|
It's not blurred out, that's his actual address. Edit: I'm not doing it. domhal fucked around with this message at 21:00 on Mar 4, 2021 |
#
?
Mar 4, 2021 20:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 10:24 |
|
|
The cul-de-sac out of space.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2021 20:53
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:Will there be no end to sectarian violence against fish people? Hmm, been playing The Sinking City this week and this sounds familiar
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2021 21:06
|
|
|
Lol https://twitter.com/wizardcubes/status/1367560639254847493
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2021 21:14
|
|
|
frenzik
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2021 21:14
|
|
|
Jose posted:lol you'd think terfs would love jorp it's a much more favorable article than jorp deserves, fortunately he's no better at reading comprehension when the article is about him
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2021 21:18
|
|
|
Doctor_Fruitbat posted:Lol, Troubles 2.0 is ramping up then. Thanks pricks, I can't wait to get my second vaccine and immediately get blown up on my first trip to the Arndale. Get them to mix a little bit of semtex in with the virus then you'll be immune to bombs too.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2021 21:19
|
|
|
The ol' spicy kieth change.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2021 21:37
|
|
|
Weird to think that less than a year ago, I was in the Labour party and basically well-disposed towards Starmer, prepared to wait and see how he wanted to move the party forward. Now I've left and am actively hoping that he eats poo poo and trashes his career. I made a post soon after he became leader where I talked about how I'd attended his 1st Zoom meeting and how he seemed a sensible chap etc. I'll have to see if I can dig it out for the schaudenfreude (on me).
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2021 21:57
|
|
|
Jaeluni Asjil posted:Is this the Dido Harding £bns thing? Yep. World-beating. Worth every penny. Pistol_Pete posted:Weird to think that less than a year ago, I was in the Labour party and basically well-disposed towards Starmer, prepared to wait and see how he wanted to move the party forward. Yep. I thought I’d cancel my membership but I might stick around to vote fir a replacement. He’s been worse than useless. I wasn’t a great Corbyn fan but I’d vastly prefer him.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2021 21:59
|
|
|
ngl it took me a fair while to work out what sorcery you'd invoked here
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2021 22:05
|
|
|
Got a box of self test kits as a teacher as we get to do these twice a week. In ridiculous, but obviously unsurprising, news I there's no way of reporting the result with the test and trace app. Cos why would it have that feature? Instead have to go to https://www.gov.uk/report-covid19-result and fill in a form.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2021 22:15
|
|
|
Well, I found this quote of mine from mid-April 2020:Pistol_Pete posted:My 2 cents on Starmer: I don't believe that he's some lurking right-winger, poised to purge the party and set it up as the Conservatives Mk2. His record shows him as a centre-left technocrat and I expect him to broadly continue along those lines. What does worry me is that I think he's over-cautious and unimaginative - we have an unprecedented opportunity right now to fundamentally change the ways things work in this country and my feeling is that Starmer will resoundingly fail to grasp it. I've got the dispiriting feeling that we're going to see Labour repeatedly outflanked on the left by the Tories, while Starmer prevaricates and hedges for fear of upsetting some focus-grouped demographic or other ... I was partly right, I guess. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2021 22:17
|
|
|
Borrovan posted:ngl it took me a fair while to work out what sorcery you'd invoked here You made me experiment. https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3960766&userid=0&perpage=30&pagenumber=24
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2021 22:21
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/TweetForTheMany/status/1367578596538253314?s=20Pistol_Pete posted:Well, I found this quote of mine from mid-April 2020: Not as bad as you thought (I mean your post) - except for the first 2 sentences! Jaeluni Asjil fucked around with this message at 22:40 on Mar 4, 2021 |
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2021 22:27
|
|
|
.nm I think it was a fake. Jaeluni Asjil fucked around with this message at 22:55 on Mar 4, 2021 |
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2021 22:51
|
|
|
edit: nm, suspicion it was fake confirmed
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2021 22:55
|
|
|
Pistol_Pete posted:Weird to think that less than a year ago, I was in the Labour party and basically well-disposed towards Starmer, prepared to wait and see how he wanted to move the party forward. therattle posted:Yep. I thought I’d cancel my membership but I might stick around to vote fir a replacement. He’s been worse than useless. I wasn’t a great Corbyn fan but I’d vastly prefer him. I picked up that Starmer was a piece of poo poo early from his brexit positioning but also fell for him in that I assumed establishment support and electoral competence, but my confident assumption that he'd win the next election is now looking naive/wrong as gently caress. From a lefty Lab perspective I'm obviously glad the british populace are rejecting him so hard but am still a little surprised by it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 00:49
|
|
|
Vitamin P posted:I picked up that Starmer was a piece of poo poo early from his brexit positioning but also fell for him in that I assumed establishment support and electoral competence, but my confident assumption that he'd win the next election is now looking naive/wrong as gently caress. He has no charisma, sincerity or competence. And it’s become very apparent.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 01:18
|
|
|
But he's so god damned *forensic*.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 01:23
|
|
|
Hopefully if and when it is time to replace him there is a better challenger, and not just the same poo poo in a different suit.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 01:27
|
|
|
All I remember commenting on at the time is that socialist discipline meant acknowledging that RLB wasn't what we wanted but you had to put her as your first choice to ensure the continuity of leftwing control of Labour and your politics were awful if you didn't understand the ramifications of doing otherwise so I'm happy with that.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 01:29
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/UKDemockery/status/1365849535495471110?s=19
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 01:32
|
|
|
uuuuugh uuugh ugh i'b keeyuh stawbuh i agreh wuth thuh gubarmunt aaaraghhahgh wut uggs uuuughhhgugh  lol that's my rory-bremner-esque impersonation-based political satire i hope yous enjoy it
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 01:34
|
|
|
personally I voted by slamming my face into the keyboard
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 01:35
|
|
|
namesake posted:All I remember commenting on at the time is that socialist discipline meant acknowledging that RLB wasn't what we wanted but you had to put her as your first choice to ensure the continuity of leftwing control of Labour and your politics were awful if you didn't understand the ramifications of doing otherwise so I'm happy with that. based
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 01:37
|
|
|
Australian friend posted this. With a few changes of names and parts of the country, it could be here: https://www.echo.net.au/2021/02/the-strategic-myth-of-the-job-snob/ quote:
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 01:43
|
|
|
Micheeaaeaeala Cash is Sir Billiam Cash's wife.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 01:46
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:Hopefully if and when it is time to replace him there is a better challenger, and not just the same poo poo in a different suit. And hopefully there are enough lefties able to vote too.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 01:55
|
|
|
Eh, even if there are I'm not enormously confident that it would achieve much, it seems depressingly contingent on the melt brigade to fall in line.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 02:04
|
|
|
There are ways to make them fall in line 
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 07:07
|
|
|
 I remember being terrified of the Jessflaps Menace, which shows just how effective propaganda can be. Fairly sure I just voted RLB with no second choice when it actually came to it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 08:05
|
|
|
goddamnedtwisto posted:I remember being terrified of the Jessflaps Menace, which shows just how effective propaganda can be. Fairly sure I just voted RLB with no second choice when it actually came to it. Same actually, if RLB hadn’t won I didn’t really care because the others clearly wouldn’t be any good. With the deputy leader it was Butler -> Burgon -> Rayner and then didn’t bother with a preference for the other two.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 08:48
|
|
|
I also rlb'ed with no secondary, at the time I didn't know much about kueef but knew enough just from looking at the trilateral commission poo poo and the getting someone six months in pokey for picking up a six-pack of water from the street that he was a bosses man and I quit when he got in Then a few weeks later the leaked report and attempts at whitewashing it settled my opinions regarding the futility of remaining within a party that refuses to sanction literal saboteurs and traitors within its ranks Everything since then has just cemented that. Not a week gone by that he hasn't hosed something up, gone silent on government crimes, or repeatedly punched left while crying bitterly for unity in the telegraph or the heil He's gonna get pasted in may, and the only real question is how many coup attempts before the right install someone even more limp and useless than the current sack of wet poo poo- I still think there is room for a coup attempt or at least an obvious/open faction thereof forming before the elections if he keeps on at this rate in the polls
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 10:01
|
|
|
There's a pretty plausible theory that the right will try and install Jess Phillips again - the problem the right will have (and have had in the past) is that they're all such blatant careerists it's hard for them to work together
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 10:21
|
|
|
I can definitely see the possibility of Labour going soft-fash (well less soft-fash than they are at the moment) after the locals. They've already signalled a willingness to attack the Tories from the right on economic policy, I can easily see them doing the same thing on culture war issues to try and chase the Nick Ferrari vote. I don't worry too much about them getting into power on that platform (as should be blatantly obvious to anyone not huffing their own centrist farts, you can turn the racism dial as far as you like and the flag-shaggers *just won't believe you*), but I'm terrified of what sort of thing that'll let Priti Patel get up to.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 10:33
|
|
|
What the gently caress will they even be for if they're running to the right of the tories on economic and social and cultural issues? It'd be like "what the gently caress are they even for now" turned up to 11 with JOBS JOBS JOBS flashing in the background.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 10:48
|
|
|
Yeah Labour can run on a fash lite platform but thats a self correcting problem because it will just never work at the ballot box, though there is the risk of irreversibly loving up the Labour party as a whole. I think that after May Labour might turn to be more economically radical, and I think that's something that would happen under Nandy more than the other candidates. I distinctly get the impression that Keith and his immediate posse are more right wing than the rest of the PLP; rumour is that Dodds wanted to be more left wing on the economy but Keith didn't, and now she will likely get the can for it because Keith is not about to admit his ideas are bad. The one thing that will really lose Keith internal support is letting up the internal war on the left - whenever the right go mask off they admit their *entire* strategy is to purge Corbynism out of Labour, because that's the only thing standing between defeat and victory. Related note: the Labour right are loving idiots.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 11:11
|
|
|
The next leadership battle will be Phillips vs Reeves vs Nandy.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 11:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 10:24 |
|
|
Comrade Fakename posted:The dislike of Harry is obviously due to racism in massive part, but don't forget that the press hate him because he dares mention how awful they are and a lot of people just follow along with that.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 11:24
|
|
