|
Acebuckeye13 posted:always... in my head ... yerk ...
|
# ? Jan 22, 2021 07:27 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 10:27 |
Kill all Yeerks!
|
|
# ? Jan 22, 2021 07:52 |
|
I am gonna make it through this Yeerk if it kills me.
|
# ? Jan 22, 2021 13:16 |
|
Animorphs-Book 16:The Warning-Chapter 7quote:I wasn’t lying when I’d told Tobias that flying as a fly is cool. I mean, in some ways it’s bad because you can’t see very well, so you don’t get to look around while you’re flying. Yea. Jake has the social awareness of a turnip. quote:<So what now?> Tobias asked. They're serving a meal on an hour and a half flight? In the 90s? I took a bunch of hour and a half long flights in the late 90s, and was lucky if I got a soda and some trail mix. quote:Oh, man, you have no idea how much my fly body wanted to go down and land on that Salisbury steak and splash around in the gravy. But that would have been suicidal. Apparently, the people on this flight have read this thread. Chapter 8 quote:I was in the crack of the hand’s lifeline. And because of that tiny indentation, I had not died. But I was shattered. So, fun fact. They've fairly recently (after this book came out), discovered flies actually can feel pain. And moreover, they can feel chronic pain. Flies can actually feel neuropathy from things like a damaged leg that has since healed. Some scientists think that this discovery can be used to find ways to better treat chronic pain and neuropathy in humans in better ways than things like opiates, which are dangerous and carry the risk of addiction. quote:<Aaaahhh! Aaaahhh! Aaaahhh!> Jake has the worst luck morphing insects, The cockroach morph got him first stuck in a roach motel and then poisoned. The ant morph doesn't need to be mentioned. And now this.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2021 04:18 |
|
Epicurius posted:So, fun fact. They've fairly recently (after this book came out), discovered flies actually can feel pain. And moreover, they can feel chronic pain. Flies can actually feel neuropathy from things like a damaged leg that has since healed. Some scientists think that this discovery can be used to find ways to better treat chronic pain and neuropathy in humans in better ways than things like opiates, which are dangerous and carry the risk of addiction. I've always thought the "insects don't feel pain" conventional wisdom is a cop-out from people who don't want to feel bad about snuffing them. Though having said that, despite being the kind of guy who puts spiders in cups and then takes them outside, the two insects I will absolutely kill and feel happy about doing it are flies and mosquitoes. gently caress 'em.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2021 04:31 |
|
Jake is very much not okay, as the rest of this book and future books will show
|
# ? Jan 23, 2021 05:06 |
|
freebooter posted:I've always thought the "insects don't feel pain" conventional wisdom is a cop-out from people who don't want to feel bad about snuffing them. I think a lot of it probably is, but the "can animals feel pain" debate has a really long history, both philosophically and, more recently, scientifically. In the renaissance, for instance, a bunch of people believed that animals didn't feel pain, or anything at all. Descartes, for instance, believed that animals didn't have consciousness...they were automatia....basically robots that acted like they were conscious but aren't really. A lot of the debate now that we've figured out a model of how pain works in humans and the human nervous system is, what happens with animals who have a different kind of nervous system than we do. For instance, in mammals, there's a part of the brain called the anterior cingulate cortex, which, among other things, registers physical pain (it also handles emotion, impulse control, etc). If you hook a person up to a brain scan, and they're in pain, that's the part of the brain that lights up. Now, fish, for instance, don't have an anterior cingulate cortex. So this raises the question, "Does a fish feel pain, and if so, how does it do it?", and it's a lot harder to hook a fish up to a brain scan. Then some people bring up opiod receptors, which are structures in the nervous system that binds to stuff like opiates and endorphins and blocks pain reception, and vertebrates have that but invertebrates don't. Is that because invertebrates don't need it or have they just never developed it, and if vertebrates all have it, does that mean they all feel pain and make brain chemicals to fight it, or does it serve other secondary functions? So, it's really a big debate.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2021 06:12 |
|
Flies don't have lungs?
|
# ? Jan 23, 2021 08:50 |
|
GodFish posted:Flies don't have lungs? nope, little openings called spiracles
|
# ? Jan 23, 2021 09:13 |
|
Also you start getting into (on the philosophical side at least) arguments about functionality, form and phenomenology of pain i.e. if fish have some brain pattern that elicits the same kind of behaviour as pain does in humans, is that 'pain' as we understand it? We could potentially transfer a similar self preservation coding to future robots, would we then say that because we've got the behaviour from the relevent stimuli that those robots experience pain? Which is probably closer to what Descartes believed, not that animals didn't feel anything when they got hurt but that they were essentially pure instinct with some underlying memory of stimuli. It was a view of animals that really only works when you have no knowledge of evolution and believe that consciousness is a non physical process added to the human body. Like a Yeerk (is this relevant to the thread again?)
