Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Venomous
Nov 7, 2011





nobody is motivated to vote for Biden, but considering how much people hated Hillary, people will be even less motivated to vote for him if Hillary of all people becomes VP

loving incredible how Yank liberalism is committed to making the wrong decisions and hoping the proletariat will support them

such is life I guess

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Eminai
Apr 29, 2013

I agree with Dante, that the hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in a period of moral crisis maintain their neutrality.

Grouchio posted:

Biden might make Hilary his VP. He tweeted (I'm with her) to Hilary's tweet about a 3pm meeting she's been invited to.

I might vomit

It's actually very clever. If Biden loses, his VP will be tainted going forward as someone who both enabled a rapist seeking the Oval Office and as someone who managed to lose a Presidential election to Donald loving Trump. So they pick the only person in the world who already has that baggage. It shows they believe in nothing and are already planning on losing the election, but that's kind of wrapped up in the phrase "presumptive nominee Joe Biden".

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

bobjr posted:

They aren’t going to make Hillary VP, only because the only person who thinks that’s a good idea is Hillary herself

Hillary owns the party.

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



evilweasel posted:

i don't get this "maybe democrats secretly don't care about voting rights"

you know why democrats are in favor of expanding voting rights and republicans aren't? because it is directly in the interests of democrats to do so, because they're more likely to get elected if more people can vote. and that is in their interests even if their only plan is to sell everyone out to corporate overlords because if they get elected as, say, governor of georgia, they can command a higher price than as, say, a democrat with no current state office in georgia

then why aren't they doing it in the spaces where they are able to effect that change right now? I mean you can't just say this is an insane possibility when it's been standard practice in blue strongholds since forever

nivdes posted:

they do not have "popular power" or any sort of meaningful power when it comes to blocking judicial nominees

the Dems don't, because they're cowards who are terrified of engaging with or firing up their base. It's why Obama worked a hundred infinity times harder to kill OWS than he did to help the Walker recall campaign. It's why Biden isn't even running on that SCOTUS seat like Trump did and is instead trying to get momentum behind another alien exclusion act

politics does not begin and end in back rooms in congress and they have supporters in every single Republican district whose can be encouraged to be outraged and that outrage harnessed

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



I still say Harris or Abrams would be the worst possible VP picks, but if Hillary is actually under consideration she's by far the worst

She barely campaigned for Obama in 08 so I don't see her starting now, maybe she's just bored

Solanumai
Mar 26, 2006

It's shrine maiden, not shrine maid!

evilweasel posted:

i don't get this "maybe democrats secretly don't care about voting rights"

Hi. I was encouraged by the presumptive Democratic Presidential nominee to vote during a loving pandemic, and then told afterwards that this vote was democratic.

They do not seem to have a very high bar set for what they consider to be fair elections. This isn't a secret.

e: Youth voting sites in Texas having one booth and 5 hour lines can be blamed on the GOP if you want, but don't act like Dems weren't treating it like a loving happy accident.

Solanumai fucked around with this message at 18:43 on Apr 28, 2020

Venomous
Nov 7, 2011





like, I genuinely struggle to see how the Democrats have any hope of winning

if they keep Biden and pick Hillary as VP, they're looking at a repeat of 2016 at the bare minimum, but with Trump winning the popular vote decisively

this is going to be a goddamn landslide.

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



Shere posted:

Hi. I was encouraged by the presumptive Democratic Presidential nominee to vote during a loving pandemic, and then told afterwards that this vote was democratic.

They do not seem to have a very high bar set for what they consider to be fair elections. This isn't a secret.

also if you voted by mail to avoid the pandemic, they tossed out your vote! If you want to vote for Bernie in New York, tough poo poo, you'll have to vote for Biden or nobody and it'll still have to be in person!

but yeah I'm sure the Dem machines that are famous for back room electioneering via ballot access are suuuuuper committed to opening things up, if only I could think of an example where they actually followed through on it lmao

meanwhile my Republican governor pushed our primary back and rolled out no-questions absentee exception for this year, and the convenient web form to sign up for it launched today

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



Venomous posted:

like, I genuinely struggle to see how the Democrats have any hope of winning

if they keep Biden and pick Hillary as VP, they're looking at a repeat of 2016 at the bare minimum, but with Trump winning the popular vote decisively

this is going to be a goddamn landslide.

Trump would demand he be able to debate as the VP as well in this case

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

Epic High Five posted:

then why aren't they doing it in the spaces where they are able to effect that change right now? I mean you can't just say this is an insane possibility when it's been standard practice in blue strongholds since forever

a lot of blue states are doing it

many of the holdouts (e.g. new york, massachussets) have local machine politics corruption issues where the incentives are different

in any state where there's been a history of republican control (e.g. georgia) or nationwide, the incentives are strongly in favor of democrats doing it. that is why republicans supress votes; because it's directly in their interests to do so.

StratGoatCom
Aug 6, 2019

Our security is guaranteed by being able to melt the eyeballs of any other forum's denizens at 15 minutes notice


Maybe they're about to swap him for her :bick::hf::kheldragar:

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

Venomous posted:

like, I genuinely struggle to see how the Democrats have any hope of winning

if they keep Biden and pick Hillary as VP, they're looking at a repeat of 2016 at the bare minimum, but with Trump winning the popular vote decisively

this is going to be a goddamn landslide.

it leaked, its official that hillary is going to be announced as the pick

Excelzior
Jun 24, 2013

StratGoatCom posted:

Maybe they're about to swap him for her :bick::hf::kheldragar:

naming her as VP would essentially be this regardless

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

evilweasel posted:

a lot of blue states are doing it

many of the holdouts (e.g. new york, massachussets) have local machine politics corruption issues where the incentives are different

in any state where there's been a history of republican control (e.g. georgia) or nationwide, the incentives are strongly in favor of democrats doing it. that is why republicans supress votes; because it's directly in their interests to do so.

So they don't care about voting rights unless it personally benefits the party? Sounds like they don't actually care about voting rights.

Ague Proof
Jun 5, 2014

they told me
I was everything

Grouchio posted:

Biden might make Hilary his VP. He tweeted (I'm with her) to Hilary's tweet about a 3pm meeting she's been invited to.

I might vomit

Isn't Hillary a TERF.

I thought transphobia was supposed to be the one red line that could not be crossed. Guess not.

Pentecoastal Elites
Feb 27, 2007

HRC as VP would be absolutely, 100% the funniest loving thing ever to happen and I am here clap for clap it clap

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



I, personally, think she's just bored or wanting to do this because it's specifically a women's forum.

But god drat would it just be incredible if Hillary were named VP. Biden wouldn't last a week after the convention

cracks and pings as far as the eyes can see across these lovely forums

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

Gumball Gumption posted:

So they don't care about voting rights unless it personally benefits the party? Sounds like they don't actually care about voting rights.

no, i'm telling you that even if you believe they don't actually care and they're craven bought toadies it still doesn't make sense to believe they're lying about an intent to reform voting rights if they get the chance

0 rows returned
Apr 9, 2007

Ague Proof posted:

Isn't Hillary a TERF.

I thought transphobia was supposed to be the one red line that could not be crossed. Guess not.

yeah shes a terf

not long ago she had an interview (maybe for her stupid hulu thing idk) where she outright stated something to the effect of transpeople being dangerous to women

StratGoatCom
Aug 6, 2019

Our security is guaranteed by being able to melt the eyeballs of any other forum's denizens at 15 minutes notice


Ague Proof posted:

Isn't Hillary a TERF.

I thought transphobia was supposed to be the one red line that could not be crossed. Guess not.

quote:

dems are gonna look themselves in the mirror, take a deep breath and tell themselves 'we gotta get more racist and transphobic'

bobjr
Oct 16, 2012

Roose is loose.
🐓🐓🐓✊🪧

Ague Proof posted:

Isn't Hillary a TERF.

I thought transphobia was supposed to be the one red line that could not be crossed. Guess not.

I think she talked about how we should fight less for trans rights, but it felt like turning that knob to acceptable bigotry more than outright being a TERF

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

She's a TERF but only when she's in the UK because she's literally just whatever the local well to do white women believe.

How are u
May 19, 2005

by Azathoth

Venomous posted:

like, I genuinely struggle to see how the Democrats have any hope of winning

if they keep Biden and pick Hillary as VP, they're looking at a repeat of 2016 at the bare minimum, but with Trump winning the popular vote decisively

this is going to be a goddamn landslide.

1. Biden is not picking Hillary.
2. All of the polling, the special elections since 2016, the 2018 midterms, Trump's utter and complete gently caress-up on COVID-19 that will pretty clearly leave at least 100,000 dead by November at this rate, an economy already in recession and very possibly in depression by November, etc.

3. It'll be a goddamn landslide alright, just not the direction you are thinking.

StealthArcher
Jan 10, 2010




Haha holy poo poo it really is her turn again again.

A4R8
Feb 28, 2020

yronic heroism posted:

You would shitpost the same either way I’m sure, but my point remains the same: voting Trump out is a necessary if not sufficient action to stop fascism. For whatever reason you do not agree with this necessary action and also devote time that you claim you use so well being this great humanitarian telling us how important it is for us not to take the necessary action.

That is enabling fascism.

You clearly do not understand what 21st century fascism is. Here’s a start:

quote:

Fascism is not a form of state power "standing above both classes -- the proletariat and the bourgeoisie," as Otto Bauer, for instance, has asserted. It is not "the revolt of the petty bourgeoisie which has captured the machinery of the state," as the British Socialist Brailsford declares. No, fascism is not a power standing above class, nor government of the petty bourgeoisie or the lumpen-proletariat over finance capital. Fascism is the power of finance capital itself. It is the organization of terrorist vengeance against the working class and the revolutionary section of the peasantry and intelligentsia. In foreign policy, fascism is jingoism in its most brutal form, fomenting bestial hatred of other nations.... The development of fascism, and the fascist dictatorship itself, assume different forms in different countries, according to historical, social and economic conditions and to the national peculiarities, and the international position of the given country." - Georgi Dimitrov

I made a thread on the current incarnation of fascism (inverted totalitarianism) in cspam if you’re interested.

Voting Biden does absolutely nothing to prevent or cure this.

A4R8 fucked around with this message at 18:56 on Apr 28, 2020

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



How are u posted:

1. Biden is not picking Hillary.
2. All of the polling, the special elections since 2016, the 2018 midterms, Trump's utter and complete gently caress-up on COVID-19 that will pretty clearly leave at least 100,000 dead by November at this rate.

3. It'll be a goddamn landslide alright, just not the direction you are thinking.

hmm, this sounds....familiar

How are u
May 19, 2005

by Azathoth

Epic High Five posted:

hmm, this sounds....familiar

Yes, I have said it many times in this thread and in others in D&D.

StratGoatCom
Aug 6, 2019

Our security is guaranteed by being able to melt the eyeballs of any other forum's denizens at 15 minutes notice


How are u posted:

Yes, I have said it many times in this thread and in others in D&D.

It's looking more like you're trying to persuade yourself, not us, HTH.

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



How are u posted:

Yes, I have said it many times in this thread and in others in D&D.

yeah same here

in 2016

thankfully this time around I don't think the best strategy is to sit back and let Trump dominate all media as a sure path to him losing

Wicked Them Beats
Apr 1, 2007

Moralists don't really *have* beliefs. Sometimes they stumble on one, like on a child's toy left on the carpet. The toy must be put away immediately. And the child reprimanded.

evilweasel posted:

no, i'm telling you that even if you believe they don't actually care and they're craven bought toadies it still doesn't make sense to believe they're lying about an intent to reform voting rights if they get the chance

It does if you believe their concern doesn't extend beyond their personal advancement. Governor Abrams might push for voting rights as a feather in her cap to run for president, but maybe VP Abrams doesn't think she needs that boost and goes for an easier target that doesn't require her to piss off her donors quite as much. And I don't think Pelosi cares if she's majority or minority leader since she has her seat either way, so why help her associates in purple districts? Hell, them having difficult elections just motivates them to spend more time dialing for dollars.

I suppose the discussion can't really go anywhere from here since we're discussing unknowable internal beliefs at this point, but I'll say I'd love to be wrong and I would hope to see legislation like HR1 passed. I just don't think the Dems would actually do it.

Probably Magic
Oct 9, 2012

Looking cute, feeling cute.

evilweasel posted:

it leaked, its official that hillary is going to be announced as the pick

Wait, where was this, because all that's out there now is she's doing an appearance with Biden about women during coronavirus today.

nivdes
Jan 3, 2008

Freedom from democracy

Brought to you by NAZCENTBOL GANG

Epic High Five posted:

the Dems don't, because they're cowards who are terrified of engaging with or firing up their base. It's why Obama worked a hundred infinity times harder to kill OWS than he did to help the Walker recall campaign. It's why Biden isn't even running on that SCOTUS seat like Trump did and is instead trying to get momentum behind another alien exclusion act

politics does not begin and end in back rooms in congress and they have supporters in every single Republican district whose can be encouraged to be outraged and that outrage harnessed

firing up the base means nothing when you're trying to stop the GOP from pursuing a goal that the entire party is united behind when it has the power to do so

no number of protests outside of mitch mcconnell's office would've stopped them from seating judges

StratGoatCom
Aug 6, 2019

Our security is guaranteed by being able to melt the eyeballs of any other forum's denizens at 15 minutes notice


Probably Magic posted:

Wait, where was this, because all that's out there now is she's doing an appearance with Biden about women during coronavirus today.

Far as I can tell, its a lazy troll... right now, anyway. :smithicide:

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



nivdes posted:

firing up the base means nothing when you're trying to stop the GOP from pursuing a goal that the entire party is united behind when it has the power to do so

no number of protests outside of mitch mcconnell's office would've stopped them from seating judges

so how does anything change under Biden if he's already committed to filling his administration with lobbyists and billionaire Republicans? what's the elevator pitch for Why It's Different This Time, why does my vote for Biden get me any more change than my votes for Obama did (none), if the default position of the entire party is to do absolutely nothing to oppose their treasured colleagues and friends to their right

Apogee15
Jun 16, 2013

evilweasel posted:

it leaked, its official that hillary is going to be announced as the pick

lol no it isn't. This is just Hillary endorsing Biden.


It would be pretty hilarious if she was the VP though.

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

Wicked Them Beats posted:

It does if you believe their concern doesn't extend beyond their personal advancement. Governor Abrams might push for voting rights as a feather in her cap to run for president, but maybe VP Abrams doesn't think she needs that boost and goes for an easier target that doesn't require her to piss off her donors quite as much. And I don't think Pelosi cares if she's majority or minority leader since she has her seat either way, so why help her associates in purple districts? Hell, them having difficult elections just motivates them to spend more time dialing for dollars.

I suppose the discussion can't really go anywhere from here since we're discussing unknowable internal beliefs at this point, but I'll say I'd love to be wrong and I would hope to see legislation like HR1 passed. I just don't think the Dems would actually do it.

pelosi would want it because the more people that vote, the more likely it is she keeps her seat. she did, after all, just spend eight years in the minority where she got to do precisely nothing, and i'm sure she would rather avoid going back to that. she wants her associates in purple districts to keep their seat because those are her margin between one of the most powerful people in Washington, and one of the most irrelevant.

i mean, after 2018 when was the last time you thought one bit about what McCarthy thought about anything? when was the last time anyone thought about what he thought about anything? do you think Pelosi wants to go back to that level of importance?

evilweasel fucked around with this message at 19:03 on Apr 28, 2020

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



evilweasel posted:

pelosi would want it because the more people that vote, the more likely it is she keeps her seat. she did, after all, just spend eight years in the minority where she got to do precisely nothing, and i'm sure she would rather avoid going back to that. she wants her associates in purple districts to keep their seat because those are her margin between one of the most powerful people in Washington, and one of the most irrelevant.

i mean, after 2018 when was the last time you thought one bit about what McCarthy thought about anything?

why would McCarthy need to do anything when Pelosi keeps rubberstamping Republican legislation?

Ague Proof
Jun 5, 2014

they told me
I was everything

Gumball Gumption posted:

She's a TERF but only when she's in the UK because she's literally just whatever the local well to do white women believe.

In England they call her 'Karen Hillary.'

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



help, despite still believing it's 0% possible, I'm still cackling manically about VP Hillary and the cascade of insanity such would entail

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

How are u
May 19, 2005

by Azathoth

Epic High Five posted:

yeah same here

in 2016

thankfully this time around I don't think the best strategy is to sit back and let Trump dominate all media as a sure path to him losing

It is currently 2020, not 2016, and a whole lot has changed since 2016.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply