Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Party In My Diapee
Jan 24, 2014
Just wondering regarding Lions led by donkeys, how come these seemingly average American guys are so left wing and and have a bunch of people listening? I thought those kind of politics were super fringe in the USA?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Arrhythmia
Jul 22, 2011

Party In My Diapee posted:

Just wondering regarding Lions led by donkeys, how come these seemingly average American guys are so left wing and and have a bunch of people listening? I thought those kind of politics were super fringe in the USA?

The American political landscape has changed dramatically in the last five or so years. Exercise to the reader as to why.

Penisaurus Sex
Feb 3, 2009

asdfghjklpoiuyt

Party In My Diapee posted:

Just wondering regarding Lions led by donkeys, how come these seemingly average American guys are so left wing and and have a bunch of people listening? I thought those kind of politics were super fringe in the USA?

Your 'average American' (that word is meaningless, America is like 12-14 monocultures that exist mostly in closed-off monads based on geography) has no real political ideology or compass and just cobbles together viewpoints.

Television backfills an ideology from that and sets the agenda, but by and large the American people are far more leftward leaning than their rulers at every level.

AnEdgelord
Dec 12, 2016
If you talked to the most diehard conservative about nationalizing industry you could probably convince them its a good idea so long as you dont mention socialism or communism by name.

Grand Fromage
Jan 30, 2006

L-l-look at you bar-bartender, a-a pa-pathetic creature of meat and bone, un-underestimating my l-l-liver's ability to metab-meTABolize t-toxins. How can you p-poison a perfect, immortal alcohOLIC?


Yeah. When you poll based on policies and leave out anything about parties or names, the majority of Americans are pretty left wing. Vastly different than the government.

feedmyleg
Dec 25, 2004
Yeah, the US is a country that is laughably swayed by propaganda. Use the right words and you can get a huge chunk of the population to completely shift their position to a more progressive one on any given matter. Then you point out their hypocrisy and they start foaming at the mouth.

whydirt
Apr 18, 2001


Gaz Posting Brigade :c00lbert:
Americans generally want left-wing policies, but also have severe crab-bucket mentality and are willing to be spiteful as hell about it.

Gaius Marius
Oct 9, 2012

feedmyleg posted:

Yeah, the US is a country that is laughably swayed by propaganda. Use the right words and you can get a huge chunk of the population to completely shift their position to a more progressive one on any given matter. Then you point out their hypocrisy and they start foaming at the mouth.

Yeah this is totally unique to America and certainly only runs one way politically :rolleyes:

feedmyleg
Dec 25, 2004
It's certainly not unique to the US, but we're more susceptible to it due to our deeply ingrained two-party system which splits the country almost exactly down the middle. The right is more susceptible not because they're less intelligent or savvy, but because there's a massive national right-wing television network that spews nonsense propaganda all day every day and there's no equivalent for the left. Plus the country is split mostly center and right, not right and left.

SlothfulCobra
Mar 27, 2011

AnEdgelord posted:

If you talked to the most diehard conservative about nationalizing industry you could probably convince them its a good idea so long as you dont mention socialism or communism by name.

The fun thing is that attempting to repurpose all the rhetoric for improvement of the social good but studiously distancing themselves from the nominative socialists and communists was one of the founding features of naziism.

Of course, most of the talk about social good was either a purposefully misleading lie or it was with the idea that only one ethnicity would get all of that government-provided social welfare. And of course, postwar America similarly was real big on government programs to promote social goods but only for whites. It's even possible that social welfare programs having been forced open is one of the reasons why there's now so much political will behind attempting to dismantle them, but I have no idea for certain. Racism as a motivating factor is definitely swimming around in politics, but it's hard to pin down, especially when some antiracists are often fine with classism.

Penisaurus Sex
Feb 3, 2009

asdfghjklpoiuyt

feedmyleg posted:

It's certainly not unique to the US, but we're more susceptible to it due to our deeply ingrained two-party system which splits the country almost exactly down the middle. The right is more susceptible not because they're less intelligent or savvy, but because there's a massive national right-wing television network that spews nonsense propaganda all day every day and there's no equivalent for the left. Plus the country is split mostly center and right, not right and left.

?

It's not split down the middle. Neither the Democratic nor Republican party represent a simple majority of the United States.

It'd be more correct to characterize the US as 2 pluralities that are represented by two parties of capital, one capital-intensive and one labor-intensive, and a disengaged majority that sees politics as, at best, a confirmation or refutation of the imaginary America.

AceOfFlames
Oct 9, 2012

SlothfulCobra posted:

The fun thing is that attempting to repurpose all the rhetoric for improvement of the social good but studiously distancing themselves from the nominative socialists and communists was one of the founding features of naziism.

Of course, most of the talk about social good was either a purposefully misleading lie or it was with the idea that only one ethnicity would get all of that government-provided social welfare. And of course, postwar America similarly was real big on government programs to promote social goods but only for whites. It's even possible that social welfare programs having been forced open is one of the reasons why there's now so much political will behind attempting to dismantle them, but I have no idea for certain. Racism as a motivating factor is definitely swimming around in politics, but it's hard to pin down, especially when some antiracists are often fine with classism.

I remember reading somewhere (probably even on these forums) a theory that the only reason the Scandinavian welfare state has survived for so long is because the Nordic countries are extremely racially homogenous and thus there was never any fear of “those people stealing our money” and now because of the refugee crisis, those fears have arrived and brought a bunch of right wing governments in those countries to power who are now eroding said welfare state. It sounds sadly plausible.

AceOfFlames fucked around with this message at 20:14 on Aug 19, 2020

Schadenboner
Aug 15, 2011

by Shine

SlothfulCobra posted:

It's even possible that social welfare programs having been forced open is one of the reasons why there's now so much political will behind attempting to dismantle them

IIRC this (and earlier fears about polio and later on air conditioning) is what happened to public swimming pools in a lot of areas?

SlothfulCobra
Mar 27, 2011

Penisaurus Sex posted:

?

It's not split down the middle. Neither the Democratic nor Republican party represent a simple majority of the United States.

It'd be more correct to characterize the US as 2 pluralities that are represented by two parties of capital, one capital-intensive and one labor-intensive, and a disengaged majority that sees politics as, at best, a confirmation or refutation of the imaginary America.

We don't have a labor-intensive party though. And while the Republicans were more centered on big business 30 years ago, now they're more centered on fundamentalism, racism, and a cult of personality.

Workers' rights don't command a major political platform in the US, and right now many of the former the big business republicans who don't have a lot of sunk cost or other reason to be interested in the party are dominating the democrats, although there is the whole progressive movement trying to infiltrate and push their platform, because that's literally the only way to put that platform out into American politics after that wing of the democrats was killed off in the 90s.

I guess in summary, politics in America have a lot of diversity of opinion that is totally snuffed out on the national level, and also often gets crowded out of all the media that we export across the planet, so it's understandable if you don't know about it if you don't live in the US. We in the US generally have much less of an idea of how other countries' politics are going ourselves, because we tend to export much more media than we import.

AnEdgelord
Dec 12, 2016
while no one would ever put it in these terms, there is a persistent feeling in the US that the rest of the world isn't actually real or at least feels very distant and muted, which mostly comes down to sheer geographic isolation as well as a cultural identity that continually looks inward

even when that feeling is ruptured by stuff like 9/11 its always ultimately about us and the terrorists themselves are reduced to cartoon villains with no motivation other than to hurt us because they "hate us for our freedom"

edit: in fact if you wanted a historical parallel to this attitude I would say its very similar to Imperial China's ideas about the rest of the world which had similar hegemonic control of its region as well as geographical isolation and was a major cultural exporter

AnEdgelord fucked around with this message at 23:28 on Aug 19, 2020

Gaius Marius
Oct 9, 2012

That's an absolutely moronic loving take. Every country on earth is primarily concerned with their own affairs, that doesn't mean they see the rest of the world as imaginary. I don't know what it is about the internet that makes people create these sweeping narratives based on absolutely nothing.

~Coxy
Dec 9, 2003

R.I.P. Inter-OS Sass - b.2000AD d.2003AD

Party In My Diapee posted:

Just wondering regarding Lions led by donkeys, how come these seemingly average American guys are so left wing and and have a bunch of people listening? I thought those kind of politics were super fringe in the USA?

I'm 99% sure that the overall podcast audience is nothing like a representative sample of "average American guys".

Grevling
Dec 18, 2016

AceOfFlames posted:

I remember reading somewhere (probably even on these forums) a theory that the only reason the Scandinavian welfare state has survived for so long is because the Nordic countries are extremely racially homogenous and thus there was never any fear of “those people stealing our money” and now because of the refugee crisis, those fears have arrived and brought a bunch of right wing governments in those countries to power who are now eroding said welfare state. It sounds sadly plausible.

That's bullshit, the reason it was established in the first place was as a truce between labor and capital after a period of high worker militancy in the early 20's century because capital was relatively weak and needed organized labor to cooperate to be competitive, they couldn't just crush it like in the US. It just hasn't been (completely) dismantled after that. It would be dismantled anyway, the immigrants are just one excuse.

Grevling fucked around with this message at 06:10 on Aug 20, 2020

Penisaurus Sex
Feb 3, 2009

asdfghjklpoiuyt

SlothfulCobra posted:

We don't have a labor-intensive party though. And while the Republicans were more centered on big business 30 years ago, now they're more centered on fundamentalism, racism, and a cult of personality.

Workers' rights don't command a major political platform in the US, and right now many of the former the big business republicans who don't have a lot of sunk cost or other reason to be interested in the party are dominating the democrats, although there is the whole progressive movement trying to infiltrate and push their platform, because that's literally the only way to put that platform out into American politics after that wing of the democrats was killed off in the 90s.

I guess in summary, politics in America have a lot of diversity of opinion that is totally snuffed out on the national level, and also often gets crowded out of all the media that we export across the planet, so it's understandable if you don't know about it if you don't live in the US. We in the US generally have much less of an idea of how other countries' politics are going ourselves, because we tend to export much more media than we import.

I guess 'labor-intensive capital' is too close to 'labor party'?

Labor-Intensive capital represents things that you would commonly associate with factory work or production. Usually it's a physical commodity being produced and sold; it's dominated by the cost of wages and the inputs of human labor (we can make more widgets if we hire more people to churn out widgets).

Capital-Intensive capital represents more 'modern' economic activity -- FIRE, Tech, etc. These industries' main input is excess capital, not labor. Apple is never going to hire 10,000 people in a month, but they'll absolutely take cheap credit to expand automation or speculate or advertise etc.

This is the primary divide in capital, in terms of economic activity. Republicans generally map to labor-intensive capital, while Democrats map to capital-intensive capital.

Penisaurus Sex fucked around with this message at 18:46 on Aug 20, 2020

twerking on the railroad
Jun 23, 2007

Get on my level

AceOfFlames posted:

I remember reading somewhere (probably even on these forums) a theory that the only reason the Scandinavian welfare state has survived for so long is because the Nordic countries are extremely racially homogenous and thus there was never any fear of “those people stealing our money” and now because of the refugee crisis, those fears have arrived and brought a bunch of right wing governments in those countries to power who are now eroding said welfare state. It sounds sadly plausible.

This is what right wing nationalists want to believe.

Which Scandinavian right wing governments did you have in mind? Erna Solberg is I suppose a conservative, but she's not exactly Boris Johnson or Geert Wilders.

Thwomp
Apr 10, 2003

BA-DUHHH

Grimey Drawer
There’s a new “In the Shadows of Utopia” episode up and the host cops to being addicted to context which is hilarious.

However, I don’t think it’s a bad thing. I’m learning all sorts of new stuff about southeast Asian history. This is the kind of good tangent (for the bad kind, see most of the tangents Carlin goes off on now that, while interesting, don’t fully relate to the topic at hand).

Count Roland
Oct 6, 2013

Thwomp posted:

There’s a new “In the Shadows of Utopia” episode up and the host cops to being addicted to context which is hilarious.

However, I don’t think it’s a bad thing. I’m learning all sorts of new stuff about southeast Asian history. This is the kind of good tangent (for the bad kind, see most of the tangents Carlin goes off on now that, while interesting, don’t fully relate to the topic at hand).

I'm 3 episodes into this and liking it a lot. Somr of his analogies aren't very useful but this is a standard feature of history podcasts so it's ok.

100YrsofAttitude
Apr 29, 2013




So I began re-listening It Could Happen Here with my partner last night. I had listened to it already while getting over eye surgery so I wasn't all that present. And frankly it's still real good, but boy it's weird listening to it in 2020. I know it was recorded less than 18 months ago, but man how things have changed. It's pretty interesting to get back into in retrospect.

The Glumslinger
Sep 24, 2008

Coach Nagy, you want me to throw to WHAT side of the field?


Hair Elf
Lions Lead By Donkeys just released an episode on the idiotic failed coup in Venezuela, but I could have sworn they already did one a few months ago, but I cant find it in the back catalog. Feel like I'm going crazy

echomadman
Aug 24, 2004

Nap Ghost

The Glumslinger posted:

Lions Lead By Donkeys just released an episode on the idiotic failed coup in Venezuela, but I could have sworn they already did one a few months ago, but I cant find it in the back catalog. Feel like I'm going crazy

Hell of a way to die did a episode about it, maybe you're thinking about that
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wa7Csry3L0w

Chairman Capone
Dec 17, 2008

Robert Evans had mentioned that Behind the Bastards will eventually do an episode on the failed coup, but he wanted to wait for more details to come out. And obviously some stuff has happened since then that has taken precedence.

AceOfFlames
Oct 9, 2012

The Dollop also did an episode on Goudreau and the coup.

The Glumslinger
Sep 24, 2008

Coach Nagy, you want me to throw to WHAT side of the field?


Hair Elf

AceOfFlames posted:

The Dollop also did an episode on Goudreau and the coup.

I'm probably thinking of that one, thanks

Lawman 0
Aug 17, 2010

Been digging this western civ podcast, nice and casual.
https://www.westerncivpodcast.com

GraPar
Jun 2, 2011
In Our Time back starting next week, for any fans of that :toot:. Do love that Bragg clearly just refused to do the show over Zoom.

WEH
Feb 22, 2009

GraPar posted:

In Our Time back starting next week, for any fans of that :toot:. Do love that Bragg clearly just refused to do the show over Zoom.

Ooo, sweet! I wasn’t sure it was going to come back until there was a vaccine.

Kazak_Hstan
Apr 28, 2014

Grimey Drawer
https://twitter.com/kthalps/status/1304554094208712706?s=21

I haven’t listened yet but it’s probably interesting.

MeatwadIsGod
Sep 30, 2004

Foretold by Gyromancy

Kazak_Hstan posted:

https://twitter.com/kthalps/status/1304554094208712706?s=21

I haven’t listened yet but it’s probably interesting.

If you listen to a decent amount of political podcasts there's probably not much here you haven't heard before, but it's worth a listen.

MeatwadIsGod fucked around with this message at 02:39 on Sep 12, 2020

WEH
Feb 22, 2009

GraPar posted:

In Our Time back starting next week, for any fans of that :toot:. Do love that Bragg clearly just refused to do the show over Zoom.

Scratch that, sounds like they did it over zoom but Bragg was in studio to thread that needle lol

Schadenboner
Aug 15, 2011

by Shine
I just wanted to “give a shout-out” (as the kids say these days) to whomever recommended the China History Podcast. It’s really really good/fun/interesting.

busalover
Sep 12, 2020
Anyone listened to Carlin's latest Common Sense? Apparently it's super doomy and gloomy.

Megazver
Jan 13, 2006
As opposed to the previous few, where he was chipper as heck? :)

busalover
Sep 12, 2020
I haven't listened to CS in a while, the only thing I remember was his "let's look at this from both sides" angle.

Halloween Jack
Sep 12, 2003
I WILL CUT OFF BOTH OF MY ARMS BEFORE I VOTE FOR ANYONE THAT IS MORE POPULAR THAN BERNIE!!!!!

Schadenboner posted:

I just wanted to “give a shout-out” (as the kids say these days) to whomever recommended the China History Podcast. It’s really really good/fun/interesting.
Can anyone compare it to the History of China podcast? I find myself listening to it in fits and starts, and relistening often because the details just don't stick in my head as much as more familiar currents of European history.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Omnicarus
Jan 16, 2006

busalover posted:

I haven't listened to CS in a while, the only thing I remember was his "let's look at this from both sides" angle.

He does the same thing again and also scolds protesters for not realizing that we just need to talk to each other.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply