|
Ric posted:We call those clouds. They're a mass of visible water droplets suspended in the atmosphere. It looks like a mural. Same for one of the pipes the right.
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2020 19:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 00:10 |
|
|
Ric posted:Is this a scanned print or scanned negative? Scanned negative. theHUNGERian posted:It looks like a mural. Same for one of the pipes the right. Maybe ANR glass pattern coming through?
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2020 21:19
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 01:04
|
|
|
   
real nap shit fucked around with this message at 02:18 on Dec 7, 2020 |
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 19:59
|
|
|
Nice lumps my man
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 22:16
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2020 17:16
|
|
|
 Cherry Creek Park by B. B., on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2020 18:57
|
|
|
 DJI_0303.jpg by Matt F, on Flickr  DJI_0300.jpg by Matt F, on Flickr  DJI_0308.jpg by Matt F, on Flickr  DJI_0312.jpg by Matt F, on Flickr  DJI_0284.jpg by Matt F, on Flickr  DJI_0321.jpg by Matt F, on Flickr Beve Stuscemi fucked around with this message at 04:02 on Dec 8, 2020 |
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2020 03:54
|
|
|
   
real nap shit fucked around with this message at 03:19 on Dec 9, 2020 |
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2020 22:56
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2020 22:36
|
|
|
window shopping 
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2020 23:03
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2020 23:03
|
|
|
bobmarleysghost posted:window shopping Both of these rule
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2020 23:14
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2020 23:25
|
|
|
The sky looks over saturated and it's a bit distracting having it be different colours in each photo. I think I can see what you're going for, particularly in the first photo, but to be honest I'm pretty confused by the second one. Would you mind explaining what you were trying to accomplish there?
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2020 23:27
|
|
|
Megabound posted:Both of these rule ty
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2020 23:28
|
|
|
Health Services posted:The sky looks over saturated and it's a bit distracting having it be different colours in each photo. Hmm, the 2nd one is the only one I like I think, and I just liked the play of the shadows on the wall.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2020 23:37
|
|
|
Health Services posted:The sky looks over saturated and it's a bit distracting having it be different colours in each photo. the implication of the dishes on another roof is cool
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2020 00:26
|
|
|
I liked the second one of that bunch as well. I'd be interested to see if there would have been a way to keep/follow more of the shadow of the roof line further to the left where it's cut off by the cars.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2020 01:00
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2020 03:13
|
|
|
These are rad
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2020 04:39
|
|
|
  
real nap shit fucked around with this message at 10:06 on Dec 10, 2020 |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2020 06:48
|
|
|
ansel autisms posted:i've been thinking a lot about this joel meyerowitz interview answer lately: Thanks for posting this link, it's a great read. One thing that stuck out to me is Meyerowitz describing the feeling of walking into some "zone" of "energy" that you just feel is right, and taking the picture there. He touches upon it in the quote you mentioned I think, mentioning how a smell can lead to a photo, even though it's not something visual. I feel like I have those moments where I step into an area that resonates with me and I feel like something about the area tells me there's a photo there. However, I also feel like I talk myself out of those photos more often than not, even as I'm actively trying to shoot them. It feels like I'll either spend far too much time trying to find the ~*perfect*~ composition and thus spend way too much time looking at the frame and the scene and wind up disliking it and losing that moment that grabbed me, or I'll rush things trying to avoid spending too much time on it and thus wind up with sloppy shots that I look back on and wonder what I even saw in the scene in the first place. I think when I'm shooting digital I tend to go too fast and loose and get sloppy shots, since my number of shots are practically unlimited. Conversely, with film I tend to over-analyze the scene to the point of going numb to it and often just not shooting it at all - since I don't want to "waste" film, especially with large format. Every time I've gone out to shoot for probably the last two months, I bring my large format and my digital with me, and I always wind up over-analyzing scenes so I never take my 4x5 out of my backpack. So instead I wind up shooting with my digital camera and end up being too impulsive and don't turn out anything good there either. Reading Meyerowitz describe using a view camera almost like a 35mm makes me think I need to stop talking myself out of the film shots, and the nature of 4x5 will hopefully slow me down to the point of not being sloppy. Maybe I'll just wind up taking tons of generic soulless photos and wasting tons of money on sheet film, but I think it's probably necessary to help me find "my voice" for lack of a better term. Obviously this is just something I need to spend time practicing with, but it's fun to discuss, and this interview helped me reflect on my own photographic process. Thanks again for posting it!
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2020 08:00
|
|
|
I think it's definitely important to pay attention to that instinct, after all photography is very visceral and deals in these kinds of ephemeral feelings - it only makes sense that feeling "charged" when looking at a scene will (hopefully) translate to the photos made there. I've been having similar problems, I suppose. I'll find a scene that seems right up my alley but I get overwhelmed with the amount of ways to shoot it and I can't seem to get a good shot that also captures the way I feel about it. I think it's important to try, regardless, so maybe digital might be the way to go if you're really unsure. real nap shit fucked around with this message at 18:52 on Dec 10, 2020 |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2020 16:53
|
|
|
I like this. I can’t tell if it’s taken at head height with a normal camera or from 50 feet up with a drone or something. It’s very hard to pin down
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2020 16:55
|
|
|
If you can't find that middle ground between taking an hour to set up a shot with your view camera and machine gunning everything with a DSLR, try incorporating your tripod into the workflow. Get a geared head and use the tripod for every single shot even if you could do it handheld, force yourself to spend 5 minutes taking a photo. Or drop your bag on the ground to anchor yourself to a specific location, then hang out for five minutes looking at stuff. If something caught your eye enough to make you consider taking a picture there's almost certainly something to shoot there, but getting it recorded effectively requires slowing down and studying.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2020 17:06
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2020 18:26
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2020 21:48
|
|
|
Love the colours in this one. Just kinda wish the horizon had been lower in frame, otherwise I think composition is very good.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2020 21:55
|
|
|
If there wasn't a hill in the background I'd think that was taken at a tallgrass prairie preserve near me in northern Illinois. I still did a doubletake.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2020 22:11
|
|
|
xzzy posted:If there wasn't a hill in the background I'd think that was taken at a tallgrass prairie preserve near me in northern Illinois. I still did a doubletake. It's by downtown Toronto.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2020 22:26
|
|
|
Health Services posted:It's by downtown Toronto. Lol I knew it. First thing I thought was pippit point.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2020 23:36
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2020 15:52
|
|
|
^I dig the layers and lines on that one. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2020 19:26
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2020 02:23
|
|
|
Mmm yes. Love the low contrast, muted colours and reflected sky. Also the way the sharp dark reflected trees in the lower right contrast with the soft, smudgy brown actual trees in the upper left. Finger Prince fucked around with this message at 02:31 on Dec 14, 2020 |
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2020 02:28
|
|
|
Finger Prince posted:Mmm yes.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2020 03:48
|
|
|
  
real nap shit fucked around with this message at 02:13 on Dec 15, 2020 |
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2020 05:19
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2020 18:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 00:10 |
|
|
  Trying to figure out the right level of bringing up the buildings without creating a ton of detail that distracts from the sky. Normally I leave everything but the sky black but I wanted to try something new because I already have a million contre jour sky pictures
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2020 03:38
|
|
