what? If you turn Ariel upside down can you squeeze caviar out of her?
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2020 10:00
|
|
|
They have a kid in the direct to video sequel so apparently they had enough compatibility there. Mermaid anatomy jokes have been almost done to death mind.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2020 10:23
|
|
|
Ghost Leviathan posted:They have a kid in the direct to video sequel so apparently they had enough compatibility there. Mermaid anatomy jokes have been almost done to death mind. I haven't seen it but I assume she's fully human in the sequel? I would chalk that up to the magic that gave her legs also giving her the human anatomy to give birth. It's obviously a situation where you can rule out mermaid caviar.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2020 10:46
|
|
|
I wonder what it would smell like haha Edit: I'm just curious for laughs
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2020 10:56
|
|
|
Ghost Leviathan posted:They have a kid in the direct to video sequel so apparently they had enough compatibility there. Mermaid anatomy jokes have been almost done to death mind. Sequel. It makes me want to give a nine year old girl the original story to read. loving sequel.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2020 11:48
|
|
|
Jedit posted:Sequel. It makes me want to give a nine year old girl the original story to read. loving sequel. The sequel has one of the most realistically horrifying scenes in a Disney animated movie, where a girl very nearly drowns alone in an underwater cave, so if anything the sequel would prepare them a little better for the original story.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2020 12:35
|
|
|
Jedit posted:Sequel. It makes me want to give a nine year old girl the original story to read. loving sequel. giving kids who've only seen the Disney movies a copy of Grimm/Andersen/etc seems like a great way to collect the tears of dismay and horror that fuel hellworld
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2020 14:32
|
|
|
Pope Corky the IX posted:The main theme for Beauty and the Beast is loving terrible because you can just sing "Beauty and the Beast" for literally every line in the entire goddamn song. This reminds me of "Oh Christmas Tree", sung by none other than Ernest P Worrell.  Goddamn, I miss Ernest/Jim Varney.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2020 15:16
|
|
|
The rule of good Superman songs is you can sing "SUPERMAN" along with them.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2020 17:44
|
|
|
A very subtle movie moment, the title of Gattaca uses only the letters a t c and g, also the chemicals that make up DNA 🧬. I feel incredibly dumb having realized this earlier tonight while on the toilet, having seen the movie a few times.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2020 05:44
|
|
|
Ghost Leviathan posted:They have a kid in the direct to video sequel so apparently they had enough compatibility there. Mermaid anatomy jokes have been almost done to death mind. She could have squirted out the eggs and he jizzed on them, like papa Neptune did.
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2020 06:35
|
|
|
Ariel is only wearing a bra for half of the movie I’m body positive; positive that filthy body should have been covered up! Her world is a nudist colony that shames mammal tits only (and only on women!!) hosed up
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2020 06:59
|
|
|
Stupid_Sexy_Flander posted:A very subtle movie moment, the title of Gattaca uses only the letters a t c and g, also the chemicals that make up DNA 🧬. https://twitter.com/tarasyoung/status/1233387022343118853
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2020 12:15
|
|
|
Stupid_Sexy_Flander posted:A very subtle movie moment, the title of Gattaca uses only the letters a t c and g, also the chemicals that make up DNA 🧬. Doesn't the title sequence literally show that?
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2020 18:57
|
|
|
Krankenstyle posted:Doesn't the title sequence literally show that? I don't think it was obvious, I didn't realize it until like 10 years ago. I went and checked. Apparently they bold those letters in the opening sequence. Guess I just didn't notice Croatoan has a new favorite as of 21:36 on Mar 3, 2020 |
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2020 21:32
|
|
|
Yeah fair enough. I remembered it as more explicit, with a DNA sequence being shown
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2020 05:13
|
|
|
Krankenstyle posted:Doesn't the title sequence literally show that? Really when you get down to it 'Subtle' is rather subjective. I hate to denigrate my fellow goons.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2020 17:10
|
|
|
Also, to be completely honest I probably haven't seen the title sequence since the movie came out. It's been years since I've caught it in the wild, but mostly it's one of those "oh poo poo, that's in? Cool." kinda films.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2020 18:18
|
|
|
Page 1 has someone saying the end of Inception is subtle
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2020 18:43
|
|
|
Stupid_Sexy_Flander posted:Also, to be completely honest I probably haven't seen the title sequence since the movie came out. It's been years since I've caught it in the wild, but mostly it's one of those "oh poo poo, that's in? Cool." kinda films. Kinda like how I didn’t see the first ten minutes of The Shawshank Redemption until the twentieth time I had seen it? It was one of those movies I’d always leave on if I saw it while channel surfing but never tuned into it in advance.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2020 18:49
|
|
|
Ugly In The Morning posted:Kinda like how I didn’t see the first ten minutes of The Shawshank Redemption until the twentieth time I had seen it? It was one of those movies I’d always leave on if I saw it while channel surfing but never tuned into it in advance. This happened to me with Predator. Saw it about a hundred times growing up on cable t.v. but I guess I never started right from the opening credits because when I sat down to watch it in my mid-20s I absolutely did not remember that they show a spaceship arriving on Earth at the beginning.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2020 18:57
|
|
|
Croatoan posted:I don't think it was obvious, I didn't realize it until like 10 years ago. don't feel bad, guy. i didn't realize saul goodman was a play on "it's all good, man" until he literally explained it in an episode in season 2 of his spinoff show
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2020 19:41
|
|
|
Basebf555 posted:This happened to me with Predator. Saw it about a hundred times growing up on cable t.v. but I guess I never started right from the opening credits because when I sat down to watch it in my mid-20s I absolutely did not remember that they show a spaceship arriving on Earth at the beginning. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2020 20:22
|
|
|
Pilchenstein posted:Do people complain about that ruining the "twist" like they do with The Thing? Yea I think they do actually. Hard for me to judge because I literally can't remember a time when I didn't know what happens in Predator.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2020 20:53
|
|
|
Probably said itt before, but the first two Predator movies do an interesting thing where they seem set up for a more standard action movie of the time that turns into a horror movie when a heavily armed alien starts picking people off with little apparent rhyme or reason. Kind of a forgotten theme about horror stories is that a lot of the classic ones present themselves as a different genre that a terrible, mysterious monster intrudes upon. At the Mountains of Madness comes to mind, a lot of Lovecraft stuff to some degree.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2020 03:32
|
|
|
Pilchenstein posted:Do people complain about that ruining the "twist" like they do with The Thing? I've seen it come up in discussion in CD
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2020 05:58
|
|
|
Also came up in the irritating moments thread a couple years ago Biplane posted:you see the UFO land in the original the Thing?? I can seriously not remember that. (Predator mentioned by yours truly a couple posts down)
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2020 07:56
|
|
|
Mars Attacks is more our speed now. Full of subtlety.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2020 08:54
|
|
|
Basebf555 posted:Yea I think they do actually. Hard for me to judge because I literally can't remember a time when I didn't know what happens in Predator. That's perfectly fine-- you're supposed to! Imagine watching Predator in the theater for the first time. They have to give you a taste of what's to come to get you through the whole faux first act and to supplement Maria's story about the legends because there's no other way to 'complete' the premise. The movie needs you to remember the half-plot you already kinda know as it makes its way towards the reveal, because it would be a twist out of nowhere if an alien just showed up in the middle of a rad action flick. Which would still be cool but very puzzling. The Thing is a creeping progressive reveal inching out of the shadows that's only resolved halfway through when they watch the footage from the Norwegian base of finding a ship in the ice, and the monstrous survivor in the ice block. Aha! That's what the Norwegians found, why they were trying to kill the dog at all costs, and how they doomed themselves and maybe the world! The ship in the beginning is a big dumb flag reading 'IT'S ALIENS JUST WAIT IT'LL BE COOL' because the producers were hedging their bets against you being stupid or getting bored... somehow. It's just the worst goddamn decision that is only mostly ignored because of how insanely good every other decision was. Psycho: They show Mrs. Bates dying and Norman weeping before having an 'I have an evil idea' look directly towards the camera in the trailer Citizen Kane: Opening credits preceded by b-roll of orphans sledding in front of Rosebud Sled Corp. Hateful Eight: Characters keep stopping and asking the audience directly if anyone heard thumping/giggling from the floor
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2020 13:40
|
|
|
Goons also have a conspiracy theory that From Dusk Till Dawn was supposed to be a heist movie until a shocking twist Midway through reveals vampires but it was ruined by marketing. They can never cite a source on that though, unlike Terminator 2 where they can cite a source saying Arnold as a good guy was supposed to be a twist that was ruined by marketing
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2020 13:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 23:32 |
|
|
I keep forgetting George Clooney was in Dust Til Dawn. Like I remember Tarantino, Hayek, and Keitel, but I'm face blind on Clooney even though he's one of only two characters who survived. Maybe because it's so different than any other film he's done since. I do remember being very surprised in theaters when it became a vampire movie.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2020 13:50
|
|
