|
Tulul posted:We should really keep a running total of how many hands/arms Ax chops off. It's got to be at least once per book. I sort of started listening to an Animorphs rewatch podcast (my podcast listening has gone way down in corona lockdown) that was doing this and even by the time I'd stopped listening it was a lot. Southern California must be full of amputees by the end of this series. Imagine the annual protests outside the Andalite consulate every year
|
# ? Aug 7, 2020 06:43 |
|
|
# ? May 23, 2024 10:26 |
|
Ax having time for a smug comeback made me smile. Also, even if the Yeerks have complete disregard for humans you would think that they still wouldn't want to just leave skeletons all over the place. It's just untidy.
|
# ? Aug 7, 2020 09:02 |
|
Starsnostars posted:Ax having time for a smug comeback made me smile. Well they're invertebrates, so perhaps they have no instinctive reaction to skellies? On par with fallen leaves maybe
|
# ? Aug 7, 2020 09:08 |
|
yay i've caught up to the part where aximili appears, he was like my edward cullenPetraCore posted:Also, not to be too cynical, but there are absolutely people who would turn over 'undesirables' to yeerks as hosts in order to keep their own freedom and reap the technological benefits the yeerks could provide. this thread is actually really inspiring. there's so much in these books that was valuable for kids to learn, and imo now would be a good time for those themes to appear in children's literature again. they're not too dark. thinking back to when i was a kid, this was just about the only series that actually rang true, both in the way characters behaved and in the general level of carnage
|
# ? Aug 7, 2020 09:31 |
|
honestly, i get kind of annoyed at the "can you believe this is a kids' book? all this dark stuff in a kids' book? for kids????" stuff. modern children's literature isn't dark enough. the theory that everything has to be simple and bloodless and fun and candy-coloured has nothing to do with what children can handle. it's a very new development, it was made up by marketers, and it has everything to do with selling books - not to kids, because kids have no money, but to their parents. most adults don't remember what it's like to be younger, so they believe what publishers tell them about children's cognition, and it suits publishers to tell them that what kids want is sanitised simplistic entertainment that contains no difficult themes or disturbing material. because difficult themes and disturbing material is what leads to moral panic and legal trouble, and modern publishers would rather not take that risk. literature has always had a major role to play in teaching kids about the world. nowadays that education has huge chunks missing out of it, and corporates are invested in telling parents that kids don't need to learn about that stuff and are better off not knowing it - but that's not necessarily true.
|
# ? Aug 7, 2020 10:26 |
|
fauna posted:modern children's literature isn't dark enough. the theory that everything has to be simple and bloodless and fun and candy-coloured has nothing to do with what children can handle. it's a very new development, it was made up by marketers, and it has everything to do with selling books - not to kids, because kids have no money, but to their parents. There is a whole tangent to go off on here about the existence of "YA" as a genre, which was invented by the publishing industry in the 2000s. I'm always really grateful that I grew up reading books from a public library and a public school library, where I would just pluck fantasy and sci-fi poo poo off the shelves and didn't care if it was "contemporary" or "Australian" or whatever else the publishing-educational complex was trying to encourage us to read at the time (I did have one English primary school teacher who'd been poisoned by his country and took me to task for not reading "the classics" when checking out library books, as though a 10-year-old kid in Perth is going to be able to parse Dickens.) It's not that those libraries didn't make an effort to stock contemporary kids' literature - I'm glad they did, otherwise I never would have read quite a few good 21st century series - but that if I'd been from a wealthier family and was only reading what bookstores had available in their constantly updated kids' fiction section, I think I would have been the poorer for it. edit - and come to think of it there's probably a lot of work that goes into that at a library. There was probably someone in the '80s who was saying, "all right, chuck this stuff out, but let's hang on to the John Wyndham and John Christopher even though it's been here since the '60s." Either that or they just went by the most recent check out date, in which I guess there's an organic preservation mechanism created by readers browsing through the shelves and checking books out on their merits. Or at least the merits of their blurbs and covers. freebooter fucked around with this message at 15:25 on Aug 7, 2020 |
# ? Aug 7, 2020 15:22 |
|
fauna posted:honestly, i get kind of annoyed at the "can you believe this is a kids' book? all this dark stuff in a kids' book? for kids????" stuff. modern children's literature isn't dark enough. the theory that everything has to be simple and bloodless and fun and candy-coloured has nothing to do with what children can handle. it's a very new development, it was made up by marketers, and it has everything to do with selling books - not to kids, because kids have no money, but to their parents. most adults don't remember what it's like to be younger, so they believe what publishers tell them about children's cognition, and it suits publishers to tell them that what kids want is sanitised simplistic entertainment that contains no difficult themes or disturbing material. because difficult themes and disturbing material is what leads to moral panic and legal trouble, and modern publishers would rather not take that risk.
|
# ? Aug 7, 2020 16:03 |
|
I'm so stoked for this thread. The biggest standout memories I have of these books were the lobsters and Visser 3 describing eating Tobias with bbq sauce
|
# ? Aug 7, 2020 22:24 |
|
fauna posted:i just had a sudden flashback to being ten years old and having a playground "battle" with my friend in which he was goku and i was a garatron. i refused to be hit by his energy beams because i was too fast; he argued that the blasts were so large i couldn't possibly outrun them. things got very heated. as an adult i am forced to admit he was probably right
|
# ? Aug 7, 2020 22:41 |
|
The Stranger-Chapter 15quote:"That's where the City Arena should be," I said. "It's where we saw the circus." Oh, this is going to work. quote:"Visser Three?" the woman repeated skeptically. Hmm, It actually worked. quote:The Yeerk pool was a busy little place. Well, that's....certainly not what you'd expect. The Stranger-Chapter 16 quote:It was me. Me, as I would be in the future. That's cold. That's just really cold. I just just assume how horrible that line would have been if I read it as a kid. quote:I really wanted to morph right then. I really wanted to become the grizzly and tear Visser Three a few new holes. But there were hundreds of Controllers around. And while I was morphing I would be vulnerable. That's Visser-Three for you. No, but really, this is interesting. This is pretty much a can't lose situation for them, so long as Visser Three is worried about screwing up the timeline. This is why I personally find time travel stories potentially interesting. For Rachel, especially, this is sort of a way to force the issue. The whole thing had been...I don't want to say not personal, because it had been personal, but more abstract, in both her dad's and the Elimist's questions? She was faced with the very concrete idea of being with her dad/keeping her family close to her, on the one hand, and on the other, the fate of humanity being conquered by the Yeerks. But now she's seeing the real effect of that, and she's seeing the Rachel-Controller. That aort of drives the stakes home in a way it didn't before.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2020 00:14 |
|
Epicurius posted:Hmm, It actually worked. "People believe what they see." Still as true as last book. Quick thinking from Tobias to intuit that if an Andalite was on Yeerk-controlled Earth, the Controllers would assume "the Visser" and not "a free Andalite," and good acting from Ax to add just enough bite and swagger to sell it. Epicurius posted:That's cold. That's just really cold. I just just assume how horrible that line would have been if I read it as a kid. As someone who read it as a kid: that line hosed me up. The thought of being forced to eat your friend by the thing controlling your body, aware with all your senses but unable to do anything about it... that was multiple nightmares' worth of hosed up. Epicurius posted:That's Visser-Three for you. No, but really, this is interesting. This is pretty much a can't lose situation for them, so long as Visser Three is worried about screwing up the timeline. This is why I personally find time travel stories potentially interesting. For Rachel, especially, this is sort of a way to force the issue. The whole thing had been...I don't want to say not personal, because it had been personal, but more abstract, in both her dad's and the Elimist's questions? She was faced with the very concrete idea of being with her dad/keeping her family close to her, on the one hand, and on the other, the fate of humanity being conquered by the Yeerks. But now she's seeing the real effect of that, and she's seeing the Rachel-Controller. That aort of drives the stakes home in a way it didn't before. Yeah, I think this is one of the best individual chapters of the series so far; there's a lot of potential packed into it. Is Rachel-Controller stopping Rachel from falling out of genuine kind instinct somehow, or out of fear that Rachel's going to crack her head on a rock, die, and ruin the timeline, or just because it's time travel and she knew Rachel was going to fall because Rachel fell when she was her? Who was the sixth human the Yeerks were expecting? Now that Rachel is completely unrestrained, will she kill her future self in the name of "freedom or death?" And (minor spoilers for the rest of the book) is the whole point of them not being the Animorphs that the future-Yeerks expected the Ellimist trying to show them that the future isn't set in stone without actually telling them?
|
# ? Aug 8, 2020 01:23 |
|
I started Animorphs when it was like 15 books in so the threat never landed for me. They had a lot more books to get through so the edginess just washed off me. “Y-y-yeah you totally ate your boyfriend in another life you’ll never experience!!” Source: dude trust me. Thanks Visser Three
|
# ? Aug 8, 2020 02:28 |
|
Look, if you can't trust Visser Three, who can you trust? Really?
|
# ? Aug 8, 2020 03:53 |
Him throwing his Rachel under the bus is such a dick move I love you Visser Three never change please
|
|
# ? Aug 8, 2020 04:08 |
|
I remembered future-Animorph controllers but boy I didn't remember how hardcore the actual Animorphs got in response to it. This is great.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2020 09:28 |
|
I don't remember the events of this book at all, except for the existence of the Ellimist obviously, and Rachel going into battle-fog for the first time. Now that we're out of the first cycle, it's interesting that these books don't stand out quite as much as the very first ones did to me, even though apparently the ghostwriting didn't start for a couple dozen books more; obviously I remembered Jake's infestation, but none of the other details of the last book. I think the only other one I really remember clearly was a later Jake book, notable for also featuring a time-travel plot, only there the resolution felt somehow even more deus-ex-machina than the Ellimist popping in to save the day. So I can read these later books with basically fresh eyes at this point.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2020 11:18 |
|
Yea I kind of feel this is starting to get way too convoluted. Just dropping time travel into a fairly simple story like this will create issues I'm sure.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2020 18:51 |
|
The massive Yeerk Pool is a neat touch since when the series reaches the final arc that’s exactly what they start doing to the ruins of the city. Also this future (if you can say it ever existed what with Ellimist weirdness) is clearly one where Ax died on impact and they teamed up with David who immediately got them all captured because he’s a loving idiot rear end in a top hat
|
# ? Aug 8, 2020 21:46 |
|
The Stranger-Chapter 17quote:I did not wait until the last of my human features was submerged. I was bear enough. I charged. Didn't somebody in this thread suggest that, actually? quote:"Are you changing your vote, Tobias?" Jake asked him. You have any clue what the Elimist actually wants? The Stranger-Chapter 18 quote:I was back in the underground Yeerk pool. Trapped. Stuck to the Taxxon's tongue. But not a cockroach. I was myself, in my human body, only tiny. Stuck. About to die. Whether you figured it out or not after reading the last chapter, Rachel just did. quote:I shucked off the T-shirt that I wear to bed, and quickly slipped into my morphing outfit. Grumpy woken up Tobias is the best. quote:<I know where it is, Tobias.> I interrupted him. She knows where it is. Do you? <points at the computer screen>
|
# ? Aug 8, 2020 23:58 |
|
quote:You have any clue what the Elimist actually wants?
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 00:22 |
|
This surprised me as a kid, and I'm pretty sure it holds up as a genuinely clever reveal now.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 00:50 |
It's an earned reveal. The pieces are all there. it was in Visser Three's pocket the whole time
|
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 01:29 |
|
Radio Free Kobold posted:did elminster just get exactly what he wanted? who knows
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 03:41 |
|
If I'm remembering when I read this as a child correctly... at the time I figured out the Ellimist has a scheme going the moment he refused their 'yes'. But I didn't figure out the Kaldrona part until after Rachel spelled it out. I tended to skim scenery details as a kid.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 06:12 |
|
Daikloktos posted:Spoilers all I love the idea none of anything in the series really even loving mattered to them, it was all about maneuvering Cassie into position to get a free hand where he actually needed it across the galaxy I'm not sure what in particular you're talking about here, but I think the outcome of the war did matter an awful lot to the Ellimist.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 06:27 |
|
Epicurius posted:I'm not sure what in particular you're talking about here, but I think the outcome of the war did matter an awful lot to the Ellimist. Well, his whole game with Crayak is making a series of deals with him that have long-reaching unforeseen consequences with the goal of screwing him over by getting him to overlook seemingly minor things that then swing back around and bite him in the rear end. Like trading the survival of an entire planet on the other side of the galaxy for allowing Cassie to be in that construction site on the night Elfangor crashed to Earth. Crayak's busy laughing his rear end off while Tau Epsilon IV gets digested alive by the black goo and suddenly--oh poo poo, Earth beats the Yeerks because Cassie is a fixed point in space-time. Or something.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 06:47 |
|
Epicurius posted:I'm not sure what in particular you're talking about here, but I think the outcome of the war did matter an awful lot to the Ellimist.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 06:50 |
|
Daikloktos posted:Megamorphs #4. Cassie's left-field cosmic significance undoes Crayak's overt move, but as the Ellimist played within the rules Crayak was bound to allow him a free hand in some conflict somewhere else. The outcome of the war mattered an awful lot to the Ellimist because he started out as the kind of Animal Crossing player who feels legitimately bummed when his best animal friends are feuding but it's perfectly petit-Lovecraft to have the overt significance of this entire series only strategically matter in that one moment. I think it's more of a wheels within wheels sort of thing for him. In Megamorphs 4, we find out that the Ellimist manipulated events so that Cassie would be part of the Animorphs so as to make the deal with Crayak to gain the advantage without a loss, but he didn't manipulate the entire war for that purpose. He takes an active role in this war itself, from his actions in this book, to his actions in the Andalite Chronicles, to saving the Iskoort (and possibly being involved in creating the Iskoort) so that if the Yeerks run into them, they'll learn there's an alternative way for them to live than parasitism. I think it's just that the Ellimist is clever, and very good at games, so he manipulates events so he can accomplish multiple goals at the same time.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 07:09 |
The Ellimist is extraordinarily good at LOSING games. He might not win at the stated objective, but that's usually because he has plans of his own in motion.
|
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 07:20 |
|
I'd say the howlers is a much bigger win for the ellimist
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 07:24 |
|
How would the Animorphs even be a threat if they didn't have Cassie, and by extension her almost unlimited access to an entire zoo, plus whatever North American Animal Ex Machina was needed by the ghostwriters that month? I guess I just don't remember Megamorphs #4 because I have no recollection what all of this Cassie being a plant from the jump stuff is about. So far, I feel like if anything, thus far, book 6 revealed that Jake is the weak link of the team. Tobias helps the team plan a brutal and flawless series of traps for Temrash, completely without Jake's dithering "leadership." This is in book 6 so as far as I can tell, has nothing to do with the Ellimist stuff, more of just a logistical "why is this guy the leader" question. His knowledge coupled with the supposedly elite Yeerk piloting him were unable to even think of a plan of escape involving the eight or so diverse morphs he has... Also, for added confusion sake, and since he's already gone ahead and acquired them, shouldn't they all acquire Ax just so they can feign an Andalite morph in times of dire emergency? Who cares if they're all the same teen centaur, better to condescendingly explain to visser three the totally new "Retratnil technique," which lets Andalites shift between morphs without returning to the original body, () you probably haven't heard of it, Alloran, you've been away from your homeland for so long; than to totally blow your cover the first time you run up on a time limit... Also they seem like legitimately strong battle morphs on their own. Do we know if Ax acquired anything before the shark when he was in the ship? Like any Andalite homeworld poo poo.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 12:04 |
|
Jake is the one who keeps the group together - it's not that he's the perfect leader, but he's the only one the others are all willing to listen to. If Jake is gone, Marco, Rachel, and Cassie are too fundamentally different in ideals and personality to stick together. As far as Ax's Andalite homeworld morphs go, he probably does, but he never uses any.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 12:20 |
|
Piell posted:As far as Ax's Andalite homeworld morphs go, he probably does, but he never uses any. Remember that the Andalites are noted as not using morphing for battle capabilities, they seem perfectly happy with the tail blades in their existing bodies and energy weapons. They regard morphing as a tool for spying and sabotage, not combat. Visser Three and the Animorphs use it for combat for different reasons of their own.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 12:58 |
|
because humans are bad at fighting, and Visser Three just enjoys turning into a giant kaiju.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 13:22 |
|
nine-gear crow posted:Well, his whole game with Crayak is making a series of deals with him that have long-reaching unforeseen consequences with the goal of screwing him over by getting him to overlook seemingly minor things that then swing back around and bite him in the rear end. Like trading the survival of an entire planet on the other side of the galaxy for allowing Cassie to be in that construction site on the night Elfangor crashed to Earth. Crayak's busy laughing his rear end off while Tau Epsilon IV gets digested alive by the black goo and suddenly--oh poo poo, Earth beats the Yeerks because Cassie is a fixed point in space-time. For those of us who haven't looked at the series in a while, remind us of what the deal with this is? I don't remember any specific Ellimist/Cassie connection
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 14:34 |
|
bunzuh
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 15:04 |
|
freebooter posted:For those of us who haven't looked at the series in a while, remind us of what the deal with this is? I don't remember any specific Ellimist/Cassie connection Spoilers for the whole series. The Ellimist's manipulations before the series started were to make sure the team had four specific people. Ax is there because he's Elfangor's brother, Tobias because he's Elfangor's son, Marco because he's Visser One's (host's) son. Meanwhile, Cassie is there because she's a weird anomaly that interferes with people's ability to change the timeline around her.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 15:04 |
|
Epicurius posted:
Like I said, it's one of the most vivid things that stuck with me. "He was tough and stringy" my whole life over and over.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 15:38 |
|
disaster pastor posted:Spoilers for the whole series. Prophecy poo poo and chosen ones is always dumb
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 17:10 |
|
|
# ? May 23, 2024 10:26 |
No lie, as much as I loved these books when I was a kid and read the ones I had obsessively, it's wild what has stuck in my memory and what hasn't.. For example, I remember the Elimist showing up in this book, but none of the major plot beats in the aftermath, while at the same time, lines like this:quote:<I smell humans.> Ax confirmed. ....will bubble up through my lizard brain literally at least once a month.
|
|
# ? Aug 9, 2020 23:49 |