Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
bird with big dick
Oct 21, 2015

The Mustang has had RGB interior lighting for over a decade

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

eeenmachine
Feb 2, 2004

BUY MORE CRABS

bird with big dick posted:

The Mustang has had RGB interior lighting for over a decade

Ooh the Mach E has it too. How has Tesla never put it in their cars?

VideoGameVet
May 14, 2005

It is by caffeine alone I set my bike in motion. It is by the juice of Java that pedaling acquires speed, the teeth acquire stains, stains become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my bike in motion.

dissss posted:

The Niro and Ioniq (OG not the 5) are more closely related, same wheelbase, similar range of drivetrain options (just larger batteries in the Niro EV)

Nope. The Ionic OG has a live beam axle and the batteries are in the back of the car. Niro has double a-arm rear suspension and the batteries are under the floor in the middle of the vehicle. The chassis is totally different.

gwrtheyrn
Oct 21, 2010

AYYYE DEEEEE DUBBALYOO DA-NYAAAAAH!
Apparently the Niro and Kona share the exact same powertrain, which is what I was confusing. Other than who provides the cells apparently

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

Godholio posted:

Give it a turbo button like a 486.

Just amend the California law responsible for the check engine light, mandate that the "Normal" driving mode has to be called "Turbo", with an on/off button that toggles Normal (now Turbo) and Turtle.

eeenmachine posted:

Didn't realize I specced the Razr option!

Razer. Razr were the Motorola phones

KYOON GRIFFEY JR
Apr 12, 2010



Runner-up, TRP Sack Race 2021/22

Fame Douglas posted:

Expensive, not a wagon and Porsche calling their faster electric model a "turbo" is triggering. Keep that to the 911 and the other ICE cars.

why isn't it a wagon?

Nitrousoxide
May 30, 2011

do not buy a oneplus phone



KYOON GRIFFEY JR posted:

why isn't it a wagon?

Where is the wagon tongue for the oxen?

Finger Prince
Jan 5, 2007


KYOON GRIFFEY JR posted:

why isn't it a wagon?

Because the marketing department determined the word "wagon" was associated with ☹️ feelings among the target demographic, but found the words "Cross, Tour, Sport, Back, Turbo, and Cialis" were associated with 😊 feelings, and here we are.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

KYOON GRIFFEY JR posted:

why isn't it a wagon?

I guess it does count, the car is apparently larger than the pictures make it seem.

But still, very expensive.

AzureSkys
Apr 27, 2003

Fame Douglas posted:

No one in the US knows about only passing on the left and driving in the rightmost lane. It's a lost cause.

I've noticed Waze suggests the left lane, or at least HOV lanes that turn to free-to-all at certain hours and is the left-most lane. I often see cars enter the highway and go straight to it and never reach the speed limit for miles when there's no traffic. This makes people get super aggressive to pass in the middle or right lane as they weave through what traffic there is. (I don't know if the open HOV lane becomes the passing lane if on the far left, or how it's supposed to be handled when those in it don't pass, go the speed limit, or keep up with the general traffic flow.)

So, I've wondered if it's a mix of that lost cause as well as navigation that tells you specific lanes.

eeenmachine
Feb 2, 2004

BUY MORE CRABS

Fame Douglas posted:

Razer. Razr were the Motorola phones

Whoops. If only the car could fold in half to fit in my garage easier... It is a good bit longer than my Model 3 was.

Nfcknblvbl
Jul 15, 2002

eeenmachine posted:

Oooh I just realized you can change the color of the ambient lighting in the Taycan, and even do it via voice control. Didn't realize I specced the Razr option!

https://i.imgur.com/vssfZUf.mp4

Kia Soul Enthusias
May 9, 2004

zoom-zoom
Toilet Rascal

bird with big dick posted:

The Mustang has had RGB interior lighting for over a decade

I think Scion was the earliest I can recall? At least it had cupholders or something. I have color changing speakers 🤪 You would think they'd put it in the back seat for kids.

eeenmachine
Feb 2, 2004

BUY MORE CRABS

Lol fair enough, somehow this is the first vehicle I've owned with it. Definitely blew my 9 year old's mind (along with the fake motor sound because he grew up in Teslas).

The other party trick I enjoy is doing tight circles in the center of a small culdesac. I don't know if the rear wheel steering is just a gimmick or not but even though it is the size of my Model S it feels like the size of my Model 3 when turning.

bird with big dick
Oct 21, 2015

The first customer Mach-E GTs have supposedly been delivered to dealerships, where's the goddamn review embargo lift

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tL9JgMt4okM

Westy543
Apr 18, 2013

GINYU FORCE RULES


Yooo I bought the acceleration boost for my Model 3 and the first time I floored it, my seatbelt tightened. Holy poo poo this car is fast now. I didn't expect to be able to feel it, but I definitely can. I can feel more power in the front motor.

Nfcknblvbl
Jul 15, 2002

I'm still waiting for an acceleration boost option for the Model 3 Performance.

