|
Endless Mike posted:not sure what the problem is. just fire up prime95 and cook some eggs in the morning why bother downloading some weird software like prime95? just open itunes or slack
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2021 04:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 22:04 |
|
|
nah you really need avx512 for even cooking
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2021 04:56
|
|
|
phase change cooling is back except it's the liquid to gas transition of water
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2021 06:12
|
|
|
Fabricated posted:
intel's innovation is disrupting the oven industry
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2021 08:10
|
|
|
Fabricated posted:
hobbesmaster posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxiuvQPL_qs
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2021 08:15
|
|
|
sure, my motherboard and cpu are fried but for a sweet 10 seconds it owned the gently caress out of amd in a benchmark
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2021 11:35
|
|
|
My 5600X should be arriving today. nice
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2021 13:32
|
|
|
what are yall using to monitor the cpu core temps? is hwmonitor stil the go to?
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2021 14:05
|
|
|
that's what i use
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2021 14:07
|
|
|
Forums Medic posted:what are yall using to monitor the cpu core temps? is hwmonitor stil the go to? hwinfo64
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2021 14:20
|
|
|
I'm jizzin' for Ryzen!
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2021 14:24
|
|
|
TheFluff posted:hwinfo64 website says its used by nasa good enough for me
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2021 15:50
|
|
|
Farmer Crack-rear end posted:what's your plan for the 6700k? turn off the spectre mitigations so it doesn't run like rear end
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2021 15:53
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:what the gently caress can even dissipate 430 watts worth of heat in this form factor? are these things all if they're increasing the thermal cutoff temp to 110 then any heatsink will become more efficient because of the larger delta between the chip and ambient temp
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2021 15:56
|
|
benchmark ln2 cooling or something?
|
Zlodo posted:sure, my motherboard and cpu are fried but for a sweet 10 seconds it owned the gently caress out of amd in a benchmark Not even all benchmarks either lmao. My ryzen 3900 apparently still smokes this new intel thermite bomb in stuff like 3d rendering
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2021 16:50
|
|
|
Got my 5600X in and installed. Just gotta figure out what to do with the 3600X now.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2021 23:57
|
|
|
yeah i been playing with memory timings to see what works with my 5900x. they should have called it 5100x cause thats how many megahurts it runs at!!!
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2021 03:10
|
|
|
yeah, the problem is definitely how you're describing your nodes and not the nodes themselves intel good job https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-new-node-shrink-measurement
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2021 03:57
|
|
|
hmm I wonder why the last datapoint there is 2017. I’m sure there’s no reason
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2021 03:59
|
|
|
that is a fantastic misleading chart. fox news would be proud.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2021 13:49
|
|
|
usually in marketing a bigger number means better. if im paying 500 bucks for a chip i want one with as many nanometers as possible
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2021 09:58
|
|
|
"what is this, a cpu for ants???" - intel marketing circa 2022, probably
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2021 13:24
|
|
|
Intel core i7, made on the latest nanomium cx14500 process
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2021 14:32
|
|
|
poty posted:usually in marketing a bigger number means better. if im paying 500 bucks for a chip i want one with as many nanometers as possible exactly what ive been saying
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2021 15:05
|
|
|
intel bringing back full room computers, but it's almost nothing but cooling for them
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2021 18:05
|
|
|
Minnesota Mixup posted:intel bringing back full room computers, but it's almost nothing but cooling for them no joke that’s what quantum computers are very complicated plumbing problem with a few wires attached
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2021 18:13
|
|
|
PCjr sidecar posted:no joke that’s what quantum computers are please don't talk about my junk like that
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2021 21:28
|
|
|
PCjr sidecar posted:no joke that’s what quantum computers are please dont get bob started
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2021 22:15
|
|
|
aren’t quantum computers a scam?
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2021 22:17
|
|
|
Silver Alicorn posted:aren’t quantum computers a scam? Jonny 290 posted:please dont get bob started
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2021 22:19
|
|
|
Silver Alicorn posted:aren’t quantum computers a scam? they’re 100% not a scam as a way to twiddle around with your top 5 cs bs education in your free time while you spend your workday fiddling adtech placement algorithms to improve click through thousandths of a percent (that is, qc as a concept is a scam like bitcoin as its vastly overpromised and may never work at a useful scale, not scam as in tether pure fraud machine)
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2021 22:27
|
|
|
nah, qc is not that easily summarized. almost everything (positive) we know we can do with quantum computing looks worthless with any technology possibly even on optimistic horizons, but as a matter of research i think everyone reasonably knowledgeable agrees that there's bound to be a lot of really promising things lurking there if it can be made to work.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2021 22:30
|
|
|
PCjr sidecar posted:(that is, qc as a concept is a scam like bitcoin as its vastly overpromised and may never work at a useful scale, not scam as in tether pure fraud machine) it’s closer to fusion power generation if you’re looking for an analogy
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2021 02:53
|
|
|
we can generate plenty of power with fusion. the problem is doing it without destroying everything in a 20km radius.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2021 04:02
|
|
|
The Management posted:we can generate plenty of power with fusion. the problem is doing it without destroying everything in a 20km radius.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2021 04:31
|
|
|
although there was a plan to use nuclear bombs to generate energy. it went: 1) dig a deep hole, put an atom bomb in it. fill the hole up 2) detonate the bomb. the surrounding rock captures all that heat energy 3) drill a bunch of holes through that rock and run pipes and water through them. boom, instant geothermal plant! 4) when the rock cools down, dig another deep hole and repeat there was another plan to use nukes in played-out oil and gas fields in an early attempt at fracking. it died when someone asked if a zillion cubic feet of radioactive natural gas was likely to find a market FMguru fucked around with this message at 04:40 on Apr 3, 2021 |
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2021 04:35
|
|
|
FMguru posted:
If I recall from my stoned late night wikipedia trawls, the deal killer on this every single time 100% of the time `However, the gas was found to be too radioactive to safely burn in residential environments`
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2021 04:36
|
|
|
cowards
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2021 04:38
|
|
|
in 1964 we nuked mississippi! twice!
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2021 04:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 22:04 |
|
|
then they stopped, for some reason
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2021 04:45
|
|