|
xtal posted:Lol I was already writing a post and then stopped when I saw this lmao owned
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 00:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 07:36 |
|
|
drat man this jfk true anonymous podcast is blowing my mind.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 00:17
|
|
|
xtal posted:Lol I was already writing a post and then stopped when I saw this Was a link to your podcast in the post? If so can you finish the post?
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 00:46
|
|
|
We're in for a real meeting of the minds as Dave Portnoy has apparently been epically owned forever by Elon Musk
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 00:53
|
|
|
Conta points is just as boring on Bad Faith as she is in her videos.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 01:38
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:Conta points is just as boring on Bad Faith as she is in her videos. what??????
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 02:01
|
|
|
How Darwinian posted:In the latest David Harvey episode, he was talking about how McCarthyism lead to a shift in science toward quantification and away from an understanding of non-quantifiable abstractions like "power". He'd also said that the free speech movement of the 1960s helped swing the pendulum back away from quantification again and to open up studying Marxism as allowable in universities again. Does anyone know of any books going into some detail on this? Mostly academic stuff, so not necessarily light reading, but all in one form or another touch on it (sorry for the weird spacing, dont know why my citation manager software added it): Amadae, S. M. (2003). Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. Chicago IL, University of Chicago Press. Fourcade, M. (2009). Economists and Societies. Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press. Giraud, Y. (2014). Negotiating the 'Middle of the Road' Position: Paul Samuelson, MIT, and the Politics of Textbook Writing, 1945-‐55. MIT and the Transformation of American Economics. E. R. Weintraub. Durham, NC, Duke University Press: 134-‐152. Hutcheson, P. A. (1997). McCarthyism and the Professoriate: A Historiographic Nightmere? Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research 12. J. C. Smart and W. Tierney. New York, NY, Agathon Press (Kluwer) Solberg, W. and R. Tomilson (1997). "Academic McCarthyism and Keynesian Economics: the Bowen Controversy at the University of Illinois." History of Political Economy29(1): 55-‐81.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 02:03
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:Conta points is just as boring on Bad Faith as she is in her videos. i couldn't even get through the preview clip. Halloween Jack posted:Proportional representation and ranked choice voting are antisemitic. when i was trying to explain it in 2016 (before TURMP) i had a black (?) goon tell me that those voting systems don't care about black people lol
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 02:27
|
|
|
Greg Legg posted:Was a link to your podcast in the post? If so can you finish the post? None of my podcasts are even about politics
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 02:31
|
|
|
xtal posted:None of my podcasts are even about politics god dammit mods please train this poster to this thread until an appropriate post is made
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 02:40
|
|
|
xtal posted:None of my podcasts are even about politics Are they about podcasts as a concept?
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 02:40
|
|
|
probably wanking about mutual aid as a replacement for politics, as if the libertarians haven't been saying the same thing about charity replacing government institutions since time immemorial
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 02:44
|
|
|
Shipon posted:probably wanking about mutual aid as a replacement for politics, as if the libertarians haven't been saying the same thing about charity replacing government institutions since time immemorial lol love that mutual aid became the internet biglib term de jour in a span of like 6 months. also the d&d thread on it has like 6 posts total in it. which granted the unionize ur loving workplace thread on cspam only has like 6 pages so glass house, etc
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 02:53
|
|
|
Shouldn't it be [Cringecasts]?
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 02:53
|
|
|
joepinetree posted:Mostly academic stuff, so not necessarily light reading, but all in one form or another touch on it (sorry for the weird spacing, dont know why my citation manager software added it): Awesome thanks! This is perfect. The social sciences have been trying to clean their poorly replicating studies up, but are also won't hear anything about theory. The main replication advocacy group in psychology is also funded by an Enron billionaire, so I'm just seeing a lot of parallels to what Harvey talked about playing out again, with a heavy focus on "just the facts" quantification.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 02:55
|
|
|
xtal posted:None of my podcasts are even about politics this is a thread for non-political podcasts as well
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 03:51
|
|
|
Kunster posted:https://twitter.com/briebriejoy/status/1386575496998232064 I hope Chapo quit paying Virgil
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 04:09
|
|
|
they still pay Brendan, so I assume everyone gets to keep their pay contractually
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 04:13
|
|
|
eyyy madone can i get one a them no show podcast jobs ovah here?
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 04:15
|
|
|
Atrocious Joe posted:this is a thread for non-political podcasts as well Ive been going through the What A Time To Be Alive patreon episodes recently. It passes the time at work which is what really matters
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 04:17
|
|
|
its a good thing cum town is made by the founder and president of the dsa since it is banned from rgd
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 04:25
|
|
|
Atrocious Joe posted:this is a thread for non-political podcasts as well I listen to the Jack Slack/Fights Gone By podcast for MMA/general combat sports when I need a break from political podcasts. He's been talking a little about how fighters should get unionized though and he and Felix both follow each other on twitter now.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 04:25
|
|
|
Relin posted:its a good thing cum town is made by the founder and president of the dsa since it is banned from rgd 
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 04:30
|
|
|
Relin posted:its a good thing cum town is made by the founder and president of the dsa since it is banned from rgd it's ok we have a good home for it now
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 04:31
|
|
|
I tried to listen to the True Anon JFK two-parter and it just feels really dry. Its weird because it's a topic I'm interested in and the show always starts high energy but I feel like they get really in the weeds in the middle and even end the first part by just...recommending different podcasts to listen to that discuss JFK in more detail.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 05:15
|
|
|
xtal posted:None of my podcasts are even about politics hahaha I don't care! Post it!
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 05:25
|
|
|
Greg Legg posted:Was a link to your podcast in the post? If so can you finish the post? is this the 2.3x listening speed of posting in the podcast thread
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 05:30
|
|
|
Wolfsheim posted:I tried to listen to the True Anon JFK two-parter and it just feels really dry. Its weird because it's a topic I'm interested in and the show always starts high energy but I feel like they get really in the weeds in the middle and even end the first part by just...recommending different podcasts to listen to that discuss JFK in more detail. I haven't listened yet but that's a shame. I see people give Brace and Liz a lot of credit for the research they do for each episode, but honestly they're both really bad at explaining a long narrative. They get sidetracked and go into long-winded, sarcastic jokes so often. Their Paddock episode was over 3 hours, but had less substantive content than one of Chapo's Poppy episodes. It's great listening to Brace and Liz freestyle about random news topics, but listening to them narrate a story makes me feel like I'm coked out trying to tell a sober person about this really cool thing that happened to me
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 05:38
|
|
|
Euphoriaphone posted:I haven't listened yet but that's a shame. I see people give Brace and Liz a lot of credit for the research they do for each episode, but honestly they're both really bad at explaining a long narrative. They get sidetracked and go into long-winded, sarcastic jokes so often. Their Paddock episode was over 3 hours, but had less substantive content than one of Chapo's Poppy episodes.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 05:41
|
|
|
Wolfsheim posted:I tried to listen to the True Anon JFK two-parter and it just feels really dry. Its weird because it's a topic I'm interested in and the show always starts high energy but I feel like they get really in the weeds in the middle and even end the first part by just...recommending different podcasts to listen to that discuss JFK in more detail. It gets off to an insanely bad start when they basically state "determining whether it was the CIA, mafia or someone else who killed JFK is impossible because they all wanted to do it, so really it was a combination of all of them, sorta". no motherfucker, they did not manifest a bullet through bad vibes alone. someone shot him, other parties either orchestrated it, gave consent for it or were aware of it. this is not an impossible question to answer, its just one we dont have the information to answer definitively, and saying "well it's a superposition of all possible conspirators" is beyond stupid. people talk in those terms about sociopolitical phenomena that are too complicated to map out or fully understand, but not when describing discrete events with individual actors. people fall into a trap when they are describing "conspiracies" like this when they don't have their own theory--they present a ton of evidence, much of which contradicts other parts and is of mixed authenticity, and never bound it with a theory of their own to create a narrative (which provides a framework for adding reinforcing evidence and also presenting evidence that contradicts the theory). all this poo poo you want cant possibly be true simultaneously, and maybe none of it is, and by presenting a trashcan full of crap and saying "sometihng happened we just dont know WHAT!" you are doing a disservice to the people and events. it also conveniently makes it impossible to argue any particular bit of evidence, because without connections between pieces of evidence, removing one piece doesn't change the whole. i think this is why "synchronicities" are so popular among people talking about conspiracies, aliens, etc---people want to find patterns, and if they can't they'll invent them and present them as evidence even without claims of relevance or meaning. ahhh isn't it INTERESTING that hitler was born on 4/20, the weed day. was this an attempt to ritually manifest the avatar of a two-faced god of pain and pleasure? who can say
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 05:56
|
|
|
papa horny michael posted:they still pay Brendan, so I assume everyone gets to keep their pay contractually where did you get this information?
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 06:46
|
|
|
Breadallelogram posted:where did you get this information?
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 06:48
|
|
|
https://open.spotify.com/show/3ftbFutRJ5iOWXEzyPYUCH maybe interesting maybe not, Ken M is interviewed
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 06:51
|
|
|
How Darwinian posted:In the latest David Harvey episode, he was talking about how McCarthyism lead to a shift in science toward quantification and away from an understanding of non-quantifiable abstractions like "power". He'd also said that the free speech movement of the 1960s helped swing the pendulum back away from quantification again and to open up studying Marxism as allowable in universities again. Does anyone know of any books going into some detail on this? richard lewontin has written a bunch on reductionism and genetic determinism in liberal science, idk about anything covering the history more broadly tho
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 06:57
|
|
|
Xaris posted:yeah same question, i find it a little hard to believe he's just collecting 1/7th of 2.1 million a year the podcast thread: extremely concerning podcast earning statistics within
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 07:00
|
|
|
how much of my chapo 5bux per month goes to Virgil Texas
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 08:37
|
|
|
joepinetree posted:Mostly academic stuff, so not necessarily light reading, but all in one form or another touch on it (sorry for the weird spacing, dont know why my citation manager software added it): i'd like to add to this: Habermas, J (1968). Knowledge and Human Interest Beacon Press; 2nd Printing October 1972 edition (February 1, 1972) idk if it's translated, but also Hans Skjervheim's essay "Deltakar og Tilskodar", or "Participant and Observer", published in the late fifties, is an excellent primer for why positive social sciences are insufficient
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 10:28
|
|
|
The economic and political forces that gathered steam in the 50 years leading up to Dealey Plaza are more interesting than the umpteenth granular theory about who did the shooting and from what angle on November 23rd itself. So from that perspective it doesn't matter who actually gave the okay for the hit, since mafia, CIA and big business are actually all part of the same horrifying machine.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 11:28
|
|
|
yea that’s an odd criticism for them specifically as of course their main focus is the material conditions that would converge and fracture at and around that day and not the day itself as some isolated thing. they’ve explicitly stated that they are historical materialists.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 12:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 07:36 |
|
|
I haven't listened to part 2 yet, because part 1 being based on JFK was shor because he was a threat thi the establishment hell is Boomer brained mythology
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2021 12:43
|
|
