Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Butternubs
Feb 15, 2012
Is the problem branding? A party left of labour will never work if they admit they're on the left.

Call it the UK First Sovereignty Blue Passport no Foreigners Party, claim that they're going to literally catapult all the immigrants into the sea and then once they get elected go back on it and enact a bunch of cool socialist policies instead, then blame the tories for making them do it. That seems to work for the other parties.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

One Day I Will Return To Your Side.
It's pretty awesome to find out through this dossier that all of our worst suspicions turned out to be 100% true about Liberals and Centrists and the degree to which they're willing to self-destroy and self-sabotage to spite the left.

Like, how the gently caress is the left going win anything through electoral means when they're dealing with people who are willing to LOSE AND COMMIT ELECTORAL SUICIDE rather than concede any kind of social democratic reforms?! Like they say the right wing are death cultists but at least they want to win on the road to apocalypse! Liberals WANT TO LOSE AND MAKE OTHERS LOSE JUST TO PREVENT A BETTER SOCIETY.

hoooly poo poo!!!

keep punching joe
Jan 22, 2006

Die Satan!
It's a shame that the Labour left didn't take the opportunity in the last 5 years to purge all of the liberal melts.

Oh well you'll know for the next time I suppose.

brian
Sep 11, 2001
I obtained this title through beard tax.

Al-Saqr posted:

It's pretty awesome to find out through this dossier that all of our worst suspicions turned out to be 100% true about Liberals and Centrists and the degree to which they're willing to self-destroy and self-sabotage to spite the left.

Like, how the gently caress is the left going win anything through electoral means when they're dealing with people who are willing to LOSE AND COMMIT ELECTORAL SUICIDE rather than concede any kind of social democratic reforms?! Like they say the right wing are death cultists but at least they want to win on the road to apocalypse! Liberals WANT TO LOSE AND MAKE OTHERS LOSE JUST TO PREVENT A BETTER SOCIETY.

hoooly poo poo!!!

they want to retain their jobs and elevated positions in society, in the society as it currently is, that's why and it happens to most people as they gain power and status

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

goddamnedtwisto posted:

I've not really been keeping up on this but I've seen three main themes:

- The EHF waves themselves are (unintentionally) the problem, by either damaging the lungs or (brace yourself physicists) changing the oxygen in the air so it can't be absorbed by the lungs
Heard a new one that the 5G destroys oxygen by converting it to energy.

That's amazing if true, because 1L of air contains about 300mg of oxygen, and the mass-energy equivalent of that is ~2.7×1013J, or almost 7,500MWh.

The UK uses 300TWh in total per year, so even if these 5G masts were only 20% efficient, they'd only have to go through 200m3 of air to run the whole country for a year, that's about 1.5 double decker buses worth, and that amount of air could be re-oxygenated with a single moderately sized tree.

5G is pretty cool! :pseudo:

Crankit
Feb 7, 2011

HE WATCHES

XMNN posted:



nature is beautiful

can birds not wear rings?

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
The one at the back's definitely trying.

Jippa
Feb 13, 2009
Eamonn Holmes is a 5G truther.

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010

The only thing these people are good at is distorting narratives. Essentially you could film them loving a pig and so long as every one of their mates agrees the story going forward will be about how you broke that person's privacy and distributed bestiality porn.

Julio Cruz
May 19, 2006
the report is terrible news but the absolute worst part of it is it's caused the return of weettakes :sigh:

Answers Me
Apr 24, 2012

Look up who Ashworth is married to, if you want a laugh.

Wachter
Mar 23, 2007

You and whose knees?

It's not quite true to say that nobody reacted to Eamonn Holmes' stupid loving 5G comment - the woman he was interviewing enthusiastically agreed with him that we shouldn't be taking the media at face value on the matter, but then went on to denounce the antenna vandals. So the overall message of the bit seemed to be that 5G actually might be related to CV, but that we shouldn't be smashing up 5G masts anyway. loving surreal

Calico Heart
Mar 22, 2012

"wich the worst part was what troll face did to sonic's corpse after words wich was rape it. at that point i looked away"



Can someone summarise what has happened and Starmer’s role plz

crispix
Mar 28, 2015

Grand-Maman m'a raconté
(Les éditions des amitiés franco-québécoises)

Hello, dear

Calico Heart posted:

Can someone summarise what has happened and Starmer’s role plz

The wreckers were significantly more depraved than many of us suspected. Keir's role is to be a startled looking pork roast in a suit who won't do very much at all about them or anything else.

crispix fucked around with this message at 16:46 on Apr 13, 2020

JordanKai
Aug 19, 2011

Get high and think of me.


Calico Heart posted:

Can someone summarise what has happened and Starmer’s role plz

The report on antisemitism within the Labour Party Part of the report on the efficacy of internal action against antisemitism in the Labour party was finalised, but party lawyers decided not to send to the EHRC. The report was leaked to various journalists soon afterwards and has now also been leaked to the public. It reveals that numerous of the more conservative higher ups of the party, including Emilie Oldknow and Iain McNicol, actively conspired to sink the party's chances in the general election, purge leftist members (who they consistently call "trots") from the party, bully minority MPs, and gridlock antisemitism investigations from being completed. Meanwhile, it reveals that Jeremy Corbyn pushed to get antisemitism investigations done and that he was doing his best to combat AS within the party.

Starmer goes completely unmentioned, but some of the main supporters of his leadership campaign are in there saying and doing some heinous stuff.

JordanKai fucked around with this message at 16:13 on Apr 13, 2020

mehall
Aug 27, 2010


JordanKai posted:

The report on antisemitism within the Labour Party was finalised, but party lawyers decided not to send to the EHRC. The report was leaked to various journalists soon afterwards and has now also been leaked to the public. It reveals that numerous of the more conservative higher ups of the party, including Emilie Oldknow and Iain McNicol, actively conspired to sink the party's chances in the general election, purge leftist members (who they consistently call "trots") from the party, bully minority MPs, and gridlock antisemitism investigations from being completed. Meanwhile, it reveals that Jeremy Corbyn pushed to get antisemitism investigations done and that he was doing his best to combat AS within the party.

Starmer goes completely unmentioned, but some of the main supporters of his leadership campaign are in there saying and doing some heinous stuff.

Your starting bit isn't quite right.

A document designed to cover the surrounding nature of the Labour parties internal actions on anti-Semitism was made, alongside the parties other submissions to the EHRC, and is now not being submitted (the claim is it was an internal document to help establish the situation between 2014 and 2019 and was intended as at most an addendum to the existing submissions)

The rest seems roughly right from a quick scan.

JordanKai
Aug 19, 2011

Get high and think of me.


mehall posted:

Your starting bit isn't quite right.

A document designed to cover the surrounding nature of the Labour parties internal actions on anti-Semitism was made, alongside the parties other submissions to the EHRC, and is now not being submitted (the claim is it was an internal document to help establish the situation between 2014 and 2019 and was intended as at most an addendum to the existing submissions)

The rest seems roughly right from a quick scan.

You're absolutely right, my bad! I fixed it.

goddamnedtwisto
Dec 31, 2004

If you ask me about the mole people in the London Underground, I WILL be forced to kill you
Fun Shoe

JordanKai posted:

The report on antisemitism within the Labour Party was finalised, but party lawyers decided not to send to the EHRC.

This take is getting a lot of traction but is completely untrue; the report is *part of* the submissions from Labour to the EHRC, and covers only a small (but admittedly very important) part of the story, the actions of the GLU - part of the disciplinary process of the party - between 2014 and 2019, to put context around the raw data about complaints that was submitted.

It's quite damaging to claim that it's the entirety (or even the majority) of the submissions of the EHRC because it only highlights a small number of cases and spends a lot of time talking about internecine conflict - if this was the actual full response then it would actually be pretty damning because it would suggest that this infighting was the whole of the story of antisemitism in the Labour Party, which is playing directly into the hands of the people attempting to weaponise the actual problem of antisemitism on the left.

serious gaylord
Sep 16, 2007

what.
I quit labour again.

Marmaduke!
May 19, 2009

Why would it do that!?
Silver lining on this is that whenever a bootlicker decries someone being called out on social media you can point them to this report to show how rubbish that will be if the complaints process sucks (which it usually does). Bonus points if they then argue that all of the examples in this report are invalid because it wasn't submitted to the proper authorities.

ronya
Nov 8, 2010

I'm the normal one.

You hate ridden fucks will regret your words when you eventually grow up.

Peace.
One can just read the conclusion - it is snappily written

quote:

We have shown here that, when antisemitism first began to emerge as a problem that needed to be addressed urgently in the Labour Party, our structures were not equipped to deal with it. The system for handling complaints and investigating them, and for taking disciplinary action against offenders, were dysfunctional. This was far too slow to change. The processes were ill-equipped for dealing with even a small number of complaints, relating not just to antisemitism but to all types of misconduct or prejudice, let alone the increase in complaints that resulted from party membership rising to unprecedented levels.

The research undertaken has also revealed two further specific problems.

The first is that, while political disagreement is normal in any democratic political party, an abnormal intensity of factional opposition to the Party leader during this time inhibited the proper functioning of the Labour Party bureaucracy, including the Governance and Legal Unit. This had an impact on the handling of complaints and disciplinary investigations, amongst many other areas of work.

The second is that Party management was for several years unequal to the task of effectively supervising existing procedures and transitioning to more robust and efficient systems. Whilst an opposition to antisemitism and to members who exhibit antisemitic conduct was evident, rigorous and far-reaching reforms neccessary to bring the Party’s procedures up to standard were not undertaken early enough.

Prior to March 2018, LOTO and Jeremy Corbyn himself had little to no oversight over the disciplinary process. Relations in general between LOTO and Labour HQ were explicit resistance to cooperation.

During this period, LOTO had little information about the handling of antisemitism cases (except extremely high-profile ones), other than through what they gleaned through the media. Contrary to claims that there was pressure from LOTO towards GLU (for example, to not enact suspensions) during this period, there was very little contact between the two offices. The “unwritten guidelines” from LOTO, which are referenced in the JLM submission to the Commission’s investigation, simply did not exist, and all of the evidence shows that LOTO could not exercise any authority over GLU. Indeed, if LOTO had been in a position to exercise such authority, the use of disciplinary processes for factional ends in the 2016 leadership election, would not have taken place, and the lack of cooperation documented during the 2017 general election could not have happened, as well as a range of other actions outlined in Chapter 2.

In the transitional period between Iain McNicol and Jennie Formby’s tenures as General Secretary, when GLU staff such as Sam Matthews initiated the emailing of antisemitism disciplinary cases to LOTO staff, decision-making authority never lay with LOTO staff, nor should it have. This was always a responsibility that lay with GLU. Although this consultation resulted in a 7,200% increase in suspensions compared to GLU’s previous rate of action, the short period when LOTO staff were consulted was not requested, desired or sustainable, and the incoming General Secretary Jennie Formby soon put a halt to it.

Over many years and leaderships, cases of significant reputational risk have involved consultation with LOTO, but this does not happen anymore, and only in cases involving elected officials, such as MPs or other high-profile elected representatives, are LOTO and/or the Parliamentary Labour Party Whips Office kept informed.

Since 2018, particularly since Jennie Formby became General Secretary in April 2018, there has been a steady, if imperfect, rate of improvement. Gradually all the reforms put into place have yielded results, as is exemplified by the statistics on the number of cases handled and how many are resulting in disciplinary action. For example:
- The tenfold increase in suspensions and NOIs from 2017 to 2018, and twenty-five fold increase between 2017 and 2019.
- The ninefold increase in the number of cases brought to NEC panels in the second half of 2018 compared to the first half, with more cases being brought in six months than in the previous two and a half years.
- The tenfold increase in the number of cases brought to NEC panels between 2017 and 2019.
- The huge increase in the number of cases brought to expulsion, from 0 in 2016 and 1 in 2017, to 10 in 2018 and 45 in 2019.

The Commission will also have considered the extensive written guidance which now exists for staff, NEC and NCC members, and the education which they receive. The results of this are apparent in the consistency and appropriateness of decisions which are now made, at all levels.
The new “fast-track” expulsion process, proposed by Jeremy Corbyn and approved at last year’s Annual Conference, has been transformational with regards to the speed with which the Party can deal with members who have exhibited clear-cut antisemitic views. For instance, a member sharing extreme antisemitic content online was expelled within ten days of a complaint about them first being received by the Party, while others have been expelled within twenty days of the Party receiving a complaint.

The Party is also now taking proactive and wide-reaching action to remove any influence of antisemites from the Labour Party. For example, GLU staff have met with Facebook a number of times to ask them to close down those groups which pose as “Labour supporting”, but have antisemitic content shared within them. GLU staff are using resources such as a Community Security Trust report published last year, and issues raised on Twitter, to proactively create disciplinary cases. GLU staff initiate their own investigations into antisemitic social media conduct from Labour members that they find online, rather than only acting on individuals reported to the Party, and, since summer 2019, staff have been conducting historical audits of previously mishandled or “lost” cases, in the light of the new guidance and procedures, to ensure that all complaints, historic and new, are now properly handled.

Finally, the following findings should be emphasised:
1. There is no evidence that, at any point in GLU’s history, antisemitism complaints were treated differently to any other complaints – the problems outlined affected all complaints about whatsoever subject. Whilst the #MeToo movement and allegations concerning MPs involved in sexual harassment led to a new specifically-tailored process for such complaints, a new specific process was then introduced for antisemitism complaints too.
2. There is also no evidence that any individual working for the Labour Party, former or current, has been motivated by antisemitic intent, nor that any complaints were ever treated less favourably because they came from a Jewish complainant or were concerned with allegations of antisemitism.
3. There is evidence that the lack of robust processes, systems, training, education and effective line management had a significant impact upon the thorough, consistent and expedient handling of all complaints. There is also evidence that there was previously much larger scope for human error, without safeguards in place to allow for correction of them.
4. The evidence demonstrates that, particularly from spring 2018 onwards, the Party has introduced appropriate processes, systems, training, education and effective line management to ensure antisemitism complaints are dealt with swiftly and robustly. These safeguards ensure that the past mistakes in the handling of antisemitism complaints cannot be repeated now.

We believe this report demonstrates an unprecedented level of openness, honesty and transparency in confronting our own past shortcomings. Our overriding objective regardless of anything else is to eradicate the virus of antisemitism from our Party and make our Party a safe and welcoming home for Jewish members.

Never Again.

Red Oktober
May 24, 2006

wiggly eyes!



If anyone wants a quick 'response to 5G claims' for someone posting trash on facebook or whatsapp I've pulled together a few sources from across the spectrum (BBC, guardian, tech press and FT) in the hopes that whomever is reading it will not discard at least one of them. Feel free to use it when you see people sparking off about it.

quote:

Just to put peoples' minds at ease, the idea of 5G being linked to _ANY_ health problems, including Covid, is absolutely 100% a hoax. 100% - not "well everything is possible", not "don't really know the facts" - 100% hoax.

Here are several separate articles from reputable sources, citing actual experts pointing out exactly this.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/52168096
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/apr/05/call-for-social-media-platforms-to-act-on-5g-mast-conspiracy-theory
https://www.techradar.com/news/5g-and-coronavirus-scientists-say-rumours-are-complete-and-utter-rubbish
https://www.ft.com/content/bcb37920-f902-4e97-84f7-6fd69df805b5

"There is no evidence that 5G mobile networks pose a threat to human health, an independent international standards body on Wednesday said after seven years of examining the scientific evidence.
The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), which was set up in 1992 to assess the impact of electromagnetic and acoustic waves on people and the environment."

If your family and friends are concerned about this, please show them some reputable reporting - enhanced network capability is going to be essential in the future to enable working from home and containing actual real threats like Covid - we deserve more than conspiracy theories.

moostaffa
Apr 2, 2008

People always ask me about Toad, It's fantastic. Let me tell you about Toad. I do very well with Toad. I love Toad. No one loves Toad more than me, BELIEVE ME. Toad loves me. I have the best Toad.

Red Oktober posted:

If anyone wants a quick 'response to 5G claims' for someone posting trash on facebook or whatsapp I've pulled together a few sources from across the spectrum (BBC, guardian, tech press and FT) in the hopes that whomever is reading it will not discard at least one of them. Feel free to use it when you see people sparking off about it.

Don't engage in serious arguments with anyone dumb or disingenuous enough to spout that 5G poo poo.

thrashingteeth
Dec 22, 2019

depressive hedonia
always tired
taco tuesday
I can't remember who posted the playlist of lefty documentaries on youtube but thank you!
Now I can get messily drunk, cry and watch a recreation of Orgreave.


(I've just copied it again in case anyone is interested)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ncrWxnxLjg

Oh dear me
Aug 14, 2012

I have burned numerous saucepans, sometimes right through the metal

TACD posted:

I want to help improve things, but just saying 'get involved' and 'organise' is not a useful instruction to somebody like me who has literally never in his life seen anything materially improve as the result of politics or organised action in general and therefore has no idea of what successful organisation looks like, and who doubts that such a thing is even possible any more.

'Organizing' is above all building a group of people with group consciousness, that is, a group of people who see each other as allies, who will act in concert even when the group has made tactical decisions they don't especially agree with, and when there are things they'd rather do, and when there are risks involved. It is the only way the impoverished can get power, the only defence against divide and rule tactics.

I think people have lost some capacity to do this because of mass entertainment and travel. The olds who grew up without much are so much more willing to turn out. And when everyone knows they have or could easily find other communities to socialize with, getting people to form alliances and stick with them through disappointments and disagreements is so much harder. As this thread currently shows, I think.

I do not know any organizations that currently have more good comrades in it than Momentum and the Labour Party, which is why I shall stay in them until that stops being true. We only just got control of the NEC in 2018 and then an election was always imminent, so people were reluctant to rock the boat. If we can take two things from the current debacle I think they should be that we always need to agree a left slate and vote for its candidates whatever our personal preferences, and we should value seizing positions of long-term power over short-term tactics. But for the second thing to work, people need to reconcile themselves to sticking with the project through defeats, and we don't seem to be doing that well.

big scary monsters
Sep 2, 2011

-~Skullwave~-
I'm not normally one to nitpick people's writing, especially in a casual setting like this, cos when people do that it's usually as a lazy gotcha. But it seems no fucker, including Tweetman, can spell the name of the Labour leader. So I will point it out this once, not having a go at anyone specifically, because I keep seeing it and it's a slightly unusual name: it's Keir Starmer, e before i, not Kier.

XMNN
Apr 26, 2008
I am incredibly stupid
maybe these people have subliminally conditioned everyone

https://www.kier.co.uk/

I only realised a couple of days ago that starmers name was spelt differently

Spuckuk
Aug 11, 2009

Being a bastard works



Catboy Autonomist posted:

Is anyone in the thread advocating for any kind of extraparliamentary organization be it through community organizing or tenant's unions or mutual aid networks or nah

Reformism (especially within the Labour Part which even way back historically was one of the few European socdem parties that didn't have Marxist roots), was always going to be a dead end and this feels like spam especially since I' haven't posted in UKMT for a while but I will drop this as a starting point for anyone who is interested, I just dunno how most of the people here could stomach organizing with Labour to begin with in spite of the alternatives being small which leads to something of a chicken-and-egg problem if people don't join them because they are considered irrelevant or incapable of effecting change

I'm happy to be with the IWW tho

Goon project, buy up the Morning Star, change its masthead to Goatse, fire all the TERFs into the sea.

big scary monsters
Sep 2, 2011

-~Skullwave~-

XMNN posted:

maybe these people have subliminally conditioned everyone

https://www.kier.co.uk/

I only realised a couple of days ago that starmers name was spelt differently

Yeah I think Kier is a variant that is also used. People misspell my name a lot too so maybe I feel especially that a persons' name is one thing that you should try and spell and pronounce correctly. Unless you're specifically making fun of them like with the current and previous health ministers.

e: Or France's Tweet Man

big scary monsters fucked around with this message at 16:55 on Apr 13, 2020

crispix
Mar 28, 2015

Grand-Maman m'a raconté
(Les éditions des amitiés franco-québécoises)

Hello, dear

big scary monsters posted:

I'm not normally one to nitpick people's writing, especially in a casual setting like this, cos when people do that it's usually as a lazy gotcha. But it seems no fucker, including Tweetman, can spell the name of the Labour leader. So I will point it out this once, not having a go at anyone specifically, because I keep seeing it and it's a slightly unusual name: it's Keir Starmer, e before i, not Kier.

I fixed my post. I forget it's a Celtic name and I default to German pronunciation of ei and ie

Kernel Monsoon
Jul 18, 2006
It's kind of incredible that the usual suspects on twitter just aren't reporting on this story at all. Laura K hasn't been on twitter in days and the likes of Peston are just ignoring it outright.

moostaffa
Apr 2, 2008

People always ask me about Toad, It's fantastic. Let me tell you about Toad. I do very well with Toad. I love Toad. No one loves Toad more than me, BELIEVE ME. Toad loves me. I have the best Toad.

Kernel Monsoon posted:

It's kind of incredible that the usual suspects on twitter just aren't reporting on this story at all. Laura K hasn't been on twitter in days and the likes of Peston are just ignoring it outright.

It's extremely credible

big scary monsters
Sep 2, 2011

-~Skullwave~-

crispix posted:

I fixed my post. I forget it's a Celtic name and I default to German pronunciation of ei and ie

Alt-right alt-history fanfic favourite, Kier Stürmer.

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer
gently caress sake

https://twitter.com/AaronBastani/status/1249725093967794179

gh0stpinballa
Mar 5, 2019

i know people don't wanna hear this but there is a reason why the guys who robbed banks and blew up okhrana horses came out on top 100 years ago, and the guys who meekly asked the labour right to form a unity shadow cabinet are now exiled forever.

Kernel Monsoon
Jul 18, 2006

moostaffa posted:

It's extremely credible

:negative:

It's true. All of it.

Bobstar
Feb 8, 2006

KartooshFace, you are not responding efficiently!

XMNN posted:

maybe these people have subliminally conditioned everyone

https://www.kier.co.uk/

I only realised a couple of days ago that starmers name was spelt differently

At least these guys spell themselves right :v:

Also one that annoyed me when he was a thing, it's Brian Leveson. Not Levison, Levenson, Levinson, or any of the other variants I've seen.

E: that reminds me, while mentally telling myself off for thinking "hehe, Keith Storm, superhero!", I got on to thinking about how it's important we use the names people want us to use / are actually their names, generally speaking. Which got me to thinking about language - in French and Spanish, you say "I call myself X" (me llamo / je m'appelle), which reinforces the choice aspect. In English it's "I'm called", which is one step away from "I get called", which has bad connotations. Just thought that was interesting.

Bobstar fucked around with this message at 17:19 on Apr 13, 2020

Jippa
Feb 13, 2009

big scary monsters posted:

Yeah I think Kier is a variant that is also used. People misspell my name a lot too so maybe I feel especially that a persons' name is one thing that you should try and spell and pronounce correctly. Unless you're specifically making fun of them like with the current and previous health ministers.

e: Or France's Tweet Man

Being mildly dyslexic it definitely makes me have to think longer than I should.

Tarnop
Nov 25, 2013

Pull me out

Al-Saqr posted:

It's pretty awesome to find out through this dossier that all of our worst suspicions turned out to be 100% true about Liberals and Centrists and the degree to which they're willing to self-destroy and self-sabotage to spite the left.

Like, how the gently caress is the left going win anything through electoral means when they're dealing with people who are willing to LOSE AND COMMIT ELECTORAL SUICIDE rather than concede any kind of social democratic reforms?! Like they say the right wing are death cultists but at least they want to win on the road to apocalypse! Liberals WANT TO LOSE AND MAKE OTHERS LOSE JUST TO PREVENT A BETTER SOCIETY.

hoooly poo poo!!!

It's a lot easier to understand if you don't think of it as self-sabotage. They're serving corporate interests, just like the Tories (mostly) do.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Doctor_Fruitbat
Jun 2, 2013



:laffo:

I was willing to give Starmer a chance to enact his ten pledges and see if the centrists had once again badly misread the room, but it seems the first big test has been failed right out the loving gate. Backstabbing and treachery embedded deep within the party apparatus? gently caress that, someone didn't follow the official channels, the greatest crime of all!

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply