Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Mayor Dave
Feb 20, 2009

Bernie the Snow Clown

gently caress COREY PERRY posted:

your regular reminder than 40% of india will be out of groundwater by 2030, and that india controls the flow of water into pakistan

enjoy the 2020s, they will be regarded fondly in retrospect

History repeats itself, is black tuesday 2029 gonna be a boe or a wet bulb mass casualty event or a mega katrina

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Chamale
Jul 11, 2010

I'm helping!



Tekne posted:

Hell, traditional Chinese "medicine" managed to destroy the Vaquita, the world's smallest cetacean that lives only in Baja California's waters. At the very least, the CCP is consistent in their utter disregard for life whether it be human or animals of all stripes. It must be hard living up to 5,000 years of failure.

lol, you think China is the large country with utter disregard for life?

Shima Honnou
Dec 1, 2010

The Once And Future King Of Dicetroit

College Slice

Mayor Dave posted:

History repeats itself, is black tuesday 2029 gonna be a boe or a wet bulb mass casualty event or a mega katrina

all three in different places

Zurtilik
Oct 23, 2015

The Biggest Brain in Guardia
China and the USA can both be lovely, y'all.

CODChimera
Jan 29, 2009

gently caress COREY PERRY posted:

your regular reminder than 40% of india will be out of groundwater by 2030, and that india controls the flow of water into pakistan

enjoy the 2020s, they will be regarded fondly in retrospect

how is this not setting off every single alarm bell and red flag that we have??

silicone thrills
Jan 9, 2008

I paint things

Zurtilik posted:

China and the USA are both lovely, y'all.

Thump!
Nov 25, 2007

Look, fat, here's the fact, Kulak!



CODChimera posted:

how is this not setting off every single alarm bell and red flag that we have??

lol


edit: lmao

The Oldest Man
Jul 28, 2003

CODChimera posted:

how is this not setting off every single alarm bell and red flag that we have??

https://twitter.com/HarryCrumb15/status/1371301995018129410?s=20

Shipon
Nov 7, 2005
quick quiz: which nation is the one that dropped multiple nuclear weapons on civilians and to this day refuses to apologize or make any amends for it

sure as poo poo ain't china

mawarannahr
May 21, 2019

Tekne posted:

Hell, traditional Chinese "medicine" managed to destroy the Vaquita, the world's smallest cetacean that lives only in Baja California's waters. At the very least, the CCP is consistent in their utter disregard for life whether it be human or animals of all stripes. It must be hard living up to 5,000 years of failure.

your effort at appearing really racist has been very successful, congrats! critical support for achievement.

Zurtilik
Oct 23, 2015

The Biggest Brain in Guardia

Shipon posted:

quick quiz: which nation is the one that dropped multiple nuclear weapons on civilians and to this day refuses to apologize or make any amends for it

sure as poo poo ain't china

We buy their Gunpla and superior cars. Its working out, okay?

Microplastics
Jul 6, 2007

:discourse:
It's what's for dinner.

CODChimera posted:

how is this not setting off every single alarm bell and red flag that we have??

Bells are noisy and they might interrupt my dinner

You idiot

BIG HEADLINE
Jun 13, 2006

"Stand back, Ottawan ruffian, or face my lumens!"

Shipon posted:

quick quiz: which nation is the one that dropped multiple nuclear weapons on civilians and to this day refuses to apologize or make any amends for it

sure as poo poo ain't china

One of the "backup" plans if the bomb had ended up being a dud was to carpet bomb the Japanese home islands with hydrogen cyanide and sulfur mustard gas bombs which were projected to kill 5+ million people. Sulfur mustard was picked specifically because it loves to soak into wood, which the majority of Japanese houses were made of, and hydrogen cyanide was the closest thing the Allies had to a nerve agent at the time since they hadn't started copying the Germans' cookbooks yet.

So while the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a very public announcement and ghastly test of "real world applications" of nuclear weapons, they did ultimately end up saving lives.

FacelessVoid
Jul 8, 2009

BIG HEADLINE posted:

One of the "backup" plans if the bomb had ended up being a dud was to carpet bomb the Japanese home islands with hydrogen cyanide and sulfur mustard gas bombs which were projected to kill 5+ million people. Sulfur mustard was picked specifically because it loves to soak into wood, which the majority of Japanese houses were made of, and hydrogen cyanide was the closest thing the Allies had to a nerve agent at the time since they hadn't started copying the Germans' cookbooks yet.

So while the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a very public announcement and ghastly test of "real world applications" of nuclear weapons, they did ultimately end up saving lives.

Actually, prior to the bombings the Japanese were willing to conditionally surrender if the US promised not to charge Emperor with war crimes. But US would only accept an unconditional surrender. They ended up not charging the Emperor anyway.

Also, I've heard evidence that it was the eminent Soviet invasion that actually pushed the Japanese to surrender. The nukes were just an convenient excuse for both sides.

So it's pretty dubious to say nuking civilians saved lives.

Robo Reagan
Feb 12, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Accretionist posted:

Balls are shrinking. ]

umm, excuse me?

Saki
Jan 9, 2008

Can't you feel the knife?

mawarannahr posted:

your effort at appearing really racist has been very successful, congrats! critical support for achievement.

that's not racist you moron

mawarannahr
May 21, 2019

Saki posted:

that's not racist you moron

I think you should stfu for 5000 years

Wakko
Jun 9, 2002
Faboo!

BIG HEADLINE posted:

So while the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a very public announcement and ghastly test of "real world applications" of nuclear weapons, they did ultimately end up saving lives.

really appreciate this d&d-circa-2009 take but gently caress off forever tia

Tekne
Feb 15, 2012

It's-a me, motherfucker

Massive lmao at making fun of a CCP slogan somehow being racist you loving donkey. They aren’t a stand in for Chinese people, especially since they are their greatest oppressor and victimizer. Also, since this apparently needs clarification, I think they like the other super powers have little regard for life. Doesn’t change the key roll TCM has had in obliterating random rear end species all over the planet.

mawarannahr
May 21, 2019

Tekne posted:

Massive lmao at making fun of a CCP slogan somehow being racist you loving donkey. They aren’t a stand in for Chinese people, especially since they are their greatest oppressor and victimizer. Also, since this apparently needs clarification, I think they like the other super powers have little regard for life. Doesn’t change the key roll TCM has had in obliterating random rear end species all over the planet.

Do better next time, buddy.

Loucks
May 21, 2007

It's incwedibwe easy to suck my own dick.

mawarannahr posted:

your effort at appearing really racist has been very successful, congrats! critical support for achievement.

I don’t think you know what racism is. You could definitely get buy-in on this over in D&D if you’d like to try screeching about it there.

mawarannahr
May 21, 2019

stop making GBS threads orientalist tripe on the climate thread in the one forum that isn’t overflowing with said tripe and carry on doomposting.

crazy eyes mustafa
Nov 30, 2014
I think you will find nuclear energy only has peaceful applications

Saki
Jan 9, 2008

Can't you feel the knife?

mawarannahr posted:

stop making GBS threads orientalist tripe on the climate thread in the one forum that isn’t overflowing with said tripe and carry on doomposting.

please gently caress off, you tedious twat

Bathtub Cheese
Jun 15, 2008

I lust for Chinese world conquest. The truth does not matter before the supremacy of Dear Leader Xi.
China is good and the US is bad.

mawarannahr
May 21, 2019

Bathtub Cheese posted:

China is good and the US is bad.

JAY ZERO SUM GAME
Oct 18, 2005

Walter.
I know you know how to do this.
Get up.


they both suck, one empire aspiring to overtake another

Admiral Ray
May 17, 2014

Proud Musk and Dogecoin fanboy

FacelessVoid posted:

Actually, prior to the bombings the Japanese were willing to conditionally surrender if the US promised not to charge Emperor with war crimes. But US would only accept an unconditional surrender. They ended up not charging the Emperor anyway.

Also, I've heard evidence that it was the eminent Soviet invasion that actually pushed the Japanese to surrender. The nukes were just an convenient excuse for both sides.

So it's pretty dubious to say nuking civilians saved lives.

I remember hearing about the Soviet angle too, but it never made sense to me. Why would they be willing to surrender under threat of a Soviet invasion but not under the threat of more nukes or an American invasion unless they viewed they Soviet invasion as worse?

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

FacelessVoid posted:

Also, I've heard evidence that it was the eminent Soviet invasion that actually pushed the Japanese to surrender. The nukes were just an convenient excuse for both sides.

So it's pretty dubious to say nuking civilians saved lives.

right. considering more damage was done during the firebombing of Tokyo their calculus probably didn’t change much when a few more cities were destroyed via bombing. during the war a report that one bomber (er, three I think? there were 1 or 2 escorts) would’ve been met with “that was the weather observer/scout before the main wave”

from an environmental standpoint the nukes are probably actually pretty far down on the list of damage from WWII. the oil campaign probably caused more lasting environmental damage

Real hurthling!
Sep 11, 2001




its the same empire
the tension is ginned up for domestic purposes on both sides of the pacific

Mayor Dave
Feb 20, 2009

Bernie the Snow Clown

Admiral Ray posted:

I remember hearing about the Soviet angle too, but it never made sense to me. Why would they be willing to surrender under threat of a Soviet invasion but not under the threat of more nukes or an American invasion unless they viewed they Soviet invasion as worse?

They were already on bad terms with the soviets before the war

Admiral Ray
May 17, 2014

Proud Musk and Dogecoin fanboy

Mayor Dave posted:

They were already on bad terms with the soviets before the war

Yeah, I know, I'm just saying that if the threat of invasion from the Soviets pushed them into unconditional surrender they must have expected extreme reprisals and complete destruction if the Soviets invaded.

Real hurthling!
Sep 11, 2001




only an american brain sees communism as worse than nuclear annihilation

Chamale
Jul 11, 2010

I'm helping!



Admiral Ray posted:

Yeah, I know, I'm just saying that if the threat of invasion from the Soviets pushed them into unconditional surrender they must have expected extreme reprisals and complete destruction if the Soviets invaded.

They were hoping to negotiate peace using the Soviets as mediators, and the invasion removed that possibility.

The Americans used atomic bombs simply as a continuation of the strategic bombing campaign, which killed over one million civilians. As soon as they had invented napalm, they started dropping that on cities. As soon as they had invented atomic bombs, they started dropping them on cities. The question of the atomic bombings is simply part of the larger question of whether it's a war crime to bomb a city into ash - it is, but that was a very uncomfortable question for the Allies so they didn't put any Germans on trial for this crime.

FacelessVoid
Jul 8, 2009

Admiral Ray posted:

I remember hearing about the Soviet angle too, but it never made sense to me. Why would they be willing to surrender under threat of a Soviet invasion but not under the threat of more nukes or an American invasion unless they viewed they Soviet invasion as worse?

IIRC they expected the Soviets to be far more brutal and the threat of a communist take over would have lead to a more dramatic remaking of traditional Japanese society. The Emperor would have been eliminated for sure as an example. Wish I had some of the articles on hand but it's been several years since I've thought about this stuff.

Accretionist
Nov 7, 2012
I BELIEVE IN STUPID CONSPIRACY THEORIES
Neat idea at 13:23 - 15:30. Dovetails with my yearning for 'Green Monks' to become a thing.

tl;dw:
  • Conflict between definitions of Social Justice and Ecological Justice -- Growth/Redistribution vs De-Growth/Sustainability.
  • Deconflict by refocusing Social Justice from 'growth/redistribution' to 'security/stability.'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gq67zwxylm4&t=803s

On a related note, I wish I had the 'sales gene' and could write good talking points.

Mayor Dave
Feb 20, 2009

Bernie the Snow Clown

Admiral Ray posted:

Yeah, I know, I'm just saying that if the threat of invasion from the Soviets pushed them into unconditional surrender they must have expected extreme reprisals and complete destruction if the Soviets invaded.

They may have heard something about how the red army acted as it advanced through poland and eastern germany

Bathtub Cheese
Jun 15, 2008

I lust for Chinese world conquest. The truth does not matter before the supremacy of Dear Leader Xi.

JAY ZERO SUM GAME posted:

they both suck, one empire aspiring to overtake another

Why do you think China is an empire?

Mayor Dave
Feb 20, 2009

Bernie the Snow Clown

Bathtub Cheese posted:

Why do you think China is an empire?

Would you prefer imperial power?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Admiral Ray
May 17, 2014

Proud Musk and Dogecoin fanboy

Chamale posted:

They were hoping to negotiate peace using the Soviets as mediators, and the invasion removed that possibility.

The Americans used atomic bombs simply as a continuation of the strategic bombing campaign, which killed over one million civilians. As soon as they had invented napalm, they started dropping that on cities. As soon as they had invented atomic bombs, they started dropping them on cities. The question of the atomic bombings is simply part of the larger question of whether it's a war crime to bomb a city into ash - it is, but that was a very uncomfortable question for the Allies so they didn't put any Germans on trial for this crime.

FacelessVoid posted:

IIRC they expected the Soviets to be far more brutal and the threat of a communist take over would have lead to a more dramatic remaking of traditional Japanese society. The Emperor would have been eliminated for sure as an example. Wish I had some of the articles on hand but it's been several years since I've thought about this stuff.

Mayor Dave posted:

They may have heard something about how the red army acted as it advanced through poland and eastern germany

Ty all for the answers.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply