Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: fart simpson)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Rent-A-Cop
Oct 15, 2004

I posted my food for USPOL Thanksgiving!

What's the functional difference between "suicide drone" and "cruise missile" except fear-mongering for more MIC contracts?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

taqueso
Mar 8, 2004


:911:
:wookie: :thermidor: :wookie:
:dehumanize:

:pirate::hf::tinfoil:

I guess the cruise missile goes faster usually

wisconsingreg
Jan 13, 2019

Rent-A-Cop posted:

What's the functional difference between "suicide drone" and "cruise missile" except fear-mongering for more MIC contracts?

Liotering muntitions can land

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

How it launches.

Some Guy TT
Aug 30, 2011

https://mobile.twitter.com/vmorkevicius/status/1391351257063960576

i think a lot about how before i became a regular cspammer it had never occurred to me that from the soviet perspective the western powers had already done a nazi non aggression pact with regards to czechoslovakia which rather changes the context of why they made their own deal with the nazis and begs the question of why our countries arent considered nazi sympathizers for making a very similar deal except with fewer benefits and more workable alternatives

my bony fealty
Oct 1, 2008

Some Guy TT posted:

https://mobile.twitter.com/vmorkevicius/status/1391351257063960576

i think a lot about how before i became a regular cspammer it had never occurred to me that from the soviet perspective the western powers had already done a nazi non aggression pact with regards to czechoslovakia which rather changes the context of why they made their own deal with the nazis and begs the question of why our countries arent considered nazi sympathizers for making a very similar deal except with fewer benefits and more workable alternatives

willing to bet that Russia never had an equivalent to Americans holding enormous pro-Nazi rallies in Madison Square Garden in the late 30s but yeah the Soviets were bad for making a realpolitik treaty to buy themselves time lmao

Kassad
Nov 12, 2005

It's about time.
The narrative that appeasing Hitler was a huge mistake is pretty common. But yes, governments at the time were more hostile towards communists than the Nazis until it became clear the Nazis were going to come for them first. It's also why the Cold War started almost immediately after the end of WW2.

Kassad has issued a correction as of 06:12 on May 12, 2021

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

Kassad posted:

The narrative that appeasing Hitler was a huge mistake is pretty common. But yes, governments at the time were more hostile towards communists than the Nazis until it became clear the Nazis were going to come for them first. It's also why the Cold War started almost immediately after the end of WW2.

I think the difference here is that appeasement is usually placed within the context* of "well WW1 had just happened and nobody had the appetite for war so it's understandable that Britain and France acted in the way they did"

but hardly anyone extends that kind of benefit-of-the-doubt to the Soviets, where the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact is often framed as Stalin merely being as predatory as Hitler was. Indeed, there's often no connection drawn between appeasement and the M-R Pact when, as it happened, Stalin felt that he had to reach some kind of accommodation with Nazi Germany precisely because the policy of appeasement had demonstrated to him that the West was more willing to side with Hitler than with him.

EDIT: it's also worth noting that in the modern context, "appeasement was a mistake" has been coopted by the right to push for less diplomacy and more aggression against whoever is America's enemy du jour, once they're been tarred with the Hitlerite feather. It's obviously bad for what's supposed to have been a reckoning with a historical mistake to then turn into agitating for more war with Iran, North Korea, China, Russia, or whathaveyou.

___

* and this context also often glosses over how certain elements within the US, the UK, and France, had sympathies towards Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy for having successfully extinguished socialist movements within their respective countries, as yet another driver for why appeasement was pursued.

gradenko_2000 has issued a correction as of 06:47 on May 12, 2021

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy
thinking about this david frum article again and something else (i can't remember where) where the author was gobsmacked that PLA troops spend a portion of their time... sitting around singing songs about mao!?!? what's that about??? it's like propaganda or something, and that can't be effective at improving the morale of the soldiers and giving them a reason to believe in what they're doing while staying focused on their mission. it can't be that, it must be just sheer incompetence, unlike the U.S. military, which has a spotless record of racking up the Ws in wars in east asia




........................

oh wait... oh no... :actually:




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6hzSwyetWM

......................

:dukedog:




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Dg2yXRKUiw&t=613s

david frum: noooooooooooooooooooooo

Comrade Koba
Jul 2, 2007


that epic sax rendition of 东方红 by patterned shirt guy is :discourse:

Deified Data
Nov 3, 2015


Fun Shoe
Saw my first "three fingers salute" fluff story on the morning news mentioning Hong Kong. Lots of appeals to the incredible military might of the US and photogenic people begging for intervention. They're tying it to the Hunger Games now apparently? "The hard power of the US military and the soft power of US culture", literal quote from the brain dead presenter lol. Truly demonic poo poo

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?

Deified Data posted:

Saw my first "three fingers salute" fluff story on the morning news mentioning Hong Kong. Lots of appeals to the incredible military might of the US and photogenic people begging for intervention. They're tying it to the Hunger Games now apparently? "The hard power of the US military and the soft power of US culture", literal quote from the brain dead presenter lol. Truly demonic poo poo

I mean it’s clearly a reference to the Hunger Games, chosen specifically to appeal to Americans and consumers of American culture

Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world

a friend of mine did a good writeup about this that i've since lost so you're going to have to bear with me but it's still absolutely true that the PLA does a ton of political education and internal democracy. very little of their doctrine is secret as such because it's publicly written about and debated by like everyone serving and the commissar attached to each unit is a listener and political educator such that there are stories of like, platoons objecting to using a certain strategy or a certain warplane or whatever and having a back and forth with their guy and ultimately developing some new approach together that's empirically better than whatever the US was doing in similar circumstances

Gorman Thomas
Jul 24, 2007

indigi posted:

I mean it’s clearly a reference to the Hunger Games, chosen specifically to appeal to Americans and consumers of American culture

Big mistake on their handlers part to not use something from Harry Potter.

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

Some Guy TT posted:

i think a lot about how before i became a regular cspammer it had never occurred to me that from the soviet perspective the western powers had already done a nazi non aggression pact with regards to czechoslovakia which rather changes the context of why they made their own deal with the nazis and begs the question of why our countries arent considered nazi sympathizers for making a very similar deal except with fewer benefits and more workable alternatives

Poland even helped invade Czechoslovakia

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

https://twitter.com/EliDFriedman/status/1392513929776189449?s=20

quote:

Associate Professor at Cornell's School of Industrial and Labor Relations.

Mr Hootington
Jul 24, 2008

I'M HAVING A HOOT EATING CORNETTE THE LONG WAY
https://twitter.com/DecampDave/status/1392524569148370944?s=19

So 3 months until we recognize the "genocide"?

ArmedZombie
Jun 6, 2004

Rent-A-Cop posted:

What's the functional difference between "suicide drone" and "cruise missile" except fear-mongering for more MIC contracts?

dwell time?

paul_soccer12
Jan 5, 2020

by Fluffdaddy

Kassad posted:

The narrative that appeasing Hitler was a huge mistake is pretty common. But yes, governments at the time were more hostile towards communists than the Nazis until it became clear the Nazis were going to come for them first. It's also why the Cold War started almost immediately after the end of WW2.

the cold war started the instant truman decided to nuke japan imo

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

the cold war started when truman was a sperm in his dad's ballsack, even before he was his mom's zygote

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

Some Guy TT posted:

https://mobile.twitter.com/vmorkevicius/status/1391351257063960576

i think a lot about how before i became a regular cspammer it had never occurred to me that from the soviet perspective the western powers had already done a nazi non aggression pact with regards to czechoslovakia which rather changes the context of why they made their own deal with the nazis and begs the question of why our countries arent considered nazi sympathizers for making a very similar deal except with fewer benefits and more workable alternatives
other important context on nazi-western-soviet relations

Agrajag
Jan 21, 2006

gat dang thats hot

Some Guy TT posted:

https://mobile.twitter.com/vmorkevicius/status/1391351257063960576

i think a lot about how before i became a regular cspammer it had never occurred to me that from the soviet perspective the western powers had already done a nazi non aggression pact with regards to czechoslovakia which rather changes the context of why they made their own deal with the nazis and begs the question of why our countries arent considered nazi sympathizers for making a very similar deal except with fewer benefits and more workable alternatives

same reason why its not largely not taught in america that the soviets were largely the ones that defeated hitler and the nazis

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?

paul_soccer12 posted:

the cold war started the instant truman decided to nuke japan imo

it didn't help things at all but I feel like the cold war would have started the instant Japan surrendered in any case, especially if Korea, most of Manchuria, and parts of the home islands were under Soviet control

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?

comedyblissoption posted:

other important context on nazi-western-soviet relations


wow I didn't realize how many civilians China lost

Agrajag
Jan 21, 2006

gat dang thats hot

literally while the US funded and equipped IDF raids Al Aqsa and murders Palestinian children for the world to see

Agrajag
Jan 21, 2006

gat dang thats hot

indigi posted:

wow I didn't realize how many civilians China lost

my friend do you not know of The Rape of Nanking?

and the conveniently ignored war crimes of imperial japan?

of which the perpetrators are still celebrated to this day in japan while Abe and his party white washes the war crimes committed during ww2?

Agrajag has issued a correction as of 21:45 on May 12, 2021

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

indigi posted:

wow I didn't realize how many civilians China lost

the imperial japanese army were not known for their mercy

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?

Agrajag posted:

my friend do you not know of The Rape of Nanking?

and the conveniently ignored war crimes of imperial japan?

of which the perpetrators are still celebrated to this day in japan while Abe and his party white washes the war crimes committed during ww2?

I just didn't realize the scale. the fact that Imperial Japan isn't talked about in the same way as Nazi Germany is either phenomenal propaganda or - oh, the victims were Chinese, so it's just racism

Fleetwood
Mar 26, 2010


biggest hochul head in china
we were never taught about non-US roles in WWII in history class, so I first learned about The Rape of Nanjing from freaking rotten.com

Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world

indigi posted:

I just didn't realize the scale. the fact that Imperial Japan isn't talked about in the same way as Nazi Germany is either phenomenal propaganda or - oh, the victims were Chinese, so it's just racism

oops, all race science

Malleum
Aug 16, 2014

Am I the one at fault? What about me is wrong?
Buglord

indigi posted:

I just didn't realize the scale. the fact that Imperial Japan isn't talked about in the same way as Nazi Germany is either phenomenal propaganda or - oh, the victims were Chinese, so it's just racism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9vFzN5MbFk&t=140s

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020

Agrajag posted:

my friend do you not know of The Rape of Nanking?

and the conveniently ignored war crimes of imperial japan?

of which the perpetrators are still celebrated to this day in japan while Abe and his party white washes the war crimes committed during ww2?

I didn't realized how many Chinese civilians were killed in WW2 either. If we go by this chart, it was about 15-16 million civilians, the Rape of Nanking only accounted for 1/3 million. I look up the actual article. The famine death estimate was 5-10 million. You know if this estimate only count the actual WW2 period, which I assume was 37-45 for China. that was about 2+ millions per year!

Although I shouldn't be that surprised since China lost huge number of people during every civil war/famine in Qing Dynasty.

Fleetwood posted:

we were never taught about non-US roles in WWII in history class, so I first learned about The Rape of Nanjing from freaking rotten.com

Just curious where did you learn about the Armenian genocide?

stephenthinkpad has issued a correction as of 22:41 on May 12, 2021

Agrajag
Jan 21, 2006

gat dang thats hot

wtf

Greg12
Apr 22, 2020

indigi posted:

wow I didn't realize how many civilians China lost

the first I heard about it was in "Thank God for the Atom Bomb," in which the author pointed out that the deaths from the atom bombs were something like a week's worth of the ongoing fighting at that point in the war.

the point of the essay is something like, "oh, the atomic bomb shortened the war by two weeks? great; humanity came out ahead."

harsh stuff.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002
Eh at that point both the Red Army and the PLA were fully on the offensive, people were dying but less and less of them were communists.

The decision to drop the bomb happened within hours of the start of August Storm and Nagasaki occurred just as Japanese positions were overrun.

The motivation was crystal clear.

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
To get a sense of the scale of the Sino-Japanese theater of WW2 and how much of it just isn't taught, look up Operation Ichi-Go

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020
In the early stage of the Japanese invasion. The Chiang Kai-shek led nationalist army had huge number of casualty when they tried to face the Japanese head on with their modern industrialized killing machines. They should have used time and space to buy more breathing room to resist the Japanese frontal assault. This is part of the history either KMT nor CCP want to talk about that much. At least mainland still make some WW2 show every year, in Taiwan you barely can find a young man who know the names of the best KMT generals.

Chiang Kai-shek is really a very incompetent leader for anything military and economy related. The only one thing he did right during WW2 was never tried to negociate with the Japanese. It was a miracle he could hold onto power till his death in Taiwan and peacefully passed the throne to his son.

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?
why wouldn't the CCP want to talk about what a shitshow KMT leadership was

fart simpson
Jul 2, 2005

DEATH TO AMERICA
:xickos:

stephenthinkpad posted:

In the early stage of the Japanese invasion. The Chiang Kai-shek led nationalist army had huge number of casualty when they tried to face the Japanese head on with their modern industrialized killing machines. They should have used time and space to buy more breathing room to resist the Japanese frontal assault. This is part of the history either KMT nor CCP want to talk about that much. At least mainland still make some WW2 show every year, in Taiwan you barely can find a young man who know the names of the best KMT generals.

Chiang Kai-shek is really a very incompetent leader for anything military and economy related. The only one thing he did right during WW2 was never tried to negociate with the Japanese. It was a miracle he could hold onto power till his death in Taiwan and peacefully passed the throne to his son.

didnt the kmt conscript surrendered japanese soldiers to fight in the civil war against the communists?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020

indigi posted:

why wouldn't the CCP want to talk about what a shitshow KMT leadership was

CCP wants to talk about in the later stage of the Japanese war, when they had some resource to put up some resistance in northern China, but CCP doesn't want to get into the detail whether KMT armies bared the brunt Japanese assault and how much sacrifice they faced. Alot of battle were actually led by warlords who officially carried KMT flag but didn't really like Chiang Kai-shek all that much.

I am not a connoisseur of Chinese WW2 history, all I can tell you is what part of the history CCP like to focus on what part they like to only talk about in books. CCP really doesn't need to revise the history because nobody in Taiwan want to talk about WW2 history at all.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply