Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
FRINGE
May 23, 2003
title stolen for lf posting

Apogee15 posted:

Most democrats do not want to abolish ICE.
Most democrats actually approved of Obama's actions in Libya.
Most democrats think the ACA was good legislation(like 94%).
Most democrats would prefer a public option(though it's close) to M4A.
Obama has like an 86% approval rating among democrats, so that includes many self-proclaimed progressives in the party.

And, I have discovered time and time again, most democrats have no loving idea what Obama actually did. Let alone Biden.

Which is where the dissonance comes from, in (for example) this thread when the actual history of their actions are brought up, and all that comes out is a keening wail the sounds faintly like ~hooooOOOOOOOOoooopechaaaaAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaange~. And occasionally some barking about ORANGEORANGE! ORANGE!

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Doktor Avalanche
Dec 30, 2008


From Branko Marcetic's "Yesterday's Man":
"Yet it was never enough. Biden’s frenzy over the issue would climb to new, outlandish heights by the end of the decade. In 1989, he suggested the new drug czar could encourage police teams to go into drug-laden neighborhoods and even schools to take on violence. Biden urged him to explore the idea of a vaccine that prevents drug addiction, a fantastical idea that a National Institute on Drug Abuse official warned would likely involve targeting neighborhoods of mostly black kids—and developing a product that would suppress not just the good feeling that resulted from drug use but any sense of enjoyment, so that “it would in effect make life not worth living.”38

Apogee think this is ridiculous but if you look into your heart you know it isn't, we're talking about a government which fed unsuspecting kids radioactive materials in their cornflakes

Shady Amish Terror
Oct 11, 2007
I'm not Amish by choice. 8(

Doctor Jeep posted:

From Branko Marcetic's "Yesterday's Man":
"Yet it was never enough. Biden’s frenzy over the issue would climb to new, outlandish heights by the end of the decade. In 1989, he suggested the new drug czar could encourage police teams to go into drug-laden neighborhoods and even schools to take on violence. Biden urged him to explore the idea of a vaccine that prevents drug addiction, a fantastical idea that a National Institute on Drug Abuse official warned would likely involve targeting neighborhoods of mostly black kids—and developing a product that would suppress not just the good feeling that resulted from drug use but any sense of enjoyment, so that “it would in effect make life not worth living.”38

Apogee think this is ridiculous but if you look into your heart you know it isn't, we're talking about a government which fed unsuspecting kids radioactive materials in their cornflakes

Thank you so much for finding a better source. I was just about to link a Buffalo News article from '89 lamenting that those mean, awful pharmacy companies won't invest in Joe Biden's Miracle Cure for Drug Use idea, just so that there would be SOME context.

PeterCat
Apr 8, 2020

Believe women.

FRINGE posted:

And, I have discovered time and time again, most democrats have no loving idea what Obama actually did. Let alone Biden.

Which is where the dissonance comes from, in (for example) this thread when the actual history of their actions are brought up, and all that comes out is a keening wail the sounds faintly like ~hooooOOOOOOOOoooopechaaaaAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaange~. And occasionally some barking about ORANGEORANGE! ORANGE!

Hey dude, I caucused for Bernie, I maxed out my contributions for Bernie, I sold Bernie to as many people as I could. I'm not happy about any of this, but it's still better than Trump.

Marxalot
Dec 24, 2008

Appropriator of
Dan Crenshaw's Eyepatch

Scooter_McCabe posted:

You're picking a fight where there isn't one, you need to stop doing that TIA.

The key difference, as stated by that article, is stating that trump codified separating people instead of just letting it happen as a consequence of capturing and deporting literally every hispanic you can get your hands on. What you said has been consistently trotted out, verbatim, as an unironic defense of the Obama administration's immigration policy for the past 4 years so please forgive me if I misunderstood your intentions :angel:



FRINGE posted:

And, I have discovered time and time again, most democrats have no loving idea what Obama actually did. Let alone Biden.

Which is where the dissonance comes from, in (for example) this thread when the actual history of their actions are brought up, and all that comes out is a keening wail the sounds faintly like ~hooooOOOOOOOOoooopechaaaaAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaange~. And occasionally some barking about ORANGEORANGE! ORANGE!

In fairness, I remember a lot of the awful poo poo either getting no coverage, or the only coverage being Smart Serious People tisk tisking about how whatever Obama is doing is somehow Pragmatic and Important and that if you disagree with how things are being done then you're just Unrealistic or Supporting Terrorism because his Hands are Tied. It's not like the media got -that- much shittier in the past few years.

Marxalot fucked around with this message at 17:41 on Apr 24, 2020

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

I remember a lot of Democrats being upset about Bernie accepting the Joe Rogan endorsement, so I’m kinda surprised there hasn’t been more outrage that Biden is not just accepting the support of Larry Summers but is taking advice from him too.

Larry Summers who told a audience in 2005 that it’s possible that women are just inferior to men. That’s one of Biden’s core advisors.


And then you get into Summer’s policies and it is obvious that Biden’s running a classically conservative campaign that wants to ensure that under a Biden administration “nothing will change.”

That’s not progressive, that’s not even neoliberal, it’s just conservative.

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010

Trabisnikof posted:

I remember a lot of Democrats being upset about Bernie accepting the Joe Rogan endorsement, so I’m kinda surprised there hasn’t been more outrage that Biden is not just accepting the support of Larry Summers but is taking advice from him too.

Larry Summers who told a audience in 2005 that it’s possible that women are just inferior to men. That’s one of Biden’s core advisors.


And then you get into Summer’s policies and it is obvious that Biden’s running a classically conservative campaign that wants to ensure that under a Biden administration “nothing will change.”

That’s not progressive, that’s not even neoliberal, it’s just conservative.

They don't care, they never cared, their intent was only ever to drown you in tedious conversations so they didn't have to talk about why they think you don't deserve health care.

Shady Amish Terror
Oct 11, 2007
I'm not Amish by choice. 8(
Also amusing is that prosecutors mysteriously dropped charges against Biden's kids for their drug use, while he was being hailed as the stern face in the war against drugs. Crazy how that works.

Also also, Biden continued to push the War on Drugs and the vilification of drug users well past the point it was understood that much of the violence had to do with the War on Drugs itself, and the policies and positions put forth continue to gently caress over our ability to deal with drug use as a problem well into the age of the opioid epidemic.

That said, Biden probably would have continued campaigning on the war on drugs if the opportunity for war in the middle east hadn't presented itself, which he was also a long-time advocate of.

Also also also, as to the above, that would be the same Larry Summers who said in an interview that inequality may be increasing because 'more people are getting treated how they deserve', yes?

Apogee15
Jun 16, 2013

FRINGE posted:

And, I have discovered time and time again, most democrats have no loving idea what Obama actually did.

What makes you think they don't know, as opposed to knowing and just not having a problem with it? I'm not typically one to argue that the general public is not incredibly ignorant and misinformed, but it definitely seems to me that a lot of people assume that because they have a problem with something means everyone else would too if only they knew. I think that's not necessarily a good assumption.

Alkabob
May 31, 2011
I would like to speak to the manager about the socialists, please

Marxalot posted:

The key difference, as stated by that article, is stating that trump codified separating people instead of just letting it happen as a consequence of capturing and deporting literally every hispanic you can get your hands on. What you said has been consistently trotted out, verbatim, as an unironic defense of the Obama administration's immigration policy for the past 4 years so please forgive me if I misunderstood your intentions :angel:


No worries, our failed immigration policies are a major gripe of mine.

FRINGE
May 23, 2003
title stolen for lf posting

PeterCat posted:

Hey dude, I caucused for Bernie, I maxed out my contributions for Bernie, I sold Bernie to as many people as I could. I'm not happy about any of this, but it's still better than Trump.
If you actually know their histories, and are making a fully informed decision between lovely trump and lovely joe, then thats legit.

The drum I am beating is to wake up the people that still, in 2020, think Biden is not a rightwing warmongering criminal, and the ones that think Obama was not a rightwing warmongering assassin fetishist.

People should be able to open their eyes, see what they are getting, and stomach it.