MrPablo
Mar 21, 2003

Westy543 posted:

Yooo I bought the acceleration boost for my Model 3 and the first time I floored it, my seatbelt tightened. Holy poo poo this car is fast now. I didn't expect to be able to feel it, but I definitely can. I can feel more power in the front motor.

I really want to do this but I'm having a hard time justifying the $2,000.

mattfl
Aug 27, 2004

Well, I have/had a MY LR on reserve that the EDD was sometime next month and then a MYP popped up in inventory up in Missouri and I might have hit the buy it now button and now I've got a MYP being delivered next week from Missouri down here to Florida. The wife just laughed at my lack of patience. So, yay me?

Ola
Jul 19, 2004

Yay you!

cruft
Oct 25, 2007

MrPablo posted:

I really want to do this but I'm having a hard time justifying the $2,000.

Same, except for the really wanting to do it. It's already much faster than I ever needed or even desired. :corsair:


mattfl posted:

Well, I have/had a MY LR on reserve that the EDD was sometime next month and then a MYP popped up in inventory up in Missouri and I might have hit the buy it now button and now I've got a MYP being delivered next week from Missouri down here to Florida. The wife just laughed at my lack of patience. So, yay me?

Yay you!

Lord Decimus Barnacle
Jun 25, 2005


Hell Gem

Westy543 posted:

Yooo I bought the acceleration boost for my Model 3 and the first time I floored it, my seatbelt tightened. Holy poo poo this car is fast now. I didn't expect to be able to feel it, but I definitely can. I can feel more power in the front motor.

Is this a DLC for your car?

mattfl
Aug 27, 2004

Dear Watson posted:

Is this a DLC for your car?

That is exactly what it is lol

A $2000 DLC that software unlocks more speed!

Wayne Knight
May 11, 2006

wolrah posted:

Ah yea, driving in the DC area is just insanity and no rhyme or reason can be made of it.

It sounded like you ware saying if the speed limit were lower you wouldn't have to move over, or that you shouldn't have to move over to let faster traffic pass if you're going more than X amount above the limit, both of which are depressingly common beliefs.

100% true, in fact it does quite the opposite. Lowering the speed limit arbitrarily doesn't actually slow the average speed of traffic without aggressive enforcement, but the small percentage of people who religiously obey the limit become even worse obstacles to the rest of traffic than they used to be, causing more anger on the roads which leads to aggressive driving.

You shouldn't have to move over if you're doing the speed limit, since there is no way anyone could legally pass you.

It sounds like you're saying that people following the law are a problem because they make people who break the law mad. Why do we placate dangerous drivers so much? If everyone drives 80, make the speed limit 80. But send tickets to anyone going >=81.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

cruft
Oct 25, 2007

wolrah posted:

It sounded like you ware saying if the speed limit were lower you wouldn't have to move over, or that you shouldn't have to move over to let faster traffic pass if you're going more than X amount above the limit, both of which are depressingly common beliefs.

100% true, in fact it does quite the opposite. Lowering the speed limit arbitrarily doesn't actually slow the average speed of traffic without aggressive enforcement, but the small percentage of people who religiously obey the limit become even worse obstacles to the rest of traffic than they used to be, causing more anger on the roads which leads to aggressive driving.

This is correct. It is the way things work right now.


Wayne Knight posted:

You shouldn't have to move over if you're doing the speed limit, since there is no way anyone could legally pass you.

It sounds like you're saying that people following the law are a problem because they make people who break the law mad. Why do we placate dangerous drivers so much? If everyone drives 80, make the speed limit 80. But send tickets to anyone going >=81.

This is also correct. It is the way things ought to work, according to the letter of the law. There may even be evidence that throttling aberrant speeds actually increases throughput on a given transportation corridor. I believe London has banned walking up the tube escalator for exactly this reason, and it did result in higher throughput out of the stations.

I expect Wayne Knight is merely trying to envision what might happen if every driver were actually bound by the law, which I expect would be the case if (nearly) every driver were a large company with lots of money and it were easy to bring speeding charges against several hundred vehicles all at once. We already have anecdotal evidence that Waymo does exactly this.

e: I guess I should throw in that the EV thread probably isn't the right place for a moot legal argument like this. Moot arguments are super interesting to lawyers and politicians, but maybe not so much gearheads.

cruft fucked around with this message at 20:04 on Aug 19, 2021

MrYenko
Jun 18, 2012

#2 isn't ALWAYS bad...

Wayne Knight posted:

You shouldn't have to move over if you're doing the speed limit, since there is no way anyone could legally pass you.

It sounds like you're saying that people following the law are a problem because they make people who break the law mad. Why do we placate dangerous drivers so much? If everyone drives 80, make the speed limit 80. But send tickets to anyone going >=81.

Are you an insufferable pedant in real life, or do you just play one on the internet?

bird with big dick
Oct 21, 2015

Wayne Knight posted:

You shouldn't have to move over if you're doing the speed limit, since there is no way anyone could legally pass you.

It sounds like you're saying that people following the law are a problem because they make people who break the law mad. Why do we placate dangerous drivers so much? If everyone drives 80, make the speed limit 80. But send tickets to anyone going >=81.

Can this guy get banned please

QuarkJets
Sep 8, 2008

Wayne Knight posted:

You shouldn't have to move over if you're doing the speed limit, since there is no way anyone could legally pass you.

It sounds like you're saying that people following the law are a problem because they make people who break the law mad. Why do we placate dangerous drivers so much? If everyone drives 80, make the speed limit 80. But send tickets to anyone going >=81.

Defensive driving requires that you do a lot more than assume everyone is following the letter of the law, hth

Refusing to let others pass you creates a problem because you are refusing to create safer driving conditions out of a feeling that speeders need to be punished. But your job is not to punish speeders, it's to drive safely, and that means pulling into the right lane to let others pass you

QuarkJets fucked around with this message at 20:11 on Aug 19, 2021

Nfcknblvbl
Jul 15, 2002

In high school, I was taught in driver's ed in California that you must move out of the left lane to allow traffic to pass regardless if you're driving at the speed limit. It's not your job to be a vigilante.

Rusty
Sep 28, 2001
Dinosaur Gum
Rather than than thinking of it as moving over for another driver, I was taught that you don't drive in the fast lane, it's for passing, so if you aren't actively passing someone, you should not be driving in the passing lane.

bird with big dick
Oct 21, 2015

Ola
Jul 19, 2004


I like that the concept of the speed limit is so eroded that laws contradict eachother with no problem in 5 states.

Peanut3141
Oct 30, 2009

Ola posted:

I like that the concept of the speed limit is so eroded that laws contradict eachother with no problem in 5 states.

Indeed. Apparently in those states, you're not allowed to pass a tractor unless you're simultaneously willing to speed.

KozmoNaut
Apr 23, 2008

Happiness is a warm
Turbo Plasma Rifle


No matter how fast or slow you're going, please position yourself in the rightmost lane for your direction, only changing lanes to the left in order to overtake or to use the hellish abomination that is a left-hand exit ramp. I don't care if you're going the speed limit or 20 over or whatever, if someone faster than you comes up behind you, please move to the right lane as soon as you can do so safely. Don't feel forced to speed up, just move over as soon as a reasonable gap appears. If the right lane is empty, you done hosed up by not being there already.

Personally, I go the speed limit because that's just what I prefer, and I think it's silly to play "I only adhere to the traffic laws that benefit me personally", as some people do. If it's 110kph, I set the cruise to control to 110kph, instead of being all like "but if the speedo's 2% off and there's a 5% leeway before they'll actually ticket me, I can go 118kph on the cruise control!". I'm too old and have other things to think about that min-maxing my speed, to save maybe a minute at the end.

There are a number of bus and truck drivers among my family and friends, and people with a need to drive professionally tend to take care not to lose their licenses, that mindset has definitely rubbed off on me. Speeding tickets are a dumb additional expenditure, which I would rather do without.

Do what you want, but please keep right except to pass no matter how fast your're going, please don't tailgate and PLEASE don't brake check tailgaters.

Ola posted:

I like that the concept of the speed limit is so eroded that laws contradict eachother with no problem in 5 states.

When even the legislators seem to think the speed limit is merely advisory and optional...

KozmoNaut fucked around with this message at 21:14 on Aug 19, 2021

trilobite terror
Oct 20, 2007
BUT MY LIVELIHOOD DEPENDS ON THE FORUMS!

bird with big dick posted:

Can this guy get banned please

Ola
Jul 19, 2004

KozmoNaut posted:



When even the legislators seem to think the speed limit is merely advisory and optional...

While I say that, if someone is camping the left lane I will passive-aggressively pass them on the right. That's why they call me...

Nfcknblvbl
Jul 15, 2002

After watching so many Bjorn Nyland videos, I think Norway has more left lane huggers than USA.

gwrtheyrn
Oct 21, 2010

AYYYE DEEEEE DUBBALYOO DA-NYAAAAAH!
I hear there are a ton of left lane huggers in the UK :razz:

cakesmith handyman
Jul 22, 2007

Pip-Pip old chap! Last one in is a rotten egg what what.

You can't loving get me out of it. :colbert:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Indiana_Krom
Jun 18, 2007
Net Slacker

Nfcknblvbl posted:

I'm still waiting for an acceleration boost option for the Model 3 Performance.
I'd buy it, but I question if the P3D even has enough overhead available to unlock a meaningful improvement out of it. Although I suppose the S Plaid pulling 1020 HP out of a 100 kWh pack could indicate that it is remotely possible because that is a higher relative discharge rate (7.6C) than the 3 Performance is pulling from its pack (5.5C). If you could get the same relative discharge rate out of a 3 Performance pack it would be somewhere in the neighborhood of 750 HP which sounds pretty unlikely to me.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply