|
Governors could do that
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2020 23:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 18:25 |
|
|
And the prisons would respond by saying "nah" and going for an injunction or whatever while they sued. And if they were in certain states and that all failed, I'm confident they'd just ignore the order. Either outright, or "there's a lot of paperwork we gotta do first."
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2020 23:32
|
|
|
Governors could just commute everyone
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2020 23:39
|
|
|
euphronius posted:Governors could just commute everyone Why are we talking about mass transit in times of a pandemic?
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2020 02:15
|
|
|
toplitzin posted:Why are we talking about mass transit in times of a pandemic? trying to get everyone sick ASAP to get herd immunity which retroactively immunizes all the dead, it’s the common law
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2020 02:59
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:trying to get everyone sick ASAP to get herd immunity which retroactively immunizes all the dead, it’s the common law Get everyone in the prisons sick, wait 1 month Then put all the grandmas and grandpas in the prisons Bing bing bong, so simple
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2020 03:15
|
|
|
Devor posted:Then put all the grandmas and grandpas in the prisons Advanced boomercide ideas here
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2020 05:38
|
|
|
Devor posted:Get everyone in the prisons sick, wait 1 month On that note https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52000173
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2020 11:25
|
|
|
My local Stop and Shop posted up signs saying that between the hours of 6 and 8 pm only people over 60 will be allowed to shop there. Special elderly hours they call it. I don't really care but is that legal? Certainly eyebrow raising. If they want to put all the boomers together in the same primordial soup then I'm cool staying outta there honestly.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2020 03:02
|
|
|
Zero VGS posted:My local Stop and Shop posted up signs saying that between the hours of 6 and 8 pm only people over 60 will be allowed to shop there. Special elderly hours they call it. I don't really care but is that legal? Certainly eyebrow raising. If they want to put all the boomers together in the same primordial soup then I'm cool staying outta there honestly. What state?
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2020 03:17
|
|
|
In California a ton of grocery stores are doing that, and I think it's being encouraged by the state.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2020 03:19
|
|
|
joat mon posted:What state? Oh whup, Massachusetts. I know labor law here has over 40 as a protected class at least. Leperflesh posted:In California a ton of grocery stores are doing that, and I think it's being encouraged by the state. It feels kinda hosed up if you're someone younger who has to work a normal 9-5 and can't pick up food on the way home. edit: Oh I see, it's actually 6am to 8am in the morning, I guess that's less screwy, it's so old people can buy poo poo before us whippersnappers beat them up and steal their TP. Zero VGS fucked around with this message at 03:23 on Mar 24, 2020 |
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2020 03:19
|
|
|
Zero VGS posted:Oh whup, Massachusetts. I know labor law here has over 40 as a protected class at least. In CA they're making the first hour of being open the old-people hours, like 8-9AM or something, and the idea is to make sure not all the just stocked products have been hoarded before the old people get a chance at them... although I think that's better done with per-customer limits on items. e.g., https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/03/17/coronavirus-shopping-stores-introduce-time-for-vulnerable-elderly-pregnant/5074064002/
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2020 03:24
|
|
|
Probably the cleanest the store will be also
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2020 03:26
|
|
|
Zero VGS posted:Oh whup, Massachusetts. I know labor law here has over 40 as a protected class at least. With regard to public accommodations (e.g., store customers) neither Massachusetts nor the Federal government treat age as a protected class. So in this case the elderly hour is both legal and moral. e: California hasn't made age a protected class for public accommodations either. joat mon fucked around with this message at 03:34 on Mar 24, 2020 |
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2020 03:31
|
|
|
I think the other big reason is that old people are dramatically more effected by the disease than younger people. Not necessarily that they get it more often but they have serious consequences from it more often. So by having a specific time for them to be there it limits their exposure to the general population. (Any study showing infection rate will be way skewed because asymptomatic people won't tend to get tested when those dying will...so younger people who tend to get it but do not get seriously ill from it will always be under represented in data sets.) Also as someone mentioned the store is it's cleanest early. They also have an ability to get items they probably actually need before the hoarders raid through.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2020 05:50
|
|
|
I love how even in the twilight of their lives boomers are demanding to be catered to and finding a way to be coddled, destroying the economy and loving everybody younger than them out of their jobs and houses and investments yet again, like it wasn’t enough to have set the world on an irreversible path toward annihilation—they wanted to do it while they were still alive, one last time to gently caress the rest of us over before checking out of this mortal coil forever
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2020 14:35
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:I love how even in the twilight of their lives boomers are demanding to be catered to and finding a way to be coddled, destroying the economy and loving everybody younger than them out of their jobs and houses and investments yet again, like it wasn’t enough to have set the world on an irreversible path toward annihilation—they wanted to do it while they were still alive, one last time to gently caress the rest of us over before checking out of this mortal coil forever thank you sir, we'll have somebody bring your order out to you in 5 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2020 15:09
|
|
|
Louisgod posted:thank you sir, we'll have somebody bring your order out to you in 5 minutes. Thanks. Make sure your man double bags, the last time he didn’t double bag and the bottom near fell out
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2020 16:09
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:Thanks. Make sure your man double bags, the last time he didn’t double bag and the bottom near fell out Forty years I been asking permission to piss. I can’t squeeze a drop without say-so.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2020 16:17
|
|
|
I tried to get a 90 day supply (3 pills) of my penis pills today but they said they didn’t have any in stock and didn’t know when they’d be resupplied is it possible for me to sue Walgreens over this?
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2020 03:42
|
|
|
What are your damages ?
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2020 03:46
|
|
|
Have you not seen his AV?
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2020 03:55
|
|
|
Birds don’t have hair or ??? Thumbs??? So I immediately dismissed it
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2020 03:59
|
|
|
euphronius posted:Birds don’t have hair or ??? Thumbs??? So I immediately dismissed it Whoa whoa whoa, are you licensed to practice bird law??
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2020 04:00
|
|
|
euphronius posted:What are your damages ? Tiny, microscopic even
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2020 10:19
|
|
|
Basically they are dick all
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2020 10:20
|
|
|
bird with big dick posted:I tried to get a 90 day supply (3 pills) of my penis pills today but they said they didn’t have any in stock and didn’t know when they’d be resupplied is it possible for me to sue Walgreens over this? No, under the de minimis non curat lex doctrine.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2020 13:16
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:No, under the de minimis non curat lex doctrine. But see Johnson v. United States, 469 U.S. 111 (dicta)
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2020 18:50
|
|
|
Cf. Wang v. Yoni, 420 U.S. 69 (2008)
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2020 20:02
|
|
|
penis
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2020 20:13
|
|
|
nice
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2020 20:15
|
|
|
Well my roommate wrote me a letter in the third person saying he was looking for another place to live, but noted twice this did not constitute notice of intent to vacate. So I guess I don't have to evict him.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2020 20:16
|
|
|
homullus posted:But see Johnson v. United States, 469 U.S. 111 (dicta) You may think you're a cunning linguist, buttressing your argument with dicta, but it's a phallusy.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2020 20:31
|
|
|
Just want to say that I love how the Italian equivalent of the word “gently caress” is cazzo
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2020 21:10
|
|
|
pseudanonymous posted:Well my roommate wrote me a letter in the third person saying he was looking for another place to live, but noted twice this did not constitute notice of intent to vacate. So I guess I don't have to evict him. Write him a letter in the third person titled 'Notice of non-intention to evict' saying you're looking for another tenant, but note twice this does not constitute notice of intent to evict.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2020 21:31
|
|
|
Outrail posted:Write him a letter in the third person titled 'Notice of non-intention to evict' saying you're looking for another tenant, but note twice this does not constitute notice of intent to evict. I'm not going to replace him. I just don't want to deal with his poo poo anymore.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2020 22:18
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:Just want to say that I love how the Italian equivalent of the word “gently caress” is cazzo Fun fact: I'm 46% sure it has something to do with where my Italian last name came from.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2020 03:24
|
|
|
blarzgh posted:Fun fact: I'm 46% sure it has something to do with where my Italian last name came from. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt3gcSyL5vg
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2020 05:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 18:25 |
|
|
I know this was asked already but I can't find it, what's the course of action when your company falsely claims your job is vital, despite not actually being classified as vital? Also, can companies really force you to use sick time when the company is shut down?
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2020 06:17
|
|
