Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
FastestGunAlive
Apr 7, 2010

Dancing palm tree.

SeanBeansShako posted:

Would be cool if we'd talk about the Soviet Paratroopers or the Indian ones that fought the Japanese in Burma, they seem to not get as much love.

Until last year I never even knew Japan had some and used them in combat too.

I recently read Slim’s Defeat into Victory and Burma is my new theater to deep dive. The paratroopers and air assaults as part of the campaign are pretty interesting.

Also extremely interested in any other ww2 memoirs at the tactical or operational level with as much insight as Slim’s btw. For years I’ve heard people recommend it and I’d always disregarded until a particular CO of mine also recommended it. It is definitely a good read for understanding operational art.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

LRADIKAL
Jun 10, 2001

Fun Shoe

Phanatic posted:

You absolutely do not. Mechanical integrators were a fundamental part of the analog gunfire control systems of the time.

The ones on the Iowas were good enough that they weren’t even touched during the refit.

https://youtu.be/GZI-PydfsQs

I mean to integrate with more autonomous, electronic networked systems. The computers themselves did really good work as far as I understand.

HookedOnChthonics
Dec 5, 2015

Profoundly dull


lightbulbs are bad enough, battleship guns do not need to be on the internet of things

Uncle Enzo
Apr 28, 2008

I always wanted to be a Wizard
Alexa, target enemy vessel and fire

"Firing on Amy's Waffles"

Sanguinia
Jan 1, 2012

~Everybody wants to be a cat~
~Because a cat's the only cat~
~Who knows where its at~

My youtube recommends sent me a video today that was about how Germany could possibly have a coal shortage before and during the war when it was its most prolific natural resource, explaining that they had more than enough coal, the issue was that they didn't have the transportation infrastructure to move it all to areas of need because the German rail system was too overtaxed by passenger, freight and military demands after it was nationalized and nazi-fied so that its operations and staffing were handcuffed by ideological concerns.

I thought it was really interesting until it suddenly took a hard turn into a screed about how the real culprit in the whole debacle was... socialism! Centrally planned economics removing profit motive and market forces and other things "Wikipedia won't tell you," are what REALLY brought down the Nazi economy, and if you're not willing to see that despite the evidence you're just willfully blind! Which is when I noticed it was on a playlist with Sargon of Akkad videos and things with titles like "Why the Nazis were Leftists."

I really hate how Youtube has so much good history content but when you watch it you're inevitably fed right wing propagandist tripe masquerading as more good history content by the loving algorithm.

poisonpill
Nov 8, 2009

The only way to get huge fast is to insult a passing witch and hope she curses you with Beast-strength.


Hey history guys, I've been told this thread is the place to ask about military history. I'd like some recommendations on the operational and strategic thinking and military / political footholds of the Cold War. I've read Command and Control, the Dead Hand, a bunch of stuff about Vietnam and the CIA. I'd like to know more about operations in Latin America, the balance of power, and especially how politics shaped and opened up following the collapse of the Soviet Union. If this is too broad of a question, I'll take just good stories and well-regarded general non-fiction. I'm just looking to shore up my knowledge in this area, not write a paper or anything.

Greggster
Aug 14, 2010
All the talk about small-arms makes me wonder if it really is that difficult to figure out once you get the hand on, for instance a kar98 or mp-40.
I understand having to clean it is obviously a hassle, but in terms of picking it off a dead nazi and using it straight away it would seem to me (who, admittedly, have only fired guns in a controlled environment where mud in the reciever is obviously not a problem) pretty straight forward.
Clip/magazine goes in, draw the bolt (I'm not familiar with the terms and english isn't my first language so apologies) and aim at the bad guys and gently squeeze the trigger to remove the enemy.

I figure there are a lot of steps I've missed so feel free to correct me and/or call me a big dumdum :D

Jobbo_Fett
Mar 7, 2014

Slava Ukrayini

Clapping Larry

Greggster posted:

All the talk about small-arms makes me wonder if it really is that difficult to figure out once you get the hand on, for instance a kar98 or mp-40.
I understand having to clean it is obviously a hassle, but in terms of picking it off a dead nazi and using it straight away it would seem to me (who, admittedly, have only fired guns in a controlled environment where mud in the reciever is obviously not a problem) pretty straight forward.
Clip/magazine goes in, draw the bolt (I'm not familiar with the terms and english isn't my first language so apologies) and aim at the bad guys and gently squeeze the trigger to remove the enemy.

I figure there are a lot of steps I've missed so feel free to correct me and/or call me a big dumdum :D

Its still important to know how to handle, just in case. We're talking knowing how the sights work, what kind of ammunition it uses, how to read "Fire" and "Safe" in a foreign language. There's a lot of universal details that are similar among firearm designs, yes, but if you're making a video on something, you might as well cover the essentials while rolling tape.

Nebakenezzer
Sep 13, 2005

The Mote in God's Eye

The Germans liked to use captured shermans, not only because they needed the tanks, but because they made excellent engineering vehicles, because their engines and transmissions were not overstressed, unlike most German tanks.

GotLag
Jul 17, 2005

食べちゃダメだよ

Sanguinia posted:

My youtube recommends sent me a video today that was about how Germany could possibly have a coal shortage before and during the war when it was its most prolific natural resource, explaining that they had more than enough coal, the issue was that they didn't have the transportation infrastructure to move it all to areas of need because the German rail system was too overtaxed by passenger, freight and military demands after it was nationalized and nazi-fied so that its operations and staffing were handcuffed by ideological concerns.

I thought it was really interesting until it suddenly took a hard turn into a screed about how the real culprit in the whole debacle was... socialism! Centrally planned economics removing profit motive and market forces and other things "Wikipedia won't tell you," are what REALLY brought down the Nazi economy, and if you're not willing to see that despite the evidence you're just willfully blind! Which is when I noticed it was on a playlist with Sargon of Akkad videos and things with titles like "Why the Nazis were Leftists."

I really hate how Youtube has so much good history content but when you watch it you're inevitably fed right wing propagandist tripe masquerading as more good history content by the loving algorithm.

Who was this clown?

Wingnut Ninja
Jan 11, 2003

Mostly Harmless

Greggster posted:

All the talk about small-arms makes me wonder if it really is that difficult to figure out once you get the hand on, for instance a kar98 or mp-40.
I understand having to clean it is obviously a hassle, but in terms of picking it off a dead nazi and using it straight away it would seem to me (who, admittedly, have only fired guns in a controlled environment where mud in the reciever is obviously not a problem) pretty straight forward.
Clip/magazine goes in, draw the bolt (I'm not familiar with the terms and english isn't my first language so apologies) and aim at the bad guys and gently squeeze the trigger to remove the enemy.

I figure there are a lot of steps I've missed so feel free to correct me and/or call me a big dumdum :D

It's probably something that anyone familiar with guns could figure out, but you may not have the chance for a lot of experimentation if you find yourself in that situation, so having some training on it beforehand can't hurt. Especially for things like safeties, which a) can vary widely between different manufacturers, and b) may not be apparent if they've been correctly disengaged until you actually pull the trigger.

There's also an aspect of safe handling, it's arguably just as important to know how to not shoot things that you don't want to be shot.

Zorak of Michigan
Jun 10, 2006


A few minutes of familiarization would be a lot nicer than figuring out how to load a Mauser from stripper clips under fire.

Weka
May 5, 2019

That child totally had it coming. Nobody should be able to be out at dusk except cars.

Tias posted:

If it's any consolation (it isn't) Denmark is also utter poo poo about this, and was as much on board as Norway and Sweden when it came to presenting a new unified protestant people, which meant, uh, thinking saami and finns were sorcerors and burning them and their stuff if someone got sick :eng99:

There are or were significant Saami and Finish populations in Denmark?

Edit: Shermans were frequently modified into tractors and other industrial and agricultural vehicles after the war, and I believe one Canadian company, Morpac industries, still makes vehicles based on Sherman components.

Weka fucked around with this message at 01:40 on Jun 2, 2021

Acebuckeye13
Nov 2, 2010

Against All Tyrants

Ultra Carp

Weka posted:

There are or were significant Saami and Finish populations in Denmark?

Edit: Shermans were frequently modified into tractors and other industrial and agricultural vehicles after the war, and I believe one Canadian company, Morpac industries, still makes vehicles based on Sherman components.

Here's a particularly fun one:



Sherman tank that was converted into a snow plow, photographed up at Grand Canyon National Park in '49.

Raenir Salazar
Nov 5, 2010

College Slice

Ensign Expendable posted:

Soviet paratroopers were kind of the black sheep of the armed forces in the GPW and don't really have many successes to point to. They did the whole "Oorah marines" overcompensating thing after the war which surprisingly resulted in a huge jump in prestige and a whole bunch of custom hardware that they didn't get during the war.

Now they have a public holiday where VDV veterans swim in fountains and are generally a public nuisance.

IIRC isn't there at least two places they did fairly well; being the battle for Kyiv where they retook some ground and held it before the Germans flanked the city; and in the Caucasus mountains? Fake edit, apparently they also fought at Stalingrad? And apparently weren't they successful in Manchuria?

Valtonen
May 13, 2014

Tanks still suck but you don't gotta hand it to the Axis either.
Haven’t checked but wasn’t VDV a big thing in tuhatsevskis deep battle ideas? Which would imply they were one of the formations that got purged big time just before the war.

Soviet airborne was the hot poo poo interbellum though. They held multiple massive shows of force in the 1930s with mind-boggling casualties. All foreign observers were impressed on their ability to drop thousands (and lose hundreds) of soldiers.

Phobophilia
Apr 26, 2008

by Hand Knit
any kind of operation is inherently dangerous but few operational maneuvers are as dangerous as paradropping

Sanguinia
Jan 1, 2012

~Everybody wants to be a cat~
~Because a cat's the only cat~
~Who knows where its at~

GotLag posted:

Who was this clown?

The channel is called TIK.

Hilarious excerpt from his About page: "FYI I neither support the far-left nor far-right, which is why some of my videos are getting plenty of dislikes, evil comments are being left on them, and why my email address is no longer available. If you have business enquires, I'm afraid you're out of luck."

The Lone Badger
Sep 24, 2007

Alchenar posted:

Basically there's two paradoxical rules of infantry:
1. A solider will find a way to discard any kit they are supposed to carry that they don't need right now.
2. A soldier will accumulate a vast amount of kit they are not supposed to be issued with if they see any value in it at all.

To what extent is this to be fought against by officers and the system, and to what extent is it to be embraced as 'veteran soldiers probably know what they're doing'?

Bagheera
Oct 30, 2003
An earlier iteration of the thread took time to laugh about Midway, the 2019 war film directed by...Roland Emmerich. The director famous for such stunningly accurate war films as Independence Day and The Patriot.

I never bothered to watch the movie and still haven't. But I finished the History Buffs two-part review of the film. He really enjoyed it the film, and said he had to admit that Roland Emmerich had actually made a good war film. It's a good review of the film, and also a really good 1-hour summary of the battle.

Part 1
Part 2

Gnoman
Feb 12, 2014

Come, all you fair and tender maids
Who flourish in your pri-ime
Beware, take care, keep your garden fair
Let Gnoman steal your thy-y-me
Le-et Gnoman steal your thyme




Greggster posted:

All the talk about small-arms makes me wonder if it really is that difficult to figure out once you get the hand on, for instance a kar98 or mp-40.
I understand having to clean it is obviously a hassle, but in terms of picking it off a dead nazi and using it straight away it would seem to me (who, admittedly, have only fired guns in a controlled environment where mud in the reciever is obviously not a problem) pretty straight forward.
Clip/magazine goes in, draw the bolt (I'm not familiar with the terms and english isn't my first language so apologies) and aim at the bad guys and gently squeeze the trigger to remove the enemy.

I figure there are a lot of steps I've missed so feel free to correct me and/or call me a big dumdum :D

Pretty much any small arm of WWII is something that anybody could figure out given a little time to practice. Relying on having that time to practice is not the greatest of ideas.

Taking the time to provide training could mean the difference between a squad holding a position by turning a MG42 around and having the same squad overrun while trying to get the thing to shoot.

GotLag
Jul 17, 2005

食べちゃダメだよ

Sanguinia posted:

The channel is called TIK.

Hilarious excerpt from his About page: "FYI I neither support the far-left nor far-right, which is why some of my videos are getting plenty of dislikes, evil comments are being left on them, and why my email address is no longer available. If you have business enquires, I'm afraid you're out of luck."

Oh my god I looked up that video and it's amazing.

Here's TIK in the comments:

quote:

Then the capitalists would be forced to lower their prices or go hungry themselves. That's why under a capitalist economy you have deflation. But of course, we don't have a capitalist economy...

Sanguinia
Jan 1, 2012

~Everybody wants to be a cat~
~Because a cat's the only cat~
~Who knows where its at~

Bagheera posted:

An earlier iteration of the thread took time to laugh about Midway, the 2019 war film directed by...Roland Emmerich. The director famous for such stunningly accurate war films as Independence Day and The Patriot.

I never bothered to watch the movie and still haven't. But I finished the History Buffs two-part review of the film. He really enjoyed it the film, and said he had to admit that Roland Emmerich had actually made a good war film. It's a good review of the film, and also a really good 1-hour summary of the battle.

Part 1
Part 2

I'd also never watched Midway so I was kind of shocked at how apparently historically accurate it actually was according to this review, beyond the general Hollywoodery of course.

Pikehead
Dec 3, 2006

Looking for WMDs, PM if you have A+ grade stuff
Fun Shoe

zoux posted:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xI1F5SnkLBs

This is a US produced instructional video on German small arms, specifically the 98K, MP40, and MGs 34 and 42. My question is: Under what circumstances would a US GI be expected to use captured German weapons? I've heard that a lot of guys preferred the MP40 because it was so good, but the US military wasn't training people with the expectation that they would pick up a lost gun and keep and use it right? I can kind of see the use case for say a captured machine gun emplacement, but was this more of a "as a last resort, here's how to use a Mauser if your M1 is broken or out of ammo" but then, why would you need to know how to field strip it?

More generally, how have militaries in the modern era dealt with soldiers using non-standard or captured equipment? Anecdotally, I've heard stories of dudes in Vietnam who liked to use AKs because of the early problems with the M16, but was this something that was explicitly permitted or just ignored by field officers? (or rare and overstated?) What about now, are you allowed to use a different gun than the one you are issued?

Others have posted about how it's fairly common for enemy equipment to be reused.

Training on enemy weapons also allows soldiers to understand how the equipment they are going to face works, and any advantages that will need to be considered, and any disadvantages that can be exploited.

EggsAisle
Dec 17, 2013

I get it! You're, uh...

Bagheera posted:

An earlier iteration of the thread took time to laugh about Midway, the 2019 war film directed by...Roland Emmerich. The director famous for such stunningly accurate war films as Independence Day and The Patriot.

I never bothered to watch the movie and still haven't. But I finished the History Buffs two-part review of the film. He really enjoyed it the film, and said he had to admit that Roland Emmerich had actually made a good war film. It's a good review of the film, and also a really good 1-hour summary of the battle.

Part 1
Part 2

Huh. I skipped the movie for the same reason. And I was even suspicious watching the YouTube video, since in my experience 99% of Youtubers who open with animated caricatures of themselves are intolerably loving annoying. So I was pleased that a.) this dude was alright, and b.) this movie had some historical chops. The world's a surprising place.

Particularly appreciated how he trashes the maudlin :reddit: "dedicated to the brave sailors on BOTH sides" bit at the end, too.

Sanguinia
Jan 1, 2012

~Everybody wants to be a cat~
~Because a cat's the only cat~
~Who knows where its at~

EggsAisle posted:

Huh. I skipped the movie for the same reason. And I was even suspicious watching the YouTube video, since in my experience 99% of Youtubers who open with animated caricatures of themselves are intolerably loving annoying. So I was pleased that a.) this dude was alright, and b.) this movie had some historical chops. The world's a surprising place.

Particularly appreciated how he trashes the maudlin :reddit: "dedicated to the brave sailors on BOTH sides" bit at the end, too.

History Buffs is a really fun channel. The guy's content is good, although a couple of them have some pretty HOT TAKES. His review of A Bridge Too Far has a really eye-rolling thought about "blunt messaging," in film, and he treats Zulu with some pretty obvious kid gloves concerning the British Imperialist history its set in because it was a childhood favorite of his and he doesn't want to think too many bad thoughts about it.

Abongination
Aug 18, 2010

Life, it's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come.
Pillbug
On Burma -

Just finished reading "Behind Japanese Lines , with the OSS in Burma" by Richard Dunlop

Super interesting stuff with the author being a late war agent dropped in. Lots of focus on native tribes in the area being raised into guerilla forces.

Milo and POTUS
Sep 3, 2017

I will not shut up about the Mighty Morphin Power Rangers. I talk about them all the time and work them into every conversation I have. I built a shrine in my room for the yellow one who died because sadly no one noticed because she died around 9/11. Wanna see it?

Acebuckeye13 posted:

One of the other problems with the drop bags was that the Americans got the idea from British paratroopers, but didn't realize they were supposed to be limited by weight - dudes would shove as much ammo and supplies as they could into the bags, and this made them so heavy that the tether would snap as soon as the chute opened.

Seems a huge oversight to me

Tias
May 25, 2008

Pictured: the patron saint of internet political arguments (probably)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund

Weka posted:

There are or were significant Saami and Finish populations in Denmark?

Edit: Shermans were frequently modified into tractors and other industrial and agricultural vehicles after the war, and I believe one Canadian company, Morpac industries, still makes vehicles based on Sherman components.

During the time of Kalmar Union, I guess there was, but these were isolated incidents where they fell into Danish hands. Our colonial hellscape was directed at (for at time) the Estonian natives, and (primarily) the Inuit people of Greenland.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

The Lone Badger posted:

To what extent is this to be fought against by officers and the system, and to what extent is it to be embraced as 'veteran soldiers probably know what they're doing'?

Go into Internet VFW and ask people who went to Iraq how much of their kit they bought themselves.

Mileage varies enormously, but there's loads of posts about how the Germans institutionalised bringing foreign equipment into their formations. Losing equipment is bad but it happens out of sight and in a conscript army what are you going to do, send the guy home? Gaining equipment was treated with anything from a shrug to enthusiastic encouragement. Frankly if you are an officer in WW2 and your troops are enthusiastically working on the next fight then you don't do much to discourage them.

Argas
Jan 13, 2008
SRW Fanatic




Milo and POTUS posted:

Seems a huge oversight to me

That's history, folks.

Letmebefrank
Oct 9, 2012

Entitled

Sanguinia posted:

The channel is called TIK.

Hilarious excerpt from his About page: "FYI I neither support the far-left nor far-right, which is why some of my videos are getting plenty of dislikes, evil comments are being left on them, and why my email address is no longer available. If you have business enquires, I'm afraid you're out of luck."

It is a shame that he has such extreme viewpoints as I actually liked his series on Crusader and Stalingrad. But now it is very hard to really believe his conclusions anymore due his *slight biases*. Perhaps now I need to re-evaluate if Halder was actually the reason for German failure in Case Blue..

The breaking point for me was when he was claiming the excellence of free--market by quoting the example of how hotel chains can build enough beds for tourists, but NHS can not have enough hospital beds ("even though their budget has grown from year to year!").

Perestroika
Apr 8, 2010

Sanguinia posted:

The channel is called TIK.

Hilarious excerpt from his About page: "FYI I neither support the far-left nor far-right, which is why some of my videos are getting plenty of dislikes, evil comments are being left on them, and why my email address is no longer available. If you have business enquires, I'm afraid you're out of luck."

Oh my god yeah, that tracks. Even as I was reading your descripting I was thinking "that kinda sounds like TIK", and there he is. The guy also managed to fool me for a while until I watched one of his less-focused Q&A videos, where he unmpromptedly went on a long rent about how von Mises and Rothbard were the best historians ever and you totally have to rely on axioms and "logic" to be a good historian. Because if you acknowledge that history can be ludicrously complex with a host of not always apparent factors playing into it, you're an bad postmodern hegelian marxist or something. :psyduck:

Scratch Monkey
Oct 25, 2010

👰Proč bychom se netěšili🥰když nám Pán Bůh🙌🏻zdraví dá💪?
This is a Morpac off-road crawler



Some very obvious Sherman parts on it

Panzeh
Nov 27, 2006

"..The high ground"

Raenir Salazar posted:

IIRC isn't there at least two places they did fairly well; being the battle for Kyiv where they retook some ground and held it before the Germans flanked the city; and in the Caucasus mountains? Fake edit, apparently they also fought at Stalingrad? And apparently weren't they successful in Manchuria?

Like pretty much everyone else, the Soviets had an idealized notion of what airborne operations could do with ww2 technology in the deep battle doctrine, and the VDV units they had were a reflection of that. Much like with the other powers, airborne operations were generallyt disappointing. The VDV units were high quality infantry units, particularly for 1941, but aside from that, their record in actual airborne operations was not very good. It's not really well-known because it was never done at even the division level, much less the corps level that you'd see the Western allies do.

Comstar
Apr 20, 2007

Are you happy now?
I watched The Battle of Milne Bay - The Unknown Turning Point of the Pacific War and I had no idea it was nearly identical results as Guadalcanal, in miniature. An Allied brigade instead of a division, fighting a Japanese Battalion instead of a Brigade, supported by at-night-superior Japanese Light Cruisers instead of Battleships, vs 2 squadrons instead of a Wing, over a period of a week instead of some months.

And they make the exact same mistakes at Guadalcanal, again!


I would like to know what the Japanese High Command concluded after Milne Bay and why that doesn't seem to have made any difference in their tactics and strategy later on at Guadalcanal.

Scratch Monkey
Oct 25, 2010

👰Proč bychom se netěšili🥰když nám Pán Bůh🙌🏻zdraví dá💪?
Wasn’t the lack of Soviet airborne operations due mainly to lack of air transport to drop them?

Panzeh
Nov 27, 2006

"..The high ground"

Scratch Monkey posted:

Wasn’t the lack of Soviet airborne operations due mainly to lack of air transport to drop them?

Yes, it's one of the reasons- they still did them but only at the brigade level. The airlift capacity just wasn't there.

SeanBeansShako
Nov 20, 2009

Now the Drums beat up again,
For all true Soldier Gentlemen.

Sanguinia posted:

History Buffs is a really fun channel. The guy's content is good, although a couple of them have some pretty HOT TAKES. His review of A Bridge Too Far has a really eye-rolling thought about "blunt messaging," in film, and he treats Zulu with some pretty obvious kid gloves concerning the British Imperialist history its set in because it was a childhood favorite of his and he doesn't want to think too many bad thoughts about it.

It's a shame Zulu is such a solid film set in a really problematic era and hosed up one sided war. The DVD case is a fantastic looking thing I am too embarassed to display because of the stupid war.

(It's a detailed close up of the 1870's pattern tunic).

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Cessna
Feb 20, 2013

KHABAHBLOOOM

SeanBeansShako posted:

It's a shame Zulu is such a solid film set in a really problematic era and hosed up one sided war. The DVD case is a fantastic looking thing I am too embarassed to display because of the stupid war.

I'd like to do Zulu era tabletop wargaming, but, again, problematic era.

I'll also say that FOR IT'S TIME the movie Zulu was pretty decent. Every time a British character says something derogatory towards the Zulus they are told to shut up by their peers or superiors.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply