Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Gaius Marius
Oct 9, 2012

Grand Fromage posted:

Yeah, guns are an obvious one. A modern pistol isn't vastly different than a M1911.

Wonder if there's still anybody flying WW2 era aircraft (to fight, not as trainers).

E: Looks like the oldest operating fighter is the Shenyang J-5, which is a 1956 copy of the MiG-17.

Maybe as transport craft, the c130's still going strong nearly seven decades old.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Pharohman777
Jan 14, 2012

by Fluffdaddy
The self-defeating nature of this is pretty impressive.
https://twitter.com/timeswang/status/1372534399644938245

Weka
May 5, 2019

That child totally had it coming. Nobody should be able to be out at dusk except cars.

Zakrello posted:

would have been a hard one due to geological reasons, thats for sure.

losing to China????? what drugs are they taking can I have some?

I guess the claim is losing to China in this one particular potential war. Defeating America is mostly about making the continuation of the war in question politically untenable. IMO that's always an even iffier question than the actual military conflict.

Mr Luxury Yacht
Apr 16, 2012


Gaius Marius posted:

Maybe as transport craft, the c130's still going strong nearly seven decades old.

A surprising number of countries apparently still use at least a handful of C-47 Skytrains.

madeintaipei
Jul 13, 2012

Gaius Marius posted:

Maybe as transport craft, the c130's still going strong nearly seven decades old.

Slight quibble, but I think most C-130's are far newer than the doofy-looking A models without a radar in the nose.

Il-28, maybe? The Chinese version is still in use by N. Korea. I don't know how much Harbin modified the design to make the H-5 though.

Blistex
Oct 30, 2003

Macho Business
Donkey Wrestler
There are a ton of WWII artillery guns being used all over the world, and if you take care of them, they last forever.

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

Weka posted:

I guess the claim is losing to China in this one particular potential war. Defeating America is mostly about making the continuation of the war in question politically untenable. IMO that's always an even iffier question than the actual military conflict.

Listen if there's one thing that Americans are known for when it comes to military affairs it's never using sunk-cost as a motivator

Grand Fromage
Jan 30, 2006

L-l-look at you bar-bartender, a-a pa-pathetic creature of meat and bone, un-underestimating my l-l-liver's ability to metab-meTABolize t-toxins. How can you p-poison a perfect, immortal alcohOLIC?


"Hit the Americans hard enough they'll stop fighting" always works out great for everyone involved when it's been tried.

Vincent Van Goatse
Nov 8, 2006

Enjoy every sandwich.

Smellrose

Grand Fromage posted:

"Hit the Americans hard enough they'll stop fighting" always works out great for everyone involved when it's been tried.

The Vietnamese and the Taliban might quibble with your sarcasm here.

I would blow Dane Cook
Dec 26, 2008

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

Vincent Van Goatse posted:

The Vietnamese and the Taliban might quibble with your sarcasm here.

They didn't win by hitting the US hard enough that the USA gave up, they both won wars of attrition where the Americans had no clear objective.

"Stop the PRC from controlling Taiwan" is an extremely clear objective and it's the kind that top brass jerk off to at night

Grand Fromage
Jan 30, 2006

L-l-look at you bar-bartender, a-a pa-pathetic creature of meat and bone, un-underestimating my l-l-liver's ability to metab-meTABolize t-toxins. How can you p-poison a perfect, immortal alcohOLIC?


Vincent Van Goatse posted:

The Vietnamese and the Taliban might quibble with your sarcasm here.

The million+ Vietnamese/Laotians/Cambodians/Afghans the US killed probably wouldn't say it worked out well for them. Also Vietnam didn't attack the US. Neither did the Taliban, but they at least had a connection with the people who did.

hakimashou
Jul 15, 2002
Upset Trowel
Ya surely a better comparison would be with al qaeda? And they are all dead or in secret hell prisons now. Saudi royal family still runs saudi arabia, no caliphate or anything they got wrecked.

Even to expand it to some inane misguided 'the muslims vs the west' thing, the result was iraq getting destroyed, syria getting destroyed, libya getting destroyed, yemen getting destroyed, the palestinians getting hosed even worse etc etc. Hitting the US hard didnt make the US give up it made the US go apeshit and declare a forever war.

Grand Fromage
Jan 30, 2006

L-l-look at you bar-bartender, a-a pa-pathetic creature of meat and bone, un-underestimating my l-l-liver's ability to metab-meTABolize t-toxins. How can you p-poison a perfect, immortal alcohOLIC?


Right. I'm not saying ra ra come at the US and your rear end is toast, I'm saying attacking the US makes it go absolutely goddamn insane for years and kill everyone it can get its hands on. Which is bad for everybody.

E: My other controversial stance is countries attacking each other is also bad and the world would be better if it stopped happening.

Grand Fromage fucked around with this message at 02:01 on Mar 19, 2021

McGavin
Sep 18, 2012

Grand Fromage posted:

My other controversial stance is countries attacking each other is also bad and the world would be better if it stopped happening.

:sickos:

Fallen Hamprince
Nov 12, 2016

Grand Fromage posted:

E: My other controversial stance is countries attacking each other is also bad and the world would be better if it stopped happening.

I disagree

Vesi
Jan 12, 2005

pikachu looking at?

vietnamese invasion of cambodia seems good in retrospect even though it was condemned by the international community

WarpedNaba
Feb 8, 2012

Being social makes me swell!

Fojar38 posted:

If you're a third world dictatorship whose primary military interest is being able to roll tanks around to intimidate civilians then WW2 stuff still gets the job done tbh.

Took me a moment to realise that that was in reference to Paraguay, not China.

Dont Touch ME
Apr 1, 2018

Vesi posted:

vietnamese invasion of cambodia seems good in retrospect even though it was condemned by the international community

In its thousands of years of history, Vietnam just can't catch a break.

Weka
May 5, 2019

That child totally had it coming. Nobody should be able to be out at dusk except cars.

Weka posted:

I guess the claim is losing to China in this one particular potential war. Defeating America is mostly about making the continuation of the war in question politically untenable. IMO that's always an even iffier question than the actual military conflict.

Y'all might notice I don't say anything about high American casualties in this post.

bob dobbs is dead
Oct 8, 2017

I love peeps
Nap Ghost
a material portion of america unironically lusts for death

Zakrello
Feb 17, 2015

missile imbound

thats surprisingly accurate LMAO

Booty Pageant
Apr 20, 2012

Not So Fast posted:

The underlying justification seems to be "please give the DoD more money".

this is my armchair strategy

Ups_rail
Dec 8, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

Dont Touch ME posted:

In its thousands of years of history, Vietnam just can't catch a break.

I ve always admired the vietnamese because they seem to not like eachother very much.

speak with the expat community here and they have some very strong opinions about their brothers and sisters back in vietnam.

etalian
Mar 20, 2006


lol

bob dobbs is dead
Oct 8, 2017

I love peeps
Nap Ghost

Ups_rail posted:

I ve always admired the vietnamese because they seem to not like eachother very much.

speak with the expat community here and they have some very strong opinions about their brothers and sisters back in vietnam.

the american war (america's vietnam war) was a civil war

ThisIsJohnWayne
Feb 23, 2007
Ooo! Look at me! NO DON'T LOOK AT ME!



Ups_rail posted:

I ve always admired the vietnamese because they seem to not like eachother very much.

speak with the expat community here and they have some very strong opinions about their brothers and sisters back in vietnam.

That's seems universal for all refugee diaspora, just talk with the Persian royalists et al. Viet in VN certanly don't hate them back if anything. There have been multiple expat "waves" and the old south who went to America when the war ended is a distinct one. Besides the other most known like the persecuted chinese, the boaters, the Hmong, there are so many who are just regular ol' work migration. They kinda get forgotten but they are a huge group today all in all. They are as big a part of who someone in VN sees when they think of expats as everyone, and that certainly might be part explanation for the very one-way feelings.

Dont Touch ME
Apr 1, 2018

Ups_rail posted:

I ve always admired the vietnamese because they seem to not like eachother very much.

speak with the expat community here and they have some very strong opinions about their brothers and sisters back in vietnam.

Talk to enough Vietnamese in Viet Nam and you'll see it's still a pretty divided country. Lots of southerners don't like northerners, but it doesn't have anything to do with the war. It's just a prevailing historical fact that transcends the Nguyễn dynasty. Northerners and central Viets are a historically different people from southerners, with different languages, culture and origins. Northerners were deeply affected by the 1000 years of Chinese domination. The south is borderline matriarchal, while the north exudes a very "confucian atmosphere", if you catch my drift.

Throw in the fact that Northerners tend to be cheeky and a little cocky, and southerners are really laid back, and there's quite a lot of clash between them. At the end of the day it's stuff that gets pushed to the sidelines, individual cases matter more. People in the country get along usually. It's just that if you go digging, you'll find the scars.

Also, many of the Viets I know think that the expats seething at the old country is very cute.

BrigadierSensible
Feb 16, 2012

I've got a pocket full of cheese🧀, and a garden full of trees🌴.

With regards to the Sinovac Chinese vaccine:

1992 Cricket World Cup winning Captain, (and in lesser importance, current Pakistan PM), Imran Khan has tested positive for COVID 19 only 2 days after receiving the Chinese vaccine.

I know that this means nothing, and antibodies etc. take time to develop, and that it is his own drat fault for having maskless rallies/gatherings etc. But this is not a good look. And is just the sort of international bad PR that the CCP hate.

Oh, and Modi, (the arsehole), sent him a sarcastic "get better soon" message, like the fascist racist fundamentalist arsehole that he is.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-03-20/imran-khan-tests-positive-for-covid-19-pakistin-prime-minister/100019474

Budzilla
Oct 14, 2007

We can all learn from our past mistakes.

Grand Fromage posted:

Wonder if there's still anybody flying WW2 era aircraft (to fight, not as trainers).
Azerbaijan in the recent war was using An-2 biplanes (first produced in 1947) as bait for Armenia to use their radar against. I am also sure that the CCP spends more on internal security than on its armed forces.

Ups_rail
Dec 8, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

Dont Touch ME posted:

Talk to enough Vietnamese in Viet Nam and you'll see it's still a pretty divided country. Lots of southerners don't like northerners, but it doesn't have anything to do with the war. It's just a prevailing historical fact that transcends the Nguyễn dynasty. Northerners and central Viets are a historically different people from southerners, with different languages, culture and origins. Northerners were deeply affected by the 1000 years of Chinese domination. The south is borderline matriarchal, while the north exudes a very "confucian atmosphere", if you catch my drift.

Throw in the fact that Northerners tend to be cheeky and a little cocky, and southerners are really laid back, and there's quite a lot of clash between them. At the end of the day it's stuff that gets pushed to the sidelines, individual cases matter more. People in the country get along usually. It's just that if you go digging, you'll find the scars.

Also, many of the Viets I know think that the expats seething at the old country is very cute.

I was talking with my friends wife about this today. The husband brought up that time me and him were in LA at a shop and the owner was a Mr NGO. The husband mentioned how the name means "corn" I think he made a pun with the band KORN.

Anyway the dude asked how he knew that and it came up how his soon to be wife was viet.

Mr NGO turned very serious and earnest and basically asked if it was a play for a green card, and was all set to warn him. and calmed down when told she already had one.

Strategic Tea
Sep 1, 2012

Budzilla posted:

Azerbaijan in the recent war was using An-2 biplanes (first produced in 1947) as bait for Armenia to use their radar against. I am also sure that the CCP spends more on internal security than on its armed forces.

Aren't the so called armed forces mainly trained to put down riots should unharmonious dissent ever occur in a significant way?

E: to the point of some low status infantry reporting they got seven rounds each of rifle training and then presumably back to their real service weapon, the police baton.

Strategic Tea fucked around with this message at 09:49 on Mar 21, 2021

Blistex
Oct 30, 2003

Macho Business
Donkey Wrestler

Strategic Tea posted:

Aren't the so called armed forces mainly trained to put down riots should unharmonious dissent ever occur in a significant way?

E: to the point of some low status infantry reporting they got seven rounds each of rifle training and then presumably back to their real service weapon, the police baton.

That was a post of mine about my wife's cousin and his brief, disappointing term in the PLA. He touched a real service rifle like two times a year for a morning. I've forgotten the specific numbers, but it was something like 6 rounds each, in two sessions of three. Semi-auto only, and you had no way to check your results, as everyone that day shot at the same target.

Training varies unit, to unit, district, province, etc. Saving money and avoiding accidents is the path to success for a PLA commander, so anything that costs money or could result in embarrassment is avoided.

90% of their training was civilian pacification.

-get dressed fast
-block formation in base
-get on trucks quickly
-arrive at destination
-hop out of truck, block formation
-grab the equipment*
-make shoulder to shoulder wall where needed

*Depending on the size of the crowd, their agitation level, and importance of quashing it before it happens the soldiers might just arrive their uniforms with nothing else, they might have face shields, plastic shields and batons, they might have unloaded rifles, or loaded rifles. They practiced for all situations, but never deployed for real with anything more than their uniforms.

While I was living in Shenyang they deployed in uniform and encircled the embassy district because an energy drink company didn't pay people for raising ants.

VideoTapir
Oct 18, 2005

He'll tire eventually.

Blistex posted:



While I was living in Shenyang they deployed in uniform and encircled the embassy district because an energy drink company didn't pay people for raising ants.

Please tell this story

Blistex
Oct 30, 2003

Macho Business
Donkey Wrestler

VideoTapir posted:

Please tell this story

Back in 2008 a startup energy drink company was operating in the N.E. of China. One of the ingredients was ground up ants. The way to source ants? Have people raise them.

People would buy an ant raising kit from the company, raise a batch of ants, then sell them back to the company. . . Profit!

Naturally someone at the company took that money and ran, so there was a planned protest to get the local government to investigate. Word spread on the internet, and by first light there were a few thousand soldiers circling government buildings and embassies throughout the city, stopping any chance of a protest before it started.

goblin week
Jan 26, 2019

Absolute clown.

Ups_rail posted:

I ve always admired the vietnamese because they seem to not like eachother very much.

speak with the expat community here and they have some very strong opinions about their brothers and sisters back in vietnam.

you emmigrate not only in pursuit of a better life but also to escape.

Shumagorath
Jun 6, 2001
Chinathread: This is how you get ants

WarpedNaba
Feb 8, 2012

Being social makes me swell!
Chinathread: Our army exists to squash the enemies of the corporation, but someone'll claim we're playing long-game communism anyway.

Alternatively: This is not how you get ants.

ThisIsJohnWayne
Feb 23, 2007
Ooo! Look at me! NO DON'T LOOK AT ME!



But they did get ants :confuoot:

E. Chinathread: we're talking about ants

ThisIsJohnWayne fucked around with this message at 21:46 on Mar 21, 2021

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

LostCosmonaut
Feb 15, 2014

Managed to find what looks like a news story about the situation; https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSSP70669

Unless there have been multiple ant-raising scams in China, which is plausible.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply