(Thread IKs:
fart simpson)
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/AlexGabuev/status/1395058547415736325
|
# ? May 21, 2021 23:49 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 22:28 |
|
The Russia MIC and energy industry are Putin's core backers. China has been maintaining long term business with these Russian industries. For example, China placed a large order of mid sized military helicopters with Russia last year right around time of the Sino-India conflict. Also China already have 2 nuclear plants designs, they don't have to buy from the Russians, but choose to anyway. They probably hold up the announcement and release it right after the Biden-Putin talk story. Speaking of outside solutions that China doesn't really need. China has invested in and has a contract with Biotech to produce the mRNA vaccine for up to 1 billion jab for the Chinese domestic market. China already have 4 Covid vaccine solutions and all of them are approved inside China. I think they probably will use the mNRA vaccine inside China and export all their Sinovac and Sinopherm vaccines for vaccine diplomacy.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 00:41 |
|
https://twitter.com/YonhapNews/status/1395893897092485120 https://twitter.com/YonhapNews/status/1395874570234593280 liberals are patting themselves on the back for the brilliant centrism of this deal that gives both the hawks and the peaceniks what they want without stopping to think that north korea sees poo poo like the entirely pointless south korean military buildup as evidence they arent actually sincere about peace talks
|
# ? May 22, 2021 01:36 |
|
https://twitter.com/SheenaGreitens/status/1395772023952089091
|
# ? May 22, 2021 01:43 |
|
https://twitter.com/GregPoling/status/1395465529419259904
|
# ? May 22, 2021 01:45 |
|
|
# ? May 22, 2021 02:22 |
|
done
|
# ? May 22, 2021 03:05 |
|
Poling is the dude from CSIS that was just quoted earlier this week as saying the US was about to pull out of the Philippines because Duterte wouldn't renew the VFA
|
# ? May 22, 2021 03:14 |
|
indigi posted:why join the militia over the PLA? people who are just too old to do it otherwise?
|
# ? May 22, 2021 04:04 |
|
incidentally just in case anyone thinks bidens people are sincere about building on the singapore framework and arent just pretending to be conciliatory on the issue to avoid embarrassing moon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkqrkC5Cccc
|
# ? May 22, 2021 07:27 |
|
America doesn't want the status quo on the korean peninsula to change. Unified korea is another germany to deal with and NK is a convenient target for sabre rattling and hard looks when you want to change a narrative.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 16:42 |
|
only trump could go to Korea
|
# ? May 22, 2021 16:49 |
|
It's hard to imagine a unified Korea being anything along the lines of German reunification. The North Koreans are well aware that reunification through privatization hollowed out eastern Germany and led to a permanent decline compared to the west. The DPRK already has a remarkably advanced economy for what it's worth, and they're not the ones who will be cashing in on being forcibly marketized.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 16:52 |
|
Well no it wouldn't be the same, because China, unlike the USSR would probably still exist in the world where Korea unifies.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 16:56 |
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:It's hard to imagine a unified Korea being anything along the lines of German reunification. The North Koreans are well aware that reunification through privatization hollowed out eastern Germany and led to a permanent decline compared to the west. The DPRK already has a remarkably advanced economy for what it's worth, and they're not the ones who will be cashing in on being forcibly marketized. It's not at all clear to me who "they" are though. Quite a number, though probably not the majority, of the soviet elite made out quite well from selling their country off. F Stop Fitzgerald posted:only trump could go to Korea He didn't end up doing anything though.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 17:20 |
|
|
# ? May 22, 2021 17:21 |
|
genericnick posted:It's not at all clear to me who "they" are though. Quite a number, though probably not the majority, of the soviet elite made out quite well from selling their country off. That's because they were selling off the country to themselves. Reunification of Germany had privatization directed by the FRG, which meant west German capitalists got first dibs on the east German firesale.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 17:23 |
|
http://www.mfa.gov.kp/en/national-rights-of-the-palestinian-people-can-never-be-deprived-of/quote:The recent Palestinian situation has become the spotlight of the world.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 18:05 |
|
F Stop Fitzgerald posted:http://www.mfa.gov.kp/en/national-rights-of-the-palestinian-people-can-never-be-deprived-of/ The chad Juche vs the virgin Dengist
|
# ? May 22, 2021 18:08 |
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:That's because they were selling off the country to themselves. Reunification of Germany had privatization directed by the FRG, which meant west German capitalists got first dibs on the east German firesale. That's a good point actually. If they'd press the selloff button there really would be little reason to not cut them out of their share of the loot.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 18:17 |
|
|
# ? May 22, 2021 18:23 |
|
AnimeIsTrash posted:The chad Juche vs the virgin Dengist It's almost like 'socialism in one country' only exists to destroy international solidarity and favors the conservative capitalists
|
# ? May 22, 2021 18:53 |
|
quote:The Philippines would become more attractive to foreign direct investors from the United States and European Union primarily because the 60/40 Filipino-foreign equity cap is the impediment for our country from joining the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and the ASEAN-EU Free Trade Agreement. Our country cannot be eligible into joining into these FTAs because they demand national treatment for all investors coming from member signatory nation-states and the 60/40 cap cannot be justified as a bargaining chip in negotiations with these countries anymore. quote:Nothing wrong with it if I'm going to profit from scrapping 60/40 because local investors are not keen into investing agriculture in which the idle land of my grandparents is an agricultural land that needs to be sell off by myself because we don't have relatives to hire to cultivate them as all of them are professionals that one of them (my second cousin) is already a naturalized Australian citizen and has already been a resident of Australia. gradenko_2000 has issued a correction as of 18:59 on May 22, 2021 |
# ? May 22, 2021 18:53 |
|
|
# ? May 22, 2021 19:04 |
|
Grapplejack posted:It's almost like 'socialism in one country' only exists to destroy international solidarity and favors the conservative capitalists It's funny how stuff becomes "state capitalism" once you start pointing out that countries like Vietnam, Laos, Cuba, and Nepal are communist countries or run by the communist party.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 19:20 |
|
Look, Obama called it state capitalism. Good enough for me!
|
# ? May 22, 2021 19:23 |
|
Grapplejack posted:It's almost like 'socialism in one country' only exists to destroy international solidarity and favors the conservative capitalists ok trot
|
# ? May 22, 2021 19:33 |
|
|
# ? May 22, 2021 19:35 |
|
Grapplejack posted:It's almost like 'socialism in one country' only exists to destroy international solidarity and favors the conservative capitalists the only way china could get the massive capital investment it did was to make concessions to DC. led to some horrendous foreign policy poo poo like the sino-viestnamese war, but they maintained their sovereignity and independence and kept rigid state control over the capitalists (rather than vice versa) instead of having their elites hollow out their country like others that caved to american pressure, for example in south america, or become american protectorates like some in southeast asia. you want to talk about international solidarity, - cut to a few decades later and the existence of a near-peer sovereign economic power (as opposed to protectorates like germany/japan) is the only thing giving countries in the american empire's crosshairs like bolivia, venezuela, cuba and iran some breathing room. massive exports of vaccines, medical equipment even to regimes hostile to it: https://translate.google.com/transl...asil/a-56344254) investment in iran: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3127278/iran-and-china-sign-25-year-cooperation-agreement engagement in south america, which included working with bolivia to help develop their (state owned) lithium resources before the coup happened: https://peoplesdispatch.org/2020/11/10/china-is-working-to-expand-its-ties-to-latin-america/
|
# ? May 22, 2021 20:01 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:I guess this is what it's like when you smoke out an honest to god Comprador So if I am reading this right they want to sell land that they own but isn't being used to foreign capital? Instead of some locals, because the foreign capitalists can pay a lot more?
|
# ? May 22, 2021 20:11 |
|
Southpaugh posted:Unified korea even without American involvement is this likely to happen within the next half century? I don’t think either country is especially enthusiastic about such a radical alteration to their government and economic system. maybe I’m wrong though mila kunis posted:you want to talk about international solidarity, - cut to a few decades later and the existence of a near-peer sovereign economic power (as opposed to protectorates like germany/japan) is the only thing giving countries in the american empire's crosshairs like bolivia, venezuela, cuba and iran some breathing room. that’s all well and good as far as side effects of China’s economic rise go but it’s not really “international solidarity” in any meaningful, participatory sense
|
# ? May 22, 2021 21:05 |
|
indigi posted:
tell that to cuba i guess.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 21:55 |
|
indigi posted:even without American involvement is this likely to happen within the next half century? I don’t think either country is especially enthusiastic about such a radical alteration to their government and economic system. maybe I’m wrong though both nk and sk explicitly desire reunification.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 22:03 |
|
Muscle Wizard posted:both nk and sk explicitly desire reunification. yes but which government has demonstrated a willingness to give up power to achieve it?
|
# ? May 22, 2021 22:21 |
|
trump had no interest in actually putting people in the right places to get any of his foreign agenda done that wasn't explicitly about doing whatever Israel wanted and trying to start Cold War 2
|
# ? May 22, 2021 22:23 |
|
indigi posted:that’s all well and good as far as side effects of China’s economic rise go but it’s not really “international solidarity” in any meaningful, participatory sense China built a massive nickel planet in Cuba that makes up 11% of its exports. China also makes up the destination for 38% of Cuban exports despite being on the other side of the globe.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 23:00 |
|
indigi posted:yes but which government has demonstrated a willingness to give up power to achieve it? They could always try "one country, two koreas" where each state has its own government and political economy but freedom of movement across the border.
|
# ? May 22, 2021 23:10 |
|
https://twitter.com/chenweihua/status/1396210812054867976
|
# ? May 22, 2021 23:18 |
|
Grapplejack posted:It's almost like 'socialism in one country' only exists to destroy international solidarity and favors the conservative capitalists but... the dprk is also socialism in one country...
|
# ? May 23, 2021 00:06 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 22:28 |
|
indigi posted:yes but which government has demonstrated a willingness to give up power to achieve it? Clearly the nation founded on the framework of Japanese colonialism and being a fascist vassal state of the US Empire should immediately dismantle themselves and beg for mercy as applied by the guiding light of juche ideals.
|
# ? May 23, 2021 00:14 |