|
uncop posted:Would you prefer trotskys aesthetics? Haha goddamn
|
# ? Jul 17, 2020 21:31 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 14:23 |
|
didn't they figure out helmets by the time the russian revolution came around just look at that dumb loving hat
|
# ? Jul 17, 2020 22:01 |
|
Goast posted:didn't they figure out helmets by the time the russian revolution came around just look at that dumb loving hat Apparently they were train guards http://warfarehistorian.blogspot.com/2016/02/odd-fighting-units-trotskys-red-100-and.html
|
# ? Jul 17, 2020 22:43 |
|
uncop posted:Would you prefer trotskys aesthetics? love the facial expression
|
# ? Jul 17, 2020 22:46 |
|
uncop posted:Would you prefer trotskys aesthetics? what if le pantalon rouge, but more
|
# ? Jul 17, 2020 23:00 |
|
uncop posted:Would you prefer trotskys aesthetics? I mean, if you're going to call yourself The Red Army
|
# ? Jul 17, 2020 23:20 |
|
uncop posted:The correctness of a line has more to do with keeping the movement together and strengthening it despite an endless stream of mistakes. A correct line can even embrace pretty blatant untruths, although that's always walking a thin line because those untruths have to be unraveled before they become hindrances to further development. On the contrary to what you're saying, it's damaging to assume that just because someone's principled and capable, they are always speaking the truth in official capacity. If the movement as a whole makes that assumption, questioning the truth-value of their statements then becomes questioning their authority, an attack on the movement's coherence and the correct line. Both wishful thinking and outright deception are part of politics in both its peaceful and warlike forms. The whole idea of communism is wishful thinking until the moment that it actually exists in reality, but it has to be treated as if it were a prophetic, unquestionable truth. It's far more productive to normalize even the greatest leaders often having incorrect ideas and being reliant on others to set them straight. Then, correcting an incorrect line doesn't have the potential to weaken the movement and thrust it into a fatal catch-22. I largely agree with you, and this gets right to heart of the matter, I do appreciate the clarification. I agree that our knowledge is necessarily provisional, and that the relationship between theory and practice must be a dialectical one. In that process, lines will of course change, responding both to changing conditions and to our changed understandings of conditions. I also agree that we cannot assume principled comrades are always speaking the truth, or always correct. To give a trivial example, no one could argue with disguising by misinformation the time and place of a party meeting that might be expected to come under attack. What I mean by an attitude towards truth in our lines is that I consider it fundamentally impermissible to knowingly mislead the masses or party cadre on political questions, though we may find that there are compelling practical reasons to do so. A specific example of what I mean, that I think had profoundly disastrous consequences, and that is particularly fresh in my mind as I've been reading Haywood, is the attitude of the CPSU and Comintern towards Browderism. Now, I don't believe for a moment that Stalin, at least, had any sympathy for Browder's revisionism. Indeed, he had shown that he was aware of a major opportunist danger within the CPUSA when Lovestone was removed, and that he knew that danger was not confined to Lovestone's faction. I don't think there can be much doubt that Stalin and others who knew better decided that, for entirely understandable practical reasons, a less revolutionary party in the US was temporarily useful, and that its line could be rectified at a later date.
|
# ? Jul 17, 2020 23:53 |
uncop posted:Would you prefer trotskys aesthetics? i love that dr. Seuss character
|
|
# ? Jul 18, 2020 00:06 |
|
Goast posted:didn't they figure out helmets by the time the russian revolution came around just look at that dumb loving hat The Russians didn't have the capacity to mass produce helmets by the time of the civil war. The red army decided on using the budenovka because it was extremely cheap and easy to produce and could protect the head from the elements. I like it, it gave the red army a tartar horde vibe that was picked up on in propaganda.
|
# ? Jul 18, 2020 18:24 |
|
uncop posted:Would you prefer trotskys aesthetics? I never thought about how exactly those potato masher grenades were stowed before
|
# ? Jul 18, 2020 20:54 |
|
Holy poo poo is the WW2 derail over yet? I can only enjoy so many pages of forums poster Enjoy dunking on everyone's feeble defense of Stalin's mistakes.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 08:24 |
|
NaanViolence posted:Holy poo poo is the WW2 derail over yet? I can only enjoy so many pages of forums poster Enjoy dunking on everyone's feeble defense of Stalin's mistakes. if dipshits like you keep having dumb ww2 takes it will never stop
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 08:29 |
|
NaanViolence posted:Holy poo poo is the WW2 derail over yet? I can only enjoy so many pages of forums poster Enjoy dunking on everyone's feeble defense of Stalin's mistakes. Enjoy was the main architect of the derailment, and anyone who wanted to make serious criticisms of Comintern policy between the wars would be furious with Enjoy for poisoning the well with liberal bullshit. gently caress back off to reddit already.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 08:55 |
|
suggestion: mods, rename enjoy to "sunday friend" or is that too harsh?
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 08:59 |
|
I've never been stupid enough to use reddit. Sorry for making your canned responses look like poo poo.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 09:05 |
|
there is no canned response to "stalin should have invaded germany in 1939" because its such an absurd idea no matter what ideological lens you view that portion of ww2 through
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 09:12 |
|
Stalin should've personally saved Rosa Luxemburg
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 09:16 |
|
stalin didn’t go back in time to kill baby hitler, guess he was the real hitler all along
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 09:55 |
|
well he did personally kill more communists than hitler
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 09:56 |
|
Comrade Koba posted:stalin didn’t go back in time to kill baby hitler, guess he was the real hitler all along Jeb Bush: Better Than Stalin?
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 10:08 |
|
after carefully considering both stalin and hitler, im still very undecided, but ive been getting back into hitler posting lately
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 10:16 |
|
Kurnugia posted:well he did personally kill more communists than hitler the only guy hitler personally killed was hitler, guess that’s hard to top no matter how you look at it
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 10:21 |
|
Comrade Koba posted:the only guy hitler personally killed was hitler, guess that’s hard to top no matter how you look at it A smile spreads across Stalin's face as he notices the assist counts as kill message.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 11:58 |
|
Old and Busted: Teddy Roosevelt is so badass, he got shot by a guy and just kept on going with this speech New Hotness:
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 14:57 |
|
NaanViolence posted:Holy poo poo is the WW2 derail over yet? I can only enjoy so many pages of forums poster Enjoy dunking on everyone's feeble defense of Stalin's mistakes. Shut up, freak.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 15:08 |
|
Seconding whoever recommended Losurdo's book on Stalin. Extremely pro-read:quote:[T]he painting drawn by the American historian could here and there be confused with a product of Soviet propaganda, if it had not come from a fiercely anti-communist author! Let’s begin to examine it. In 1921, while the civil war rages on, for some time the Butyrka prison of Moscow operates as follows:
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 15:52 |
|
Has it been published yet or is this the translation that's already online?
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 20:01 |
|
Gotta be the online one. There’s still a change dot org petition floating around for MR Press or Verso to publish a new translation
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 20:27 |
|
Last I saw Sinistra got the rights but their site is down.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 20:32 |
|
They also haven't posted on social media in two years, might not be legit.
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 20:35 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:Seconding whoever recommended Losurdo's book on Stalin. Extremely pro-read: definitely reading this after i finish black bolshevik
|
# ? Jul 19, 2020 21:14 |
|
https://twitter.com/getfiscal/status/1284927744854327297?s=20
|
# ? Jul 20, 2020 02:02 |
|
https://twitter.com/CursedBoomers/status/1286044071430062080
|
# ? Jul 22, 2020 22:05 |
|
Lmao is that really a “cursed boomer image” seems more like something this thread would have conjured
|
# ? Jul 22, 2020 22:38 |
It's gone now, what did it say?
|
|
# ? Jul 23, 2020 14:33 |
|
something about anarchists being children who only want to eat dessert
|
# ? Jul 23, 2020 14:39 |
|
from memory so maybe not verbatim but it was close to "Marxist-Leninists and Anarchists both want dessert, anarchists just don’t wanna eat their veggies first!”
|
# ? Jul 23, 2020 14:45 |
|
GalacticAcid posted:from memory so maybe not verbatim but it was close to "Marxist-Leninists and Anarchists both want dessert, anarchists just don’t wanna eat their veggies first!” It's funny cuz it's true
|
# ? Jul 23, 2020 15:42 |
|
Boomers reinventing lf on facebook
|
# ? Jul 23, 2020 17:17 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 14:23 |
veggies rule
|
|
# ? Jul 24, 2020 06:37 |