Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
lumpentroll
Mar 4, 2020

FrancisFukyomama posted:

drat, the DSA delegation got to personally meet with Maduro https://twitter.com/NicolasMaduro/status/1411121788701052933

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

mila kunis
Jun 10, 2011

FrancisFukyomama posted:

drat, the DSA delegation got to personally meet with Maduro https://twitter.com/NicolasMaduro/status/1411121788701052933

lol

https://twitter.com/jergong/status/1413302463642308611

Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world
ah, the guaido caucus. i hope they don't pick up too many seats at convention

Golden Bee
Dec 24, 2009

I came here to chew bubblegum and quote 'They Live', and I'm... at an impasse.

https://twitter.com/kamenism/status/1413721094205280257?s=20

fermun
Nov 4, 2009
https://twitter.com/DSA_Intl_Comm/status/1422722217691992070

bedpan
Apr 23, 2008


is this a joke? wtf

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

bedpan posted:

is this a joke? wtf

She's not the only one, but it's serious
https://twitter.com/DSA_Intl_Comm/status/1422753685982040065

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.
What's this poo poo I'm hearing about Ibiza?

mila kunis
Jun 10, 2011
they seem to be walking back one of the good things they did

https://twitter.com/socialistcall/status/1423031445971509251

fermun
Nov 4, 2009
The Call is the newspaper of the DSA caucus Bread and Roses, which has broken apart, I believe but was(maybe the remnants still are?) run by Jeremy Gong, the Guiado supporter quoted a few tweets up. The resolution that the group is opposed to is resolution 14.

Resolution 14 was written by a bunch of people that wrote the resolution to re-establish the international committee in its current form from 2 years ago, the main thrust of it is to have DSA become officially associated with the Sao Paulo Forum and to bring members of parties that are part of the Sao Paulo Forum to the US for visits as well as to have DSA members participate more strongly in international politics by visiting in the runup to elections and writing reports to DSA at large about the politics etc. as part of a broader international education project. It will also explore the possibility of granting DSA membership to anyone that is a member of a party within Sao Paulo Forum that is currently living within the US.

Resolution 14 has made the consent agenda, which means that so many of the DSA delegates at the convention found it obvious and unobjectionable that it will be voted as one of a mass of resolutions that will just be passed en masse to save time. Bread and Roses had been fighting to keep it off of the consent agenda but lost, so they wrote that article and are trying to take time at the start of tomorrow's debate to remove it from the consent agenda. The consent agenda is expected to be voted on tomorrow so they're trying to get a rush of pressure to get people to change their minds before tomorrow's debate section.

Doktor Avalanche
Dec 30, 2008

Feds and Ruses

papa horny michael
Aug 18, 2009

by Pragmatica

Doktor Avalanche
Dec 30, 2008


Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

spacemang_spliff
Nov 29, 2014

wide pickle

Crusader
Apr 11, 2002

fermun
Nov 4, 2009
Resolution 14 was removed from the consent agenda and voted on directly today, as the cia-aligned DSA caucus wanted to defeat it and the people that had put it on the consent agenda in the first place wanted to show the assholes that it was not a controversial position.

https://twitter.com/best__ev/status/1423458631014625280
that's a supermajority, baby

mila kunis
Jun 10, 2011
nice

Tim Pawlenty
Jun 3, 2006
Extremely good to see the social chauvinists defeated.

Yossarian-22
Oct 26, 2014

Wasn't bread and roses started by a forums poster who sexted people without their consent?

Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world
i absolutely detest the push to take r14 off the consent agenda and the extremely weasely way it was done, it's very satisfying to watch it win the vote decisively despite it all

Doktor Avalanche
Dec 30, 2008

Yossarian-22 posted:

Wasn't bread and roses started by a forums poster who sexted people without their consent?

are you maybe mistaking it for the forum

Crusader
Apr 11, 2002

fermun posted:

Resolution 14 was removed from the consent agenda and voted on directly today, as the cia-aligned DSA caucus wanted to defeat it and the people that had put it on the consent agenda in the first place wanted to show the assholes that it was not a controversial position.

https://twitter.com/best__ev/status/1423458631014625280
that's a supermajority, baby

https://twitter.com/best__ev/status/1423459641351098369?s=21

edit:

https://twitter.com/DSAEmerge/status/1422373799404658688

Crusader has issued a correction as of 22:54 on Aug 6, 2021

Greatbacon
Apr 9, 2012

by Pragmatica
Is there a breakdown on which delegation/delegates voted which way?

R. Mute
Jul 27, 2011

fermun posted:

Resolution 14 was removed from the consent agenda and voted on directly today, as the cia-aligned DSA caucus wanted to defeat it and the people that had put it on the consent agenda in the first place wanted to show the assholes that it was not a controversial position.

https://twitter.com/best__ev/status/1423458631014625280
that's a supermajority, baby
369 no votes you say

fermun
Nov 4, 2009
More from the convention. Resolution 38 was voted on today and it went down pretty hard, only about 25% in support.

R38 was the resolution written by SAlt joiners, which is a large part of why it was voted down, I think, but it increased the requirements to get a DSA endorsement and then also was to make DSA a semi-party. R38 would have allowed for censure or removal from DSA of elected politicians that, after taking office, did not continue to meet the standards that the endorsement set. Delegates opposed to R38 rightfully pointed out that if R38 were to pass, AOC would be kicked out of DSA, and that also freaked out a lot of the delegates. R38 also required DSA to start creating infrastructure that would have allowed DSA to fully separate from ever running on the Democratic party line. This made a lot of people think that this was set up by SAlt as a conspiracy to get DSA to merge with SAlt in a couple years.

The areas where DSA has had the most electoral success are the areas that were most supportive of this resolution, which I think indicates that those chapters are the ones which think they are more ready to fully break from Democrats and run on a socialist party line.


Also: here's the video for Socialist Internationalism from yesterday with Jeremy Corbyn, Dilma Rousseff, Kara Taggaoa, Karin Sosa, Monica Valente, and Omar Barghouti
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZn7i5PdW3I

WorkerThread
Feb 15, 2012

fermun posted:

More from the convention. Resolution 38 was voted on today and it went down pretty hard, only about 25% in support.

R38 was the resolution written by SAlt joiners, which is a large part of why it was voted down, I think, but it increased the requirements to get a DSA endorsement and then also was to make DSA a semi-party. R38 would have allowed for censure or removal from DSA of elected politicians that, after taking office, did not continue to meet the standards that the endorsement set. Delegates opposed to R38 rightfully pointed out that if R38 were to pass, AOC would be kicked out of DSA, and that also freaked out a lot of the delegates. R38 also required DSA to start creating infrastructure that would have allowed DSA to fully separate from ever running on the Democratic party line. This made a lot of people think that this was set up by SAlt as a conspiracy to get DSA to merge with SAlt in a couple years.

The areas where DSA has had the most electoral success are the areas that were most supportive of this resolution, which I think indicates that those chapters are the ones which think they are more ready to fully break from Democrats and run on a socialist party line.


Also: here's the video for Socialist Internationalism from yesterday with Jeremy Corbyn, Dilma Rousseff, Kara Taggaoa, Karin Sosa, Monica Valente, and Omar Barghouti
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZn7i5PdW3I

lol

Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world
https://twitter.com/babejamin/status/1424444863173496833?s=20

WorkerThread
Feb 15, 2012

fermun posted:

Delegates opposed to R38 rightfully pointed out that if R38 were to pass, AOC would be kicked out of DSA, and that also freaked out a lot of the delegates.

not like it really matters anyway, but do DSA types really think AOC is on their side? it makes me laugh to think about their supposed new focus on "internationalism", ie going on field trips, together with AOC's actual foreign policy positions

Judakel
Jul 29, 2004
Probation
Can't post for 9 years!

fermun posted:

More from the convention. Resolution 38 was voted on today and it went down pretty hard, only about 25% in support.

R38 was the resolution written by SAlt joiners, which is a large part of why it was voted down, I think, but it increased the requirements to get a DSA endorsement and then also was to make DSA a semi-party. R38 would have allowed for censure or removal from DSA of elected politicians that, after taking office, did not continue to meet the standards that the endorsement set. Delegates opposed to R38 rightfully pointed out that if R38 were to pass, AOC would be kicked out of DSA, and that also freaked out a lot of the delegates. R38 also required DSA to start creating infrastructure that would have allowed DSA to fully separate from ever running on the Democratic party line. This made a lot of people think that this was set up by SAlt as a conspiracy to get DSA to merge with SAlt in a couple years.

The areas where DSA has had the most electoral success are the areas that were most supportive of this resolution, which I think indicates that those chapters are the ones which think they are more ready to fully break from Democrats and run on a socialist party line.


Also: here's the video for Socialist Internationalism from yesterday with Jeremy Corbyn, Dilma Rousseff, Kara Taggaoa, Karin Sosa, Monica Valente, and Omar Barghouti
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZn7i5PdW3I

hanging on to aoc for dear life. don't talk to me or my celebrity socialist daughter

fermun
Nov 4, 2009

WorkerThread posted:

not like it really matters anyway, but do DSA types really think AOC is on their side? it makes me laugh to think about their supposed new focus on "internationalism", ie going on field trips, together with AOC's actual foreign policy positions

apparently some do! my chapter's delegates (dsa sf) voted unanimously in favor of r38. there's no way to know why the various delegates that voted against it voted the way they did, but r38 wouldn't have even had enough support to get voted on in the convention 2 years ago, so progress?

In Training
Jun 28, 2008

yeah 25% is better than what I woulda thought. in 2 more years of Biden maybe more people will realize that Dems are a waste etc.

Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world
no one's more obsessed with aoc than the gaggle of trot microsects gnawing at dsa's heels. i didn't follow the r38 resolution or vote but if it was anything like the fake opposition to r14 (joining the sao paolo forum) and that amendment to the union resolution that tried to enshrine the idea that the biggest enemies of unionization were existing union leaders then it was definitely best ignored

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

fermun posted:

Delegates opposed to R38 rightfully pointed out that if R38 were to pass, AOC would be kicked out of DSA, and that also freaked out a lot of the delegates.
lmao

Judakel
Jul 29, 2004
Probation
Can't post for 9 years!

Ferrinus posted:

no one's more obsessed with aoc than the gaggle of trot microsects gnawing at dsa's heels. i didn't follow the r38 resolution or vote but if it was anything like the fake opposition to r14 (joining the sao paolo forum) and that amendment to the union resolution that tried to enshrine the idea that the biggest enemies of unionization were existing union leaders then it was definitely best ignored

the dsa defender has logged on

Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world

Judakel posted:

the dsa defender has logged on

the dsa has many problems, but it also has this advantage: the trots are losing influence rather than gaining it

fermun
Nov 4, 2009
New NPC for 2021-2023:

Caucus-wise that's:
3 Green New Deal Slate (no real ideology, just about pressuring for environmentalism and stronger union laws)
3 Bread and Roses (weird control-freak social democrats containing all the Ivy-league-educated dsa members opposed to dsa's internationalist changes in the past couple years)
3 Socialist Majority (Careerist Dem Party/NGO climbers progressive liberals) lost 2 of their 3 incumbents
2 Renewal (internationalist caucus that were all about joining the sao paulo forum)
1 Red Star (SF communist caucus)
1 Emerge (NYC communist caucus)

2 Independent

due to personal antagonism, a bunch of candidates withdrew and only 20 candidates were running for the 16 seats so little surprises.

of the 7 incumbents running, 5 elected

of the 4 black candidates that ran, only 1 was elected.

fermun has issued a correction as of 23:08 on Aug 8, 2021

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018

Ferrinus posted:

the dsa has many problems, but it also has this advantage: the trots are losing influence rather than gaining it

type of guy obsessed with trots in 2021

Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world

AnimeIsTrash posted:

type of guy obsessed with trots in 2021

buddy, i wish as much as you do that they were a distant memory by this point in history

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Judakel
Jul 29, 2004
Probation
Can't post for 9 years!

Ferrinus posted:

the dsa has many problems, but it also has this advantage: the trots are losing influence rather than gaining it

to the democrats, apparently

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply