Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
Jacobin did a good thing on real idpol vs. liberal shitpol last night.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FztmNrp08yY

Red Oktober posted:

Different versions of this all over the place. Most are saying it’s an attempted murder arrest.


https://www.standard.co.uk/news/cri...y-a4409696.html
Is an attempted murder arrest when the Met don't manage to kill the minority?

e: In April 29, 1992 the LAPD were acquitted for the attempted murder arrest of Rodney King.

Guavanaut fucked around with this message at 10:22 on Apr 8, 2020

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

RockyB
Mar 8, 2007


Dog Therapy: Shockingly Good

jaete posted:

I still don't know what "organising around identity" or indeed "identity politics" actually means. It seems that no politician anywhere ever mentions the word "identity", at least not explicitly, and instead "identity politics" or whatever is like a derogatory term?

Identity as a concept seems like an appeal to emotions kind of thing, which in politics is potentially dangerous imo

(Maybe my lack of understanding stems from the fact that I've myself never "identified" with any political group, not very strongly anyway; direction yes, many specific semi-detailed things yes, but parties or such? Nah)

Identity politics is about stuffing people into little pigeon holes, then treating them as a homogeneous mass rather than actual thinking, breathing people. Which is why it appeals so much to technocrats.

You are a WOMAN? As a WOMAN you should vote for a Hillary Clinton who is a WOMAN beep boop (ignores that 40% of women vote for trump).

Deketh
Feb 26, 2006
That's a nice fucking fish

Braggart posted:

Hey all. Hope you’re okay. I’m good, but not following the thread. Running my mouth off in the discord though :D

Dropping this thing wot I writ just now in here cos I think you’ll like it:


Keir Starmie, I choose you!
“Not battling for battling’s sake.”
Boffing used Savile attack!
It’s super effective!
Keir Starmie fainted!
What?
BOFFING evolved into WHEEZING!
WHEEZING evolved into DEAD!

Oh hey dude! I missed seeing your posts in here

Josef bugman
Nov 17, 2011

Pictured: Poster prepares to celebrate Holy Communion (probablY)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund

peanut- posted:

Maybe not inherently, but practically identity politics has been heavily co-opted by liberals as a weapon against the left. The exact same pattern is playing out in the US, where bullshit IDPOL reasons are conjured up to manufacture justifications for liberals ignoring Sanders, before being immediately thrown by the wayside with regards to Biden. Anyone pushing a genuinely transformative, class-based agenda is going to be hit with the exact same smears.

See to me this seems more like a critique of specifics circumstances. In the same way that class analysis has often been co-opted by reactionaries. I don't think you can lay the blame for that on the people trying to do the best they can.

jaete posted:

Identity as a concept seems like an appeal to emotions kind of thing, which in politics is potentially dangerous imo

(Maybe my lack of understanding stems from the fact that I've myself never "identified" with any political group, not very strongly anyway; direction yes, many specific semi-detailed things yes, but parties or such? Nah)

Mate, i hate to tell you this but everything is an appeal to emotions. Trying to talk solely in graphs and charts and so on is also an appeal to the emotion of "You are smart because you understand this".

sebzilla
Mar 17, 2009

Kid's blasting everything in sight with that new-fangled musket.


I definitely don't need solidarity fund money to buy a new laptop, thanks though Ms A!

After a bit of searching about this one seems like a pretty solid deal: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Lenovo-Thinkpad-T460-i5-6300U-2-4GHz-512GB-SSD-16GB-Ram-Windows-10-Laptop-HDMI-/153847380126

Any big red flags why I shouldn't get it at the price? Newish i5 (6300U), 16GB RAM, 512 GB SSD.

Doctor_Fruitbat
Jun 2, 2013


Josef bugman posted:

Mate, i hate to tell you this but everything is an appeal to emotions. Trying to talk solely in graphs and charts and so on is also an appeal to the emotion of "You are smart because you understand this".

See also Brexit, where remainers furiously pushed economic stats to the front and it was like water off a duck's back in the face of "your life is poo poo, let's shake things up!".

thrashingteeth
Dec 22, 2019

depressive hedonia
always tired
taco tuesday
Humans aren't rational, we're hugely emotional animals. It's one of the positives of our species imo.

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


Azza Bamboo posted:

Idpol is when people get to fight for how the groups they are a member of are regarded by others rather than having that decided for them. It's no wonder it pisses off right wingers and liberals: it deprives them of the sense of control and expertise respectively.

...IdPol is explicitly liberal in the common definition.

DesperateDan
Dec 10, 2005

Where's my cow?

Is that my cow?

No it isn't, but it still tramples my bloody lavender.

sebzilla posted:

a new laptop

maxxing out the ram, installing an ssd and doing a clean install can give laptops a whole new life if you haven't already done that

Strom Cuzewon
Jul 1, 2010

feedmegin posted:

I did History at Oxford and in my time at least, lectures were strictly optional. I think I went to, like, two, both in my first year. You get your essay topic and reading list, you go to the library and get your books, you read them and write your essay, you go to the tutorial and read it out to your tutor, and then he eviscerates you for an hour or so. Lather, rinse and repeat for three years.

You forgot the lifelong trauma!

:smith:

sebzilla
Mar 17, 2009

Kid's blasting everything in sight with that new-fangled musket.


DesperateDan posted:

maxxing out the ram, installing an ssd and doing a clean install can give laptops a whole new life if you haven't already done that

Would also need to replace the screen and battery and charger and source an enter key which last time I checked a couple of years ago was out of stock from the replacement keys people. Basically at that point I might as well just drop a few hundred on a new machine and save myself the bother, right?

Soylent Yellow
Nov 5, 2010

yospos

sebzilla posted:

I definitely don't need solidarity fund money to buy a new laptop, thanks though Ms A!

After a bit of searching about this one seems like a pretty solid deal: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Lenovo-Thinkpad-T460-i5-6300U-2-4GHz-512GB-SSD-16GB-Ram-Windows-10-Laptop-HDMI-/153847380126

Any big red flags why I shouldn't get it at the price? Newish i5 (6300U), 16GB RAM, 512 GB SSD.

The only obvious thing I can see that would put me off is no dedicated graphics card. Depends what you want to do with it, but even a mediocre dedicated card is better than onboard graphics.

Kassad
Nov 12, 2005

It's about time.

sebzilla posted:

Would also need to replace the screen and battery and charger and source an enter key which last time I checked a couple of years ago was out of stock from the replacement keys people. Basically at that point I might as well just drop a few hundred on a new machine and save myself the bother, right?

Yes.

Josef bugman
Nov 17, 2011

Pictured: Poster prepares to celebrate Holy Communion (probablY)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund

forkboy84 posted:

...IdPol is explicitly liberal in the common definition.

Mmmm, if you mean how it is commonly used by some folk, sure, but it is a very mutable categorisation of things. Same way class analysis is often mutable in some instances.

Bardeh
Dec 2, 2004

Fun Shoe

sebzilla posted:

I definitely don't need solidarity fund money to buy a new laptop, thanks though Ms A!

After a bit of searching about this one seems like a pretty solid deal: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Lenovo-Thinkpad-T460-i5-6300U-2-4GHz-512GB-SSD-16GB-Ram-Windows-10-Laptop-HDMI-/153847380126

Any big red flags why I shouldn't get it at the price? Newish i5 (6300U), 16GB RAM, 512 GB SSD.

Be aware that the pricing on that is quite deceptive, once you add the 512 SSD and the 16gb RAM it's actually £325, not the £199 it seemingly costs. Having said that, £325 seems pretty good for those specs. You won't be playing many games on it, but it's got a 1080p panel and will be nice and zippy with the SSD.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
It's not liberal to organize as a group in a society where that group is marginalized as a result of shared conditions.

Or to paraphrase Steve Biko, if a bunch of shits are going to come along and say "we're white and that makes us better than you, because you are a non-white" then it makes perfect sense to organize along the lines of "we're not non-white, we're black, and we deserve the right to make that distinction ourselves".

As Biko himself points out, both the thesis of whiteness and the antithesis of blackness are socially constructed, and the correct synthesis is that dividing people by pigmentation is some bullshit, but it's not the people defending the antithesis who started that.

Where it becomes liberal is when a bunch of people from the group defended by the thesis start using the existence of the dichotomy to shut down any class based analysis.

Algol Star
Sep 6, 2010

Azza Bamboo posted:

Idpol is when people get to fight for how the groups they are a member of are regarded by others rather than having that decided for them. It's no wonder it pisses off right wingers and liberals: it deprives them of the sense of control and expertise respectively.

Maybe I'm cynical but in recent years identity politics seems to have been latched on to by liberals as a way to cling on to support instead of actually offering solutions to the world's problems. It seems to be all about superficial actions and posturing that signal support and steering away from genuine attempts at change and restructuring society, even for the specific group they're claiming to support. When you don't agree with the right and want to see yourself as the good guy, but the policies the left proposes might inconvenience your comfortable bubble it's very useful to create artificial ground to claim and seem like you're doing something. It's used as much as a stick to beat the left as the right, even if there's no basis for the attacks like with Sanders in America where despite being the best chance for the marginalised to improve their quality of life you had a bunch of IDpol people directing women to Warren and African Americans to Biden. People are using it as a wedge to divide support on the left.

Algol Star fucked around with this message at 11:18 on Apr 8, 2020

HJB
Feb 16, 2011

:swoon: I can't get enough of are Dan :swoon:
Doing another little look round for Starmer stuff, because why not, here's the Heil's 'takedown' of him in 2009:

quote:

Profile: The very political DPP with a past that he doesn't want you to know

Keir Stramer, the left-wing Director of Public Prosecutions, makes an intriguing omission in his Who's Who entry. While describing himself as being educated at Leeds and Oxford Universities, he excludes his years at the fee-paying Reigate Grammar School. Left-wingers view such excellent schools as temples of Tory elitism, and is not hard to see why having gone to one might conceivably be a trifle embarrassing for the New Labour figure whose parents named him after Keir Hardy, the founding Labour Party leader. But aren't we entitled to expect the nation's law chief to be entirely frank about his background? This, after all, is the man who expects us to listen when he expresses the view that, in some cases, relatives should be given the go-ahead to help loved ones kill themselves.

To Starmer, this comes under the heading of human rights, the great cause of his life which has also enriched many lawyers. Yesterday he was chauffeured between television studios to trail his 'clarification' of the legal position on assisted suicides. No other DPP in history has publicly paraded himself quite so enthusiastically. Didn't they used to be relatively-anonymous figures, universally respected for their discretion?

So what else do we know about him? He hated the name Keir as a boy but 'grew to appreciate it later', he has said, revealing the depth and historic resonance of his Left-wing beliefs. Certainly, Keir Starmer is a clever lawyer. But there was widespread surprise when he was appointed by the Government last November at the age of 46, because his reputation since being called to the bar in 1987 was purely as a defender. 'He'd never been thought of as a criminal specialist let alone a prosecutor,' says a colleague. 'But he talks like a man with all the answers. I hope he has an answer if the Conservatives take over next year.' Indeed he has: his appointment, he points out, 'is a five-year contract, so a change of government doesn't make any difference to me'.

In 2001 Starmer was voted Human Rights Lawyer of the Year. As joint head of the Doughty Street Chambers in London specialising in human rights cases, he has represented tree dwellers, road protesters and hunt saboteurs in various legal tussles. He also defended ex-MI5 officer David Shayler in his appeal against conviction for breaching the Official Secrets Act. Two year ago he acted for two terror suspects in the landmark House of Lords case which led to the control order system being declared unlawful under the Human Rights Act. He also examined the Government's legal arguments on the eve of going to war in Iraq and found (in typical courtroom language) 'a problem of credibility'.

