|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:What a hosed up probation.... Probated for truth I am going to have to appeal this, justice cannot be denied.
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 00:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 06:49 |
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:I’m not wet Wet rear end Phil
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 00:55
|
|
|
Toona the Cat posted:Wet drat
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 01:23
|
|
|
שנה טובה קאפו
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 01:44
|
|
|
L’chaim
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 01:49
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:I’m not wet Ben Shapiro's wife right here EDIT: Beaten to it SlyFrog fucked around with this message at 02:33 on Sep 20, 2020 |
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 02:24
|
|
|
Soothing Vapors posted:lol congrats on your ascendancy into the cabal of chomos and wifebeaters you wet freak This is great, finally someone is stepping up and doing something.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 07:32
|
|
|
Toona the Cat posted:שנה טובה קאפו Philús lagabœtr
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 07:35
|
|
|
Soothing Vapors posted:lol congrats on your ascendancy into the cabal of chomos and wifebeaters you wet freak Somewhere Actus Rhesus looks up from her desk and just can't help but smile.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 08:10
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:this is a good “I’m not saying I support trump but the imaginary Biden in my head keeps doing terrible terrible things” but it needs a garnish that says “you can trust me, really, I have a keen sense of reality and am not reflexively making up stupid poo poo to defend the indefensible” like a “national review contributor” or a gang tag that says something like “noj...” ... hrmm I know your brain has been shattered so I'll give you a pass for this pathetic excuse of a post.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 09:12
|
|
|
So, over/under on Thomas being pushed to resign and getting replaced in the lame duck session should the election go badly for Republicans.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 20:34
|
|
|
Munin posted:So, over/under on Thomas being pushed to resign and getting replaced in the lame duck session should the election go badly for Republicans. How could they pressure someone with a lifetime position?
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 20:40
|
|
|
therobit posted:How could they pressure someone with a lifetime position? His wingnut wife will do it for them.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 20:46
|
|
|
therobit posted:How could they pressure someone with a lifetime position? I wouldn't care to speculate what inducements or threats might be available or necessary. If it does happen it might be a great day to have been a clerk for Thomas, and who he liked, and is now in their late 40s to mid 50s...
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 20:48
|
|
|
I don’t see how a scotus justice can be pressured into anything.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 21:34
|
|
|
They'll let him stay but if they wanted they'd just give his wife more.money than they already do.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 21:45
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:I don’t see how a scotus justice can be pressured into anything. A normal SCOTUS justice, or like baseball ticket debt Kav? As easily as Republican Senators were bought, it doesn’t seem so hard to pressure a judge anymore.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 21:50
|
|
|
for the rest of my days I will hold fast to this belief: phil pressing the button to probate me was an act of penetration, and he and I are now one flesh
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 21:55
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:I don’t see how a scotus justice can be pressured into anything. They call him up on the phone and offer his freak wife and whatever kids they have 5m/year no show jobs at some loving think tank Done
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 22:27
|
|
|
Phil and SV finally created joinder.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 22:31
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:I don’t see how a scotus justice can be pressured into anything. Ask Anthony Kennedy
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 23:19
|
|
|
Soothing Vapors posted:for the rest of my days I will hold fast to this belief: phil pressing the button to probate me was an act of penetration, and he and I are now one flesh Hot Now that’s pressure
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 23:42
|
|
|
terrorist ambulance posted:They call him up on the phone and offer his freak wife and whatever kids they have 5m/year no show jobs at some loving think tank That’s incentive but not pressure. These people think they’re demigods or more. Their kids will be rich, that’s not a motivator.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 23:44
|
|
|
Amy Coney Barrett, the judge at the top of Trump’s list to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg, has said we should always remember that a “legal career is but a means to an end … and that end is building the Kingdom of God."
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2020 23:46
|
|
|
Claiming to be an originalist should basically be a disqualifying factor. If the founding fathers came back today, they'd be horrified that we have women and black people on the Supreme Court. It's a term that lets you rule however you want while claiming no one should be able to disagree.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2020 00:34
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:Amy Coney Barrett, the judge at the top of Trump’s list to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg, has said we should always remember that a “legal career is but a means to an end … and that end is building the Kingdom of God." if I’m gonna have a legal career for a word, that word is poontang
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2020 01:10
|
|
|
Toona is one of the finest human beings in the world. All he needs is somebody to throw traveling pants at him the rest of his life.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2020 02:14
|
|
|
Toona should be thread IK because he is the GOAT, but also he'd probate you for some pussy
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2020 03:28
|
|
|
nm posted:Claiming to be an originalist should basically be a disqualifying factor. Conservatives aren't originalists any more, they felt comfortable saying it was all a pretense once they seized generational control of the courts. Adrian Vermule wrote an essay about their new "common good" theory of jurisprudence. The Common Good will somehow always magically favor the clients of the NoJoe V10 L&E lawyers that post here. Sab0921 fucked around with this message at 05:56 on Sep 21, 2020 |
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2020 05:41
|
|
|
Sab0921 posted:Conservatives aren't originalists any more, they felt comfortable saying it was all a pretense once they seized generational control of the courts. Adrian Vermule wrote an essay about their new "common good" theory of jurisprudence. Barrett claims to be an originalist.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2020 05:56
|
|
|
nm posted:Barrett claims to be an originalist. So did Scalia. So does Alito. It is clear that it was just a branding exercise that only meant no Substantive Due Process. Edit: Thomas probably actually is one Sab0921 fucked around with this message at 06:17 on Sep 21, 2020 |
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2020 06:11
|
|
|
Sab0921 posted:So did Scalia. So does Alito. It is clear that it was just a branding exercise that only meant no Substantive Due Process. Hence "claiming to be an orginalist."
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2020 06:42
|
|
|
nm posted:Claiming to be an originalist should basically be a disqualifying factor. The difference with current Republicans being...?
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2020 09:56
|
|
|
nm posted:Hence "claiming to be an orginalist." Look man - I'm just gonna be honest with you. I just saw an opening to lol a bit at our BigLaw Maoist crew and took it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2020 16:37
|
|
|
To be fair, the only positive right biglaw cares about is the right to contract... (he says incredulous that he's looking at going back to a firm)
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2020 18:17
|
|
|
Whitlam posted:The difference with current Republicans being...? Nah, current republicans class them as "good ones" as long as they vote the way they want.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2020 18:35
|
|
|
Barrett was my favorite FF7 character, excited to see how this cameo plays out!
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2020 17:34
|
|
|
Grip it and rip it posted:Barrett was my favorite FF7 character, excited to see how this cameo plays out! Court's dying Cloud.
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2020 17:36
|
|
|
Pook Good Mook posted:Court's dying Cloud. All the Senatorial races are the various atma weapons, trying to rebalance the mako stream. Grip it and rip it fucked around with this message at 18:05 on Sep 23, 2020 |
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2020 17:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 06:49 |
|
|
Wow one of the older lawyers at the place I'm working for got really pissed when I casually mentioned that republicans would appoint someone who would advance their policy goals to SCOTUS, he was the one that brought up the subject too so it's not like I was idly chatting on work time. Borderline screamed at me that I didn't understand that judiciary and judicial philosophy (something about originalism) if I thought that justices were just "politicians in robes". Is this (the supreme court being impartial) really like a sacrosanct belief or shibboleth among lawyers? Because uhh, there is more than a little research showing that it isn't true.
|
|
#
?
Sep 23, 2020 22:47
|
|