|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDoBBFVWLTg
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2021 08:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 10:20 |
|
|
Man reading that China invaded Vietnam to defend the khmer rogue is crack pinging me
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2021 09:54
|
|
|
SSJ_naruto_2003 posted:Man reading that China invaded Vietnam to defend the khmer rogue is crack pinging me states gonna state
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2021 10:24
|
|
|
Larry Parrish posted:It was pretty epic, yes. It was somehow more brazenly patriotic than the ending of Black Ops 1 where you swim up from the russian undersea base and there's a bunch of American flags waving off of ships while jets fly overhead in formation, like a football game. However they made her a serious babe so I can't complain. is it fun? i havent felt the call of duty in a long long time...
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2021 14:18
|
|
|
SSJ_naruto_2003 posted:Man reading that China invaded Vietnam to defend the khmer rogue is crack pinging me The US was also arming the Khmer Rouge at the time
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2021 14:20
|
|
|
StashAugustine posted:The US was also arming the Khmer Rouge at the time yeah but that’s to be expected
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2021 15:43
|
|
|
vo nguyen giap ftw
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2021 19:50
|
|
|
China also supported Mujahedeen iirc
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2021 20:41
|
|
|
StashAugustine posted:The US was also arming the Khmer Rouge at the time I think that was the Khmer Republic.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2021 23:01
|
|
|
jarofpiss posted:is it fun? i havent felt the call of duty in a long long time... It's not as good as modern warfare 1 and 2 or black ops 3, which are the only ones I didnt think sucked or had tedious gimmicks. It's really short even for a cod campaign.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2021 23:12
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/tysonbrody/status/1354285537054650370?s=20
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2021 18:08
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/haymarketbooks/status/1354489338432802816
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2021 19:40
|
|
|
“instead of working” oh god no anything but that !! how much was £400 worth in 1864 Germany anyway
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2021 19:49
|
|
|
maybe a year's wages, maybe two?
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2021 20:44
|
|
|
It's a stretch to say engaging in the stock market is somehow waging war against the enemy but I'm pretty sure Marx is kidding there. He was a funny guy. I wouldn't consider it proper work but more power to you if you actually make money on the stock market without gambling.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2021 23:02
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2021 09:24
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2021 07:58
|
|
|
Obvious lie. I'll never be happy.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2021 08:49
|
|
|
I choose the one winged angel
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2021 12:03
|
|
|
karl posted:The realm of freedom actually begins only where labour which is determined by necessity and mundane considerations ceases; thus in the very nature of things it lies beyond the sphere of actual material production. Just as the savage must wrestle with Nature to satisfy his wants, to maintain and reproduce life, so must civilised man, and he must do so in all social formations and under all possible modes of production. With his development this realm of physical necessity expands as a result of his wants; but, at the same time, the forces of production which satisfy these wants also increase. Freedom in this field can only consist in socialised man, the associated producers, rationally regulating their interchange with Nature, bringing it under their common control, instead of being ruled by it as by the blind forces of Nature; and achieving this with the least expenditure of energy and under conditions most favourable to, and worthy of, their human nature. But it nonetheless still remains a realm of necessity. Beyond it begins that development of human energy which is an end in itself, the true realm of freedom, which, however, can blossom forth only with this realm of necessity as its basis. The shortening of the working-day is its basic prerequisite.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2021 12:25
|
|
|
what is the [title bracket] for this thread
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2021 21:45
|
|
|
i say swears online posted:what is the [title bracket] for this thread [failure]
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2021 21:46
|
|
|
i say swears online posted:what is the [title bracket] for this thread [sdnw]
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2021 23:22
|
|
|
i say swears online posted:what is the [title bracket] for this thread i propose this question be settled through prolonged debate in which everyone desperately wants to go home instead
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2021 23:33
|
|
|
i say swears online posted:what is the [title bracket] for this thread [bernie panders]
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2021 23:33
|
|
|
[56k no libs]
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2021 23:42
|
|
|
Jon Joe posted:i propose this question be settled through prolonged debate in which everyone desperately wants to go home instead no matter what we pick it will cause a vitriolic schism that will last a century
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2021 23:51
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:[bernie panders] except this one, I like this one
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2021 23:51
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:[bernie panders]
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2021 23:52
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:[bernie panders]
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2021 00:20
|
|
|
i was going to suggest something lame like [marxist theory], but [bernie panders] is much better
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2021 00:35
|
|
|
i say swears online posted:what is the [title bracket] for this thread [SA]
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2021 00:35
|
|
|
[Cummunism]
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2021 01:08
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ProudSocialist/status/1355379250476380161
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2021 03:23
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:[bernie panders]
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2021 07:01
|
|
|
[tanks]
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2021 10:00
|
|
|
[#BEB]
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2021 10:55
|
|
|
if I was to venture a serious answer, [communism] or [marxism] would probably broadly describe what this thread is about socdems need not apply
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2021 11:19
|
|
|
quote:Although it remains remarkably little-known in contemporary European or North American intellectual circles, Marxism was the dominant strand of theoretical inquiry in Japan for most of the 20th century; more pointedly, we might say, Japanese has remained perhaps the most important language for Marxist-theoretical scholarship beyond English, German, and French, yet its theoretical history remains relatively isolated within its own linguistic boundaries. From its initial entry into the Japanese intellectual world in the late 1800s, Marxist analysis quickly came to constitute a vast and osmotic field that permeated all aspects of academic life, historical thought, forms of political organisation, and ways of analysing the social condition. Numerous examples testify to this, including the striking fact that the first Collected Works of Marx and Engels in the world was not published in German, Russian, French or English, but in Japanese, by Kaizōsha publishing house in 1932 in 35 volumes, overseen by Sakisaka Itsurō. quote:From the 1910s into the 1920s, during the Taisho era, Marx’s Capital came more and more to the fore, to the extent that it became even a public figure of discourse to refer to the young men obsessed with Capital by the name “Marx boys” [Marukusu bōi]. lmao dudes rock there's a bunch of cool poo poo in this reading guide. i learned, for example, that the japanese communist party did extraordinarily well after the war, which freaked out the US, leading to a red scare of sorts over there https://www.historicalmaterialism.org/reading-guides/marxist-theory-japan-critical-overview Finicums Wake fucked around with this message at 13:06 on Feb 1, 2021 |
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2021 13:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 10:20 |
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:[bernie panders]
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2021 17:30
|
|