Starmer - who is married to Victoria, a solicitor who mentors deprived children - was the first university graduate in his family. In Who's Who he refers to his parents Rodney and Josephine - lifelong, Guardian-reading socialists - as 'Rod and Jo'. Rod, 74, was a toolmaker and Jo used to be a nurse. She has been physically disabled for some years. As well as devoting themselves to rescuing donkeys, Rod and Jo had four children. The other three went to comprehensive school. Starmer has said about his happy home life that 'whenever one of us left home, they were replaced with a donkey'. In fact his parents now rescue various animals full time from their home in the Surrey commuter belt. After Reigate Grammar-Starmer went on to read law at Leeds and up to St Edmund Hall Oxford, before joining the Middle Temple chambers of Sir John Mortimer, the late barrister and novelist. From there he moved on to Doughty Street, immersing himself in human rights issues.

Since then Franz Kafka's The Trial has become his favourite book. It's about a man arrested by a remote and inaccessible authority without knowing what crime he is meant to have committed. But help is at hand from an unexpected source. Could this be how Keir Starmer perceives himself - as the unexpected source of help for those helping a loved one end their own life?

Azza Bamboo
Apr 7, 2018


THUNDERDOME LOSER 2021

I've been thinking more about this. I found the age ranges interesting. I do wonder if there's a reluctance to even admit anyone over 70 into intensive care, instead just providing them means to...

..."manage their discomfort" at home.

If so, that'd explain the age readings. Not necessarily that the 55 year olds are particularly vulnerable, but that they're of the age where triage isn't going to pull them out of the study.

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.
Identity politics has been completely hollowed out by liberals and used as a bludgeon against the left almost exclusively, since it doesn't work at all against the right.

The key part is that 'identity' can be given and taken away at will- look at the way liberals treat leftist women and minorities- or Biden's rape victims- and all of a sudden the protection and dignity liberals are supposed to afford them disappears in a flash, with the active aid of the media in framing it- what liberals took from 'don't punch down' was 'always frame things so you look like you're punching up'.

radmonger
Jun 6, 2011

Josef bugman posted:

Mmmm, if you mean how it is commonly used by some folk, sure, but it is a very mutable categorisation of things. Same way class analysis is often mutable in some instances.

Can you give me some examples of words that are not used differently by different people?

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Algol Star posted:

Maybe I'm cynical but in recent years identity politics seems to have been latched on to by liberals as a way to cling on to support instead of actually offering solutions to the world's problems. It seems to be all about superficial actions and posturing that signal support and steering away from genuine attempts at change and restructuring society, even for the specific group they're claiming to support. When you don't agree with the right and want to see yourself as the good guy, but the policies the left proposes might inconvenience your comfortable bubble it's very useful to create artificial ground to claim and seem like you're doing something. It's used as much as a stick to beat the left as the right, even if there's no basis for the attacks like with Sanders in America where despite being the best chance for the marginalised to improve their quality of life you had a bunch of IDpol people directing women to Warren and African Americans to Biden. People are using it as a wedge to divide support on the left.
I think there's a large difference between people saying "if people are going to exclude us on the basis of our pigmentation then we have the right to build structures that explicitly include us on that basis" and "you colored folks folks of color should vote for the man who treated a public bath as a black people zoo and lied about fighting a man called Corn Pop."

One of those is group socialist and one is liberal lies.

HJB posted:

Doing another little look round for Starmer stuff, because why not, here's the Heil's 'takedown' of him in 2009:
Back in the day when "terminally ill people should have the right to die with dignity without their partner doing 14 years for manslaughter" was the worst thing ever.

Azza Bamboo
Apr 7, 2018


THUNDERDOME LOSER 2021

radmonger posted:

Can you give me some examples of words that are not used differently by different people?

Cockwomble has an absolute value in a world of so many relatives. It is axiomatic.

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


HJB posted:

Doing another little look round for Starmer stuff, because why not, here's the Heil's 'takedown' of him in 2009:

This is weird. Obviously you don't expect the Mail to care about factual accuracy but "going to a fee paying school" was not a black mark in the New Labour days. Blair attended Fettes. Of the 22 people in the original Blair cabinet 10 were educated at independent schools.

On the other hand, good on Keir for representing hunt sabs in his legal days.

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer
lol cool

https://twitter.com/peterjukes/status/1247685177465344002?s=20

Azza Bamboo
Apr 7, 2018


THUNDERDOME LOSER 2021

Algol Star posted:

Maybe I'm cynical but in recent years identity politics seems to have been latched on to by liberals as a way to cling on to support instead of actually offering solutions to the world's problems. It seems to be all about superficial actions and posturing that signal support and steering away from genuine attempts at change and restructuring society, even for the specific group they're claiming to support. When you don't agree with the right and want to see yourself as the good guy, but the policies the left proposes might inconvenience your comfortable bubble it's very useful to create artificial ground to claim and seem like you're doing something. It's used as much as a stick to beat the left as the right, even if there's no basis for the attacks like with Sanders in America where despite being the best chance for the marginalised to improve their quality of life you had a bunch of IDpol people directing women to Warren and African Americans to Biden. People are using it as a wedge to divide support on the left.

I don't know, it sounds to me like every political movement has seen the value of self determination and is co opting it for their gains. Liberalism and Socialism are both going the route of saying "our proposed structure will provide you what you're asking for" and the right wing has said "if allowing groups self determination over how they are regarded is the way of doing things, we'll make sure that already powerful groups are replicating this for themselves."

Azza Bamboo fucked around with this message at 11:33 on Apr 8, 2020

radmonger
Jun 6, 2011

Doctor_Fruitbat posted:

See also Brexit, where remainers furiously pushed economic stats to the front and it was like water off a duck's back in the face of "your life is poo poo, let's shake things up!".

The issue there was more that they misunderstood the class nature of Brexit voters, when it was not the case that they benefited from a stronger national economy.

Say a landlord went to tenants, and promised them higher rents and easier evictions. They might judge them irrational when they rejected what to them were self-evidently good things.

Necrothatcher
Mar 26, 2005





I feel like there's an opportunity to get ahead of the game by setting up some kind of apocalyptic death cult in the UK.

e: ah gently caress this is just basically the tories isn't it

Josef bugman
Nov 17, 2011

Pictured: Poster prepares to celebrate Holy Communion (probablY)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund

radmonger posted:

Can you give me some examples of words that are not used differently by different people?

No? That's what I was arguing.

Necrothatcher posted:

I feel like there's an opportunity to get ahead of the game by setting up some kind of apocalyptic death cult in the UK.

e: ah gently caress this is just basically the tories isn't it

Dammit you stole the joke I was going to make!

Josef bugman fucked around with this message at 11:39 on Apr 8, 2020

Azza Bamboo
Apr 7, 2018


THUNDERDOME LOSER 2021

Is this the lube that will push "maybe some private healthcare is good" through the electorate's collective anus?

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

forkboy84 posted:

Blair attended Fettes.
Prole humiliation, Nazi roleplay, being a human toilet [everything about it]

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

Guavanaut posted:

It's not liberal to organize as a group in a society where that group is marginalized as a result of shared conditions.

Or to paraphrase Steve Biko, if a bunch of shits are going to come along and say "we're white and that makes us better than you, because you are a non-white" then it makes perfect sense to organize along the lines of "we're not non-white, we're black, and we deserve the right to make that distinction ourselves".

As Biko himself points out, both the thesis of whiteness and the antithesis of blackness are socially constructed, and the correct synthesis is that dividing people by pigmentation is some bullshit, but it's not the people defending the antithesis who started that.

Where it becomes liberal is when a bunch of people from the group defended by the thesis start using the existence of the dichotomy to shut down any class based analysis.

I really do wonder how different South Africa would be now if the police hadn't murdered Brah Biko in captivity...

Brendan Rodgers
Jun 11, 2014





There's so many "let's not bring politics into our brave boris being ill" melts populating my social media, but I wonder what will they say when politics are overrunning the hospitals, politics are backing up the cremation/funeral services, and they see politics being taken in body bags from their neighbours houses.

Barry Foster
Dec 24, 2007

What is going wrong with that one (face is longer than it should be)

That's ludicrously optimistic for the USA, surely

Not that that makes our situation any better (and I'm still convinced it's going to be much, much worse than 66,000 here)

IllusionistTrixie
Feb 6, 2003

Brendan Rodgers posted:

There's so many "let's not bring politics into our brave boris being ill" melts populating my social media, but I wonder what will they say when politics are overrunning the hospitals, politics are backing up the cremation/funeral services, and they see politics being taken in body bags from their neighbours houses.

Nothing, because fingers crossed they'll be also dead.

Algol Star
Sep 6, 2010

Guavanaut posted:

I think there's a large difference between people saying "if people are going to exclude us on the basis of our pigmentation then we have the right to build structures that explicitly include us on that basis" and "you colored folks folks of color should vote for the man who treated a public bath as a black people zoo and lied about fighting a man called Corn Pop."

One of those is group socialist and one is liberal lies.

Back in the day when "terminally ill people should have the right to die with dignity without their partner doing 14 years for manslaughter" was the worst thing ever.

I'm not saying there aren't these issues or that marginalised groups shouldn't have their own organisation and structures. It's just there's a deliberate effort from liberals to co-opt this and focus entirely on superficial targets while distracting from real change and using this to attack agents of real change. This takes up almost the entirety of mainstream identity politics since the media loves it as it lets you feel good without actually changing or sacrificing anything. To be honest I wouldn't even have a problem with a lot of it if it wasn't used to distract from the real issues and used to attack genuine people while supporting establishment ideas.

goddamnedtwisto
Dec 31, 2004

If you ask me about the mole people in the London Underground, I WILL be forced to kill you
Fun Shoe

Barry Foster posted:

That's ludicrously optimistic for the USA, surely

Not that that makes our situation any better (and I'm still convinced it's going to be much, much worse than 66,000 here)

I think if it gets past the 50k number that was being bandied around it becomes anyones guess, because all of those pretty graphs that show how they get that number all have the hospitalisation rate staying *just* below the capacity of the NHS which I'm sure is rigorously researched and backed and not just wishful thinking and working backwards from that capacity. If we breach that, poo poo's going to go sideways really loving quickly.

Barry Foster
Dec 24, 2007

What is going wrong with that one (face is longer than it should be)

goddamnedtwisto posted:

I think if it gets past the 50k number that was being bandied around it becomes anyones guess, because all of those pretty graphs that show how they get that number all have the hospitalisation rate staying *just* below the capacity of the NHS which I'm sure is rigorously researched and backed and not just wishful thinking and working backwards from that capacity. If we breach that, poo poo's going to go sideways really loving quickly.

Yeah.

To be honest I'm still working from the old '60-80% infected, 7% mortality' thing

and that's not a pleasant number to contemplate

Azza Bamboo
Apr 7, 2018


THUNDERDOME LOSER 2021

Brendan Rodgers posted:

There's so many "let's not bring politics into our brave boris being ill" melts populating my social media, but I wonder what will they say when politics are overrunning the hospitals, politics are backing up the cremation/funeral services, and they see politics being taken in body bags from their neighbours houses.

They'll say "we have asked too much of the NHS. It's clear that their structures have disallowed their brave workers the resources and numbers needed to deal with this crisis. We need to release the burden on the NHS by providing an alternative to those who can afford it, and encouraging them to make use of this alternative."

What's more, if this becomes policy, the media focus won't be on "that's bullshit" it'll be on "if I'm making use of this alternative, why should I pay national insurance?"

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jippa
Feb 13, 2009
Those stats seem crazy.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply