|
disappointed to find that the likes of PERPETUAL IDIOT and i say swears online unable to give WhiteGenocideNow a comprehensive education in the "better posts arent possible" subforum. guess its true what they say, dont meet your heroes
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 03:29 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 07:24 |
|
i in the following post will teach you everything i know about communism:
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 03:31 |
|
apropos to nothing posted:disappointed to find that the likes of PERPETUAL IDIOT and i say swears online unable to give WhiteGenocideNow a comprehensive education in the "better posts arent possible" subforum. guess its true what they say, dont meet your heroes
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 03:31 |
Darkman Fanpage posted:you're really dumb huh? Nah I think they had a fair question. Slurs aren't just bad words, it requires a class/group to be in a position of power. Calling a white guy a cracker isn't a slur imo. Can't write more tho, clocking into work at the poo poo factory
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 03:55 |
|
WhiteGenocideNow posted:That a bunch of mayos are trying to have a class reductionist culture war and debating the concept of blackness when y'all used to be sharing informational and educational poo poo before you just started going anti mod after the uygur poo poo and started assuming any idpol = liberalism is upsetting to me this type of posting got left behind with 2017 leftbook
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 04:25 |
|
https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/2017/is-posting-praxis/ch01.html
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 04:34 |
|
SSJ_naruto_2003 posted:Nah I think they had a fair question. Slurs aren't just bad words, it requires a class/group to be in a position of power. Calling a white guy a cracker isn't a slur imo. Can't write more tho, clocking into work at the poo poo factory wow how enlightening
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 04:34 |
|
maybe you guys should read a book about poo poo instead of getting all your knowledge from a forum full of idiots
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 04:35 |
|
WhiteGenocideNow posted:a bunch of mayos some of us here are brown
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 04:35 |
|
apropos to nothing posted:if youre looking for education and information anywhere on the sa forums let alone cspam then i dunno what to say really that’s not why I visit cspam but it’s a nice bonus when it happens
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 04:46 |
the class reductionist posts are dumb, but also very easy to scroll past
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 05:53 |
|
exmarx posted:my position on 'the r word' is that i'm not gonna use it, but it's a bad look when a mod probes someone for making fun of them
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 05:57 |
|
seriously, the weakest form one can assume is the one where you're countering every post with a probation
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 05:57 |
|
waaaah class reductionism!!!
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 06:57 |
|
Intersectionality
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 07:04 |
|
there’s a good reading list in the op
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 07:12 |
|
lol i forgot mayor dave was the op of this thread
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 07:23 |
|
shameful
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 07:23 |
|
lumpentroll posted:shameful not even the IK of his own thread, that's gradenko's job now
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 07:25 |
|
WhiteGenocideNow posted:That a bunch of mayos are trying to have a class reductionist culture war and debating the concept of blackness when y'all used to be sharing informational and educational poo poo before you just started going anti mod after the uygur poo poo and started assuming any idpol = liberalism is upsetting to me this is a very mayo twitter post that somebody with an in this neighborhood sign would have. all it's missing is a sassy gif
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 07:32 |
|
sorry everyone, the whites have decided that race isn’t real. the cis men have also begun to theorize that gender is a spook and the able bodied just can’t with your accessible construction rn.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 07:36 |
namesake posted:Haven't read it in detail but it seems to be a (the?) solid argument for Third Worldism. The counterpoint is that exploitation is not just bad and a source of revolutionary discontent due to the transfer of value from the working class to the ruling class - the first world worker is still miserable, stressed, managed by idiots daily and alienated from their labour and society even if the overall standard of living they have is boosted significantly due to transfers to the national economy from the rest of world. They experience the sharp end of capitalism, even if it isn't the sharpest end available globally and often occupy the insanely good position of being able to physically disrupt or threaten the actual members of the ruling class who live in the first world so the idea that they can't really develop revolutionary organisation is not as concrete as is argued there, although it does explain why reformism is so strong in the West. I wasn't really convinced by their net-exploitation argument, it seemed a bit unrealistic to expect that people check all the economic data to figure out whether they are a Net Exploiter or not before deciding on whether they will support socialism. I think their other argument, that a revolution arises only when and where it is historically necessary, is much more convincing. In fact I think that since communism can be understood primarily as a negation or critique of capitalism (viz. "Communism is for us not a state of affairs which is to be established, an ideal to which reality [will] have to adjust itself. We call communism the real movement which abolishes the present state of things. The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence." emphasis mine), the desirability to the proletariat of a communist revolution can't be understood in terms of whether they will be better off after the revolution, but rather how intolerable the present conditions are to them. And while certainly the conditions of the first-world worker are in places benefited by capitalism (explaining their drift towards reformism), they are as you said immiserated in other ways that can't just be fixed by throwing money at them. So I think the prospects for revolution are, while dim, still present in the first world - and brightening daily, given the gradual eroding of the wage differences that are the bedrock of unequal exchange and the increasing impossibility of a reformist solution as the rate of profit decreases.
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 08:00 |
Darkman Fanpage posted:maybe you guys should read a book about poo poo instead of getting all your knowledge from a forum full of idiots True you do post here I wasn't agreeing with them, just saying maybe explain that it's also partly that the enslavement, exploitation etc of various peoples by Americans/europeans means that, even if there's a classless society, there's still a history of that poo poo. But instead of saying any of that, you'd prefer to just pretend to be the smartest person here. SSJ_naruto_2003 fucked around with this message at 08:04 on Apr 29, 2021 |
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 08:00 |
|
never thought i'd see an explicit defence of race realism itt lol
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 09:36 |
Sir use its proper name, scientific racism
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 09:56 |
|
the immoral science
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 09:59 |
i say swears online posted:the immoral science
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 10:03 |
|
i say swears online posted:the immoral science unfortunately there is more than one immoral science, and only the one immortal science
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 11:48 |
|
i say swears online posted:the immoral science
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 12:13 |
|
i say swears online posted:the immoral science lol
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 12:18 |
|
WhiteGenocideNow posted:That a bunch of mayos are trying to have a class reductionist culture war and debating the concept of blackness when y'all used to be sharing informational and educational poo poo before you just started going anti mod after the uygur poo poo and started assuming any idpol = liberalism is upsetting to me this is your first post in this thread lol
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 12:19 |
|
i say swears online posted:the immoral science just laughed out loud irl
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 12:31 |
|
i say swears online posted:the immoral science
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 12:45 |
|
i say swears online posted:the immoral science
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 12:49 |
|
take a look a few pages back at the post where i quoted all the people using the word. if you actually care about making it so that word is no longer used in cspam, then you should get mad at the mods and demand they enforce the rule consistently so people stop posting it. instead i see a lot of people getting mad at posters who are calling out how larry and a few others are punished for poo poo that other people get away with. so again, no reason for me to think its anything other than posting clique bullshit. if people want the word to stop being used, are you reporting those people and getting pissed at the mods and asking why those posters havent been punished just like larry was? no, instead theyre just arguing that its good larry was punished. if you think its good that larry was punished for using the word then you should also be pissed at the mods for not punishing all the others who continue to use the word but dont face any consequences. really dont see how this is so hard to understand. you say you want the word to stop being used? well heres a bunch of examples of it being used that the mods have decided to ignore, so get pissed at the mods for not doing anything about it instead of continuing to be pissed at larry who has already been punished in excess of what anyone else who is punished for the same thing ever gets.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 13:45 |
|
i say swears online posted:the immoral science
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 13:47 |
|
apropos to nothing posted:take a look a few pages back at the post where i quoted all the people using the word. if you actually care about making it so that word is no longer used in cspam, then you should get mad at the mods and demand they enforce the rule consistently so people stop posting it. instead i see a lot of people getting mad at posters who are calling out how larry and a few others are punished for poo poo that other people get away with. Shut up retard (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 13:54 |
|
apropos to nothing posted:take a look a few pages back at the post where i quoted all the people using the word. if you actually care about making it so that word is no longer used in cspam, then you should get mad at the mods and demand they enforce the rule consistently so people stop posting it. instead i see a lot of people getting mad at posters who are calling out how larry and a few others are punished for poo poo that other people get away with. report the posts then, if you don't report them and then they don't get actioned on then why is it the mods fault for not seeing it?
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 13:57 |
|
Start a feedback thread or something, goddamn. No, I'm not going to probate people for using it in the context of discussing whether we can use it, no it's not as bad as the n-word, and no, I'm not going to probate posts that flew under the radar weeks ago or longer.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 14:02 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 07:24 |
|
I think the best solution for all involved would be for you to go the gently caress away, don’t post in this thread, and let someone else handle the moderation of it. you suck and absolutely no one wants you here. it’s a simple solution that you can’t seem to bring yourself to do for some reason
|
# ? Apr 29, 2021 14:04 |