Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
DACK FAYDEN
Feb 25, 2013

Bear Witness

CommieGIR posted:

Well, I mean, Baron Samedi (Baron Saturday to his friends) is a literal Haitian Voodoo religious icon
wow you don't say

almost like I think the name is great because it's one letter off something existing and that letter alludes to how they're doing it :allears:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

DACK FAYDEN posted:

wow you don't say

almost like I think the name is great because it's one letter off something existing and that letter alludes to how they're doing it :allears:

Okay, I misread that post.

Meanwhile:

https://twitter.com/GossiTheDog/status/1354411050838466561?s=20

some kinda jackal
Feb 25, 2003

 
 
Fuuuuck I can't believe I missed this valuable webinar



Thanks a LOT, email quarantine :mad:

BaseballPCHiker
Jan 16, 2006


This explains why my Mint computer at home had an update for Sudo which I had never seen before.

Question for people here who have a CISSP. How many credits do you get from getting other certs? Im going to go for my AWS Security cert in the next month or two and I am wondering if that will cover me in credits for the next year or if I need to start hitting up webinars left and right down the line.

xtal
Jan 9, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
The good news is you can upgrade sudo as any user

some kinda jackal
Feb 25, 2003

 
 

BaseballPCHiker posted:

Question for people here who have a CISSP. How many credits do you get from getting other certs? Im going to go for my AWS Security cert in the next month or two and I am wondering if that will cover me in credits for the next year or if I need to start hitting up webinars left and right down the line.

I've actually never given this much thought and now I'm worried I might be passing up CPEs for just GETTING a new cert. I've always counted the training time as CPEs but nothing for the actual achievement.

BaseballPCHiker
Jan 16, 2006

Martytoof posted:

I've actually never given this much thought and now I'm worried I might be passing up CPEs for just GETTING a new cert. I've always counted the training time as CPEs but nothing for the actual achievement.

I didnt know I could list the training for CPEs, I figured since its all self guided, I'm just labbing on my own and watching ACloudGuru videos that I would get zilch until I get the cert.

some kinda jackal
Feb 25, 2003

 
 
I just followed stuff like linuxacademy and lynda when I did my cloud stuff, where I submit screenshots of time watched and their little completion "certificates" as evidence, but I think as long as you can qualify how you spent the time and back it up in event of an audit you should submit those as CPEs.

I should position that knock on wood I've never actually been audited for CPEs so I don't know how this holds up.

Pablo Bluth
Sep 7, 2007

I've made a huge mistake.
What are the odds that this wasn't known as a zero day by at least one of the major state-backed hacking groups?

BlankSystemDaemon posted:

Nah, there's going to be a new fun bug in Windows any day now.

No matter how much pair programming, code review, static analysis, automated fuzzing, and automated code sanitization you do, it won't be enough.

Just look at FreeBSD; all of those are practiced, the source code is "only" ~13 million lines, and yet there's inevitably more fun things like this to find.

For comparison, the Linux kernel itself is over 20 million lines (and that ignores all the userland code that makes up the libraries and utilities in a typical Linux distribution, because as an example Debian is ~60 million lines if you exclude the kernel), while Windows is estimated to be over 100 million lines.

The sudo project is ~150k lines of code.

Assuming a standard developer makes one bug per 100 lines of code, a good developer makes one bug per 1000 lines of code, and the ratio being 100 standard developers to 1 good developers, that leaves the various examples with somewhere on the order of 130k bugs for FreeBSD, 250k bugs for the Linux kernel, 600k bugs for Debian, over a million bugs for Windows, and ~1500 for sudo.
The thing that surprises me about sudo is that there's no independent check for raising the privilege level. It's just granted root when it's run and assumed to be trustworthy (where it turns out it's not been trustworthy for nine years...).

I do wonder what a modern from-the-ground-up OS where security was the over-riding factor, would look like. Where every design decision is about treating all code as untrustworthy, limiting everything only to the designed behaviour and having multiple independent checking mechanisms.

The Fool
Oct 16, 2003


Pablo Bluth posted:

I do wonder what a modern from-the-ground-up OS where security was the over-riding factor, would look like. Where every design decision is about treating all code as untrustworthy, limiting everything only to the designed behaviour and having multiple independent checking mechanisms.

Seems like a lot of work when you could just turn your computer off.

Pablo Bluth
Sep 7, 2007

I've made a huge mistake.

The Fool posted:

Seems like a lot of work when you could just turn your computer off.
But how do I then grow my porn collection from Russian web forums? I demand a OS where I can run sex-orgy-game-3D-[RU].exe safely without having to worry....

RFC2324
Jun 7, 2012

http 418

Pablo Bluth posted:

What are the odds that this wasn't known as a zero day by at least one of the major state-backed hacking groups?

The thing that surprises me about sudo is that there's no independent check for raising the privilege level. It's just granted root when it's run and assumed to be trustworthy (where it turns out it's not been trustworthy for nine years...).

I do wonder what a modern from-the-ground-up OS where security was the over-riding factor, would look like. Where every design decision is about treating all code as untrustworthy, limiting everything only to the designed behaviour and having multiple independent checking mechanisms.

TempleOS is rather difficult to use.

CLAM DOWN
Feb 13, 2007




Martytoof posted:

Fuuuuck I can't believe I missed this valuable webinar



Thanks a LOT, email quarantine :mad:

same

Methylethylaldehyde
Oct 23, 2004

BAKA BAKA

RFC2324 posted:

TempleOS is rather difficult to use.

You just have to pray, and if you're devout enough you'll be granted a holy vision of what specific undocumented and half working command line tool you need to actually do the thing you wanted to.


Given how incredibly fiddly real time OSs are and life/safety critical code is in general, I wonder how much of an incredibly awful undertaking it would be to make a provably secure OS. Do we even have a formal framework that can prove code does what we want it to, or is it still in the realm of P=NP, the traveling salesman, and the halting problem?

DrDork
Dec 29, 2003
commanding officer of the Army of Dorkness

Methylethylaldehyde posted:

Do we even have a formal framework that can prove code does what we want it to, or is it still in the realm of P=NP, the traveling salesman, and the halting problem?

My understanding is that for all but the most trivial of code, no, we haven't really found a viable provability framework for any of that. Just some clever hacks for figuring stuff out in some situations, but not for arbitrary general ones.

e; with appropriate testing and some languages that lend themselves to it you can sometimes prove that your code does X where X is some list of things it should do, but there's rarely a way to prove that it only does X and never anything else, which is where a lot of the issues crop up.

DrDork fucked around with this message at 00:14 on Jan 28, 2021

isaboo
Nov 11, 2002

Muay Buok
ขอให้โชคดี
What do ya'll have to say about Qubes OS? Been thinking of giving it a whirl just to play around.

Thinking of trying OpenBSD too

Guy Axlerod
Dec 29, 2008
You may be able to prove your code does what you have in your spec, but your spec can also be flawed.

Bonzo
Mar 11, 2004

Just like Mama used to make it!

RFC2324 posted:

TempleOS is rather difficult to use.

Didn't they have a feature for adding devices called, "Plug n' Pray"? Oh wait that was MS.



I'll show myself out

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?

Bonzo posted:

Didn't they have a feature for adding devices called, "Plug n' Pray"? Oh wait that was MS.



I'll show myself out

That was actually pretty good.

Butter Activities
May 4, 2018

isaboo posted:

What do ya'll have to say about Qubes OS? Been thinking of giving it a whirl just to play around.

Thinking of trying OpenBSD too

Yeah I was gonna say Qubes is probably the most secure user facing OS I’ve ever heard of.

Speaking of that has anyone here tried Graphene OS on a phone?

cage-free egghead
Mar 8, 2004
Been running Graphene for a few months now. Have loved the transition, actually. Also used Qubes for a while and have Tails on a flash drive I carry with me.

Butter Activities
May 4, 2018

cage-free egghead posted:

Been running Graphene for a few months now. Have loved the transition, actually. Also used Qubes for a while and have Tails on a flash drive I carry with me.

Oh cool. I’ve heard bad things about most “open source phone” projects but this seems to be the exception so far

acetcx
Jul 21, 2011

SpaceSDoorGunner posted:

Yeah I was gonna say Qubes is probably the most secure user facing OS I’ve ever heard of.

Speaking of that has anyone here tried Graphene OS on a phone?

I tried it for a couple weeks about six months ago. It works in the sense that you can make phone calls and send texts and emails and use a web browser but all the modern comforts are missing. No google services means no google apps, no play store, and no notifications. You're probably okay with this if you're considering Graphene but not having notifications definitely sucks.

Many of the fdroid apps are pretty janky so your best bet is to just use services accessible through a web browser. You'd be surprised how many services are not accessible from the web (e.g. ride sharing) and for those that are, how their associated apps are often just pretty webviews.

There was also a fair amount of drama from the devs because they're heavily overworked and underpaid. I respect what they're doing and if your life depends on your phone not getting hacked it's worth the trouble but I didn't feel confident in the project's future. Expect major bugs too, e.g. for a few days bluetooth was busted and they had to roll back a system update to fix it. I'm not sure how it's progressed since then because I gave up shortly after.

