|
DACK FAYDEN posted:clearly it is divided into the most natural two sides possible, to the left and to the right of the Candy Desk it used to be occupied by rick santorum, who filled it with a frothy mixture of whipped cream and chocolate sauce
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2021 18:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 17:28 |
|
|
Elizabeth Warren seems like the kind of person that would fill the candy desk with dental floss and healthy snacks. Like, ok yes I understand these are better for me than the candy but if I'm making a pilgrimage to the goddamn candy desk I know what I'm getting myself into.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2021 19:25
|
|
|
if I had the candy desk nobody is getting any of my loving candy
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2021 19:25
|
|
|
give me the GOD drat candy
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2021 19:42
|
|
|
Not So Fast posted:Hold on, you think the bad take is what Marianne is replying to, right? Williamson equating zionists with Jews is a bad take, the hotness of which is debatable given how common it is in US politics
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2021 19:59
|
|
|
World War Mammories posted:give me the GOD drat candy 
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2021 20:03
|
|
|
indigi posted:if I had the candy desk nobody is getting any of my loving candy I'd fill it with necco wafers, the centrism of candy
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2021 01:01
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/OzKaterji/status/1409431056865021952?s=20 i need to block Oz just so I stop hate reading his tweets
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2021 03:41
|
|
|
Spazmo posted:Williamson equating zionists with Jews is a bad take, the hotness of which is debatable given how common it is in US politics I doubt someone blaming zionists for 9/11 differentiates between the two groups
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2021 03:50
|
|
|
fierce partisan fist fight in congress over control of the candy desk
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2021 05:29
|
|
|
I pledge that, if elected to the the Senate, I will seize the contents of the candy desk and distribute them to the people. I will then refill it with sugar‐free candies, befitting the character of America’s highest legislative body.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2021 08:24
|
|
|
Atrocious Joe posted:https://twitter.com/OzKaterji/status/1409431056865021952?s=20 He blocked me and I don't know why but I'm glad of it. Reminder he got sacked by the daily mail for using his work email account to repeatedly call Peter hitchins an assadist
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2021 08:25
|
|
|
He, like many other twitter cowards, probably uses a block list.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2021 08:46
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:I pledge that, if elected to the the Senate, I will seize the contents of the candy desk and distribute them to the people. I would clear out all the candy and replace it all with those tiny boxes of raisins. Raisins loving rule.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2021 09:34
|
|
|
fermun posted:I would clear out all the candy and replace it all with those tiny boxes of raisins. Raisins loving rule. *stav voice* get the hell outta here with that poo poo!!! shut the gently caress up!!!! https://youtu.be/5ABG70hT97U crepeface has issued a correction as of 10:30 on Jun 29, 2021 |
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2021 10:23
|
|
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:He, like many other twitter cowards, probably uses a block list. i'm glad i'm on it imagine the level of insane you have to be to get fired from the loving daily mail
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2021 11:03
|
|
|
Lol in Oz getting savaged history https://twitter.com/sammisam147/status/1409830155825070081?s=19
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2021 12:08
|
|
|
Top City Homo posted:im getting tired of these whiny anglo nerds complaining about existing socialism Yes, famous communist state: China under Xi.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2021 16:16
|
|
|
Megillah Gorilla posted:Yes, famous communist state: China under Xi. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2021 16:20
|
|
|
the oz katerji owns keep comingAnimeIsTrash posted:Lmao
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2021 23:38
|
|
|
Jose posted:Lol in Oz getting savaged history 
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2021 23:44
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/tariqnasheed/status/1410283032519462915?s=20
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2021 18:09
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2021 18:11
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:lol it’s called “babe breaking” and Tariq is working f on a documentary about how good it is
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2021 18:23
|
|
|
ha ha loving lord those replies ha hahahahahaha
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2021 18:27
|
|
|
All it takes is for one buck to not be broken for the whole system to collapse.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2021 18:34
|
|
|
Break the buck breaking cycle
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2021 18:39
|
|
|
I’m a break bucker
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2021 18:40
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/PhyliciaRashad/status/1410289746539130882?s=20
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2021 18:41
|
|
|
Mantis42 posted:All it takes is for one buck to not be broken for the whole system to collapse. The buck stops HERE!
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2021 18:42
|
|
|
indigi posted:I’m a break bucker I’m a buck bumble
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2021 19:13
|
|
|
Breaking Buck
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2021 22:13
|
|
|
so, uh, I never followed that case too closely, but I was under the impression it was pretty settled that cosby was drugging and raping women. is that arguably not the case, or...
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2021 22:16
|
|
|
He definitely did do the crimes, but his conviction was overturned because the DA in 2005 made a deal with Cosby that he wouldn’t be prosecuted in return for testifying in a civil case. That idiot DA later went on to represent Trump at one of his impeachment’s
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2021 22:20
|
|
|
Internet Wizard posted:He definitely did do the crimes, but his conviction was overturned because the DA in 2005 made a deal with Cosby that he wouldn’t be prosecuted in return for testifying in a civil case. Because that deal didn't technically exist in writing (although it did exist as a press release which iirc stated that the intention was to prevent Cosby from being able to plead the 5th during the civil case) the following DA didn't feel bound by the agreement and used the testimony. The courts ruled that the testimony was illegally used and that due to the scale of damage it did, not only does it pretty much ruin any chance of a fair trial going forward, the only way to remedy the damage is to return things to the situation where he couldn't be prosecuted. It's a lovely outcome but AFAIK the actual legal argument is fairly sound and the takeaways are that the first DA hosed this all up and that only someone as rich and powerful as Cosby would have the means to fight something like this.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2021 22:40
|
|
|
The fairly sound legal argument made by unimaginably wealthy guy's army of lawyers
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2021 23:17
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/tariqnasheed/status/1410286929044594695
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2021 23:18
|
|
|
Now Bill Cosby can dedicate his life to finding the real rapist.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2021 23:21
|
|
|
Flesh Forge posted:The fairly sound legal argument made by unimaginably wealthy guy's army of lawyers Well yeah, that's what I said. Only someone with his material resources would have recourse.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2021 23:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 17:28 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1410298586152198147
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2021 23:31
|
|
