Yeah Nah? This poll is closed. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Yeah Nah | 122 | 53.51% | |
Nah Yeah | 64 | 28.07% | |
Nah Yee | 18 | 7.89% | |
No Yes | 9 | 3.95% | |
Yes No | 15 | 6.58% | |
Total: | 228 votes |
|
Squidtits posted:Anyone else getting a "Fast. Affordable. Sooner" feeling regarding the vaccine rollout? No I dont because it is a load of media beatup. AstraZeneca is possibly as high as 90% (the half dose result) and even if it is 70%? That's actually really good for a vaccine and more than adequate. There is also a multi-vaccine strategy where Pfizer is to be given to the more vulnerable / critical groups (10 million doses on order), one other vaccine that I cant remember the name of and AstraZeneca given to others. Modenca has so far refused to supply due to mostly the fact they just cant meet anything close to demand.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2021 11:57 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 17:36 |
|
generally 50% effectiveness is considered acceptable for vaccines so i'm not too concerned at this stage
|
# ? Jan 13, 2021 12:12 |
CAT INTERCEPTOR posted:No I dont because it is a load of media beatup. AstraZeneca is possibly as high as 90% (the half dose result) and even if it is 70%? That's actually really good for a vaccine and more than adequate. There is also a multi-vaccine strategy where Pfizer is to be given to the more vulnerable / critical groups (10 million doses on order), one other vaccine that I cant remember the name of and AstraZeneca given to others. Modenca has so far refused to supply due to mostly the fact they just cant meet anything close to demand. Yeah with the flu shot don't they give the really good one to vulnerable people through doctors offices and everyone else has to go to a pharmacy for the slightly less effective one?
|
|
# ? Jan 13, 2021 13:15 |
|
Does taking the Astra Zeneca vaccine preclude you from taking the Pfizer vaccine later on when demand eases?
|
# ? Jan 13, 2021 15:20 |
|
The Lord Bude posted:Does taking the Astra Zeneca vaccine preclude you from taking the Pfizer vaccine later on when demand eases? Or if you've already had covid? There's a bunch of Questions that can be asked. My fear is an attempted return to normal without the herd immunity. What of you're one of the unlucky ones that can't vaccinated. There's always going to be the lol bl on losing your taste and smell. You got unlucky. It's not the future scenario I want but I suppose perfect is the enemy of good.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2021 20:59 |
|
|
# ? Jan 13, 2021 21:27 |
|
Bag of (shredded) goon
|
# ? Jan 13, 2021 21:30 |
|
Maybe worse.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2021 21:30 |
|
goon cheese is just smegma
|
# ? Jan 13, 2021 21:32 |
|
The Lord Bude posted:Does taking the Astra Zeneca vaccine preclude you from taking the Pfizer vaccine later on when demand eases? No, there's been a heap of vaccines that have been changed in the past and people have gotten the new ones with no problems.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2021 22:05 |
|
Big Willy Style posted:goon cheese is just smegma Name post c-c-c-c-combo!
|
# ? Jan 13, 2021 22:16 |
|
Big Willy Style posted:goon cheese is just smegma KJS was diagnosed with lung cancer shortly after incarceration in 2014. He also suffered from ischaemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, obesity, obstructive sleep apnoea, bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, prostate cancer and lumbar osteoarthritis. KJS was given radiotherapy and other treatments but the cancer progressed and he died in August 2015. The coroner found that the care, supervision and treatment of KJS was of an appropriate standard.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2021 23:45 |
|
CAT INTERCEPTOR posted:No I dont because it is a load of media beatup. AstraZeneca is possibly as high as 90% (the half dose result) and even if it is 70%? That's actually really good for a vaccine and more than adequate. There is also a multi-vaccine strategy where Pfizer is to be given to the more vulnerable / critical groups (10 million doses on order), one other vaccine that I cant remember the name of and AstraZeneca given to others. Modenca has so far refused to supply due to mostly the fact they just cant meet anything close to demand. What is the efficacy a measure of though? Is it 95% efficacy at preventing contraction of disease or of preventing severe disease while not neccesserily preventing infection?
|
# ? Jan 14, 2021 00:17 |
|
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-01-14/when-backpackers-went-home-these-australians-tried-farm-work/13047062 ABC interviews some Australians who turned off Netflix and went to farms. My favourite is the 14 year old working 12 hours a day for $14/hr and going "this is fine".
|
# ? Jan 14, 2021 00:22 |
|
Eediot Jedi posted:https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-01-14/when-backpackers-went-home-these-australians-tried-farm-work/13047062 Standard award agreements state that 15-year-olds and younger are paid 50% of the wage of a 21-year-old so the rate of pay probably is fine Working 12 hour days at 14 absolutely isn't though
|
# ? Jan 14, 2021 01:23 |
|
we back to the 16th century boys
|
# ? Jan 14, 2021 01:28 |
|
Eediot Jedi posted:https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-01-14/when-backpackers-went-home-these-australians-tried-farm-work/13047062 how the hell wasn't there something for him to fill his water up on a farm
|
# ? Jan 14, 2021 02:19 |
|
Town water is expensive! They'd go broke if they just threw it at every 14 year old with 'heatstroke'
|
# ? Jan 14, 2021 02:28 |
|
Water isn't for drinking it's for selling.
|
# ? Jan 14, 2021 02:37 |
|
LIVE AMMO COSPLAY posted:Water isn't for drinking it's for selling.
|
# ? Jan 14, 2021 02:43 |
|
Eediot Jedi posted:https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-01-14/when-backpackers-went-home-these-australians-tried-farm-work/13047062 quote:She missed out on a job that would have required her to work 12-hour days, seven days a week. I'd gladly work 84 hours a week for free manning the guillotine for these wannabe slavers
|
# ? Jan 14, 2021 03:42 |
|
LIVE AMMO COSPLAY posted:Water isn't for drinking it's for selling. Remember this one lol https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/dec/12/queensland-school-water-commercial-bottlers-tamborine-mountain
|
# ? Jan 14, 2021 03:46 |
|
https://twitter.com/CUPUWorkers/status/1349140089872347138
|
# ? Jan 14, 2021 04:39 |
|
Eediot Jedi posted:https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-01-14/when-backpackers-went-home-these-australians-tried-farm-work/13047062 My favourite bit was the person who drank half a water bottle and then realised there was nowhere to get more water and would have to ration the other half a bottle of water over the remainder of their 12 hour shift. Farmers are hosed eh?
|
# ? Jan 14, 2021 05:57 |
|
LIVE AMMO COSPLAY posted:Water isn't for drinking it's for selling.
|
# ? Jan 14, 2021 06:07 |
|
lol remember that school that ran out of water in qld because nestle or coke or something was using all the water? edit: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/dec/12/queensland-school-water-commercial-bottlers-tamborine-mountain crepeface fucked around with this message at 06:22 on Jan 14, 2021 |
# ? Jan 14, 2021 06:15 |
|
They have every rigth to better pay.
|
# ? Jan 14, 2021 13:33 |
|
crepeface posted:lol remember that school that ran out of water in qld because nestle or coke or something was using all the water?
|
# ? Jan 14, 2021 14:17 |
|
gosh maybe the state shouldn't be selling something in such high demand to make gatorade
|
# ? Jan 14, 2021 15:02 |
|
crepeface posted:gosh maybe the state shouldn't be selling something in such high demand to make gatorade They’re selling it to the farmers as well, at prices so low that water bottling companies will buy as much as they can lay their hands on.
|
# ? Jan 15, 2021 01:06 |
|
gosh maybe the state shouldn't be selling something in such high demand for farmers to resell?!?
|
# ? Jan 15, 2021 01:13 |
|
crepeface posted:gosh maybe the state shouldn't be selling something in such high demand for farmers to resell?!? Edit - except I'd say we should be selling it to farmers at a price where there's no profit in reselling it.
|
# ? Jan 15, 2021 01:33 |
|
So why can't we just sell water to local primary producers at a cheaper rate? And then make it illegal to sell that water? I dunno I'm not a lawyer. Seems loving insane that the free market is just at play here for no other reason than "multiple state MPs own stakes in foreign owned wineries in the region" lmao I looked it up and a bunch of national LNP mps as well. But yeah the farmers selling the water because its literally more profitable than growing food are to blame. Jezza of OZPOS fucked around with this message at 01:42 on Jan 15, 2021 |
# ? Jan 15, 2021 01:39 |
|
Malcolm Turnbeug posted:So why can't we just sell water to local primary producers at a cheaper rate? And then make it illegal to sell that water?
|
# ? Jan 15, 2021 01:44 |
|
The Artificial Kid posted:Because there isn't enough water. There are a lot of places where food is being grown where we can't actually afford to grow food. there's a real discussion about water use efficacy and how much of our water ag actually needs to provide adequate food security, which is an important thing, but given that you have absolutely no insight into resource management I have to assume you are taking the piss and couldn't give less of a gently caress about that and are just trying to be argumentative on the internet for fun. Sorry if thats not the case but maybe take a look at how you actually talk online if it isnt.
|
# ? Jan 15, 2021 01:46 |
|
oh he's the 'masks cost too much' guy lol
|
# ? Jan 15, 2021 01:51 |
|
Malcolm Turnbeug posted:there's a real discussion about water use efficacy and how much of our water ag actually needs to provide adequate food security, which is an important thing, but given that you have absolutely no insight into resource management I have to assume you are taking the piss and couldn't give less of a gently caress about that and are just trying to be argumentative on the internet for fun. Sorry if thats not the case but maybe take a look at how you actually talk online if it isnt.
|
# ? Jan 15, 2021 02:07 |
|
Dude just get a hobby or something. Jerk off fifteen times in a row. Literally anything except what you're doing here E: if you're actually serious; it's a huge topic that has lots of literature and arguments on both sides. I'm not actually qualified to educate you on it. Unclear why you would want a random on the internet to 'educate' you Jezza of OZPOS fucked around with this message at 02:19 on Jan 15, 2021 |
# ? Jan 15, 2021 02:13 |
|
if only there was a way of setting a maximum on how much water someone gets instead of throwing open the doors to the aquifer like an all you can eat buffet but such restraints on the system would violate the tenets of a free market. ahh well, at least number went up
|
# ? Jan 15, 2021 02:21 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 17:36 |
|
lol https://twitter.com/anthonydever/status/1349666878868766720?s=21
|
# ? Jan 15, 2021 02:27 |