|
lmao https://twitter.com/Daily_Record/status/1311415019813449730?s=20
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 12:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 01:33 |
|
|
Apparently Corbyn's 'rule breaking' dinner was a wake, and therefore not against the rule of six, because wakes are exempt, because reasons. So the whole thing is manufactured outrage about a person to distract from outrage against inconsistent rules.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 12:57
|
|
|
One possible benefit to a boat is that, if the migrants can rebel and take the vessel, they can sail away and force their captors to do the £1p/h slave labour instead.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 13:01
|
|
|
i am having a lot of fun in my marketing course
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 13:05
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:Apparently Corbyn's 'rule breaking' dinner was a wake, and therefore not against the rule of six, because wakes are exempt, because reasons. A friend went to a wake and it was 30 people, max, split on to tables of 6 max with the 2 household rules. Seems less risky than any general pub setting, but yeah pandemic. Can't imagine how poo poo it would feel to lose someone and not even be able to have a wake at the moment though. Tough times.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 13:05
|
|
|
Doctor_Fruitbat posted:One possible benefit to a boat is that, if the migrants can rebel and take the vessel I support this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogNCqYmNB9I
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 13:06
|
|
|
Pistol_Pete posted:Well, it's definitely happening: Jose posted:They were too good for us
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 13:07
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:Apparently Corbyn's 'rule breaking' dinner was a wake, and therefore not against the rule of six, because wakes are exempt, because reasons. Do you have a link for that?
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 13:15
|
|
|
If that's true then surely someone at the wake took the picture and sold it despite knowing that it wasn't against the rules? Scummy as gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 13:20
|
|
|
Jaeluni Asjil posted:Do you have a link for that? e: ^^ Or they just used it without attribution, like the tabloids did with my friend's photos. He got a few grand out of that eventually, but they often hope people don't know the law.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 13:21
|
|
|
If the wake story is true expect the papers to report as: Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. Corbyn bad. also the picture is from a wake where groups of over 6 are allowed. Hah you can't sue us now
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 13:23
|
|
|
Weird for him to apologise if it was a wake tbh
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 13:27
|
|
|
sebzilla posted:Weird for him to apologise if it was a wake tbh Maybe he thought it was the quickest way to stop the press going on about it. While the press never ask tories to apologize, they are always demanding apologies from Corbyn, warranted or not.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 13:30
|
|
|
It still should have been 6 to a table if it was a wake, I guess. So it looks like he went to a gathering in honour of a friend who had died, and then more people arrived, making it over 6 to a table, and he didn't automatically beep boop and leave. So he was breaking the rule of 6, but not unlike any other normal person in that situation, if that's what happened.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 13:30
|
|
|
Jaeluni Asjil posted:Maybe he thought it was the quickest way to stop the press going on about it. It's crazy that he still lives rent free in the press' heads despite them already getting everything they wanted. It's deranged. E: Also seeing people compare this to Cummings, choosing not to see the difference between a slightly too large gathering and taking a family outing with symptoms.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 13:35
|
|
|
Yeah, that. Maybe he broke the rules by not automatically leaving the table mid-conversation when two more people showed up, raising the number to 7, but it's not "driving 30 miles to test your eyesight" level of abnormal human behaviour, but the press can't seem to let go of any opportunity. You won, your idiot manchild is crashing the country, get over it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 13:38
|
|
|
I wonder if BoJo's dad will apologise.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 13:43
|
|
|
For not using protection?
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 13:45
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:For not using protection? In a way I suppose it would be, yes.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 13:54
|
|
|
bessantj posted:I wonder if BoJo's dad will apologise. quote:“I’m extremely sorry for the slip-up and I would urge absolutely everybody to do everything they can to make sure they do follow the rules about masks and social distancing,” he said.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 14:04
|
|
|
Cerv posted:it would be uncharitable to point out that the mask in shops rule dates back to late July, more than 3 weeks ago. Yes, a very poor excuse.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 14:07
|
|
|
If your own son leads regular news briefings about the rules I don't think you have an excuse for not knowing the rules. Unless you hate your son I guess, which checks out.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 14:07
|
|
|
happyhippy posted:Just back from the shops, had to collect a prescription, it was pissing down, and I looked how I looked like a modern day computer game ninja jedi baddy with my hoodie and black face mask. me irl 
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 14:11
|
|
|
Cerv posted:it would be uncharitable to point out that the mask in shops rule dates back to late July, more than 3 weeks ago. Depends where he was. In Wales they didn't become compulsory until 14th September. Not in defence of Spaffer Snr but to show how it can get confusing when the news publicizes rules for England as if they are UK wide when they're not - gets especially confusing round here where the border between England and Wales snakes in and out between villages so drive down the same road and you're in Wales, under Welsh rules, a mile further on and it's England and English rules and another mile down the same road it's back in Wales again. Lots of people in the locality live in England/Wales, shop in Wales/England, have a GP in Wales/Englad, have to go to hospital in England/Wales, have family a mile away with different socializing rules.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 14:12
|
|
|
All fudge orders have shipped! So watch those mailboxes people! I do have a few bits of stock left in all flavours if anyone has missed out and wants to make a Hail Mary order.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 14:12
|
|
|
big scary monsters posted:Just nipping down to the chippie for a jelly supper, anyone want anything? I mean if jellied eels are a thing v0v Mine's a pie and mash with parsley liquor ta
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 14:13
|
|
|
A good video: https://twitter.com/PeoplesMomentum/status/1311621888175734785
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 14:13
|
|
|
Cerv posted:it would be uncharitable to point out that the mask in shops rule dates back to late July, more than 3 weeks ago. And even less charitable to point out that if he's just been abroad, he should probably be isolating.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 14:18
|
|
|
Spoilers. It's gonna rain.  https://twitter.com/metoffice/status/1311659633375936513
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 14:45
|
|
|
Thanks Comrade Cetacean.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 14:46
|
|
|
Jaeluni Asjil posted:Englad cheeky bants
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 14:47
|
|
|
The Met are even now trying to work out a way of getting an undercover copper in this dangerous subversive group.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 14:49
|
|
|
goddamnedtwisto posted:The Met are even now trying to work out a way of getting an undercover copper in this dangerous subversive group. They can just gently caress them, same as usual. It shouldn't be too hard to find a six foot prick in the Met.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 14:53
|
|
|
this is maybe the most embarrassing thing the media in the UK have ever done https://twitter.com/talkRADIO/status/1311385312967483393?s=20
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 15:00
|
|
|
Jose posted:this is maybe the most embarrassing thing the media in the UK have ever done Weird, it seems to have been deleted already.  e: wait no it seems to be an issue with Twitter. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 15:04
|
|
|
Jose posted:this is maybe the most embarrassing thing the media in the UK have ever done it's true, you can't be a real socialist if you live in a house and own books
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 15:13
|
|
|
Paperhouse posted:it's true, you can't be a real socialist if you live in a house and own books I bought a book once and now I'm a snooty Victorian lord
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 15:23
|
|
|
Paperhouse posted:it's true, you can't be a real socialist if you live in a house and own books If you live in a house and own books you are a 'champagne socialist'. If you don't live in a house and have nothing you are exhibiting 'the politics of envy'. In the eyes of the right, there is no one who can justify being a socialist. In the words of Senator Gracchus: "I don't pretend to be a man of the people. But I do try to be a man for the people." Gracchus : Fear and wonder, a powerful combination. Falco : You really think people are going to be seduced by that? Gracchus : I think he knows what
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 15:27
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:It still should have been 6 to a table if it was a wake, I guess. So it looks like he went to a gathering in honour of a friend who had died, and then more people arrived, making it over 6 to a table, and he didn't automatically beep boop and leave. The rule of 6 exemption for religious ceremonies, which a wake could qualify as, is only in venues with social distancing measures (where you can spend money) such as a pub or restaurant and you have to stay in tables of 6 and not move between. In a home you can only have 6 people in total. The wake thing is rubbish and Corbyn himself isn't using it. He hosed up and hes apologised. He might get fined 200quid I guess.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 15:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 01:33 |
|
|
NotJustANumber99 posted:He might get fined 200quid I guess. He won't get fined unless Boris also fines his dad £200
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2020 15:45
|
|