Marxalot posted:

In fairness, I remember a lot of the awful poo poo either getting no coverage, or the only coverage being Smart Serious People tisk tisking about how whatever Obama is doing is somehow Pragmatic and Important and that if you disagree with how things are being done then you're just Unrealistic or Supporting Terrorism because his Hands are Tied. It's not like the media got -that- much shittier in the past few years.
I agree.

Marxalot
Dec 24, 2008

Appropriator of
Dan Crenshaw's Eyepatch

Shady Amish Terror posted:

Also amusing is that prosecutors mysteriously dropped charges against Biden's kids for their drug use, while he was being hailed as the stern face in the war against drugs. Crazy how that works.

Also also, Biden continued to push the War on Drugs and the vilification of drug users well past the point it was understood that much of the violence had to do with the War on Drugs itself, and the policies and positions put forth continue to gently caress over our ability to deal with drug use as a problem well into the age of the opioid epidemic.

That said, Biden probably would have continued campaigning on the war on drugs if the opportunity for war in the middle east hadn't presented itself, which he was also a long-time advocate of.

Also also also, as to the above, that would be the same Larry Summers who said in an interview that inequality may be increasing because 'more people are getting treated how they deserve', yes?

He's also the same Larry Summers who tried getting racist at Cornel West as a part of some weird PR thing to make it look like he was reigning in the radical blackness of the Harvard African American studies department. West promptly gave Harvard the double bird and left for Princeton.


Summers is a loving great guy.

joepinetree
Apr 5, 2012

Willo567 posted:

When did the Democrats stick kids in cages or stopped immigration?

Obama created the family detention program. When the courts blocked indefinite detention of families, the Obama administration solution was to expedite deportations, restrict access to a lawyer, and do things like make 3 year olds represent themselves in court. Not to mention that this is a silly technicality. Obama ramped way up the detention of unaccompanied minors, and under him ICE would frequently target school bus stops.
The difference between Obama and Trump is that Obama's solution to not having indefinite detention was to deny due process and expedite deportations, and Trump's is to detain adults indefinitely (since the law signed by Bill Clinto removed judicial review from immigration decisisons) and separate the children to be assigned to child services (since the courts have blocked the indefinite detention of children but not adults).

As for blocking immigration, the only reason DREAMers can't just adjust status and become permanent residents is that Clinton signed IIRIRA, a 1996 law that blocked anyone who has been in the US illegally from applying for a visa or any other legal status. Up until 1996, people who got married, got an employer sponsor, etc, could apply for adjustment of status. Clinton made that impossible and requires DREAMers to leave the country for 10 years before being even eligible to apply.

https://twitter.com/ImmCivilRights/status/1008902662828511232


Boywhiz88 posted:

I haphazardly caught up to the last 6 pages or so, but HAHAHAHAHAHAHANAHAHA at the guy who brought up Puerto Rico. Part of why PR was so hosed was because of the awful poo poo the Obama administration pushed on it. Debt shenanigans, which tied into stuff w the power grid and gave Trump ammo for poo poo-talk.

So lol on the idea that they would have done better under Clinton’s neoliberal flunkies.

Yeah. Puerto Rico is under an unelected board with absolute power to dictate spending caps that is permanently made up of 4 people appointed by republicans and 3 people appointed by democrats.


Scooter_McCabe posted:

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2019/sep/13/joe-biden/fact-checking-biden-use-cages-during-obama-adminis/

The difference between Obama and Trump is that it was not policy to forcibly separate families.


Both Obama and Trump tried to detain families indefinitely. IIRIRA, signed into law by bill clinton gave the government the power to do indefinite detentions. But the courts blocked that, under the Flores settlement, which said that children (but not adults) cannot be detained indefinitely. The solution that the Obama administration found was to deny access to lawyers and expedite deportations. The solution that Trump has found is to detain the parents and put the children in line for social services. It would be very hard to make a principled argument as to which is more humane.

Apogee15
Jun 16, 2013

FRINGE posted:

The drum I am beating is to wake up the people that still, in 2020, think Biden is not a rightwing warmongering criminal, and the ones that think Obama was not a rightwing warmongering assassin fetishist.

When was the last time we didn't have a "rightwing warmonger criminal president"?

FRINGE
May 23, 2003
title stolen for lf posting

Trabisnikof posted:

I remember a lot of Democrats being upset about Bernie accepting the Joe Rogan endorsement, so I’m kinda surprised there hasn’t been more outrage that Biden is not just accepting the support of Larry Summers but is taking advice from him too.

Larry Summers who told a audience in 2005 that it’s possible that women are just inferior to men. That’s one of Biden’s core advisors.


And then you get into Summer’s policies and it is obvious that Biden’s running a classically conservative campaign that wants to ensure that under a Biden administration “nothing will change.”

That’s not progressive, that’s not even neoliberal, it’s just conservative.

Summers is also part of the economic (literally, not qanon bs) cabal that crafted the situation that lead to 2008. (Greenspan, Rubens, Summers... i would have to look for the others.)

That was with Clintons help and approval. (Barnes tried to warn everyone about this, and she was laughed at. PBS documentary: "The Warning".)

Then Obama came in and gave Rubens apprentice (Gheitner) control over Treasury. And then the bank handouts flowed like the rivers of paradise.

FRINGE
May 23, 2003
title stolen for lf posting

Apogee15 posted:

When was the last time we didn't have a "rightwing warmonger criminal president"?

Carter was neither one and Trump isnt focused enough to be a warmonger, just a loud mouthed grifter doing shitloads of incidental damage.

Speaking of, this was a weird one-off story from a while ago:

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-jimmy-carter-china-war-infrastructure-economy-trade-war-church-1396086

quote:

Former President Jimmy Carter told a church congregation this weekend that he had spoken with President Donald Trump about China on Saturday, and said the commander in chief was worried that Beijing had outpaced its global rivals.

According to Emma Hurt, a reporter for NPR affiliate WABE, Carter spoke of the call during his regular Sunday School lesson at Maranatha Baptist Church in his hometown of Plains, Georgia.

Carter, 94, said Trump was worried that "China is getting ahead of us," and suggested the president was right to be concerned.

He told the congregation that Trump feared China's growing economic strength. Economic modeling indicated that China would overtake the U.S. as the world's strongest economy by 2030, and many experts have said that we were already living in what has been dubbed the "Chinese Century."

Carter said he did not "really fear that time, but it bothers President Trump and I don't know why. I'm not criticizing him this morning," he added, to laughs from fellow churchgoers.

Carter—who normalized diplomatic relations between Washington and Beijing in 1979—suggested that China's breakneck growth had been facilitated by sensible investment and buoyed by peace.

"Since 1979, do you know how many times China has been at war with anybody?" Carter asked. "None. And we have stayed at war." The U.S., he noted, has only enjoyed 16 years of peace in its 242-year history, making the country "the most warlike nation in the history of the world," Carter said. This is, he said, because of America's tendency to force other nations to "adopt our American principles."

In China, meanwhile, the economic benefits of peace were clear to the eye. "How many miles of high-speed railroad do we have in this country?" he asked. While China has some 18,000 miles of high-speed rail, the U.S. has "wasted, I think, $3 trillion" on military spending. "It's more than you can imagine. China has not wasted a single penny on war, and that's why they're ahead of us. In almost every way."

"And I think the difference is if you take $3 trillion and put it in American infrastructure you'd probably have $2 trillion leftover. We'd have high-speed railroad. We'd have bridges that aren't collapsing, we'd have roads that are maintained properly. Our education system would be as good as that of say South Korea or Hong Kong," Carter told the congregation.

Marxalot
Dec 24, 2008

Appropriator of
Dan Crenshaw's Eyepatch

FRINGE posted:

Carter was neither one and Trump isnt focused enough to be a warmonger, just a loud mouthed grifter doing shitloads of incidental damage.

Speaking of, this was a weird one-off story from a while ago:

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-jimmy-carter-china-war-infrastructure-economy-trade-war-church-1396086

Carter was a bit of a neolib but I don't know enough of his history to call him a right winger with literally any credibility at all. I know there's a significant number of leftists who blame him for shitloads of union busting but my 1970-80s US history is really shoddy.

Lemming
Apr 21, 2008

Trabisnikof posted:

I remember a lot of Democrats being upset about Bernie accepting the Joe Rogan endorsement, so I’m kinda surprised there hasn’t been more outrage that Biden is not just accepting the support of Larry Summers but is taking advice from him too.

Don't lie you're not surprised

FRINGE
May 23, 2003
title stolen for lf posting

Marxalot posted:

Carter was a bit of a neolib but I don't know enough of his history to call him a right winger with literally any credibility at all. I know there's a significant number of leftists who blame him for shitloads of union busting but my 1970-80s US history is really shoddy.

I know less about him than the more recent ones, but this is unheard of since his time:

quote:

Carter believed that previous administrations had erred in allowing the Cold War concerns and Realpolitik to dominate foreign policy. His administration placed a new emphasis on human rights, democratic values, nuclear proliferation, and global poverty. The Carter administration's human rights emphasis was part of a broader, worldwide focus on human rights in the 1970s, as non-governmental organizations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch became increasingly prominent.

He also made Canada like us again. :canada:

But he did get caught up in the nato-v-warsaw buildup and (as always) the middle east quagmire.

readingatwork
Jan 8, 2009

Hello Fatty!


Fun Shoe

FRINGE posted:

And, I have discovered time and time again, most democrats have no loving idea what Obama actually did. Let alone Biden.

Which is where the dissonance comes from, in (for example) this thread when the actual history of their actions are brought up, and all that comes out is a keening wail the sounds faintly like ~hooooOOOOOOOOoooopechaaaaAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaange~. And occasionally some barking about ORANGEORANGE! ORANGE!

The problem is that most Democrats trust (and almost exclusively rely on) mainstream news sources like MSNBC, WaPo, and NYT and can’t fathom the idea that they might bury inconvenient stories or even outright lie. My parents for example absolutely LOVE Rachel Maddow and it’s very hard to explain to them that she’s in many ways just as dishonest as somebody like Hannity. She’s nice and funny and shares drink recipes so how can she be bad???

E: At least they’re not into Fox News so thank Satan for that at least.

readingatwork fucked around with this message at 18:30 on Apr 24, 2020

ManBoyChef
Aug 1, 2019

Deadbeat Dad



PeterCat posted:

Hey dude, I caucused for Bernie, I maxed out my contributions for Bernie, I sold Bernie to as many people as I could. I'm not happy about any of this, but it's still better than Trump.

Then withhold your vote. Show them that what has been happening for the last 50 years is unacceptable to you. or dont. your choice

PeterCat
Apr 8, 2020

Believe women.

ManBoyChef posted:

Then withhold your vote. Show them that what has been happening for the last 50 years is unacceptable to you. or dont. your choice

I"m certain that me withholding my vote in a red state is going to send a message to either party.

V. Illych L.
Apr 11, 2008

ASK ME ABOUT LUMBER

PeterCat posted:

I"m certain that me withholding my vote in a red state is going to send a message to either party.

this is an amusing inversion of the normal trope

Boywhiz88
Sep 11, 2005

floating 26" off da ground. BURR!

ManBoyChef posted:

Then withhold your vote. Show them that what has been happening for the last 50 years is unacceptable to you. or dont. your choice

Seriously.

What’s their motivation to court your vote? You may not give them that sweet grift money, but they got the vote. They receive that rebuttal of public “support.” You know what gives the Democrat head-honchos the finger? A 55/45 blowout with a low Democratic turnout for the presidential election. Vote down ballot for whatever you want, but don’t just fork over the vote.

ManBoyChef
Aug 1, 2019

Deadbeat Dad



Apogee15 posted:

When was the last time we didn't have a "rightwing warmonger criminal president"?

Not in my lifetime and I'm 37.

ManBoyChef
Aug 1, 2019

Deadbeat Dad



Boywhiz88 posted:

Seriously.

What’s their motivation to court your vote? You may not give them that sweet grift money, but they got the vote. They receive that rebuttal of public “support.” You know what gives the Democrat head-honchos the finger? A 55/45 blowout with a low Democratic turnout for the presidential election. Vote down ballot for whatever you want, but don’t just fork over the vote.

those ghouls will never get my vote. I'm absolutely with you on this. I look at voting for Biden as me approving of what they are doing. I don't

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

Boywhiz88 posted:

You know what gives the Democrat head-honchos the finger? Voting them out in your state party convention

Trabisnikof posted:

I remember a lot of Democrats being upset about Bernie accepting the Joe Rogan endorsement, so I’m kinda surprised there hasn’t been more outrage that Biden is not just accepting the support of Larry Summers but is taking advice from him too.

i dunno i'm seeing a pretty good amount of outrage now that it's been pointed out loudly enough

Feldegast42
Oct 29, 2011

COMMENCE THE RITE OF SHITPOSTING

quote:

"There was a feeling that [the White House] needed to show the American public that you believed in enforcement, and that [we weren’t pushing for] open borders. But in hindsight I was like, what did we get for that? We deported more people than ever before. All these families separated, and Republicans didn’t give him one ounce of credit. There may as well have been open borders for five years."

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2019/03/the-obama-boys

John Wick of Dogs
Mar 4, 2017

A real hellraiser


https://twitter.com/ryangrim/status/1253739593104588800?s=19

Well holy poo poo. Reades mom might have talked about the Biden assault on Larry King in the 90s. This would prove she has been talking about the story for a long time.

Rainbow Knight
Apr 19, 2006

We die.
We pray.
To live.
We serve

readingatwork posted:

One legitimate point in Biden's favor is that day he told the press the Obama administration supported gay marriage (they did not at the time, he was full of poo poo). He essentially forced Obama to finally fully embrace gay rights and may inadvertently be the one most responsible for the tone shift that happened on the topic in the 10's which later paved the way for the courts to legalize gay marriage.

I really think that was just something he said to appeal to some voters. I mean, lgbtq are mostly democrats as near as I could tell, and he was running right after bush so I think he figured that he could get away with it. It sounds like I'm giving him too much credit but I think he's just ambivalent about the whole thing tbh.

Shady Amish Terror
Oct 11, 2007
I'm not Amish by choice. 8(
I will probably be an overthinking dumbass my entire life, doomed to endlessly triangulate and waver and weigh, but goddamn, Biden is several bridges of poo poo too far.

I can't justify voting to give power over others to a rapist. An electoral competition between two of them is a loving non-choice.

I can't justify voting for the candidate who tells the marginalized and vulnerable to suck it up and deal because he has no empathy for them.

I can't justify voting for the candidate who spent his entire life creating the tools and institutions of oppression now being used by his opponent.

I can't justify voting for the candidate who fought against his own party to seat conservative judges.

I can't justify voting for one of the principal architects of student debt enslavement, of the War on Drugs, of the forever-wars in the middle east.

Joe Biden is one of the biggest reasons we have Trump in the first place. He opposed integration, eulogized Strom Thurmond, normalized police overreach, and his entire career right up into his campaign has talked about cutting away social safety nets. Joe Biden is almost certainly responsible for more deaths and more ruined lives than Trump could ever be, because Trump doesn't have the dedication to devote his entire life to it the way Joe has.

Whether Joe gets the nomination because voters like him, or don't know him, or don't care, or because the DNC outright rigged the results (and probably some combination of all of these are important), I cannot justify voting for him. I'm kind of disgusted by the illusion of the charming 'Diamond Joe', by the fact that I once didn't know how deep his personal shittiness extended, and by the fact that a loving Onion parody has apparently become his face in the minds of many.

gently caress hellworld

Boywhiz88
Sep 11, 2005

floating 26" off da ground. BURR!

ManBoyChef posted:

those ghouls will never get my vote. I'm absolutely with you on this. I look at voting for Biden as me approving of what they are doing. I don't

For sure. I was more agreeing w/ you and addressing PeterCat.

readingatwork
Jan 8, 2009

Hello Fatty!


Fun Shoe

Rainbow Knight posted:

I really think that was just something he said to appeal to some voters. I mean, lgbtq are mostly democrats as near as I could tell, and he was running right after bush so I think he figured that he could get away with it. It sounds like I'm giving him too much credit but I think he's just ambivalent about the whole thing tbh.

Oh yeah let me be clear here. It was something he just said in the moment for some quick praise, not some Machiavellian masterstroke. A gaffe basically. The Obama administration actually walked the statement back for a bit before realizing that they’d look like huge assholes for doing that and just going with it.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


How are you going to guilt anyone into voting Biden when his campaign thinks it's acceptable to hire Summers as an advisor?

Doktor Avalanche
Dec 30, 2008

Groovelord Neato posted:

How are you going to guilt anyone into voting Biden when his campaign thinks it's acceptable to hire Summers as an advisor?

"there's a dang cheeto in the white house!"

punishedkissinger
Sep 20, 2017

Intercept is running with the new info on Biden rape

https://theintercept.com/2020/04/24/new-evidence-tara-reade-joe-biden

Euphoriaphone
Aug 10, 2006

Apogee15 posted:

Most democrats do not want to abolish ICE. Most democrats actually approved of Obama's actions in Libya. Most democrats think the ACA was good legislation(like 94%). Most democrats would prefer a public option(though it's close) to M4A.

How many Democrats interpret "abolish ICE" as "enforce immigration laws"? How many Democrats are even aware of Obama's action in Libya, and could explain what happened? Most Democrats (and even people in this forum) would say that the ACA getting rid of pre-existing condition restrictions in health insurance was good, but I'd bet most voters would be hard pressed to articulate anything positive ACA did beyond that.

Voters aren't economic hypotheticals who have perfect information and pick candidates that most closely align with their own beliefs. Even if you took that polling at face value, the fact is voters don't pull the lever for their ideologically closest candidate.

How are u
May 19, 2005

by Azathoth

ManBoyChef posted:


I need to ask you, are you comfortable? Are your needs met? I think a lot of how people view the "harm minimization in voting for the lesser of two evils" has to do with whether or not people are poor.

I have $100,000+ in student loan debt, I have $10,000 in credit card debt. I graduated college at the beginning of the Great Recession and last year started a job where I was making the most I have ever made at about $30,000/year. I was laid off because of this pandemic a month ago. I haven't had health insurance since I was 26 except for 1 year on Michigan Medicaid (possible because of the Obamacare Medicaid expansion, thanks Obama!) which was incredible, but I don't have it any longer.

I could never dream of owning a house, no idea what I'll do if my hand-me-down car from my dead grandparents dies on me, have no savings, I'm unemployed for however long this pandemic lasts. I'm luckier than many because my partner has a steady job (so far) so we're not in imminent danger of being out on the street and I don't have life threatening chronic health problems on top of everything else.

I wanted Bernie to win so badly. For a moment in January I even began to think it could happen.

I'll be voting for whoever is (D) in November because whoever that is is going to be infinitely better for me and a hundred million other Americans than mother loving Donald J Trump.

Cpt_Obvious
Jun 18, 2007

How are u posted:

I haven't had health insurance since I was 26 except for 1 year on Michigan Medicaid (possible because of the Obamacare Medicaid expansion, thanks Obama!) which was incredible, but I don't have it any longer.

I think this is the most important part of your entire post. This is the soul of incrementalism, to make small, minor changes that only function as to create short term stability at the cost of long term fragility. It is directly because of the Democrats' failure to significantly reform medical care that people are literally dying of insulin rationing.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

How are u posted:

I have $100,000+ in student loan debt, I have $10,000 in credit card debt. I graduated college at the beginning of the Great Recession and last year started a job where I was making the most I have ever made at about $30,000/year. I was laid off because of this pandemic a month ago. I haven't had health insurance since I was 26 except for 1 year on Michigan Medicaid (possible because of the Obamacare Medicaid expansion, thanks Obama!) which was incredible, but I don't have it any longer.

check out your resumed eligibility for medicaid and/or your eligibility for ACA subsidies, because if you're in an expanded Medicaid state you're eligible for one or the other, unless your partner Makes Too Much Money and you're legally enough attached to them

this goes for everybody who is below 400% of the federal poverty line, btw

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply