|
Arcturas posted:That sounds exactly like a question for the lawyer that helped you with the divorce & parental plan. They're going to know Oregon's rules about this stuff and have a better sense of how this specific judge will react. (Also if mom was represented, they may have a sense of how to lean on opposing counsel.) oh gently caress yeah, I love another needless and expensive fight, that sounds wonderful! My ex went unrepresented during trial as her lawyer dropped her a month before it because she wasn't following her advice, so that should give you a good sense of what I'm dealing with. Seeing as the judge tore her up during her decision, I likely could've got sole legal custody if I didn't voluntarily give it up. Live and learn.. I'm trying to compromise with her now by saying I can adopt some homeschooling stuff she comes up with, but no guarantees, and only if she keeps the kids enrolled. Depending on her response I'll hit up my lawyer to get his take on the situation. Thanks! e: cool I may have convinced her to go with the online academy our district is offering. It's not ideal but supplementing homschooling stuff off to the side can be done and doesn't require unenrolling kids from school. Louisgod fucked around with this message at 17:55 on Aug 5, 2020 |
#
?
Aug 5, 2020 17:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 21:45 |
|
|
If you have a family law attorney then definitely go talk to them about the situation. If you don't, maybe consult with one local to the area your case is in in the likely inevitable event that your agreement falls apart.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2020 19:18
|
|
|
euphronius posted:poo poo I think I forgot to do my state return Same, but also my federal. Guess I know what I'm doing when I get home from work.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2020 19:21
|
|
|
Louisgod posted:Depending on her response I'll hit up my lawyer to get his take on the situation. Thanks!
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2020 21:43
|
|
|
Just a practical thing to keep in the back of your head: a lot of home schooling folks are also anti-vaccination, which has specific implications for when one would be available for your kid. Make sure you're both going to be in agreement on this.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2020 23:14
|
|
|
Volmarias posted:Just a practical thing to keep in the back of your head: a lot of home schooling folks are also anti-vaccination, which has specific implications for when one would be available for your kid. Make sure you're both going to be in agreement on this. It's true, and thankfully she's not anti-vax though she unfortunately ticks off many other boxes (anti-gluten, anti-dairy, anti-soy, anti-dye). Even then, I personally wouldn't rush out to get the first covid vaccine on the market considering Trump's dipshit admin and the FDA.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2020 00:03
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:There’s a rich guy I know, probably worth about $500 million. Intentionally splits time between homes he owns in California, Louisiana, Wyoming, Florida and South Carolina do he legally doesn’t pay income tax in any state. (He could live in Florida or Wyoming full time but wants his fancy places in Louisiana, SC, and California.) Read about how when George Washington was president, he would live half the year down in Virginia and half the year up in Philadelphia (the capital at the time) in order to prevent his slaves from being freed by Pennsylvania.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2020 00:19
|
|
|
Louisgod posted:It's true, and thankfully she's not anti-vax though she unfortunately ticks off many other boxes (anti-gluten, anti-dairy, anti-soy, anti-dye). Congrats on the divorce
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2020 14:38
|
|
|
Louisgod posted:It's true, and thankfully she's not anti-vax though she unfortunately ticks off many other boxes (anti-gluten, anti-dairy, anti-soy, anti-dye). Even then, I personally wouldn't rush out to get the first covid vaccine on the market considering Trump's dipshit admin and the FDA. Sounds like she might be crabwalking her way down Contrail Parkway to Anti-vax Ave. But agreed on any 'tremendous medical breakthrough' with the current fuckwits fingerprints on it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2020 15:00
|
|
|
blarzgh posted:Congrats on the divorce been almost two years since, and as the kids these day say, it "owns".
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2020 15:46
|
|
|
So last Christmas I won a couple months of one of those “we send 3 meals a week” services in a raffle at a company Christmas party. The thing is I haven’t worked for the company for a few months now, and I’m still receiving the weekly shipments of food even though it’s way past the amount of time that I had won in the raffle. Anyone who would even remember me winning this has to my knowledge left the company or been laid off. The amount that they’re paying in monthly subscription fees is likely a tiny blip on their finances which is why I guess no one has noticed. I kind of want to just let it rock and let them keep paying for free dinners for me but is there anyway I can get in trouble for this legally if they ever realize what’s going on?
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2020 17:40
|
|
|
Ghosthotel posted:So last Christmas I won a couple months of one of those “we send 3 meals a week” services in a raffle at a company Christmas party. The thing is I haven’t worked for the company for a few months now, and I’m still receiving the weekly shipments of food even though it’s way past the amount of time that I had won in the raffle. The FDA could come after you for being unjustly enriched with seven vitamins and iron.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2020 19:58
|
|
|
I hope vitamin jail is cool at least
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2020 20:50
|
|
|
Ghosthotel posted:I hope vitamin jail is cool at least On the first day you have to beat up the biggest, baddest dude you can find or else you're gonna be force-fed vitamin C for your entire stay.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2020 23:38
|
|
|
therobit posted:On the first day you have to beat up the biggest, baddest dude you can find or else you're gonna be force-fed vitamin D for your entire stay.
|
|
#
?
Aug 11, 2020 03:11
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/WakeUp2Politics/status/1293161540435300352 Need to know this thread's take on this argument. I understand why it's being written off as ridiculous given the broader context around West's mental health and the GOP's involvement in propping up his campaign, but putting that aside it actually seems like a reasonable argument to me? Here's the snippet from legal filing: quote:14. Wisconsin law states that “[n]omination papers for independent candidates for president and vice president, and the presidential electors designated to represent them . . . may be filed not later than 5 p.m. on the first Tuesday in August preceding a presidential election.” Wis. Stat. § 8.20(8)(am). The Commission alleged that the nomination paperwork was filed at 5:00:14 p.m. See Aff. of Ruhland. Even if this is true, the nomination papers were filed “not 5:00:14pm is obviously later than 5:00:00pm, but is it later than "5 pm"??? Personally if someone tells me they need something no later than 5pm and I submit it before it's 5:01pm, then I'd feel like I submitted it in time. If I was trying to run for president I probably wouldn't push my luck to begin with, but that's beside the point
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2020 22:52
|
|
|
I’m with Kanye on this one
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2020 22:56
|
|
|
Nah, 'not later than 5:00pm' is functionally the same as 'not greater than 5.0', and i'd say 5.01 is more than 5.0. Or, not later than 5pm implies not later than 5:00:00, the number of decimal places doesn't need to be stated.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2020 23:10
|
|
|
What is year 0 AD. Are you 1 as soon as you leave the womb?
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2020 23:10
|
|
|
Sharks Eat Bear posted:5:00:14pm is obviously later than 5:00:00pm, but is it later than "5 pm"??? Personally if someone tells me they need something no later than 5pm and I submit it before it's 5:01pm, then I'd feel like I submitted it in time. If I was trying to run for president I probably wouldn't push my luck to begin with, but that's beside the point
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2020 23:11
|
|
|
Thanatosian posted:By your argument, wouldn't that give him until 5:59:59pm? Since it's "not later than 5pm," even though it would be later than 5:00pm? This.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2020 23:19
|
|
|
Thanatosian posted:By your argument, wouldn't that give him until 5:59:59pm? Since it's "not later than 5pm," even though it would be later than 5:00pm? Haha I thought about making this argument but knew it was too ridiculous. Seriously though I do feel like in informal, day-to-day usage, people measure time in hours & minutes, so I do think an average/reasonable person would in most circumstances agree that "not later than 5pm" is functionally "before 5:01pm" That said i'm not like All In on this argument, I just thought it maybe wasn't as absurd as it's being cast on twitter, and was curious if there's any actual legal precedent on an issue like this edit: also fwiw i think the whole kanye campaign and ties to the GOP is ridiculous & a little sad, in no way am I like rooting for him to get on the ballot euphronius posted:I’m with Kanye on this one yessssssss Sharks Eat Bear fucked around with this message at 23:32 on Aug 12, 2020 |
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2020 23:28
|
|
|
0 AD never existed
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2020 23:49
|
|
|
5 pm ends at 5:00:59 before 5:01:00. It’s not even close
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2020 23:52
|
|
|
Counting things is very hard
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2020 23:54
|
|
|
euphronius posted:5 pm ends at 5:00:59 before 5:01:00. when does it begin?
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2020 23:55
|
|
|
euphronius posted:5 pm ends at 5:00:59 before 5:01:00. 5 pm is a period that is 60 seconds in duration, beginning at go figure 5 pm. It’s very simple and Kanye is right despite his dragging feet and mental illness
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2020 23:56
|
|
|
Nah. That's wrong. Not later than 5 means it has to be in before 5.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2020 00:01
|
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:Nah. That's wrong. Not later than 5 means it has to be in before 5. No You can’t just say two different things mean the same thing
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2020 00:04
|
|
|
euphronius posted:No Not later than means cannot be after X time i.e. it must be in before X. Something due not later than 5 must be turned in before the clock ticks over to 5.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2020 00:06
|
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:Not later than means cannot be after X time i.e. it must be in before X. Something due not later than 5 must be turned in before the clock ticks over to 5. that means that if someone turns it in at exactly 5:00:00:00... pm, you're suggesting that it wouldn't meet the definition of "not later than 5pm"?
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2020 00:13
|
|
|
I’ll bite. Sure, because 5PM means 5:00:00.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 and so on. It’s a moment which does not exist for any duration. Perhaps as long as the Planck time, at most. So something can not happen DURING that moment, it must happen either before or after. Unless you or the observer a traveling at relativistic speeds, then I suppose it could happen both before and after depending on who you ask.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2020 00:17
|
|
|
5 pm exists for exactly 60 seconds it isn’t a physics mystery or anything.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2020 00:18
|
|
|
Nah
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2020 00:20
|
|
|
How much time elapses between 5 pm and 5:01 pm In seconds
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2020 00:21
|
|
|
60 seconds. The first of which is at 5:00:01, which is 1 second after 5PM... Maybe the problem is that, being a traffic lawyer, you can’t afford a clock that is more precise than minutes??
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2020 00:23
|
|
|
5:00:00 is the first second Not 5:00:01. Typical time amateur mistake
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2020 00:24
|
|
|
euphronius posted:How much time elapses between 5 pm and 5:01 pm 60. How much time exists between 5pm and 5:00:00.000000000001pm? .000000000001 seconds. Incidentally, both of those latter times are later than 5pm.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2020 00:41
|
|
|
Thanatosian posted:60. This guy fucks
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2020 00:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 21:45 |
|
|
Thanatosian posted:60. Your response is internally incoherent
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2020 00:43
|
|