|
# ? Jan 23, 2021 09:39 |
|
I love that this series answers the ancient philosophical debate of "can animals feel pain?" with a resounding "oh, you have no loving idea."
|
# ? Jan 23, 2021 10:47 |
|
Epicurius posted:In the renaissance, for instance, a bunch of people believed that animals didn't feel pain, or anything at all. Descartes, for instance, believed that animals didn't have consciousness...they were automatia....basically robots that acted like they were conscious but aren't really. Hell, until shockingly recently, doctors believed that babies don't feel pain.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2021 11:16 |
|
Rochallor posted:Hell, until shockingly recently, doctors believed that babies don't feel pain. 1985
|
# ? Jan 23, 2021 12:23 |
|
Looks like I was born just in time to avoid the "babies must be screaming for fun" era of medicine
|
# ? Jan 24, 2021 02:04 |
|
Animorphs-Book 16:The Warning-Chapter 9quote:Fortunately, no one seemed to notice that I hadn’t been on the plane before I emerged from the bathroom. We were landing, so I guess the flight attendants were distracted. So open question here. Why do you think he's afraid he's admit to be scared to Cassie here? Is it an age and masculinity thing? A leadership thing? A boyfriend thing? quote:Rachel had gone to the Western Union office. We needed clothing and it turns out you can send money by wire and pick it up by supplying a code word. Rachel went to pick up the money and get us something approaching shoes at an airport shop. Now you know where our allowances go. When this is over, Ax needs to go into marketing. "Tabasco: Tasty and Full of Flavor" is a great slogan. quote:The WAA Building was one of those medium-sized buildings, maybe twenty floors high and not all that modern. We loitered around outside, trying to figure out what to do next. And that’s when a bus pulled up and a bunch of old people started climbing out. So at least getting into the building was easy. Also, even though we know Bill Gates exists in this world, Joe Bob Finestre is kind of Bill Gatesish. Chapter 10 quote:“How do we get in?” Rachel asked. “It’s daytime. There are people around. This isn’t how we usually do things. It’s usually night.” So what does everybody think about this argument? Take DNA from unconsenting humans, or not? quote:“So how do we do what we came here to do, oh fearless leader?” Rachel asked. I'm sure that a bear, a tiger, a wolf, and a hawk are a good way to draw attention, yes.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2021 03:35 |
I think Jake is afraid to admit he's scared because he's holding it together - just. If he acknowledges that fear, he may not be in control anymore and may fail his friends, and that's his biggest fear of all.
|
|
# ? Jan 24, 2021 03:57 |
|
Epicurius posted:So what does everybody think about this argument? Take DNA from unconsenting humans, or not? Just one of the many ethical lines the Animorphs will cross further on down the line! e: also glad to see that Jake getting splattered is even more brutal than I remembered it being.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2021 04:03 |
|
It's a definite ethical question mark using sometimes DNA to turn into a physical copy of them but I kind of feel it's on the line of logging into someone else's Facebook or online bank. It's identity theft rather than enslavement and it feels weird how they keep equating the two.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2021 07:06 |
|
Epicurius posted:So open question here. Why do you think he's afraid he's admit to be scared to Cassie here? Is it an age and masculinity thing? A leadership thing? A boyfriend thing? Yes.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2021 09:53 |
|
Epicurius posted:So at least getting into the building was easy. Also, even though we know Bill Gates exists in this world, Joe Bob Finestre is kind of Bill Gatesish. Also, "finestre" is (Old) French for "window".
|
# ? Jan 24, 2021 11:18 |
|
MrNemo posted:It's a definite ethical question mark using sometimes DNA to turn into a physical copy of them but I kind of feel it's on the line of logging into someone else's Facebook or online bank. It's identity theft rather than enslavement and it feels weird how they keep equating the two. I would have said the same, 'till Rachel crapped out a whole-rear end crocodile outta nowhere. That raised a lot of questions.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2021 11:49 |
|
Glad I finally caught up! It's so strange how I clearly remember small moments from this series and have no idea from which books they are from. When I saw the cover of this book I couldn't remember anything about Jake morphing a rhino so I was excited to be going through a book I hadn't read. Jake almost dying as a fly was something else I had no memory of. But then came the scene of Ax sucking down packets of sauce and getting the group kicked out which is something I remember clear as day! I'm not sure how to feel about taking human DNA. As long as it doesn't hurt them it should be fine? How could you hurt someone by morphing into them? I guess you could damage someone and their reputation with the actions you take while morphed as them. I also do wonder what they're gonna do about clothes if they have to morph an adult. They might need specific clothes or work badges. dungeon cousin fucked around with this message at 22:57 on Jan 24, 2021 |
# ? Jan 24, 2021 12:54 |
|
MrNemo posted:It's a definite ethical question mark using sometimes DNA to turn into a physical copy of them but I kind of feel it's on the line of logging into someone else's Facebook or online bank. It's identity theft rather than enslavement and it feels weird how they keep equating the two. The other thing is that they're going to be on the hook for anything you get seen doing in their body. If they, say, just walked in as morphed workers and started smashing poo poo, that person would go to jail for it (or be turned into a Controller, depending).
|
# ? Jan 24, 2021 13:04 |
|
Piell posted:The other thing is that they're going to be on the hook for anything you get seen doing in their body. If they, say, just walked in as morphed workers and started smashing poo poo, that person would go to jail for it (or be turned into a Controller, depending). Well, I think the idea is that they walk in as morphed workers so they don't have to start smashing....you know, they'd be there licitly.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2021 15:56 |
|
Animorphs-Book 16:The Warning-Chapter 11quote:We ducked into a small janitor’s closet to prepare. Ax and Marco quickly headed down the stairs and around to the entrance to the command center. I can see how this would be distracting. quote:A few people screamed. A few ran. Most just stared as we cavorted around, having a fine time. That's all levels of awkward. Chapter 12 quote:We had to memorize the list of names we’d gotten. There was no way to carry them. For the most part the names meant nothing to us. They were just names. And I’ll only use the first names. Christ, that poor kid. That poor, poor, little kid. I just just want to give him a hug and tell him it's going to be ok.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2021 04:05 |
|
Epicurius posted:Animorphs-Book 16:The Warning-Chapter 11 Please don't lie to the Animorphs But hey there's a fun scene with a skunk, a bear, a hawk, and a tiger sandwiched between a gruesome near death experience and a sad meditation on leadership, morality, and suppressing genuine emotions!
|
# ? Jan 25, 2021 07:04 |
|
It says something that the most unrealistic part of this book so far is that an image-conscious tech billionaire would willingly allow himself to be publicly known by the name "Joe Bob". If this book were written even like 10 years later he'd be "Joseph Robert Fenestre" or "JB Fenestre", or "JR Fenestre" or just "Joe Fenestre". Also I guess Web Access America has a Yeerk problem the same way Twitter has a Nazi problem.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2021 07:21 |
|
Reading this book, I can’t get the “Bill who?” line from Antitrust out of my head. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7hhqX1PANU&t=36s On the “ethics of morphing humans” question, I agree with whoever said before that it’s closer to identity theft than enslavement. But given the way an animal’s instincts and personality are felt so strongly in a new morph, I can’t blame the team for being reluctant to do it. Suppressing that personality might feel too close to mind control for comfort, even if you’re only suppressing a cloned mind and not a real person. wizzardstaff fucked around with this message at 18:23 on Jan 25, 2021 |
# ? Jan 25, 2021 08:42 |
|
nine-gear crow posted:It says something that the most unrealistic part of this book so far is that an image-conscious tech billionaire would willingly allow himself to be publicly known by the name "Joe Bob". If this book were written even like 10 years later he'd be "Joseph Robert Fenestre" or "JB Fenestre", or "JR Fenestre" or just "Joe Fenestre". That seems unfair to WAA, because all their Yeerks are in one place and you actually have to seek them out, unlike Twitter Nazis. Something I find kind of interesting, about the difference between the 1990s internet and now is that, so with AOL, for instance, you could get onto the web, but the service also cultivated its own services for you....games, chatrooms, news, internal e-mail, etc. The companies that would become internet service providers....AOL, Compuserve, Prodigy, all started like that in their pre-web days. You'd sign onto them, and then you'd be in their own private little corner, where you could only interact with other members and use the services they provided. Then, when the Web became a think, they'd put that on top of the services they already provided, and some of this cultivation lasted a lot lonnger than you'd think. AOL didn't entirely close their chatrooms until 2010, for instance. -It's just an interesting look at the way people interacted with the internet.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2021 14:54 |
|
I always found it odd that Ax is able to effortlessly hack into human computer systems. However, it does make sense after reading Andalite Chronicles, because apparently Windows is based on Andalite tech thanks to Elfangor.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2021 18:20 |
|
Animorphs-Book 16:The Warning-Chapter 13quote:We made it back home okay. No one swatted me and I felt better for getting past the fear. At least that’s what I told myself. You never really get past the fear. Fear eats a little hole in you, like rust in the fender of a car. You fill the hole up with putty and sand it smooth and paint it over so no one else can see it. But it’s never really as good as new. There's a lot to say about this chapter.....about Jake's thoughts on fear, about his quest for normality.....that people mostly want to be left alone to live their lives in peace. But I think Applegate says it all better than I would. What are your thoughts, though? Chapter 14 quote:While I spent the evening with my family, Marco had been busy. He’d used the hack-proof program Ax had written for him to go back to the chat room. He told us about it when we trudged out to the woods at the edge of Cassie’s farm. Tobias and Ax could both be themselves out there. He made the decision. I think in a lot of ways, this is the most painful book so far for me. It feels like Jake is trying to act like he feels like a leader should act instead of being a leader...and of course, the whole time, he's just psychologically a mess here.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2021 04:22 |
|
Epicurius posted:That seems unfair to WAA, because all their Yeerks are in one place and you actually have to seek them out, unlike Twitter Nazis. I was going to ask about this, actually, because I was confused exactly what WAA (or AOL) is supposed to be, exactly. Re: ethics of morphing humans, I think it's a fair point of the difference between identity theft and enslavement, but I also think that bending the moral rules they've established for themselves - not just this, but any moral rules, like the Geneva conventions or whatever - is different given their situation as a deeply outnumbered guerilla warfare group fighting for the survival of the whole planet. Like, it would be one thing if the Andalite military acquired unwilling sapient beings; it's less bad if the Animorphs do it, imo.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2021 04:30 |
Jake, I think you need to relax. Why not try some nice video games to get your mind off things? Here's one I think you'll love: https://youtu.be/kIoJnMT3yUI
|
|
# ? Jan 26, 2021 04:38 |
|
freebooter posted:I was going to ask about this, actually, because I was confused exactly what WAA (or AOL) is supposed to be, exactly. So, to give you some more info, America Online was an American company that provided online service (originally called Quantum-Link or PC-Link, but eventually changed to America Online, or AOL for short. It launched in the mid to late 80s, and they really marked it as "the internet for everyone" You just had to have a modem and account, and it was really heavily marked in the US. It was sort of most famous for two things, both later on. First, they gave out CDs with the software like candy....sign up for an account, get 500 minutes free, that sort of thing. The second thing was, when you got e-mail, it would play this really chipper sound clip that said "You've got mail!". AOL got so famous in the US that when they made a remake of the old movie "The Shop Around the Corner (about these two people who fall in love as penpals but hate each other in real life) with Meg Ryan and Tom Hanks, they updated the pen pals part to e-mail penpals on AOL and called it "You've Got Mail". See the trailer here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znESQTt3L80. It became a really big thing in the US and was a lot of people's introduction to online.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2021 04:48 |
|
Comrade Blyatlov posted:Jake, I think you need to relax. Why not try some nice video games to get your mind off things? Here's one I think you'll love: How'd you survive all this? Who said I did?
|
# ? Jan 26, 2021 04:59 |
|
Comrade Blyatlov posted:Jake, I think you need to relax. Why not try some nice video games to get your mind off things? Here's one I think you'll love: Or, one that would be period appropriate as well as thematically: https://youtu.be/5tAkJOoA5r0 Epicurius posted:Something I find kind of interesting, about the difference between the 1990s internet and now is that, so with AOL, for instance, you could get onto the web, but the service also cultivated its own services for you....games, chatrooms, news, internal e-mail, etc. The companies that would become internet service providers....AOL, Compuserve, Prodigy, all started like that in their pre-web days. You'd sign onto them, and then you'd be in their own private little corner, where you could only interact with other members and use the services they provided. Then, when the Web became a think, they'd put that on top of the services they already provided, and some of this cultivation lasted a lot lonnger than you'd think. AOL didn't entirely close their chatrooms until 2010, for instance. Don't those online portals that are still around from that era, like Yahoo and MSN, still kinda do that on their frontpages?
|
# ? Jan 26, 2021 11:47 |
|
Fuschia tude posted:Or, one that would be period appropriate as well as thematically: Even AOL sort of still does that, but in their case, its mostly news links. https://www.aol.com
|
# ? Jan 26, 2021 14:49 |
|
I still have elderly relatives that use their aol email addresses as their primary email. And just the other day, I saw a link to a reuters news article that someone had read on aol.com
|
# ? Jan 26, 2021 16:01 |
|
Bobulus posted:I still have elderly relatives that use their aol email addresses as their primary email. And just the other day, I saw a link to a reuters news article that someone had read on aol.com My job means I see contact information for a wide variety of people, and there's a lot of people, mainly elderly, who still use aol addresses.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2021 16:21 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 10:27 |
|
Cythereal posted:My job means I see contact information for a wide variety of people, and there's a lot of people, mainly elderly, who still use aol addresses. I still have an aol address. I mostly just use it for stuff I subscribe to, so spam goes there and not my google address, but I have it.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2021 19:02 |