|
PT6A posted:How did they convince themselves this film has "no serious literary, artistic, political ... value"? These people dont look for that regardless. It's always surface level. But saying that makes the argument stick harder.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2020 23:34 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 13:20 |
|
CelticPredator posted:These people dont look for that regardless. It's always surface level. But saying that makes the argument stick harder. No, that phrase is literally a component of the crime (at least here, and I assume by its inclusion, there as well). Even fully naked minors may be depicted if the work falls into one of those categories, because the law is against "child pornography" not "nude or near-nude children." The prosecution must prove that the work is pornographic in nature and I don't think anyone could make the case that's what happening here, even if one or more pedophiles get a boner.
|
# ? Oct 7, 2020 00:46 |
|
absolutely hilarious.
|
# ? Oct 7, 2020 01:49 |
|
PT6A posted:No, that phrase is literally a component of the crime (at least here, and I assume by its inclusion, there as well). Even fully naked minors may be depicted if the work falls into one of those categories, because the law is against "child pornography" not "nude or near-nude children." The prosecution must prove that the work is pornographic in nature and I don't think anyone could make the case that's what happening here, even if one or more pedophiles get a boner. yea it's not just them being chuds, they literally have to show that there is zero artistic or political value in a story explicitly about a woman sharing her own experiences and hoping to reach parents of young girls like her to understand that perspective. Sharing one's perspective with the world is literally one of the definitions of art. Like, to be full on 'child porn' you have be making, you know, porn with kids, as in there's no real point to it other than getting the audience off, and it's a rough argument to make that a movie ending with the main character bursting into to tears in front of a shocked and disgusted audience is meant to give people a boner.
|
# ? Oct 7, 2020 03:31 |
|
Cut to a room full of old white republican men all emphatically insisting that while they 100% did not find it arousing because they are good Christians they all know plenty of degenerates who have told them they got excited watching it.
|
# ? Oct 7, 2020 03:38 |
|
yea I'm looking forward to the transcript of the obviously very normal and cool lawyer explaining how well OBVIOUSLY this movie about children is meant to be purely sexual as its primary function with nothing else to it, I mean just look at it, it's got, ya know, kids and...kids...and, you know...their bodies...the kids' bodies in outfits and all...I'm sorry what was the question?
|
# ? Oct 7, 2020 15:53 |
|
It's kind of weird to be having fantasies about other people having fantasies about children.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2020 06:19 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 13:20 |
|
Kangra posted:It's kind of weird to be having fantasies about other people having fantasies about children. That's just super empathy. You should be proud.
|
# ? Oct 8, 2020 07:02 |