(Thread IKs:
sharknado slashfic)
|
has anyone ever filmed a ufo with a real camera that captures any amount of detail
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 02:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 02:39 |
|
|
no because if they did it wouldn't be unidentified dummy
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 02:57
|
|
|
random pubbie videos are completely unhelpful if you're actually trying to "investigate uaps" (as opposed to just liking to look at things that seem cool and mysterious, which is also a valid approach to life). like there are just so many ways now to either physically or digitally fake a ufo, and that's not even getting in to misinterpretation of banal causes. this is why the navy accounts/videos are actually good and cool. Mola Yam has issued a correction as of 03:32 on May 30, 2021 |
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 03:03
|
|
|
There's only poor-quality footage because a lot of ufos are artifacts of the function of the camera and so will always be blurry because they're created by the camera itself as nondistinct blobs.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 03:21
|
|
|
also lets see you JABRONES get a clear picture much less video of your standard "whats that poo poo in the sky" its tough!
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 03:28
|
|
|
Antifa Turkeesian posted:There's only poor-quality footage because a lot of ufos are artifacts of the function of the camera and so will always be blurry because they're created by the camera itself as nondistinct blobs. it’s not because the cameras in phones are poo poo and terrible at recording anything at a distance...?
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 03:31
|
|
|
I mean, I like making fun of grainy UFO footage as much as the next guy, but even exceptionally good phone cameras are going to suck poo poo at taking pictures of bright objects in the sky at night. Even really basic and lovely phone astrophotography requires a tripod to get anything that isn't a total mess. Top-tier phones have special modes just for taking pictures of the moon that don't look like a weird blazing sky spotlight. Lots of phone cameras are great but it's just really hard to take clear pictures of anything in the sky at night.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 03:39
|
|
|
or during the day; nobody's making videos of birds in flight because they can't because the phone cameras are poo poo. can't even take a decent picture of a mountain.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 03:50
|
|
|
Feral Integral posted:what is a large coherent spin state in condensed matter? is that like aligning the quantum spin of all the atoms (?) in some matter? Does aligning spins effect gravity or something? most of the time matter obeys fermi quantum statistics, and can't do things like smash the same particles into the same space in the same state because fermi statistics don't allow it (e.g. pauli exclusion) - so this is related to the reason why atoms take up space your force carriers, like the photon, conversely obey bose statistics and are quite happy to exist in the same space with the same state (e.g. you can aim a light beam at another light beam and most of the time they are not interacting) anyway, this is all related to quantum spin or intrinsic angular momentum which is such a strange hosed up interesting concept to me because it's one of the first areas where the math (spinors) works really well to describe what's happening in experiment but conceptually relating it to a physical model gets into "??????" fermi particles can have half-integer spin, meaning something like they have to spin a full 360 twice to reach the same state, unlike say a photon which just does it once (edit: “something like” is also being very hand-wavy, apologies) so anyway an electron or proton in isolation can't be smashed into the same place as another electron/proton, but once you have an atom or molecule with the same properties as a fundamental particle boson, e.g. integer spin, reality is apparently quite happy to treat it the same way as a particle-scale boson and let you do weird poo poo like have helium superfluids oblivious to friction because helium atoms no longer have that half-integer exclusion requirement:  also i am a complete amateur coming from a ham radio background so anyone who actually deals with this stuff professionally feel free to correct any of the above Crusader has issued a correction as of 04:00 on May 30, 2021 |
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 03:54
|
|
|
Bob lazar is just as legit as that weirdo with the hosed up hand who said he got in a plasma shootout with aliens under dulce base
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:05
|
|
|
the math really gets hairy once you start dealing with bofa particles
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:09
|
|
|
Hatebag posted:Bob lazar is just as legit as that weirdo with the hosed up hand who said he got in a plasma shootout with aliens under dulce base i kinda believe bob was shown stupid poo poo to flap his jaw about in public. hes the perfect type to run that game on. dulce was seriously just ecstatic to sell some spiral bound printouts
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:13
|
|
|
Farm Frenzy posted:has anyone ever filmed a ufo with a real camera that captures any amount of detail it would be kinda nice to get one where a professional happens to be outside testing their new Red DSMC2 on a tripod when some weird poo poo appears and they manage to get 8k 75fps video without zooming in and out a bunch like a spaz
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:14
|
|
|
Feral Integral posted:what is a large coherent spin state in condensed matter? is that like aligning the quantum spin of all the atoms (?) in some matter? Does aligning spins effect gravity or something? Spin-coherent states are displacements of some fiducial state (whose classical properties must still be determined), just like canonical coherent states (CCS). They saturate the uncertainty relation ΔSxΔSy≥12|⟨Sz⟩| for any three angular momentum operators satisfying the usual commutation relations, similar to CCS saturating the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. They have localized Wigner functions on the sphere, just like CCS being localized in phase space. Their phase space distributions rotate rigidly under Hamiltonians of the form H=r⋅S for some real vector r (dubious because this is true for all states). This is also true for all continuous-variable states under a displacement operation there, so again this is not a good way of choosing coherent states. They achieve the standard quantum limit for estimating a single phase, equivalent to a rotation around an axis perpendicular to the direction of their spin. CCS achieve the same limit in precision for phase estimation. They are eigenstates of some spin operator r⋅S, just like CCS are eigenstates of the annihilation operator. some more answers: The fiducial state being displaced is a minimum uncertainty state, is a maximally-localized state in phase space, and is annihilated by one of the ladder operators. For SU(2) we know that S−|S,−S⟩=0 similar to a|0⟩=0 with continuous variables. These states uniquely minimize the total variance Δ2Sx+Δ2Sy+Δ2Sz, just like CCS minimize Δ2x+Δ2p (the latter is sometimes known as total variance, quadrature coherence scale, mean quadrature variance, total noise, etc.), again for any set of orthogonal angular momentum operators (ie it doesn't matter if you displace the phase space before calculating these quantities). They satisfy ⟨Ω|S|Ω⟩=Sn, where Ω encodes the angular coordinates (θ,ϕ), the unit vector n=(sinθcosϕ,sinθsinϕ,cosθ) points in that direction, and S is the total spin. For some calculations this lets us replace the spin operators with their expectation values. For example, if the spins about which we are talking are representing the optical polarization of N=2S photons, the classical Stokes parameters are Sn and so we can replace the Stokes operators with scalar values. This means that we can consider only the classical Poincaré sphere when trying to understand the optical polarization properties of these states, which is not true of other quantum states. They minimize other variance inequalities. For example, if we define n||=⟨S⟩/|⟨S⟩| and two other mutally orthogonal unit vectors n⊥1 and n⊥2, the spin-coherent states are the only ones that simultaneously saturate the three inequalities Δ 2S⊥1Δ2S⊥2Δ2S⊥1Δ2S||Δ2S||Δ2S⊥2≥|⟨S||⟩|≥0≥0. They form an overcomplete basis for the state space of the system ∫|Ω⟩⟨Ω|dΩ∝I, just like CCS. Their Husimi Q-functions are the most localized in phase space. This is seen in many ways, one of which is the relatively recent proof of the Lieb conjecture, stating that the spin coherent states minimize the Wehrl entropy of the phase space distribution. CCS also uniquely minimize the Wehrl entropy in their phase space. If the Husimi function is expanded in terms of spherical harmonics, the sum of the squared absolute values of the expansion coefficients is maximized by the spin-coherent states. Edit: this means that the states mostly have a dipole moment, less so a quadrapole moment, and so on to all orders. Other, more quantum states hide their information in higher-order moments that require higher-order correlation measurements to be unearthed. They have the largest inverse participation ratios in terms of Husimi functions, again meaning they are the most localized in phase space, just like CCS are the most localized. One can create a Majorana constellation with N=2S points for any state with total spin S, and the spin-coherent states have all N points degenerate to the same location on the sphere.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:14
|
|
|
more simply: If the total spin S is made from N=2S qubits in a symmetric superposition, the spin-coherent states are the only pure states that are completely separable in a first-quantized description. This means they are the only states for which we can unequivocally say what each qubit is doing, independent of the others, which is something that we can typically say about classical states but not always something we can say about quantum ones.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:15
|
|
|
The Saucer Hovers posted:i kinda believe bob was shown stupid poo poo to flap his jaw about in public. hes the perfect type to run that game on. dulce was seriously just ecstatic to sell some spiral bound printouts If he was deliberately shown things to talk about, he's actually less legitimate than an insane conman because he's a limited hangout
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:18
|
|
|
english doc, does this mean i can have sex with the alien or not
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:18
|
|
|
They're both half crazy guys who wanted attention and money, imo
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:19
|
|
|
i was a cameraman for a while and just lol at filming anything in the sky from the ground unprepared. its one of the dumbest hand waves
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:19
|
|
|
Hatebag posted:If he was deliberately shown things to talk about, he's actually less legitimate than an insane conman because he's a limited hangout Hatebag posted:They're both half crazy guys who wanted attention and money, imo word
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:20
|
|
|
Mola Yam posted:random pubbie videos are completely unhelpful if you're actually trying to "investigate uaps" (as opposed to just liking to look at things that seem cool and mysterious, which is also a valid approach to life). like there are just so many ways now to either physically or digitally fake a ufo, and that's not even getting in to misinterpretation of banal causes. Some of these even have the detail people are looking for, that make them look like they have actual structure
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:21
|
|
|
Rickshaw posted:antigravity words i remember well over 20 years ago there was this show that showed some weird science stuff that i only really saw once the thing i recall was a levitating object in some experiment from a recording i think it was something like capacitors and high voltage the scientists recorded themselves doing this and they celebrated with champagne afterwards but i don't know who they were since it was on a tv show at a store i never really found out more about this Farm Frenzy posted:has anyone ever filmed a ufo with a real camera that captures any amount of detail yes and no https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2012/11/13/co-ufo-sightings-in-denver.kdvr
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:21
|
|
|
The Saucer Hovers posted:i was a cameraman for a while and just lol at filming anything in the sky from the ground unprepared. its one of the dumbest hand waves I still don't understand how to make the moon look big in pictures
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:22
|
|
|
The ufos, They are here for my cum and I am gonna give It to them
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:23
|
|
|
Evil_Greven posted:i remember well over 20 years ago there was this show that showed some weird science stuff that i only really saw once I saw a video in a documentary of a spider put in a chamber and made to float, sometime in the early 2000s, something to do with electricity
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:26
|
|
|
Superconductors is the key word to search for on that I think vv hmm, I don't remember seeing anything about that vv Inspector Hound has issued a correction as of 04:31 on May 30, 2021 |
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:27
|
|
|
Inspector Hound posted:Superconductors is the key word to search for on that I think this was in the late 90s and it was definitely capacitors rather than superconductors also i think it was near room temperature but idk for sure Evil_Greven has issued a correction as of 04:34 on May 30, 2021 |
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:29
|
|
|
Evil_Greven posted:i remember well over 20 years ago there was this show that showed some weird science stuff that i only really saw once What was the object being levitated? I remember some pseudoscience show, either Sightings, Encounters, or The Paranormal Borderline, showing video of a guy supposedly inventing antigravity in a shack with wood-paneled walls, and he was supposedly levitating some kind of grey or pink putty that stretched out and split as it accelerated upward. It was transparently fake, like way more fake than the usual poo poo on those shows.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:36
|
|
|
Antifa Turkeesian posted:What was the object being levitated? I remember some pseudoscience show, either Sightings, Encounters, or The Paranormal Borderline, showing video of a guy supposedly inventing antigravity in a shack with wood-paneled walls, and he was supposedly levitating some kind of grey or pink putty that stretched out and split as it accelerated upward. It was transparently fake, like way more fake than the usual poo poo on those shows. this had people (male & female) in lab coats in some drab facility, i don't really recall what it was they were levitating though i think it was something metal
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:40
|
|
|
I'm inside a UFO right now. Updates later, I gotta go for now, they got stuff to show me they say. Sure hope I remember!
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:45
|
|
|
Bideo James posted:I'm inside a UFO right now. Updates later, I gotta go for now, they got stuff to show me they say. Sure hope I remember! 
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:46
|
|
|
xxxcum
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:48
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:48
|
|
|
HKOY FUVK
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:50
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0XFgs0eGMY
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:52
|
|
|
i am harry posted:I saw a video in a documentary of a spider put in a chamber and made to float, sometime in the early 2000s, something to do with electricity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1vyB-O5i6E how about a frog in a big ol' magnetic field.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:53
|
|
|
Delta-Wye posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1vyB-O5i6E yes thats what it must have been.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 04:56
|
|
|
Delta-Wye posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1vyB-O5i6E free him
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 06:59
|
|
|
Antifa Turkeesian posted:What was the object being levitated? I remember some pseudoscience show, either Sightings, Encounters, or The Paranormal Borderline, showing video of a guy supposedly inventing antigravity in a shack with wood-paneled walls, and he was supposedly levitating some kind of grey or pink putty that stretched out and split as it accelerated upward. It was transparently fake, like way more fake than the usual poo poo on those shows. the guy was John Hutchison https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RL6cX06xsyo *edit realized that video was hyperbad The Vinja Ninja has issued a correction as of 08:14 on May 30, 2021 |
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 08:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 02:39 |
|
|
buy the $UFO etf if you wanna make money off aliens and think the pentagon will admit little green men are real
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2021 10:32
|
|