Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Motronic
Nov 6, 2009

PirateDentist posted:

Yep. Mine was cut off my 4runner a few weeks ago. Out $300 so far and still fighting one stupid nut to get the end of the pipe off the header. They cut the upstream O2 sensor wires as well, even though they didn't cut that part off. So I have to solder those back together as well.

Do NOT solder O2 sensor wires if they are not copper. Hopefully they are after the connector that was cut off. If the wires are silver (i.e steel wire) you need to find the right crimps.....and those are not the ones that you have at the parts store. They are the kind that come with "universal" o2 connectors.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Black88GTA
Oct 8, 2009

PirateDentist posted:

Yep. Mine was cut off my 4runner a few weeks ago. Out $300 so far and still fighting one stupid nut to get the end of the pipe off the header. They cut the upstream O2 sensor wires as well, even though they didn't cut that part off. So I have to solder those back together as well.

Uhm, you're not supposed to solder oxygen sensor wires. The solder joint will add resistance to the wire and screw up the signal. If you must repair them, quality crimp / heat shrink connectors should be used instead. If they're not super expensive, I would just replace them.

e:fb

Motronic
Nov 6, 2009

Black88GTA posted:

Uhm, you're not supposed to solder oxygen sensor wires. The solder joint will add resistance to the wire and screw up the signal.


FYI, it's not resistance......there is super low current coming out of an O2 sensor and they are very hot so wires close to it of different materials can create a thermocouple that makes actual power......throwing off the very little power coming from the O2 sensor that your ECU is trying to read.

(this is a super simplified answer, tl'dr don't do this it will make a bunch of problems that are hard to diagnose)

PirateDentist
Mar 28, 2006

Sailing The Seven Seas Searching For Scurvy

Motronic posted:

Do NOT solder O2 sensor wires if they are not copper. Hopefully they are after the connector that was cut off. If the wires are silver (i.e steel wire) you need to find the right crimps.....and those are not the ones that you have at the parts store. They are the kind that come with "universal" o2 connectors.


Black88GTA posted:

Uhm, you're not supposed to solder oxygen sensor wires. The solder joint will add resistance to the wire and screw up the signal. If you must repair them, quality crimp / heat shrink connectors should be used instead. If they're not super expensive, I would just replace them.

e:fb

Noted, thanks. I was not aware of that. I'll just buy a new one, so another $50 down the tube because of those fuckers.

Saukkis
May 16, 2003

Unless I'm on the inside curve pointing straight at oncoming traffic the high beams stay on and I laugh at your puny protest flashes.
I am Most Important Man. Most Important Man in the World.
So what kind of misbehaviour soldering the wires would have caused and how long it would have taken to diagnose it?

Rhyno
Mar 22, 2003
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!
FIRE.

No. 6
Jun 30, 2002

You can solder if it's done right. Generally automotive wiring recommends against solder for various reasons, non of which were described.

Woolwich Bagnet
Apr 27, 2003



You generally don't want to solder because it hardens when it cools, and can crack from the vibration. If you tie the wires together properly and put heat shrink tubing on them they should be fine. I don't think you need to replace the O2 sensor because of it.

Use a western union splice and put heat shrink over it and you'll be fine:

EvenWorseOpinions
Jun 10, 2017
I'm having difficulty putting the heat shrink over it after I made the splice, can someone help?

Sagebrush
Feb 26, 2012

Well you have to put the heat shrink on before you solder the wires together. :razz:

But seriously just use bigger heat-shrink.

Post a picture of the joint?

Lightbulb Out
Apr 28, 2006

slack jawed yokel
I crimped milcirc pins to mine and then soldered the pins and used adhesive heatshrink to hold it all together.

Shifty Pony
Dec 28, 2004

Up ta somethin'


Saukkis posted:

So what kind of misbehaviour soldering the wires would have caused and how long it would have taken to diagnose it?

It would gently caress with the oxygen sensor signal going to the ECU so you'd see the same sort of stuff that you would with a faulty O2 sensor. Bad fuel economy, a little less power, funky smelling exhaust, and eventually a check engine light when the O2 sensor signal doesn't respond to various load conditions like the ECU expects it to.

Night Danger Moose
Jan 5, 2004

YO SOY FIESTA

The cat thefts have gotten so bad that all of Toyota's cats are on manual release. Which means dealerships are no longer allowed to simply order them for stock, or order them for a vehicle and have them sent right away like a normal part. They need to be manually checked to make sure the part number fits the vin, then it's recorded that the part was sent for that specific vin. For every manifold and pipe converter that Toyota makes. And that's assuming the part isn't on national backorder like about 25% of our parts are. Don't bother with OEM rotors, we probably don't have them. We're keeping our local NAPA in business solely through orders for rotors for 11+ Highlanders and Siennas...

Woolwich Bagnet
Apr 27, 2003



Shifty Pony posted:

It would gently caress with the oxygen sensor signal going to the ECU so you'd see the same sort of stuff that you would with a faulty O2 sensor. Bad fuel economy, a little less power, funky smelling exhaust, and eventually a check engine light when the O2 sensor signal doesn't respond to various load conditions like the ECU expects it to.

Yes, soldering could eventually lead to that, and it wouldn't be immediate. The annealing/cooling process would lead to the solder becoming brittle, especially if it's lead free, due to proximity to the exhaust path. A properly spliced and covered connection will be fine. The splice that I posted is designed to be able to withstand changes in tension etc. The resistance of the wire is not going to be wildly fluctuating and will be well within the material specifications.

An O2 sensor will have an internal resistance of 10-25 Ohms. An addition of a few mOhms is not going to change anything.

Humphreys
Jan 26, 2013

We conceived a way to use my mother as a porn mule


That's why I have two new sensors complete with their wanky looms. Not soldering poo poo.

Shifty Pony
Dec 28, 2004

Up ta somethin'


It is not the resistance that fucks with the signal it is the EMF generated by inserting a junction of dissimilar metals into the circuit. It essentially is putting the O2 sensor in series with an uncharacterized thermocouple without a reference junction.

It isn't a serious problem with other sensors because the signal voltages are high enough and/or the temperature difference across the harness isn't high enough to generate substantial emf, but a big swing in the O2 sensor signal is tens of mV and the sensor body is at over 600°F.

Motronic
Nov 6, 2009

Minnesota Mixup posted:

Yes, soldering could eventually lead to that, and it wouldn't be immediate. The annealing/cooling process would lead to the solder becoming brittle, especially if it's lead free, due to proximity to the exhaust path. A properly spliced and covered connection will be fine. The splice that I posted is designed to be able to withstand changes in tension etc. The resistance of the wire is not going to be wildly fluctuating and will be well within the material specifications.

An O2 sensor will have an internal resistance of 10-25 Ohms. An addition of a few mOhms is not going to change anything.

This is simply not correct. Again, due to the specifics of the environment an O2 sensor exists in, putting dissimilar metal (whether it solder or a crimp) creates a thermocouple, which produces voltage. The same way that the O2 sensor itself does by design. So now you're creating a dirty signal.

Wasabi the J
Jan 23, 2008

MOM WAS RIGHT

Saukkis posted:

So what kind of misbehaviour soldering the wires would have caused and how long it would have taken to diagnose it?

Don't solder. I did it on my stereo harness and the heat/vibration eventually caused intermittent crackling that I didn't realize it was my lovely solder job failing months later.

Your engine bay and O2 sensor are more critical and in a more volatile area.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOTrS6-mNtA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTbNxhTzucU

Advent Horizon
Jan 17, 2003

I’m back, and for that I am sorry


Well, I certainly learned some things in there. I’ve always tried to solder vehicles wires over crimps but I also do a western union splice like above. I shall endeavor to crimp in the future instead.

Guess I need to order a bunch of those fancy heat shrink crimps.

Woolwich Bagnet
Apr 27, 2003



Motronic posted:

This is simply not correct. Again, due to the specifics of the environment an O2 sensor exists in, putting dissimilar metal (whether it solder or a crimp) creates a thermocouple, which produces voltage. The same way that the O2 sensor itself does by design. So now you're creating a dirty signal.

No. You will not produce enough voltage to have any impact on the O2 sensor reading. For instance, a type k thermocouple, made of chromel and alumel is specifically chosen due to it's high seebeck coefficient. At 200-400 C this type of probe will produce approximately 8-16 mV. O2 sensors are typically made of zirconium dioxide and will produce at a stochiometric mixture of combustion around 450 mV. That's a 2-4% difference. And that's assuming that you are soldering with type k material and doing it inside the actual sensor. It's negligible in the same way that the temperature gradient along the wires that connect the sensor are. If it were that sensitive they would require strict thermal controls to control the change in resistance with temperature.

Solder itself however would be well within it's glass transition temperature, and will become brittle after many thermal cycles, and combined with vibration etc is a recipe for poor connections. It should outside of very special circumstances only be used when at least one side of it is a rigid structure, and caution taken to avoid strain. Crimps are fine, tied splices are fine. The signal isn't going to be 'dirty' because it's off by a percent or two. This isn't a measurement where analytical precision is required.

Source: I have spent over a decade designing and creating analytical instrumentation, including some destined for space flight, with nearly every sensor under the sun, primarily producing sub uA/uV signals, with some in the fA/fV regime.

Motronic
Nov 6, 2009

Minnesota Mixup posted:

No. You will not produce enough voltage to have any impact on the O2 sensor reading. For instance, a type k thermocouple, made of chromel and alumel is specifically chosen due to it's high seebeck coefficient. At 200-400 C this type of probe will produce approximately 8-16 mV. O2 sensors are typically made of zirconium dioxide and will produce at a stochiometric mixture of combustion around 450 mV. That's a 2-4% difference. And that's assuming that you are soldering with type k material and doing it inside the actual sensor. It's negligible in the same way that the temperature gradient along the wires that connect the sensor are. If it were that sensitive they would require strict thermal controls to control the change in resistance with temperature.

Solder itself however would be well within it's glass transition temperature, and will become brittle after many thermal cycles, and combined with vibration etc is a recipe for poor connections. It should outside of very special circumstances only be used when at least one side of it is a rigid structure, and caution taken to avoid strain. Crimps are fine, tied splices are fine. The signal isn't going to be 'dirty' because it's off by a percent or two. This isn't a measurement where analytical precision is required.

Source: I have spent over a decade designing and creating analytical instrumentation, including some destined for space flight, with nearly every sensor under the sun, primarily producing sub uA/uV signals, with some in the fA/fV regime.

So your talking about this using experience you have that isn't an O2 sensor in a car? Because I've looked at this on a scope with multiple O2 sensors in multiple cars that were having this exact issue. This isn't a theory for me, it's direct observation. And I'm not the only person who has observed this exact phenomena, which seems even more pronounced when using the wrong crimps.

Woolwich Bagnet
Apr 27, 2003



Motronic posted:

So your talking about this using experience you have that isn't an O2 sensor in a car? Because I've looked at this on a scope with multiple O2 sensors in multiple cars that were having this exact issue. This isn't a theory for me, it's direct observation. And I'm not the only person who has observed this exact phenomena, which seems even more pronounced when using the wrong crimps.

I am talking about fundamental laws of physics. It's a sensor that creates a potential. It doesn't matter if it's an O2 sensor or anything else, the same methods are used to measure them. If you create a poor contact through poor crimping or another method, yes, it will not function properly. No one is debating that. It has nothing to do with creating a nernst cell by accident. Or by having solder (before a poor contact/heating is introduced) as it would act in parallel or series over a small distance. Yes, if you have bad contact, either initially or through vibration/tension then it will not behave as expected.

You cannot cite observational data such as that without controls and knowledge of the properties of the connections. I have seen soldered joints that have poor connections on circuits. Does that mean that solder should not be used?

Motronic
Nov 6, 2009

So the answer is "no, I don't not have direct experience". But you do have a huge case of "well ackshually I'm an engineer" going on.

Woolwich Bagnet
Apr 27, 2003



Motronic posted:

So the answer is "no, I don't not have direct experience". But you do have a huge case of "well ackshually I'm an engineer" going on.

Ok you're right, I bow to your experience of I've looked at cars with bad ones. Engineers are stupid and all that science is a waste of time.

Anyway here's how I solder all my car wiring connections

Woolwich Bagnet
Apr 27, 2003



And to get the thread moving again:



Somehow on the front AND backwards.

Uthor
Jul 9, 2006

Gummy Bear Heaven ... It's where I go when the world is too mean.
It's on the rear and forwards if you are driving in reverse!

Woolwich Bagnet
Apr 27, 2003



Uthor posted:

It's on the rear and forwards if you are driving in reverse!

Brilliant, the cheapest way to turn your fwd car in to a rwd one!

A classic that was recently posted in the randomwaffles thread:

MrYenko
Jun 18, 2012

#2 isn't ALWAYS bad...


TIL that shirtless dude is still making music…

https://youtu.be/8D7iT2MT00o

…Even though no one asked him to.

Woolwich Bagnet
Apr 27, 2003



MrYenko posted:

TIL that shirtless dude is still making music…

https://youtu.be/8D7iT2MT00o

…Even though no one asked him to.

Yeah it's uhh, quite a change and also awful.

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

Minnesota Mixup posted:

Ok you're right, I bow to your experience of I've looked at cars with bad ones. Engineers are stupid and all that science is a waste of time.

Anyway here's how I solder all my car wiring connections



I usually intertwin braided wires then solder them together so they look like one contiguous wire.

Woolwich Bagnet
Apr 27, 2003



CommieGIR posted:

I usually intertwin braided wires then solder them together so they look like one contiguous wire.

Yeah that's pretty much SOP for things like that. Just that special attention is sometimes warranted in areas where the environmental temperature can approach the Tg of the solder or even Tm. It can just become brittle over time and in some places oxidize giving a bad connection. Since engines/exhausts etc aren't rigid it can cause issues long term. If materials etc were really such an issue it would suck because we wouldn't even be able to use things like connectors, or solder on PCBs.

Fun fact: NASA has huge rooms where equipment can be mounted and put through the same vibrational frequencies of the rockets that will launch them to test for wiring/mechanical issues before hand.

cakesmith handyman
Jul 22, 2007

Pip-Pip old chap! Last one in is a rotten egg what what.

Minnesota Mixup posted:

Fun fact: NASA has huge rooms where equipment can be mounted and put through the same vibrational frequencies of the rockets that will launch them to test for wiring/mechanical issues before hand.

I'll be disappointed if someone hasn't strapped their car to it.

cursedshitbox
May 20, 2012

Your rear-end wont survive my hammering.



Fun Shoe

Minnesota Mixup posted:


Anyway here's how I solder all my car wiring connections



Well it's in the right thread at least.

Do talk more about what you yeet off this rock though, fascinating stuff.

honda whisperer
Mar 29, 2009

Gotta be honest when AI gets all crimp don't solder there's usually a link to a NASA wiring standards pdf.

I can also count on the fingers of one hand the number of times a soldered wiring splice has bit me and or a car I've worked on with the fingers of one hand. I have lost count of the number of problems with twisted, twisted and taped, twisted and heat shrunk, and crimped, and loving wire nuts but that doesn't count, have caused.

Crimped with heat shrink though has batted 100% but is the least common I've seen.

Sagebrush
Feb 26, 2012

All the slap fight arguments about soldering vs. crimping are only valid if the job is done correctly.

Which is better: a halfassed crimp done with the wrong size of terminal and a pair of pliers, or a dusty soldered joint done with a thousand degree wood burner and no flux? Cause both of those are far more likely on a PO car than a correctly executed anything.

cakesmith handyman
Jul 22, 2007

Pip-Pip old chap! Last one in is a rotten egg what what.

Where do the all in one heatshrink/solder/seal jobbies come on that scale?

Motronic
Nov 6, 2009

Sagebrush posted:

All the slap fight arguments about soldering vs. crimping are only valid if the job is done correctly.

Which is better: a halfassed crimp done with the wrong size of terminal and a pair of pliers, or a dusty soldered joint done with a thousand degree wood burner and no flux? Cause both of those are far more likely on a PO car than a correctly executed anything.

This is actually what it comes down to. Most people say soldering sucks because they don't know how to solder. Or that you need the right solder for the right applications. Or strain relief. This is why the NASA PDF gets posted. If you can't be arsed to figure any of that out the answer is simple: it's not that soldering sucks, it's that you suck at soldering.

On the other side of this, most people crimp wrong too. Wrong size connector. lovely connectors. Not using the right crimper, or any crimper at all.......

honda whisperer
Mar 29, 2009

It's just no crimper at all from my experience. Just mushed with side cutters or vise grips.

But I also was only looking when there were electrical problems so what's the opposite of survivor bias?

CAT INTERCEPTOR
Nov 9, 2004

Basically a male Margaret Thatcher

Sagebrush posted:


Which is better: a halfassed crimp done with the wrong size of terminal and a pair of pliers, or a dusty soldered joint done with a thousand degree wood burner and no flux?

The crimp, because I can see it a lot easier and then fix it, rather than unravelling a wiring harness that I cant find a replacement for to try and work out where there's a soldering joint that is intermittent hidden under conduit and tape. And frankly most people who solder in cars are thinking that means it'll be a better connection while not for one second wonder why the loom they are spicing into doesnt have a hint of solder in it to start with ... and then wonder why their ECU is showing up weird outputs or it stops working a couple of years later when they should have done a proper breakout plug to install a signal interceptor style ECU upgrade but nooooo is like more work man and we dont have time for that poo poo

The dodgy crimpers usually know they dont know what they are doing and that usually limits the damage because they only do minimal poo poo. The dodgy solders think they do and gently caress things up worse by going to town.

Also its a drat sight easier to learn how to crimp properly than to solder.

Maybe it's the excessive pain from what I'm avoiding due to previous owner stupidity trying to fix in my WRX project speaking but *gently caress soldering in a car's wiring*

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Woolwich Bagnet
Apr 27, 2003



cursedshitbox posted:

Well it's in the right thread at least.

Do talk more about what you yeet off this rock though, fascinating stuff.

Instrumentation to do accurate soil ion analysis on Mars. Previous rovers with wet chemistry labs used 'ion selective' electrodes. Except that they used these and found that they had more of the components than the total mass of soil that was tested. Turns out these ion selective electrodes aren't actually single ion selective and that perchlorate throws off the measurements in a huge way, and the soil of Mars appears to have a significant amount of it. So I worked to develop a compact method of doing what we would do on Earth to do the same on Mars. Power and weight are understandably severely constrained when it comes to space flight, especially somewhere distant like Mars. A system that we'd use for this here would weigh around 50 kg and consume several liters of liquid, which would need to be heated for the entire trip to keep it from freezing. Getting 1 kg of mass to low earth orbit costs ~$10,000, and it's way way more to get it to Mars.

So I developed an instrument that weighs < 500 g, uses < 1 watt, and consumes ~10,000x less liquid. Other advantages are that because of the way it works it can go through freeze/thaw cycles without reduction in performance, greatly reducing power requirements when not in use. It's been moved on to engineers now to ensure that it's radiation hardened etc.

Also fixed some problems with another project that was on-going while I was there to separate amino acids by chirality for exoplanet exploration in the search of evidence for why L amino acids are overwhelmingly preferred in terrestrial lifeforms as opposed to D. (Chirality is 'handedness,' your left and right hands are mirrors of each other but cannot be aligned on top of one another due to chirality).

I do more boring stuff these days, as working for government agencies like NASA that are controlled by politicians can be a total nightmare, especially when the people in power move between 'we'll just kinda forget about them' and 'the earth is 6000 years old and space exploration angers god.' There were several contractors there that had been waiting 5+ years to try and get a civil servant job. I did get to meet several astronauts though which was pretty cool, including Jim Lovell.

honda whisperer posted:

It's just no crimper at all from my experience. Just mushed with side cutters or vise grips.

But I also was only looking when there were electrical problems so what's the opposite of survivor bias?

Probably something like selection bias. Taking a non-representative sample, i.e. only cases where something has failed, and considering only those or placing a much higher weight on those. Tends to feed in to confirmation bias. You're already expecting that to be the result, and only see cases where it was the cause, so they work together to lead you to an inaccurate interpretation of the data.

We don't tend to seek out causes of something working, only failing. Especially when it comes to repairing things that have failed.

Also I agree that I'd rather have someone do a lovely crimping job than a lovely soldering job. You can hide the solder joints a lot more easily than the crimp connectors.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply