|
Yeah, the lead of the moving target and elevation angle are the trickiest parts of the shot. Plus the minor movements of a person’s head in an automobile.
|
# ? Nov 23, 2020 23:04 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 05:41 |
|
GiP Political Pictures : Theorycrafting old assassinations
|
# ? Nov 23, 2020 23:09 |
|
mlmp08 posted:Yeah, the lead of the moving target and elevation angle are the trickiest parts of the shot. Plus the minor movements of a person’s head in an automobile. There are no minor head movements when I'm in the car.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2020 00:01 |
|
As someone whose only qual was in basic and consisted of "you didn't sweep anyone with your barrel, good job," this is all I have to contribute:
|
# ? Nov 24, 2020 01:06 |
|
LibCrusher posted:My USAF pre deployment training was 45 (I think) rounds through an M9. I only vaguely remember it because the Intel LT in the lane next to me failed because she didn’t load all her mags and failed hard. One of the security forces dudes running the course just re-shot her qual for her because she broke down crying once they figured out her issue. 45 for practice, 45 for the test. Good for the year.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2020 03:16 |
|
Every range I went to after boot was an utter clusterfuck, period. I shot expert on m16 after boot, so I was the shop guy that shot next to the ulls clerk when I "wanted more practice" and it was closing in on dusk because gently caress being at the range with a flashlight picking up brass because someone can't even make marksman. Then they gave me a saw and I "qual'd" on it shooting into an old jet bunker at Anaconda. Absolute shitshows every single time. Probably why I'm hesitant to go to a civilian range around here.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2020 04:14 |
|
i always shot a 33. every time. in order to get that you have to hit every target at least once. i dont get it either.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2020 06:36 |
|
The way the Army trains people on handguns is terrifying, i.e. they don't. Basically here's an M9, go qualify. Watching a CSM or various field grade officers struggle with how to operate a handgun while also stopping them from flagging half the range with a loaded pistol is
|
# ? Nov 24, 2020 14:54 |
|
I have attended exactly one handgun training in the Army where the instructor did not flag anyone and actually gave a decent 10 minute class. Every single other one, so many flaggings and no real effort to correct people. M17 way better than the M9 though!
|
# ? Nov 24, 2020 14:56 |
|
I have been through the 6th floor museum in Dallas a few times with family over the years and you can see right where he shot. Considering that JFK’s car was slowing down to come around a bend in the plaza and was slowing down if not literally standing still relative to Oswald’s frame of reference, and the height and overlook are ideal, it all makes the shot incredibly simple. My only experience is hunting and shooting at targets on a range and just conceptually I stood there every time and was like... yeah he could make those shots through a scoped rifle no doubt. I lived in Irving, TX for a few years and at one point my neighbor let me in on the fact that the house where his girlfriend lived, the one famous for the pic of him in front of the fence holding his rifle, was just a few streets down from me. People live there like nbd. Totally freaked me out when I found out about it.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2020 16:40 |
|
Flying_Crab posted:The way the Army trains people on handguns is terrifying, i.e. they don't. Basically here's an M9, go qualify. Watching a CSM or various field grade officers struggle with how to operate a handgun while also stopping them from flagging half the range with a loaded pistol is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mu51rszgotI
|
# ? Nov 24, 2020 17:08 |
|
mlmp08 posted:Yeah, the lead of the moving target and elevation angle are the trickiest parts of the shot. Plus the minor movements of a person’s head in an automobile. Aside from everything else, JFK was strapped in to a brace for his horribly hosed up back. His head wouldn't have moved much independent of the car.
|
# ? Nov 29, 2020 06:20 |
|
Flying_Crab posted:The way the Army trains people on handguns is terrifying, i.e. they don't. Basically here's an M9, go qualify. Watching a CSM or various field grade officers struggle with how to operate a handgun while also stopping them from flagging half the range with a loaded pistol is My fave is idiots who ever only shot striker fire pistols not realizing you can indeed hit a target at 5 yard with the double action pull by doing a thing called holding the loving gun properly. Dudes get it in their head everything the Army has sucks and it's like "that's fair, but you suck more than it does." Like how do y'all play Xbox for hours and not know how to modulate a loving trigger without moving the rest of your hand?? You don't need to be cocking the hammer for a loving extra pound of pressure, go jack off more or something. Wasabi the J fucked around with this message at 23:08 on Nov 29, 2020 |
# ? Nov 29, 2020 23:04 |
|
The M9 is too large for a significant percentage of the military, it’s not that hard of a stretch that people have trouble with issued guns.
|
# ? Nov 30, 2020 00:33 |
|
God gave you two hands and if I can teach the literal baby-handed folks in our unit to get a grip, there is no excuse. And rear end in a top hat know-it-alls on the range double and triple coaching shooters hosed them more than any fitment issues. Hyperbolic annoyances aside, it's all about surface area. Once you get as much skin on the grip as possible with both hands, everything else works out for most shooters. The main issue is the manual of arms has to be modified on a case by case basis, depending on how fat/short/wide the shooters hands are, but that can be re-trained. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2tizpgdiSk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1g2-46CxSLA Wasabi the J fucked around with this message at 13:35 on Nov 30, 2020 |
# ? Nov 30, 2020 13:26 |
|
The m9 sucked poo poo. It felt wrong as hell in my hands. The 1911 however felt perfect.
|
# ? Dec 1, 2020 00:02 |
|
ded posted:The m9 sucked poo poo. It felt wrong as hell in my hands. Opposite for me, I even bought a 92fs after I got out.
|
# ? Dec 1, 2020 00:22 |
|
I liked the M9 and was a drat good shot with it.
|
# ? Dec 1, 2020 00:32 |
|
I shot fine with the m9. I just didn't like how it felt. The double wide mag just made it feel like i was trying to shoot while holding a log.
|
# ? Dec 1, 2020 00:41 |
|
ded posted:I shot fine with the m9. I just didn't like how it felt. The double wide mag just made it feel like i was trying to shoot while holding a log. Welcome to every modern double stack magazine.
|
# ? Dec 1, 2020 00:45 |
|
Flikken posted:Welcome to every modern double stack magazine. M9 is in a different class with that though.
|
# ? Dec 1, 2020 00:45 |
|
Yeah I can shoot a glock 19 all day with no problem, but the M9 felt like a torture device on my soft baby Air Force hands.
|
# ? Dec 1, 2020 00:59 |
|
LibCrusher posted:Yeah I can shoot a glock 19 all day with no problem, but the M9 felt like a torture device on my soft baby Air Force hands. Exact opposite for me. A Beretta with Hogue grips is my favorite pistol to shoot.
|
# ? Dec 1, 2020 07:08 |
|
I like my M9, it fits my baby hands just fine. I sold a Sig 229 because it WAS too big. Best handgun for me though is the HP 35.
|
# ? Dec 1, 2020 15:09 |
|
I think the M9 grips felt fine, but they were just generally old as gently caress and clapped out, so it's not fair to compare to a privately purchased Beretta 92, even if you bought a used Beretta 92. Fit my hands fine, but I have large hands. The M17 is excellent in comparison, though. Just a great shooter, better recoil profile, and I prefer the safety placement.
|
# ? Dec 1, 2020 15:15 |
|
My first deployment we carried M11 pistols, which were some model of Sig Sauer da/sa 9mm. Those things had an amazing grip shape and angle, just perfect. Ruined me for the M9 forever.
|
# ? Dec 1, 2020 15:56 |
|
US Berder Patrol posted:My first deployment we carried M11 pistols, which were some model of Sig Sauer da/sa 9mm. Those things had an amazing grip shape and angle, just perfect. Ruined me for the M9 forever. P228 basically.
|
# ? Dec 1, 2020 21:07 |
|
I liked the M9 and shot well with it, I liked it enough that I may buy one. That said the grip is huge and I don’t fault anyone who hated it. Especially if your hands weren’t large.
|
# ? Dec 1, 2020 23:57 |
|
Richard Bong posted:I liked the M9 and shot well with it, I liked it enough that I may buy one. That said the grip is huge and I don’t fault anyone who hated it. Especially if your hands weren’t large. I have huge hands and the thing still feels awkward, but that also might be because mlmp08 posted:they were just generally old as gently caress and clapped out, so it's not fair to compare to a privately purchased Beretta 92, even if you bought a used Beretta 92. The P228 was nice, but in general I'm a loving Navy officer so I don't need to care about any of this poo poo.
|
# ? Dec 1, 2020 23:59 |
|
|
# ? Dec 2, 2020 05:24 |
|
US Berder Patrol posted:My first deployment we carried M11 pistols, which were some model of Sig Sauer da/sa 9mm. Those things had an amazing grip shape and angle, just perfect. Ruined me for the M9 forever. Oh trust I'm a sig dude. I love their DA/SA and even their latest striker fire is pretty nice. Almost bought one back when the red box ones were like $450
|
# ? Dec 2, 2020 07:06 |
|
https://twitter.com/jennyposting/status/1333212111997194244?s=20
|
# ? Dec 2, 2020 07:54 |
|
from replies https://twitter.com/WobbenBuffet/status/1333240803230101506?s=20
|
# ? Dec 2, 2020 08:22 |
|
Stultus Maximus posted:The P228 was nice, but in general I'm a loving Navy officer so I don't need to care about any of this poo poo. What kind of a grip do you have on your issue cutlass
|
# ? Dec 2, 2020 12:49 |
|
|
# ? Dec 3, 2020 08:10 |
|
It appeals to me.
|
# ? Dec 3, 2020 17:22 |
|
source:https://twitter.com/iammarcpi/status/1333522206568050688/photo/1
|
# ? Dec 3, 2020 21:41 |
|
aphid_licker posted:What kind of a grip do you have on your issue cutlass Super tactical pistol grip conversion.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2020 00:06 |
|
https://twitter.com/R3volutionDaddy/status/1335308919925706753
|
# ? Dec 5, 2020 23:45 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 05:41 |
|
I've seen this one a few times over the last month https://twitter.com/LoveKrims/status/1335530850566328320/photo/1 Do the people posting this not realize that scientists, scholars, historians, economists, and journalists have been the enemy of conservatives since roughly 1800?
|
# ? Dec 6, 2020 22:45 |