|
'who the gently caress is the charlimentarian' is really good and accurate
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 16:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 23:26 |
|
|
It really really felt good to hear three people I consider to be really smart all agree that the Parlimentarian thing was like this weird new move no one had ever tried before and is like only mentioned once in 8th grade social studies, because that was my exact reaction.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 17:58
|
|
|
legit funny dems posted the parliamentarian for all it was worth against themselves, rather than against republicans
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 18:12
|
|
|
Sounds like I need to try the bonus ep again. I made it a few mins in before her voice and mannerisms annoyed me - she was talking about what she wanted her project to be, etc., and it was just tedious.
havelock fucked around with this message at 19:24 on Mar 5, 2021 |
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 19:18
|
|
|
I didn't like the part where the anthropologist, social scientist, cultural critic, political science, or whatever professor couldn't understand what the lifestyle-branded boner pill ads were all about. "WHAT IS THISSSSSS" "HOW ARE YOU SUPPOSED TO gently caress IN SEPARATE BATH TUBS" idk you are a doctor of analyzing it maybe it was annoying to me because I was in a traffic jam idk
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 19:20
|
|
|
havelock posted:Sounds like I need to try the bonus ep again. I made it a few mins in before her voice and mannerisms annoyed me - she was talking about what she wanted her project to be, etc., and it just tedious. Yeah she sounded wasted from the get go and that's not something I can do for an hour straight.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 19:22
|
|
|
i for one love it when a guest tries to get a laugh by saying pussy over and over again to no reaction Still better than most of their non podcaster/comedian guests though tbf
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 19:25
|
|
|
I haven't finished listening to the bonus ep yet. I wasn't pleased that she immediately started getting into more-or-less random foibles of the people she's talking about. I mean that's entertaining enough, but Amber could do that by herself. I wasn't expecting a job talk but I do like a more focused approach.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 19:55
|
|
|
Greg12 posted:I didn't like the part where the anthropologist, social scientist, cultural critic, political science, or whatever professor couldn't understand what the lifestyle-branded boner pill ads were all about. Okay so there's this thing called a joke, right, that people sometimes make, where they
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 20:06
|
|
|
I liked the episode, maybe because I am a PMC and a pain pig and we are a ridiculous and worthless class. Hell I even bought the loving Owlet SMART SOCK because every single aspect of baby marketing revolves around the fact that your child will die instantly and silently all the time. “Child rolled on its side? Dead. Put it to sleep on its stomach? Dead. Swaddle too tight? Dead. Swaddle too lose? Dead. Blanket in crib? Dead. Too hot? Dead. Too cold? Dead. Oh this stuffed animal has a 6 page CVS receipt disclaimer stapled to it listing the 1000 ways it will slaughter your infant? 99% of infants will die of SIDS and this sock will beep at you when that’s happening.” Anyway I wasted my money and never got it to work and the baby hated it when I put it on and I was so sleep deprived and lazy that it didn’t become part of the routine. He’s still alive so far. I would have liked more PMC analysis and less McArdle-esque gadget reviews? Although I like both. I guess I was just kind of bait and switched by that intro - here’s a book and a theory and a lot of anger, let’s now redirect to some kind of super specific invent a mommy blogger period lady.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 20:07
|
|
|
Halloween Jack posted:I haven't finished listening to the bonus ep yet. I wasn't pleased that she immediately started getting into more-or-less random foibles of the people she's talking about. Sometimes I feel like half the people in this thread have never listened to Chapo before the episode they're posting about
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 20:07
|
|
|
There was one point where they were talking about the baby poo poo and I was like, yeah theres a market for this, because having a baby is a very anxious thing. Then they started talking in the next breath about it being a product of anxiety
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 20:09
|
|
|
Good interview with the imprisoned lawyer, the hard r history segment that Matt and Felix did before the interview was a little sus though.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 20:14
|
|
|
some plague rats posted:Sometimes I feel like half the people in this thread have never listened to Chapo before the episode they're posting about
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 20:16
|
|
|
Liu's other interview on Its Not Just In Your Head sure is something too if you enjoyed her on Chapo, powerful wine aunt energy
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 21:02
|
|
|
some plague rats posted:Okay so there's this thing called a joke, right, that people sometimes make, where they where's the joke
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 21:06
|
|
|
whomst amongst us has not recorded a podcast while totally zooted on white zin and xannies.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 21:10
|
|
|
we need a Neera of the left
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 21:28
|
|
|
Greg12 posted:where's the joke An example of a joke would be to point out the absurd incongruity of the way a situation is represented and the dissonance created by that representation, and to then laugh about it with your friends
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 21:44
|
|
|
I thought the Liu chat was more interesting than the Donziger or Curtis interviews  the Chapo boys trying to do a serious interview isn’t what I go to the pod for
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 21:49
|
|
|
THS posted:we need a Neera of the left neera's lunatic posting is the only redeemable thing about her, i agree
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 21:55
|
|
|
shrike82 posted:I thought the Liu chat was more interesting than the Donziger or Curtis interviews They choke on serious interviews, they're much better when they have fun with it and this was a fun one.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 21:55
|
|
|
I honestly only wish they brought up that when republicans had the senate we actually heard about the parliamentarian then too, because they also told the republicans they couldn't do a thing. So the republicans fired them and replaced them with one who would let them do what they wanted, and there were no consequences because it's a loving fake job nobody cares about!
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 22:01
|
|
|
Any episode where Felix and/or Amber get to go full on catty is good, imo.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 22:37
|
|
|
space uncle posted:I would have liked more PMC analysis and less McArdle-esque gadget reviews? Although I like both. I guess I was just kind of bait and switched by that intro - here’s a book and a theory and a lot of anger, let’s now redirect to some kind of super specific invent a mommy blogger period lady. The idea behind the product reviews seemed to be, "the PMC like to fashion themselves as above being mere consumers of products, but we can look at what they consume and see that they're rubes too." Which is an okay idea, but they didn't structure it well and it came off messy, but also them just going off was entertaining anyway IMO.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 23:47
|
|
|
Shipon posted:They choke on serious interviews, they're much better when they have fun with it and this was a fun one. Virgil did good interviews for the primaries that were also funny
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2021 23:55
|
|
|
the bit they did at the start of the curtis ep felt true in that they were asking “serious” questions e.g will asking if curtis had thrown in so much imagery of dancing in his docs to make some tortured point and curtis pausing for a while then “yes that’s exactly what i was doing”
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2021 00:02
|
|
|
sexpig by night posted:I honestly only wish they brought up that when republicans had the senate we actually heard about the parliamentarian then too, because they also told the republicans they couldn't do a thing. When was this? I've read that the current parliamentarian has been there since 2012
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2021 00:04
|
|
|
shrike82 posted:the bit they did at the start of the curtis ep felt true in that they were asking “serious” questions e.g will asking if curtis had thrown in so much imagery of dancing in his docs to make some tortured point and curtis pausing for a while then “yes that’s exactly what i was doing” That seemed kind of embarrassing to Curtis, but it was a helpful observation to me, and getting things out of an interview subject that they wouldn't necessarily just say on their own seems like a good thing to do.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2021 00:13
|
|
|
That bit reminded me of this, just with a different ending https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEqhiC4zcGA
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2021 00:15
|
|
|
Breadallelogram posted:When was this? I've read that the current parliamentarian has been there since 2012 bush era https://www.washingtonpost.com/arch...1-54e6c033207c/ it had 0 negative effects on the Rs
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2021 00:16
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1367891313539055621?s=19 uhh let me be clear. americans will not vote for uhh lil homie gay rear end
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2021 00:47
|
|
|
Pharmaskittle posted:https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1367891313539055621?s=19 I thought I was in the cumtown thread for a second 
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2021 01:34
|
|
|
got to have them ribs (height) and pussy too (not gay)
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2021 01:36
|
|
|
Obama's right. I think Jimmy Carter was the last manlet president.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2021 02:06
|
|
|
Groovelord Neato posted:Obama's right. I think Jimmy Carter was the last manlet president. So easy to forget HW
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2021 02:24
|
|
|
yea America will allow a gay president, especially a white boring gay like him, but we will not tolerate a short president.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2021 02:24
|
|
|
Pharmaskittle posted:https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1367891313539055621?s=19 lol so that's where they got the "bernie said women can't be president" lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2021 02:32
|
|
|
Eegah! posted:So easy to forget HW 6'2"
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2021 02:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 23:26 |
|
|
Obama was giving Pete a swirlie while saying those things.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2021 03:17
|
|
