Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

Jack2142 posted:

This act was signed into law by a Republican and as a result is poo poo, can't trust anything that party does.

teddy was the progressive back then though.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

theflyingorc
Jun 28, 2008

ANY GOOD OPINIONS THIS POSTER CLAIMS TO HAVE ARE JUST PROOF THAT BULLYING WORKS
Young Orc

Lemming posted:

You're right that Obama was too incompetent to notice that his political opponents were ruthless criminals who don't give a gently caress about following fake rules that require everyone to pinky swear they'll act in good faith, that was actually one of the major failings of his administration, a mistake he made over and over for 8 years
No reasonable person would assume that Trump would exercise an executive power he explicitly doesn't have.

I agree with you on many of Obama's decisions, but it makes absolutely no sense in this case. What Trump has done here is little different from if he decided that congress passing a law making Bear Ears protected doesn't matter and now it's open.

Acebuckeye13
Nov 2, 2010

Against All Tyrants

Ultra Carp

Lemming posted:

You're right that Obama was too incompetent to notice that his political opponents were ruthless criminals who don't give a gently caress about following fake rules that require everyone to pinky swear they'll act in good faith, that was actually one of the major failings of his administration, a mistake he made over and over for 8 years

I literally cannot understand your reasoning. He should have had a law passed because he should have known his opponents think laws don't matter??? :psyduck:

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

Acebuckeye13 posted:

I don't think i ever expected to be debating whether the antiquities act is good, actually, at one am but here I am i guess

lookit this here ivory hater

Jack2142
Jul 17, 2014

Shitposting in Seattle

Dapper_Swindler posted:

teddy was the progressive back then though.

Lies he did Imperialism.

Slow News Day
Jul 4, 2007

Camel Camus posted:

I can tell you care a whole lot about this. I do too! I've had people pull this line a lot in casual conversations, but it really is a trick of marketing.

Do you also browbeat people for not volunteering at migrant shelters once a month? For not donating money to women's shelters? No? Why do you think that is, when those things are infinitely more effective than casting a one in a billion chance vote at changing the outcome of the presidency?

Friend, I do all of the things you listed. Literally all of them.

Here's the difference though: volunteering at migrant shelters and soup kitchens and things like that are attempts to address the symptoms of the problem. Voting, in contrast, is an attempt to address the root cause.

Is your vote, by itself, going to change anything? No, of course not. But, especially in local elections, it is very likely to result in a lot of good.

This is why it is insanely irresponsible to tell people that voting doesn't matter.

quote:

Besides that, accepting the narrative that eschewing elections is an act of privilege ignores some pretty major progressive thrusts in US history. Many incredibly disprivileged peoples in transformative movements have figured out that voting is a conservative and meaningless gesture and not an exercise of disengaged indulgence. I'm sorry you're frustrated and you don't like my tone but the reality doesn't reflect your frustration.

In my experience, people who don't vote fall into two categories: the the disenfranchised and the privileged. I think the so-called "tankies" on the forum, as much as they like to pretend they fall in the former group, actually are a part of the latter group. Because the fact is, if you are able to tolerate and withstand a second term of this president, you are, without a shred of doubt, privileged.

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

Jack2142 posted:

Lies he did Imperialism.

lol. white fleet go brrr.

Ague Proof
Jun 5, 2014

they told me
I was everything

Dapper_Swindler posted:

teddy was the progressive back then though.

Oh, Strasserism.

skeleton warrior
Nov 12, 2016


Phone posting so I can’t quote Matt’s post without it being a mess, but:

Trump is running literally fifty percent more drone strikes and has removed procedures to prevent civilian casualties, so once again we’re arguing “Biden would be better” vs. “but Biden wouldn’t END THEM, so it’s okay to let Trump continue to escalate as much as he wants”

Maybe voting for Biden is kicking the can down the road, but not voting for him is opening that can of rotting poo poo and chowing down on it in the hopes that after four years of more food poisoning we get a socialist revolution rather than a fascist one, while claiming moral superiority because even while we’re increasing bombing and dropping bigger bombs and getting more tied into new civil wars and supporting new coups in South America “at least i didn’t vote so im not resposnisble!!!!!”

Pick
Jul 19, 2009
Nap Ghost

Ague Proof posted:

Oh, Strasserism.

Theodore Roosevelt was the first president to ever ask an African-American person to dine with him in the White House. I'm not confident that Donald Trump has done that for an African-American person over a century later.

Madkal
Feb 11, 2008

Fallen Rib

Lemming posted:

Guess it wasn't that lasting, it would've been nice if Obama had gotten a law passed with his supermajority that would have actually done this instead of something showy but easily overturned by the same overreaching executive authority he passed it with

I guess if Obama really cared about America he would have made it illegal for Trump to run for president. Thanks Obama.

Ershalim
Sep 22, 2008
Clever Betty

Pick posted:

Theodore Roosevelt was the first president to ever ask an African-American person to dine with him in the White House. I'm not confident that Donald Trump has done that for an African-American person over a century later.

that just makes him highly representative of the average white american tbh

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006

enraged_camel posted:

This is demonstrably false, as Biden helped and supported Obama on his EPA policies (that Trump has been rolling back). And if there is one thing Biden wants to do, it is to go back to the glory days of Obama. We should be grateful for this, with regards to environmental policies.

Biden's ecological policies are being written by the oil and gas companies, precisely the same as Donald Trump's. if you expect that he will suddenly make a u-turn on a career spent proclaiming any green initiative a step too far, you can make that argument, but as it stands? the difference is whether you are drowning in boiling seawater to own the libs or to own the Bros.


quote:

Sorry but I have no loving idea what you are trying to say here. Please try to sound lucid, as opposed to clever.
you have, in the past, expressed that you believe the Armenian Genocide is a lie told by Armenians to try to win sympathy from the international community. as such, your assessment of Joe "We Must Jail Several Million People For Doing The Kinds Of Drugs Black People Use, And Maybe Chemically Lobotomize Black Children While We're At It" Biden, whose civil rights record is an unbroken string of considering those belonging to undesirable ethnic groups not technically human, and as such deserving of all the miseries visited upon them, may differ from mine.

trump is racist as all hell, and much more crude about it than Joe Biden, but in terms of raw damage done? it is -really- hard to understate the amount of damage Joe Biden has done and is proud of doing.

quote:

Matches how? How does Biden match Trump with regards to *checks notes* giving insane amounts of tax breaks to wealth people and corporations?
biden earned his reputation as a bought-and-paid-for creature of the finance industry. he is the reason student loans are not dischargeable in bankruptcy, and he has proudly stood against every effort to raise taxes on corporations or wealthy people in his career. Elizabeth Warren started getting involved in politics, back when she still considered herself a Republican, on the grounds that Joe Biden was too obsequious a servant of corporate power. both men believe that the wealthy's taxes should be lowered as far as humanly possible. if any distinction exists, it is only in the definition of that term, and I would not put money on the assertion one or the other thinks it should be lower.

quote:

Biden is... measurably inferior on infrastructure?

After Trump's "infrastructure week" has become such a meme joke?

nah, that one I freely grant as a Biden advantage, Trump's inferior on that one. Biden has certainly never given a poo poo about infrastructure but Trump's an incompetent enough manager that he's actively antagonistic to accomplishing any.

Lemming
Apr 21, 2008

theflyingorc posted:

No reasonable person would assume that Trump would exercise an executive power he explicitly doesn't have.

I agree with you on many of Obama's decisions, but it makes absolutely no sense in this case. What Trump has done here is little different from if he decided that congress passing a law making Bear Ears protected doesn't matter and now it's open.

How did you already forget about Bush

Mystic Mongol
Jan 5, 2007

Your life's been thrown in disarray already--I wouldn't want you to feel pressured.


College Slice
C'mon, guys. I want an example of Biden being good without needing to compare him to Trump. Saying he'll recognize treaties that Trump ignored ain't it. Saying he won't bulldoze Bear Ears like Trump is trying to ain't it. Saying he won't staff the feds with drunk criminals ain't it. And you all know it, or these examples wouldn't be filled with explanations on how I'm just going to move the goalposts.

You think I like looking at Biden and worrying that he'll be worse for the country than another four years of that diseased lunatic? This is the God damned worst. Give me something to hold on to.

Please.

Please.

Something good, about Biden, that isn't predicated on Trump. If it helps you focus exactly on what I'm looking for: What about Joseph Biden's 2022 America will be better than Barrack Obama's 2014 America?

Pick
Jul 19, 2009
Nap Ghost
armenian genocide?? when the gently caress did that become part of this conversation??

RandomBlue
Dec 30, 2012

hay guys!


Biscuit Hider

Holy poo poo, cops are trying to get their suspects to incriminate themselves? WTF?

Failboattootoot
Feb 6, 2011

Enough of this nonsense. You are an important mayor and this absurd contraption has wasted enough of your time.

Mystic Mongol posted:

You think I like this model? Give me a reason to vote for Biden that doesn't entirely revolve around Donald Trump.

I am literally begging. What is there to look forward to? Don't tell me what would be less bad. Tell me what would be good about a Biden white house.

You are ignoring a third way, which is that Joe Biden very obviously isn't going to make it to a second term.

Not that I particularly care, I'm not going to vote for Biden because he's dogshit. Also not voting for trump because he is also complete dogshit. I also live in Texas, where my presidential vote doesn't matter. I'll make sure to show up and vote for as many leftists as I can. And failing a leftist choice, a democratdownballot. If I lived somewhere my vote mattered, I'd probably suck it up though and vote for sleepy joe.

Failboattootoot fucked around with this message at 06:22 on Apr 30, 2020

Ershalim
Sep 22, 2008
Clever Betty

RandomBlue posted:

Holy poo poo, cops are trying to get their suspects to incriminate themselves? WTF?

It's sort of amazing how little conservatives seem to know about anything they wholeheartedly support, isn't it?

Mystic Mongol
Jan 5, 2007

Your life's been thrown in disarray already--I wouldn't want you to feel pressured.


College Slice

Failboattootoot posted:

You are ignoring a third way, which is that Joe Biden very obviously isn't going to make it to a second term.

Honestly this makes me feel a little better, thank you.

Ershalim
Sep 22, 2008
Clever Betty

Mystic Mongol posted:

Honestly this makes me feel a little better, thank you.

If that makes you feel better, he also signaled to a group of investors that he wasn't even likely to serve a full term. I'm looking for the article, but google searching Biden to find something specific is a bit poo poo.

Acebuckeye13
Nov 2, 2010

Against All Tyrants

Ultra Carp

Lemming posted:

How did you already forget about Bush

buddy you can read the Antiquities Act, it's not very long.

The Antiquities Act of 1906 posted:

16 USC 431-433

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That any person who shall appropriate, excavate, injure, or destroy any historic or prehistoric ruin or monument, or any object of antiquity, situated on lands owned or controlled by the Government of the United States, without the permission of the Secretary of the Department of the Government having jurisdiction over the lands on which said antiquities are situated, shall, upon conviction, be fined in a sum of not more than five hundred dollars or be imprisoned for a period of not more than ninety days, or shall suffer both fine and imprisonment, in the discretion of the court.

Sec. 2. That the President of the United States is hereby authorized, in his discretion, to declare by public proclamation historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and other objects of historic or scientific interest that are situated upon the lands owned or controlled by the Government of the United States to be national monuments, and may reserve as a part thereof parcels of land, the limits of which in all cases shall be confined to the smallest area compatible with proper care and management of the objects to be protected: Provided, That when such objects are situated upon a tract covered by a bona fied unperfected claim or held in private ownership, the tract, or so much thereof as may be necessary for the proper care and management of the object, may be relinquished to the Government, and the Secretary of the Interior is hereby authorized to accept the relinquishment of such tracts in behalf of the Government of the United States.

Sec. 3. That permits for the examination of ruins, the excavation of archaeological sites, and the gathering of objects of antiquity upon the lands under their respective jurisdictions may be granted by the Secretaries of the Interior, Agriculture, and War to institutions which the may deem properly qualified to conduct such examination, excavation, or gathering, subject to such rules and regulation as they may prescribe: Provided, That the examinations, excavations, and gatherings are undertaken for the benefit of reputable museums, universities, colleges, or other recognized scientific or educational institutions, with a view to increasing the knowledge of such objects, and that the gatherings shall be made for permanent preservation in public museums.

Sec. 4. That the Secretaries of the Departments aforesaid shall make and publish from time to time uniform rules and regulations for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this Act.
Approved, June 8, 1906

this isn't something Bush, Bush Sr, Reagan, Ford, Nixon, Eisenhower, Hoover, Coolidge, Harding, or Taft tried to do. This is something no one has done, since it is not in the law or in a hundred years of precedent of the law. As you can read. In the law. Right there.

Lemming
Apr 21, 2008

Mystic Mongol posted:

Honestly this makes me feel a little better, thank you.

I'll give you one guess as to whether you're gonna like whoever he picks as VP

skeleton warrior
Nov 12, 2016


Mystic Mongol posted:

C'mon, guys. I want an example of Biden being good without needing to compare him to Trump. Saying he'll recognize treaties that Trump ignored ain't it. Saying he won't bulldoze Bear Ears like Trump is trying to ain't it. Saying he won't staff the feds with drunk criminals ain't it. And you all know it, or these examples wouldn't be filled with explanations on how I'm just going to move the goalposts.

You think I like looking at Biden and worrying that he'll be worse for the country than another four years of that diseased lunatic? This is the God damned worst. Give me something to hold on to.

Please.

Please.

Something good, about Biden, that isn't predicated on Trump. If it helps you focus exactly on what I'm looking for: What about Joseph Biden's 2022 America will be better than Barrack Obama's 2014 America?

I appreciate that when I quoted you and said “here’s what will be better under Biden, but you’re going to ignore it”, you then proceeded to put out another post like no one had ever responded to you

Here’s a link to it in case you actually want to be honest:

skeleton warrior posted:


Biden is going to make things better on global warming, better on civil rights, better on taxing the rich and investing in infrastructure. He’s going to appoint Supreme Court justices that protect your liberties and women’s reproductive health. He’s going to have us work with allies again instead of threatening to pull out of all of our treaties if they don’t pay up, and will work to re-establish the Iranian peace deal. All of that is in his platform.

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006

Pick posted:

armenian genocide?? when the gently caress did that become part of this conversation??

the guy asking about what in Joe Biden's civil rights record is so bad has expressed Opinions re: whether or not the purging of troublesome ethnicities from the motherland constitutes genocide, or just an act of national self-defense that got a little out of hand.

i can totally buy that he in good faith considers Joe Biden's civil right's record just fine, but i suspect that given the above fact, he and I are operating from very different places when we discuss what a good civil rights record looks like.

Failboattootoot
Feb 6, 2011

Enough of this nonsense. You are an important mayor and this absurd contraption has wasted enough of your time.

Lemming posted:

I'll give you one guess as to whether you're gonna like whoever he picks as VP

For me personally, he just needs to pick someone who doesn't have dementia and a history of sexual assault.

theflyingorc
Jun 28, 2008

ANY GOOD OPINIONS THIS POSTER CLAIMS TO HAVE ARE JUST PROOF THAT BULLYING WORKS
Young Orc

Mystic Mongol posted:

C'mon, guys. I want an example of Biden being good without needing to compare him to Trump. Saying he'll recognize treaties that Trump ignored ain't it. Saying he won't bulldoze Bear Ears like Trump is trying to ain't it. Saying he won't staff the feds with drunk criminals ain't it. And you all know it, or these examples wouldn't be filled with explanations on how I'm just going to move the goalposts.

You think I like looking at Biden and worrying that he'll be worse for the country than another four years of that diseased lunatic? This is the God damned worst. Give me something to hold on to.

Please.

Please.

Something good, about Biden, that isn't predicated on Trump. If it helps you focus exactly on what I'm looking for: What about Joseph Biden's 2022 America will be better than Barrack Obama's 2014 America?
He's not very good, sorry.

The only valid argument is "better than Trump"

Old Dem voters are stupid

Mystic Mongol
Jan 5, 2007

Your life's been thrown in disarray already--I wouldn't want you to feel pressured.


College Slice

Lemming posted:

I'll give you one guess as to whether you're gonna like whoever he picks as VP

Y...... yes?

skeleton warrior posted:

I appreciate that when I quoted you and said “here’s what will be better under Biden, but you’re going to ignore it”, you then proceeded to put out another post like no one had ever responded to you

Here’s a link to it in case you actually want to be honest:

I asked for an example where you didn't compare him to Trump. You're comparing him to Trump. (That's the person he's going to be "better" than in your quote, and the person threatening to pull out of treaties) I'm not ignoring your excellent post because I'm so owned all my flesh fell off, I'm ignoring it because it's explicitly not what I'm looking for.

Am I being unclear here?

Ershalim
Sep 22, 2008
Clever Betty

Failboattootoot posted:

For me personally, he just needs to pick someone who doesn't have dementia and a history of sexual assault.

A low bar, but still pretty easy for most politicians to limbo right under. Personally, I'm holding out for him being abducted by aliens prior to the convention so he can be replaced by someone better. Do we have a solid idea who he's picking for VP? "Called him a racist on live television" seems the obvious choice, but that's a bit of a sidegrade, from my perspective.

Slow News Day
Jul 4, 2007

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!! posted:

Biden's ecological policies are being written by the oil and gas companies, precisely the same as Donald Trump's.

Please provide evidence.

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!! posted:

]you have, in the past, expressed that you believe the Armenian Genocide is a lie told by Armenians to try to win sympathy from the international community. as such, your assessment of Joe "We Must Jail Several Million People For Doing The Kinds Of Drugs Black People Use, And Maybe Chemically Lobotomize Black Children While We're At It" Biden, whose civil rights record is an unbroken string of considering those belonging to undesirable ethnic groups not technically human, and as such deserving of all the miseries visited upon them, may differ from mine.

Hmm yes very interesting that you have dug up posts from my past for opinions I no longer hold. Either way though, it's not relevant at all to what we're saying!

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!! posted:

trump is racist as all hell, and much more crude about it than Joe Biden, but in terms of raw damage done? it is -really- hard to understate the amount of damage Joe Biden has done and is proud of doing.

Joe Biden has been in politics for literal decades. Trump has been in politics for only three and a half years.

Give Trump another four years, and you'll see what he is capable of. (I know you would happily risk that in order to bring about your socialist paradise in 2024, but, fortunately, the Democratic base is not insane.)

Camel Camus
Jun 16, 2009

Mais, non, je suis fantastique!

enraged_camel posted:

Friend, I do all of the things you listed. Literally all of them.

Here's the difference though: volunteering at migrant shelters and soup kitchens and things like that are attempts to address the symptoms of the problem. Voting, in contrast, is an attempt to address the root cause.

Is your vote, by itself, going to change anything? No, of course not. But, especially in local elections, it is very likely to result in a lot of good.

This is why it is insanely irresponsible to tell people that voting doesn't matter.


In my experience, people who don't vote fall into two categories: the the disenfranchised and the privileged. I think the so-called "tankies" on the forum, as much as they like to pretend they fall in the former group, actually are a part of the latter group. Because the fact is, if you are able to tolerate and withstand a second term of this president, you are, without a shred of doubt, privileged.

I'm glad to hear you are engaged in acts of community support! But what I was getting at isn't about whether or not to personally so those things as much as if you give other people a hard time about not volunteering or doing actually effective actions in the same way you are committed to shaming people about their decision to vote. If not, why not?

I also think you have it backwards! The electoral system has never and will absolutely not change the systemic stations of oppression that have existed in this country for centuries. I agree that your vote in local elections is likely to be more impactful (and I personal choose to vote in both federal and local elections for the ~feel goods~ even though I recognize it as ineffectual,) but even then the odds are not "very good" that they'll impact the outcome, they're in the one in tens of thousands to one in hundreds of millions range depending on the municipality and the kind of election. It's not a practical expression of power and it's certainly not worth trying to harass someone into doing before other, more practical abd transformative methods of building community and power.

I think you are misreading what I'm saying. I'm absolutely not saying that it is okay to idly sit by and leave the president's power unchecked, I'm saying that the individual decision to vote is not a meaningful challenge to that power.

You seem very concerned with fighting the tankies and making sure everyone understands their posture on the privilege meter. That seems tough and I hope you can soon find closure on both counts!

Camel Camus fucked around with this message at 06:30 on Apr 30, 2020

Jack2142
Jul 17, 2014

Shitposting in Seattle

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!! posted:

nah, that one I freely grant as a Biden advantage, Trump's inferior on that one. Biden has certainly never given a poo poo about infrastructure but Trump's an incompetent enough manager that he's actively antagonistic to accomplishing any.

Nope Trump has built beautiful skyscrapers and resorts. What is bidens real estate portfolio? some dumpy mcmansion in Dover?

Failboattootoot
Feb 6, 2011

Enough of this nonsense. You are an important mayor and this absurd contraption has wasted enough of your time.

Ershalim posted:

A low bar, but still pretty easy for most politicians to limbo right under. Personally, I'm holding out for him being abducted by aliens prior to the convention so he can be replaced by someone better. Do we have a solid idea who he's picking for VP? "Called him a racist on live television" seems the obvious choice, but that's a bit of a sidegrade, from my perspective.

Since this is the dumbest timeline, I am going to guess he picks hilary clinton.

Pick
Jul 19, 2009
Nap Ghost

Jack2142 posted:

Nope Trump has built beautiful skyscrapers and resorts. What is bidens real estate portfolio? some dumpy mcmansion in Dover?

Wasn't Biden the poorest Senator for many years?

Jack2142
Jul 17, 2014

Shitposting in Seattle

Pick posted:

Wasn't Biden the poorest Senator for many years?

That's why its a dumpy mcmansion.

Lemming
Apr 21, 2008

Acebuckeye13 posted:

buddy you can read the Antiquities Act, it's not very long.


this isn't something Bush, Bush Sr, Reagan, Ford, Nixon, Eisenhower, Hoover, Coolidge, Harding, or Taft tried to do. This is something no one has done, since it is not in the law or in a hundred years of precedent of the law. As you can read. In the law. Right there.

https://www.outsideonline.com/2146236/overturning-bears-ears-long-shot-doesnt-mean-republicans-wont-try

quote:

Pendley acknowledges that unilateral action by Trump to eliminate a national monument would be unprecedented. “Obviously, that will probably get to the Supreme Court, but I’m confident that a Trump Administration would prevail in that situation,” he says.

This was written the day after Obama did his thing, it kind of looks like people at the time thought there was a pretty good chance of it getting undone!

Ershalim
Sep 22, 2008
Clever Betty

Failboattootoot posted:

Since this is the dumbest timeline, I am going to guess he picks hilary clinton.

My personal "holy gently caress what a bad call, how very 2020" would be Doug Jones. It's vaguely plausible and incredibly underwhelming, so it'd fit with "I'm Hilary, but slightly worse" motif he's got going on.

Jack2142
Jul 17, 2014

Shitposting in Seattle

Gonna laugh when Biden actually picks Hunter as his VP.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

Mystic Mongol posted:

C'mon, guys. I want an example of Biden being good without needing to compare him to Trump. Saying he'll recognize treaties that Trump ignored ain't it. Saying he won't bulldoze Bear Ears like Trump is trying to ain't it. Saying he won't staff the feds with drunk criminals ain't it. And you all know it, or these examples wouldn't be filled with explanations on how I'm just going to move the goalposts.

You think I like looking at Biden and worrying that he'll be worse for the country than another four years of that diseased lunatic? This is the God damned worst. Give me something to hold on to.

Please.

Please.

Something good, about Biden, that isn't predicated on Trump. If it helps you focus exactly on what I'm looking for: What about Joseph Biden's 2022 America will be better than Barrack Obama's 2014 America?

Joe Biden's stated healthcare plan is expanded Medicaid, expanded Medicare, and a public option that is technically Medicare For All in the sense that it is literally structured after Medicare's implementation and means-tested premiums. Donald Trump's healthcare plan is "repeal the ACA, let everyone with preexisting conditions / receiving expanded Medicaid / receiving subsidies die".

Joe Biden's stated climate plan is carbon neutral by 2050. Donald Trump's climate plan is carbon neutral when all oxygen-breathing life on the planet is dead.

Joe Biden's stated immigration plan is to put immigrant families in communities that share their language and provide them with case agents, lawyers, and holistic and community support. Donald Trump's immigration plan is to put immigrant families in cages where they will contract covid19 and die.

The rebuttal which people are already at this moment rearing up to post is that Joe Biden won't try to fulfill his platform, or will try halfheartedly and fail, or even if he succeeds it's not good enough, or even if he succeeds it will lead to Richard Spencer 2024 and the end of the world. And you know, they have a point in some of that. But you asked for a difference, and if he succeeds in literally any of that, never mind the pile of other planks if you Check His Website, that's actual positives vs Not Being Trump.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

LorneReams
Jun 27, 2003
I'm bizarre
Electing Biden (or whoever the nominee is) is electing the Democratic platform, warts and all. It's difficult to not only compare this to the Republican platform but to also the current figurehead of the party (Trump). That is why these comparisons are naturally being made. Instead, by focusing on local elections, you will make the people's lives around you better than focusing on who the figurehead of the party is going to be. I will say that down-ticket (and my local representatives) will have a MUCH better time and be more empowered to enact change with a Dem president than a Republican one. This isn't even in question. I'm focusing on that. I've already helped to get an extremely progressive candidate elected to my city council, defeating a fairly conservative incumbent who's family literally owns the local newspaper and was writing "just asking questions" bullshit articles (full of SOCIALISM and the like). After the second (and final) recount, he won by five loving votes. Considering I registered about a dozen people personally, it feels really good. This guy may be a Senator one day (he's young enough!), so building a bench while trying to keep Dems in power seems to be the way to go for now.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply