Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Shine
Feb 26, 2007

No Muscles For The Majority
I bypassed our usual process to ban a bigot without running it by the mods, and made it clear that it'll be upgraded to a perma if they act a fool again. They're gone, likely for good, and they'll be handled harshly if they come back and keep their bit up. Sorry this doesn't please everybody, but I'm done going in circles about this.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Junpei Hyde
Mar 15, 2013




Yeah he ain't becoming a better person

Mekchu
Apr 10, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Shine posted:

I bypassed our usual process to ban a bigot without running it by the mods, and made it clear that it'll be upgraded to a perma if they act a fool again. They're gone, likely for good, and they'll be handled harshly if they come back and keep their bit up. Sorry this doesn't please everybody, but I'm done going in circles about this.


People have been banned for less egregious posts. lol?

Edit - Like what is the process to ban a bigot on SA? It's always been a "no gently caress off, that's a ban" approach, not a "well first we must convene a quorum of the elder mods (those who have not fallen on their swords for cartoon porn in QCS) to then have a preliminary meeting about the merits of what is or is not bannable."

Mekchu fucked around with this message at 01:52 on Jun 9, 2021

yea ok
Jul 27, 2006

lol? haha? Lol? Hehe?

Shine
Feb 26, 2007

No Muscles For The Majority

Junpei Hyde posted:

Yeah he ain't becoming a better person

Then they'll be tossed. I've already bypassed much of our usual admin permaban chatter in this case because I personally don't think it warrants much internal conversation about ramping and documenting this and that. Please trust me when I say that if they come back (which they probably won't) they'll be handled if they step an inch out of line.

yea ok
Jul 27, 2006

the lovely rereg got banned incredibly quickly with an admin note and the person most directly impacted has asked to stop playing Guess Who? about it but my god that's not good enough, more must be done. lol?

Shine
Feb 26, 2007

No Muscles For The Majority
Mekchu, you do understand that I banned them, right?

Orange Carlisle
Jul 14, 2007

Sorry i've still got beef held over from the time one of the forums most notoriously hateful shitheads was given a pass because they changed their name and avatar so all of their sins were washed away and trust me guys they'll be better this time

My previous post wasn't about this specific shithead, who seems to have been dealt with

collocation
Jun 17, 2018

jesus WEP posted:

collocation apologising to scoopsgal on the banned poster’s behalf makes me assume that it’s yukaichiban, since iirc they know each other irl

I don't talk to them anymore. I don't know if it was them. And I apologized on behalf of the world being lovely. That person is allegedly enby though, so transphobia seems weird coming from them, but they are pretty nuts, so anything is possible.

Eat My Fuc
May 29, 2007

Rarity we all love you i'm sorry that happened, you've been nice to me even when I was being a jerk, I will send hot sauce to your country where it's illegal for food to be spicy and risk imprisonment for it.

NienNunb
Feb 15, 2012

People rarely get permabanned anywhere on the forums for things outside of actual crimes. Make peace with it or make a thread in QCS about it because nothing productive will come from yelling at Shine for doing his job.

MJeff
Jun 2, 2011

THE LIAR
I would like the chance of that person posting on this sub again to be as close to 0 as possible but Shine's explanation strikes me as pretty reasonable, honestly!

Oh Snapple!
Dec 27, 2005

Yeah ultimately there is like a 1% chance they actually rereg on that account at all, and they're almost certainly using a VPN so linking them to any future accounts to instaban them based on a perma won't really be doable.

Mekchu
Apr 10, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Shine posted:

Mekchu, you do understand that I banned them, right?

Yeah I do. My point is you were waxing on about how you had to "bypass" the procedure to ban a bigot, which is a stupid line pretty clearly.

Plenty of mods have easily banned ppl for lesser poo poo without needing a whole inquiry into it.

Beef Jerky Robot
Sep 20, 2009

"And the DICK?"

Eat My Fuc posted:

Rarity we all love you i'm sorry that happened, you've been nice to me even when I was being a jerk, I will send hot sauce to your country where it's illegal for food to be spicy and risk imprisonment for it.

I sent a hot sauce care package to ancient PSP legend APSouthern many moons ago and the bobbies didn’t do poo poo, the cowards.

Shine
Feb 26, 2007

No Muscles For The Majority

Mekchu posted:

Yeah I do. My point is you were waxing on about how you had to "bypass" the procedure to ban a bigot, which is a stupid line pretty clearly.

Plenty of mods have easily banned ppl for lesser poo poo without needing a whole inquiry into it.

I feel like you're misunderstanding what happened here.

I was pointing that instead of leaving the report for mods to handle (and as admins, we usually take the stance of "mods handle their report") I instead saw a report for what was clearly lovely bigotry, and I banned them without hesitation, versus letting a mod review and it and then later approve what they queued. My aim was to handle a clearly bannable shitlord as expediently as possible, and I did. It literally could not have been handled any faster than it was. So yes, I was bypassing a procedure because I felt it was the right thing to do, and I want to be transparent about what I did and why.

And I'll note that I'm not suggesting the mods acted poorly here. I know that any of them would have queued a ban for that post if they saw it. I just happened to see it first, and I used my discretion to sidestep the usual report/mod/queue/admin flow and jump straight to a ban without running it by anybody. I assume you find that preferable to me letting the report sit in the name of "workflow" until a mod got to the report and queued something, yes?

Ultimately, if me banning a bigot within 30 seconds of me seeing the bigoted post is not expedient enough for you, then I don't know what to tell you other than that I'm not a Facebook algorithm and I can't handle everything instantly.

Mekchu
Apr 10, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Shine posted:

I feel like you're misunderstanding what happened here.

I was pointing that instead of leaving the report for mods to handle (and as admins, we usually take the stance of "mods handle their report") I instead saw a report for what was clearly lovely bigotry, and I banned them without hesitation, versus letting a mod review and it and then later approve what they queued. My aim was to handle a clearly bannable shitlord as expediently as possible, and I did. It literally could not have been handled any faster than it was. So yes, I was bypassing a procedure because I felt it was the right thing to do, and I want to be transparent about what I did and why.

And I'll note that I'm not suggesting the mods acted poorly here. I know that any of them would have queued a ban for that post if they saw it. I just happened to see it first, and I used my discretion to sidestep the usual report/mod/queue/admin flow and jump straight to a ban without running it by anybody. I assume you find that preferable to me letting the report sit in the name of "workflow" until a mod got to the report and queued something, yes?

Ultimately, if me banning a bigot within 30 seconds of me seeing the bigoted post is not expedient enough for you, then I don't know what to tell you other than that I'm not a Facebook algorithm and I can't handle everything instantly.

Cheers for the clarification as yeah there was a misunderstanding of what you meant. Mainly due to basically anytime mods/admins go "we are discussing it"/"following procedure" in any situation similar to this, it has been pretty much a universal net negative. (eg. see the Flavius stuff recently where people called for him to be demodded for months for his shittiness & petty probes/bans, Bobbiewickham, etc.)

You stepping in was good and fine. Why its not a perma if its apparently someone who everyone in the thread agrees is a blatant rereg who came by to stir up poo poo is beyond me since its pretty clear they only came by to cause problems, again.

Rarity
Oct 21, 2010

~*4 LIFE*~

Eat My Fuc posted:

Rarity we all love you i'm sorry that happened, you've been nice to me even when I was being a jerk, I will send hot sauce to your country where it's illegal for food to be spicy and risk imprisonment for it.

You're gonna turn me into an outlaw! :ohdear:

Anyway, Shine's explained his reasoning pretty clearly so I think if we disagree with it the only thing that's gonna happen if we keep going at him about it is pissing him off so he's less likely to help in future so we should probably just drop the subject now.

Rarity fucked around with this message at 05:10 on Jun 9, 2021

Cavauro
Jan 9, 2008

cool chauncy thoughts: great job by the admin. (sometimes when i'm being cool chauncy i'll denote it this way, but not always)

Shine
Feb 26, 2007

No Muscles For The Majority

Rarity posted:

You're gonna turn me into an outlaw! :ohdear:

Anyway, Shine's explained his reasoning pretty clearly so I think if we disagree with it the only thing that's gonna happen if we keep going at him about it is pissing him off so he's less likely to help in future so we should probably just drop the subject now.

Mekchu and I are now sworn enemies and I hope they never get to eat a bowl of delicious Fruity Pebbles ever again, but I assure you that will not stop me from banning transphobes in the future.

STING 64
Oct 20, 2006

i do not think they will be posting here in the future anyway.

Mekchu
Apr 10, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Shine posted:

Mekchu and I are now sworn enemies and I hope they never get to eat a bowl of delicious Fruity Pebbles ever again, but I assure you that will not stop me from banning transphobes in the future.

gently caress Fruity Pebbles. Captain fo lyfe

karmicknight
Aug 21, 2011
Originally from: The Chris Regal Memorial Bad Takes Thread: you don't have to argue with stuff posted

Cerebral Bore posted:

If you yourself don't even want to look at the place, then surely you have to realize how unreasonable it sounds that your solution is "well just go engage with the place that I myself don't want anything to do with".

Like, I get if posting poo poo from these forums overall is verboten and that's OK, but in that case the people with authority have to make sure that some modicum of decency is maintained even in the wild west forums zones. Because it's still publicly viewable and people will be looking and I've been on SA long enough to see that if there either is no outside pressure valve or some sort of moderation the whole thing will blow up eventually and the fallout will end up loving both subforums up.

If you are reading the posts to get mad, I'm sorry to tell you but you are already engaging. That ship has sailed because reading and feeling emotions is engagement. The question is what are you doing with that engagement because taking it and bringing it to another forum to, I don't know, signal boost it to get other people mad with you, is something I'm not keen on in general.

What is the material difference from posting it in the Chris Regal thread and posting it in the forum you found it, in response to something you think is lovely and worthy of challenge.

In a positive direction, specifically, because the main substantive difference is that I'll get annoyed at people trying to start fights (a dick move) over stuff I don't read or care about, because I remain completely cool with knowing there is a forum that I don't vibe with. (this is okay, you are free not to vibe with a forum or posting culture, but in the end posting on this website only matters as much as you make it)

Cavauro
Jan 9, 2008

responding to the same quote:

i've watched chocopro shows and will watch more. no one actually thinks it's a fetish but now multiple people do think the person who made fun of it like that in the 'loving around' forum is a coward and rear end in a top hat who went behind peoples backs to treat them like poo poo as if they would never be able to find it. as though EMF's calculating plan had this big hole in it where they thought no one would ever be able to find a post on SA in another forum about the same subject. that's ridiculous and it's not reality. if you don't want to engage w/ other people shooting the poo poo that's fine but how about the thread where every person who posts there has sincerely outed themselves as a gross pervert or whatever? why isn't there a serious accusation about that and the hypocrisy? does that mean on some level you do understand what's going on there and it's not attacking ppl or themselves? i don't get it.

anyway, if nothing can be settled about this then i encourage a new thread here for people to quote generic posts from the RSF that aren't specifically about anyone here and "respond" with serious posts to get it out of their system. i am not allowed to give the OK for this however and i would prefer to see someone go there and quote a post they feel targets them as a fan and turn it around on the person posting it and make me emptyquote them like a champion

Cavauro fucked around with this message at 09:53 on Jun 10, 2021

Rarity
Oct 21, 2010

~*4 LIFE*~
I think if people have a problem with posting going on in EPA they're much better served taking it QCS, a place that the admin team reads and responds to, than bringing it to the Bad Takes thread, a place where they do not. You can't expect kk and JH to be responsible for posts not happening in PSP so bringing posts over here to bitch about just feels incredibly high school.

Cavauro
Jan 9, 2008

the main thing to me is the treatment like somebody quoted posts from here or called out someone from here but that didn't happen and i'm certain it wouldn't be allowed. the forum isn't fyad

yea ok
Jul 27, 2006

it’s just one guy who is super upset that a new forum where 10 people post got made. extremely weird behavior. well, that rereg also was really upset about it. hm...

IGgy IGsen
Apr 11, 2013

"If I lose I will set myself on fire."
Before EPA got made I thought it was a poo poo idea because the justification was basically "I want to make jokes on a wrestling forum and not be told that Jericho is a Trumper" but now I post there and enjoy posting about wrestling on a forum for the first time in a long time and this somehow also made me more active on PSP itself.

Clearly, the only solution is a third wrestling forum for getting mad at the two others.

yea ok
Jul 27, 2006

welcome to the clique.

fez_machine
Nov 27, 2004

yea ok posted:

it’s just one guy who is super upset that a new forum where 10 people post got made. extremely weird behavior. well, that rereg also was really upset about it. hm...

I'm going to stop being aggro and poo poo posting about the Enclosed Pool Area with this post.

In this thread alone, there's a bunch of people who didn't like the idea of a new wrestling sub-forum. I'm just way too aggressive about it.

For the record, I posted in the bad take thread because I thought those were bad takes. I have no problem with people saying they don't like Chocopro. It's a hard promotion to like, which is why it has some of the most annoying fans in wrestling. But all comedy wrestling is bad improv/panto and saying it's apartment wrestling that's for perverts is in the upper echelon of aggressively anti-Chocopro reactions.

I do think a lot of the demand for the sub forum was inspired by cowardice rather than funny people unable to be funny in this forum and it'll lead to some club house/illuminati bullshit by basically being an off-site on-site.

I'm absolutely not the disgusting transphobe rereg, I've been posting/lurking the fourms on and off for almost 20 years, mainly shouting at people to read Brian Evenson in the horror thread, and my recent uptick in posting is probably a sign that I'm not getting enough viatmin D and exercise.

Ad by Khad
Jul 25, 2007

Human Garbage
Watch me try to laugh this title off like the dickbag I am.

I also hang out with racists.
I like EPA

I like Rarity

Mekchu I gotta warn you Shine has a pretty brutal finisher, we call it the Couch Lift

That's all I got, I'll hang up now and listen, keep up the good work cool chauncy

yea ok
Jul 27, 2006

fez_machine posted:

I'm going to stop being aggro and poo poo posting about the Enclosed Pool Area with this post.

In this thread alone, there's a bunch of people who didn't like the idea of a new wrestling sub-forum. I'm just way too aggressive about it.

For the record, I posted in the bad take thread because I thought those were bad takes. I have no problem with people saying they don't like Chocopro. It's a hard promotion to like, which is why it has some of the most annoying fans in wrestling. But all comedy wrestling is bad improv/panto and saying it's apartment wrestling that's for perverts is in the upper echelon of aggressively anti-Chocopro reactions.

I do think a lot of the demand for the sub forum was inspired by cowardice rather than funny people unable to be funny in this forum and it'll lead to some club house/illuminati bullshit by basically being an off-site on-site.

I'm absolutely not the disgusting transphobe rereg, I've been posting/lurking the fourms on and off for almost 20 years, mainly shouting at people to read Brian Evenson in the horror thread, and my recent uptick in posting is probably a sign that I'm not getting enough viatmin D and exercise.

oh aye i didn't think you were that guy but re-reading my post it does make it seem like that's the connection i was making. my bad for that. i super don't care if people don't like the new thing, i barely post in it myself, but am not really bothered to debate the reasons for why people wanted it made in the first place. i don't think you are either lol so we can just leave it at that. i'm a man of peace.

MotU
Mar 6, 2007

It was like she was evicting walking garbage.
Pillbug
Luna

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe
I have no desire to ever post in or even read EPA and no strong opinions on the subforum in question beyond hoping that they keep their poo poo together. Only reason I said anything in the first place is because I do have a strong desire to post about pro graps in an environment where it isn't OK to make gross personal attacks on people for absolutely no valid reason, jokes or no, and it's better to nip that kinda poo poo in the bud. Or as case in point,

yea ok posted:

it’s just one guy who is super upset that a new forum where 10 people post got made. extremely weird behavior. well, that rereg also was really upset about it. hm...

What the hell is this poo poo even? Why is it suddenly OK to make oblique comparisons to some transphobe jackass simply because someone else allegedly dislikes another subforum?

E: Didn't see your last post so I partially retract my comment, but it's still p bad to just immediately jump to unfounded speculation like that.

Rarity posted:

I think if people have a problem with posting going on in EPA they're much better served taking it QCS, a place that the admin team reads and responds to, than bringing it to the Bad Takes thread, a place where they do not. You can't expect kk and JH to be responsible for posts not happening in PSP so bringing posts over here to bitch about just feels incredibly high school.

This is a bit tangential, but QCS is the last place you want to take any serious complaints.

Cerebral Bore fucked around with this message at 11:49 on Jun 10, 2021

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

EMF is an idiot who's addicted to hot takes. But this probably could of been dealt with either passively, close your eyes and realize you're not a pedo, or aggressively, tell EMF to gently caress off. Passive aggressively was the bad option to pick. Hell you could of tried reporting it since the post didn't really fit the other subs vibe and I thought a point of that sub was to tell people to go away of they're not going to be chill.

Mekchu
Apr 10, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Cerebral Bore posted:

This is a bit tangential, but QCS is the last place you want to take any serious complaints.

You're wrong, again. Because actual changes have been enacted via threads made there.

Benne
Sep 2, 2011

STOP DOING HEROIN
I guess I should weigh in since some of my posts were a catalyst for this whole thing.

My ChocoPro takes were and still are genuine and this is after I gave it a long and honest chance, I just find it a brutally unfunny promotion with bad wrestling and worse production values. But I was never going to Kramer into the ChocoPro thread and piss all over everybody's cornflakes, that's not my style and I dislike it when other people do that. So I left my opinions to myself and never read the thread, just let people enjoy their poo poo. If that makes me a "coward" for only giving my takes in the other subforum thread specifically designed to let people air random hot takes they wouldn't make in the regular wrestling forum, then whatever.

This all could've been easily ignored, but when you bring that poo poo into the Chris Regal thread in a lame attempt at a dunk, you're making it A Thing and stirring up even more needless drama. And you're not helping this subforum's reputation of being overly defensive babies.

NienNunb
Feb 15, 2012

I will not watch ChocoPro or learn really what it is because I think the name is dumb

RealFoxy
May 11, 2011

I'm not making a fucking QCS thread for this but seriously can we take a harder stance on Kiwifarms freaks like this guy, Jesus Christ seriously, you used to be better at knocking these creeps down. I guess ADTRW mods aren't responsible like GBS mods are.

NienNunb posted:

I will not watch ChocoPro or learn really what it is because I think the name is dumb
The name of the plaza they wrestle in is called Chocolate Square. That's all there is to it :v:

I don't understand why people are still defending/attacking Chocopro or their opinions from another subforum since the issue's already been addressed by a mod.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Rarity
Oct 21, 2010

~*4 LIFE*~

Mekchu posted:

You're wrong, again. Because actual changes have been enacted via threads made there.

QCS is a shithole populated by the worst posters on this site. That I said it would be more effective than posting in the Bad Take thread wasn't meant to be a compliment for QCS

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply