|
Carthag Tuek posted:yeah looks like current law says max 30 days unless theres like a criminal investigation or similar situation
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2021 23:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 07:12 |
|
|
is your goal to make things so onerous that he gives up, or are you okay with having cameras everywhere and just want to make sure it's done right?
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2021 23:52
|
|
|
Jabor posted:is your goal to make things so onerous that he gives up, or are you okay with having cameras everywhere and just want to make sure it's done right? the former would be best, but if they go through with it id want it to be minimally idiotic
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2021 23:55
|
|
|
Carthag Tuek posted:yeah looks like current law says max 30 days unless theres like a criminal investigation or similar situation Also point out that they need to comply with CCPA and GDPR takedowns from residents/citizens of those places and the legal lift there is significant. If you're in CA, well, the CCPA is a whole entire thing. If they don't retain the data then compliance is much much easier. SYSV Fanfic posted:Don't count on an unhardened consumer OS to have a magical "protect me" button. It's definitely a bypass, but it required the machine to have a user account with automatic recovery options enabled. Without a competent sysadmin and a TPM, all you should really count on bitlocker for is having a thief format the machine instead of snooping. I've heard rumored (but have seen no evidence) that Bitlocker can prevent certain kinds of ransomware from being able to encrypt your drives. Any idea if that's true, or is it just pure rumor?
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 00:24
|
|
|
Kesper North posted:I've heard rumored (but have seen no evidence) that Bitlocker can prevent certain kinds of ransomware from being able to encrypt your drives. Any idea if that's true, or is it just pure rumor? almost certainly not, ransomware activity would not be distinguishable from any other activity under that account at best a good policy could protect your backups from also being encrypted, which smart ransomware will do
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 00:31
|
|
|
Carthag Tuek posted:yeah looks like current law says max 30 days unless theres like a criminal investigation or similar situation they're going to order the cheapest thing from amazon and tell you it does all that
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 00:43
|
|
|
Kesper North posted:I've heard rumored (but have seen no evidence) that Bitlocker can prevent certain kinds of ransomware from being able to encrypt your drives. Any idea if that's true, or is it just pure rumor? as they say in the pseudoscience thread, I would be interested to know the mechanism of action here
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 00:45
|
|
|
jetz0r posted:they're going to order the cheapest thing from
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 00:45
|
|
|
RFC2324 posted:if an agent string switcher isn't just one of your standard browser addons, what are you even doing on the internet? it’s a heavily restricted internal network.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 00:50
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:as they say in the pseudoscience thread, I would be interested to know the mechanism of action here
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 00:51
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:as they say in the pseudoscience thread, I would be interested to know the mechanism of action here maybe it's a particularly stupid ransomware that tries to use bitlocker itself to encrypt the drive and then gives up when it sees its already encrypted
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 00:51
|
|
|
jetz0r posted:they're going to order the cheapest thing from amazon and tell you it does all that oh yeah also insist on general assembly approval of technical solution
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 00:54
|
|
|
Carthag Tuek posted:yeah looks like current law says max 30 days unless theres like a criminal investigation or similar situation Start looking for other places before they start doing "technically not harassment" stuff to you if you make enough of a fuss.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 01:07
|
|
|
thats not a worry. hes a nice guy, just not very smart
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 01:13
|
|
|
the minimally idiotic solution here is to do normal cctv. no internet connection, you just have a box somewhere in locked room in building basement that has storage capacity for N days. that’s it, if some suddenly spray paints goatse on landlord’s door the cops just take the HDD as it is at that moment.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 01:33
|
|
|
Shame Boy posted:maybe it's a particularly stupid ransomware that tries to use bitlocker itself to encrypt the drive and then gives up when it sees its already encrypted oh yes, the famous bootlicker malware
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 02:14
|
|
|
Kesper North posted:I've heard rumored (but have seen no evidence) that Bitlocker can prevent certain kinds of ransomware from being able to encrypt your drives. Any idea if that's true, or is it just pure rumor? NetApp has something like this, I would assume the other big storage vendors do too, so it's possible that's what you've heard of?
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 07:47
|
|
|
~Coxy posted:NetApp has something like this, I would assume the other big storage vendors do too, so it's possible that's what you've heard of? Considering NTFS manages to contain OS breaking bugs from back in the XP days, I'm not holding my breath for Microsoft to do a CoW filesystem.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 08:20
|
|
|
as someone adjacent to that sort of camera network poo poo, holy christ never put an internet-enabled camera in your home. at best use actual cctv and put the recorder somewhere not obvious there have been enough stories of "dvr manufacturer shitto includes a backdoor root account with a password you can find on the internet" already
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 09:57
|
|
|
BlankSystemDaemon posted:Any copy-on-write filesystem which implements snapshots, and where snapshots are taken automatically and often enough, can defeat ransomware. isn’t ReFS cow?
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 10:06
|
|
|
the only acceptable in home surveillance 
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 10:45
|
|
|
pseudorandom name posted:isn’t ReFS cow? To paraphrase Kirk McKusick, who's been working on the Fast File System/Unix File System in BSD since the early 80s and FreeBSD now: "Once you throw people's data away, they don't trust you with it anymore". Especially not when there's no official spec from Microsoft, and the unofficial attempt at making recovery tools has all but stalled.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 11:34
|
|
|
fins posted:the only acceptable in home surveillance Ceiling cat is watching you masturbate
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 13:52
|
|
|
xtal posted:false Ceiling cat is watching you masturbate
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 14:04
|
|
|
Buddy, if seeing rubbable cat tummies is wrong, I don't wanna be right.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 14:26
|
|
|
I've never heard bitlocker by itself can block ransomware. If it does anything, it probably just adds data to microsoft defender for it's own heuristics. Windows does have the option to enable a whitelist for programs that can access your known folders (search for ransomware protection in start). If you've ever tried to edit your hosts file you've dealt with this before. Most ransomware targeting end users is pretty stupid. If someone has enabled any kind of protection, they probably have backups and won't pay out. Having the software include any kind of exploit or bypass increases the likelihood of detection. Imagine a python script which phones home for an encryption key, then recursively walks the known folders encrypting the first kb of data for every file, and finally drops a .html file on the desktop with instructions about how to pay the ransom and decrypt. All the effort goes into getting the program running as the local user with minimum interaction. Ransomware that targets institutions with deep pockets is a whole different thing.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 14:30
|
|
|
Also - What I know about bitlocker comes from designing and implementing an appliance (read windows 10 LTSB laptop) for reading data from a medical device and sending it over the internet or dial up modem. I don't have any magical insider knowledge. I do understand why the DoD trusts windows and bitlocker. It's good enough from a technical perspective that you would be better off just paying (or I guess blackmailing) someone who could decrypt/unlock the device.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 15:26
|
|
|
quote:The Intel hack https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-01-25/the-game-never-stops
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 20:14
|
|
|
what was the last company that got hit with that trick?
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 20:16
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:what was the last company that got hit with that trick? i think it was at&t
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 20:31
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:what was the last company that got hit with that trick? it’s how the archive team was able to get everything off of parler it happened to att a while ago too
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 20:53
|
|
|
the at&t guy was successfully prosecuted for hacking too
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 21:47
|
|
|
haveblue posted:the at&t guy was successfully prosecuted for hacking too Do you mean weev? Wasn't that overturned?
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 21:53
|
|
|
Volmarias posted:Do you mean weev? Wasn't that overturned? on a venue technicality
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 21:56
|
|
|
I have a camera I keep in the room with my birds so I can check on them when I'm out. I also use alexa in there because someone gave it to me and it's easier than keeping a dumb tablet or whatever for bird music. So anyone listening in or watching will just get endless screams followed by repeated pleading to alexa to play the drat rainforest sounds
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 23:05
|
|
|
SYSV Fanfic posted:Also - What I know about bitlocker comes from designing and implementing an appliance (read windows 10 LTSB laptop) for reading data from a medical device and sending it over the internet or dial up modem. I don't have any magical insider knowledge. I do understand why the DoD trusts windows and bitlocker. It's good enough from a technical perspective that you would be better off just paying (or I guess blackmailing) someone who could decrypt/unlock the device. yeah theres no special stuff to bitlocker beyond drive encryption and people are probably confusing it w/ cryptolocker and the ransomware protection which isnt enabled by default.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2021 23:08
|
|
|
Clark Nova posted:a lot of people in a position to be able to afford to pay some guy to wire up their entire house with surveillance cameras also have hired help in the home who they want to micromanage and abuse Yea this I could see for sure.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2021 00:45
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/KimZetter/status/1352681107804676096?s=20 just send them a link like this about how easy it is for hackers to spy on underage girls and say something about 'are kids' and get the overprotective parents on your side
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2021 01:43
|
|
|
oh ya thanks for that link, gonna shoot that off if he doesnt get it yet
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2021 01:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 07:12 |
|
|
crepeface posted:https://twitter.com/KimZetter/status/1352681107804676096?s=20 lol that is 6 times a day
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2021 02:43
|
|