All this is to say it's fine and it works but you've got to be willing to give up a lot for what you get.

cage-free egghead
Mar 8, 2004

acetcx posted:

I tried it for a couple weeks about six months ago. It works in the sense that you can make phone calls and send texts and emails and use a web browser but all the modern comforts are missing. No google services means no google apps, no play store, and no notifications. You're probably okay with this if you're considering Graphene but not having notifications definitely sucks.

Many of the fdroid apps are pretty janky so your best bet is to just use services accessible through a web browser. You'd be surprised how many services are not accessible from the web (e.g. ride sharing) and for those that are, how their associated apps are often just pretty webviews.

There was also a fair amount of drama from the devs because they're heavily overworked and underpaid. I respect what they're doing and if your life depends on your phone not getting hacked it's worth the trouble but I didn't feel confident in the project's future. Expect major bugs too, e.g. for a few days bluetooth was busted and they had to roll back a system update to fix it. I'm not sure how it's progressed since then because I gave up shortly after.

All this is to say it's fine and it works but you've got to be willing to give up a lot for what you get.

Yeah, I went into Graphene knowing its purpose goes along with those who are more privacy-conscious, so I got rid every Play store app except for Awful and Wyze, which runs on a work profile. Stopped using my Google accounts, switched over to Signal which works without G-services too. All my photos and data get backed up locally and is encrypted. I think Graphene is aimed at some very specific use cases, but definitely should be considered by those wanting to be more privacy oriented or get away from phone addiction.

Sickening
Jul 16, 2007

Black summer was the best summer.

cage-free egghead posted:

Yeah, I went into Graphene knowing its purpose goes along with those who are more privacy-conscious, so I got rid every Play store app except for Awful and Wyze, which runs on a work profile. Stopped using my Google accounts, switched over to Signal which works without G-services too. All my photos and data get backed up locally and is encrypted. I think Graphene is aimed at some very specific use cases, but definitely should be considered by those wanting to be more privacy oriented or get away from phone addiction.

Hats off to folks who deal with these kinds of inconveniences in order to try to be more private. I simply can't do it, especially on the phone. I justify it to myself because I know the data that already exists on me is so vast that going dark now is kind of pointless. Also that my wife and children, by proxy, are going to give back all ground I attempt to take away anyway.

RFC2324
Jun 7, 2012

http 418

Sickening posted:

Hats off to folks who deal with these kinds of inconveniences in order to try to be more private. I simply can't do it, especially on the phone. I justify it to myself because I know the data that already exists on me is so vast that going dark now is kind of pointless. Also that my wife and children, by proxy, are going to give back all ground I attempt to take away anyway.

My self justification is sunken cost fallacy, and a determination to use the gently caress out of google services so I get something back from their massive monetization of my being

acetcx
Jul 21, 2011

RFC2324 posted:

My self justification is sunken cost fallacy, and a determination to use the gently caress out of google services so I get something back from their massive monetization of my being

I figure everything else I've done is more bang for my buck anyway - getting rid of facebook, twitter, gmail, google maps, google drive, dropbox, etc... plus using firefox instead of chrome, linux instead of windows, and getting all my contacts to switch to signal for texting. I'm pretty interested to see if any of the linux phone projects pan out in the next few years but until then I'll just sell my soul to apple in exchange for a pleasant phone experience.

xtal
Jan 9, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
I've tried Qubes before but never had a system with enough memory to make it run acceptably fast. I would just use Tails for my Tor business.

some kinda jackal
Feb 25, 2003

 
 
I'm trying to decide what my favourite thing about the ISC2 site is. Whether it's the fact that it redirect me to http://localhost half the time I try to load it, or whether it renders a bunch of items and then hides them so I always have a minor heart attack because *AUDIT* is visible in red before it disappears.

Butter Activities
May 4, 2018

Tails looks pretty interesting too. I’ve used whonix in the past but tails just from a 30 second skim looks much more professional and mature.

I have a parrot os flash drive with an encrypted persistent partition, but I haven’t really used it except some experiments on my home network to feel like

cage-free egghead
Mar 8, 2004

Sickening posted:

Hats off to folks who deal with these kinds of inconveniences in order to try to be more private. I simply can't do it, especially on the phone. I justify it to myself because I know the data that already exists on me is so vast that going dark now is kind of pointless. Also that my wife and children, by proxy, are going to give back all ground I attempt to take away anyway.

The way I look at it, the less info they get now and in the future, the less value trying to gather that data becomes and the less they try to prey on us. Let's be honest too, a lot of the stuff we do on our phones is simply a waste of time so that was an easy call for me to make. We are not without options, thank goodness but giving into these ecosystems, especially Google, is dangerous as already evidenced by their involvement with government forces. Cambridge Analytica is another good example. These companies don't give a poo poo about us, so it's a good opportunity to take control of our own data over the sake of convenience.

acetcx posted:

I figure everything else I've done is more bang for my buck anyway - getting rid of facebook, twitter, gmail, google maps, google drive, dropbox, etc... plus using firefox instead of chrome, linux instead of windows, and getting all my contacts to switch to signal for texting. I'm pretty interested to see if any of the linux phone projects pan out in the next few years but until then I'll just sell my soul to apple in exchange for a pleasant phone experience.

Bingo. Although there are ways to mitigate your data exposure to Apple, it is probably the best out of box experience. I just fired up an old 6S+ I had, registered an anonymous iCloud account and use Mullvad VPN with it exclusively at home. I haven't used an iPhone in like 5 years and they are taking good steps to better the privacy game, but I'd still be wary.

RFC2324 posted:

My self justification is sunken cost fallacy, and a determination to use the gently caress out of google services so I get something back from their massive monetization of my being

I felt that way up until just a few months ago. I had EVERYTHING backed up to Drive but with their constant fuckery with random apps, mostly messaging ones, the removal of free photo storage and other shenanigans that if there's a good time to get out, it's now. What happens if they just randomly change their policy? We are at the whims of their TOS which who knows what sort of gotchyas they've got in there if they make some sweeping change. Obviously the unlikelihood of that is low, but I'd rather be the one in control of my data and not contribute to their monopolistic practices.

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

SpaceSDoorGunner posted:

Tails looks pretty interesting too. I’ve used whonix in the past but tails just from a 30 second skim looks much more professional and mature.

I have a parrot os flash drive with an encrypted persistent partition, but I haven’t really used it except some experiments on my home network to feel like



Tails is great, Qube is RAM hungry but good, but honestly usability wise ParrotOS is my favorite.

Also, watched a bunch of people who realized Kali is missing a bunch of packages that breaks basic functionality this week.

Sickening
Jul 16, 2007

Black summer was the best summer.

cage-free egghead posted:

The way I look at it, the less info they get now and in the future, the less value trying to gather that data becomes and the less they try to prey on us. Let's be honest too, a lot of the stuff we do on our phones is simply a waste of time so that was an easy call for me to make. We are not without options, thank goodness but giving into these ecosystems, especially Google, is dangerous as already evidenced by their involvement with government forces. Cambridge Analytica is another good example. These companies don't give a poo poo about us, so it's a good opportunity to take control of our own data over the sake of convenience.

This only works when you and everyone around you goes to the same lengths and that has to be exceedingly rare. I can't even fathom how unplugged one must get to to even put a dent into things for a single person. You would have to pay cash for everything, basically not use any internet service, and then get every bit of data that is already built up on you purged from every ecosystem. I am glad others can gleam some bit of satisfaction from it but I question is effectiveness.

droll
Jan 9, 2020

by Azathoth
Probably need a constitutional amendment for a right to Privacy?

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug
https://twitter.com/_mattata/status/1354972614507311110?s=20

Buck Turgidson
Feb 6, 2011

𓀬𓀠𓀟𓀡𓀢𓀣𓀤𓀥𓀞𓀬

isaboo posted:

What do ya'll have to say about Qubes OS? Been thinking of giving it a whirl just to play around.

Thinking of trying OpenBSD too

OpenBSD is ok for a server. i host a few very small things on mine, and the docs and example configs are good. i probably wouldn't use it for desktops, it's s bit slow

Butter Activities
May 4, 2018

CommieGIR posted:

Tails is great, Qube is RAM hungry but good, but honestly usability wise ParrotOS is my favorite.

Also, watched a bunch of people who realized Kali is missing a bunch of packages that breaks basic functionality this week.

Parrot is great, it has all the tools I’ve actually used as a beginner and it’s also more Ubuntu like in the sense the basics it comes with work well enough and it has a lot of dependencies there where Kali Linux feels like Debian where you have to do a lot more troubleshooting to get any non default tools working.

Internet Explorer
Jun 1, 2005






This is cool as hell.

Subjunctive
Sep 12, 2006

✨sparkle and shine✨

Buck Turgidson posted:

OpenBSD is ok for a server. i host a few very small things on mine, and the docs and example configs are good. i probably wouldn't use it for desktops, it's s bit slow

Uh oh, here we go.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

rafikki
Mar 8, 2008

I see what you did there. (It's pretty easy, since ducks have a field of vision spanning 340 degrees.)

~SMcD


Other than the age old "OT is a secfuck nightmare" advice, are there are good resources I can start following about industrial/manufacturing specific infosec concerns? Doing some work for a customer in that space and anything I could start following with topical news would be appreciated.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply