Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Doggles
Apr 22, 2007

Applewhite posted:

1000% chance someone in the writer’s room of Picard/Disco has suggested incorporating fighter craft into Star Trek.

Season 2 finale of Discovery:
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Tactical_flyer

Never mentioned or seen before that episode. Never mentioned or seen since. :shrug:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Rent-A-Cop
Oct 15, 2004

I posted my food for USPOL Thanksgiving!

Nothing about space fighting makes any sense in Star Trek so why not fighters?

Edmund Sparkler
Jul 4, 2003
For twelve years, you have been asking: Who is John Galt? This is John Galt speaking. I am the man who loves his life. I am the man who does not sacrifice his love or his values. I am the man who has deprived you of victims and thus has destroyed your world, and if you wish to know why you are peris

Hollismason posted:

What the gently caress Neelix had a goddamn family this whole loving time and chose to stay on Voyager

He had to look after a young child, ok. End of story. Nothing weird about it.

Ghostlight
Sep 25, 2009

maybe for one second you can pause; try to step into another person's perspective, and understand that a watermelon is cursing me



his kids had all grown up

Neddy Seagoon
Oct 12, 2012

"Hi Everybody!"

Mulaney Power Move posted:

well they should have been full of fighters during the war. modify the shuttles or something. they were constantly outnumbered.

They literally do this for the big space battle at the end of Disco season 2, with Enterprise and Discovery pumping out a stupid amount of shuttles and one-man "fighter pods". It's also a really, really, stupid battle scene.

Mulaney Power Move
Dec 30, 2004

i want to see a helicopter in space...hold on getting another call from alex kurtzman all of the sudden

Endless Trash
Aug 12, 2007


The Discovery has a spinny middle part so I’m gonna say he already beat you to it

Brawnfire
Jul 13, 2004

🎧Listen to Cylindricule!🎵
https://linktr.ee/Cylindricule

Endless Trash posted:

The Discovery has a spinny middle part so I’m gonna say he already beat you to it

If the middle part stops spinning the ship glides towards the nearest gravity well.

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


sweet geek swag posted:

Those ships the Borg Cube destroyed approaching Earth in Best of Both Worlds were fighter sized.

Which part are you referencing here because the ships at wolf 359 were all full starships.

ChubbyChecker
Mar 25, 2018

Applewhite posted:

1000% chance someone in the writer’s room of Picard/Disco has suggested incorporating fighter craft into Star Trek.

shuttlecrafts?

Rent-A-Cop posted:

Nothing about space fighting makes any sense in Star Trek so why not fighters?

yeah

Edmund Sparkler
Jul 4, 2003
For twelve years, you have been asking: Who is John Galt? This is John Galt speaking. I am the man who loves his life. I am the man who does not sacrifice his love or his values. I am the man who has deprived you of victims and thus has destroyed your world, and if you wish to know why you are peris

CainFortea posted:

Which part are you referencing here because the ships at wolf 359 were all full starships.

They're the two dinky little pods that intercepted the cube when it entered the solar system.

gimme the GOD DAMN candy
Jul 1, 2007
fighters don't make sense in trek because targeting with phasers is always 100% accurate. even if they were somehow threats to larger ships, they'd still get instantly popped like balloons. as odd as it sounds, they would have to be like in beyond, which featured a massive all-encompassing swarm of tiny ships.

gimme the GOD DAMN candy
Jul 1, 2007
still, i can see why they'd want to jazz things up a bit from tng where space ship fights were almost always simply trading shots until one side went down.

Neddy Seagoon
Oct 12, 2012

"Hi Everybody!"

gimme the GOD drat candy posted:

fighters don't make sense in trek because targeting with phasers is always 100% accurate. even if they were somehow threats to larger ships, they'd still get instantly popped like balloons. as odd as it sounds, they would have to be like in beyond, which featured a massive all-encompassing swarm of tiny ships.

I'd assume it'd take the Defiant to the next logical conclusion; scaling down to a one-man craft that's just all engine, shields and weapons. Runabouts can eat a hit or two from capital ship phasers, and if you cut out all the science equipment, living quarters, transporter, etc, you probably have a fair amount of surplus power to play with for a one/two man craft.

MikeJF
Dec 20, 2003




Everything we've seen on screen seems to imply that a Klingon Bird of Prey is about as small as you can optimally get, below that you're just too weak to survive and play a meaningful role. Runabouts can take maybe one or two hits and lightly tickle a big ship with their phasers and microtorpedoes.

Meredith Baxter-Burnout posted:

Legit felt bad for them but loving lol that they were they entirety of earth's defenses.

Just assume they were the last of many. (It was a pretty distant shot, they really should've filled space behind the cube with just-visible tiny glitters of debris to imply they'd been carving their way through a massive number of them)

I don't know if we ever get much of a scale on those things, they could be anywhere from defiant sized to unmanned smart missiles.

Arc Hammer posted:

The "fighters" that were used in DS9 were those light patrol ships that the Maquis used a lot. They got slaughtered whenever they showed up in fleet battles.

Yeah, we saw them once in a fleet battle in sacrifice of angels briefly and that was it. Before that they were little ships used to harrass/escort freighters and things.

Rent-A-Cop posted:

Nothing about space fighting makes any sense in Star Trek so why not fighters?

Bacause it's structured as WWII naval battles not WWII dogfight battles.

MikeJF fucked around with this message at 09:36 on Aug 28, 2021

MikeJF
Dec 20, 2003




Huh apparently they did do something like that with trying to imply more ships too far too see clearly but decided not to use it because it just looked like invisible ships.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXkotQQ4vB0

kdrudy
Sep 19, 2009

What was Nova Squadron flying when they tried the Kolvoord Starburst? Those always looked like fighters as opposed to shuttle craft, which was confusing at the time since we never see fighters. Weird.

MikeJF
Dec 20, 2003




They were like space stunt planes, I think.

Mulaney Power Move
Dec 30, 2004

why did the borg need to stop at wolf 359 to fight the fleet? what did they need to break through the mars defense perimeter for? it's not like, the allies had to go through france to get to germany. it's space.

Zesty
Jan 17, 2012

The Great Twist
Why did the borg need to go back in time AT Earth in First Contact? Why not go back in time somewhere along the long rear end journey when they had zero resistance?

Neddy Seagoon
Oct 12, 2012

"Hi Everybody!"

Zesty posted:

Why did the borg need to go back in time AT Earth in First Contact? Why not go back in time somewhere along the long rear end journey when they had zero resistance?

Too many potential tangents. First Contact means zero Starfleet creativity and no capable resistance. If they went back to say, Encounter at Farpoint then it's realistically no different than what happens a few years later occurring early.

Brawnfire
Jul 13, 2004

🎧Listen to Cylindricule!🎵
https://linktr.ee/Cylindricule

Wolf 359 in my head represented a momentary breakthrough against the Borg, where the Fleet was able to affect a collapse of the transwarp conduit in order to force a confrontation outside 001. The Borg dropped out of transwarp hard, got swarmed by Feds on all sides, then swept the area, fixed itself up, and carried on.

Nothing in the text suggests this, I just imagine things

Zesty
Jan 17, 2012

The Great Twist

Neddy Seagoon posted:

Too many potential tangents. First Contact means zero Starfleet creativity and no capable resistance. If they went back to say, Encounter at Farpoint then it's realistically no different than what happens a few years later occurring early.

what?

No, physically at Earth. Why not go back in time 1000 LY away where no one could stop them and then travel 1000 LYs to 2060's Earth?

The General
Mar 4, 2007


Neddy Seagoon posted:

Too many potential tangents. First Contact means zero Starfleet creativity and no capable resistance. If they went back to say, Encounter at Farpoint then it's realistically no different than what happens a few years later occurring early.

Go back in time before you leave home. And if you have travel time, go back that much further.

Mulaney Power Move
Dec 30, 2004

they were using picard's knowledge to inform their tactics and strategies

MikeJF posted:

Bacause it's structured as WWII naval battles not WWII dogfight battles.

that doesn't make sense, if anything that would mean tons of fighters, dive bombers, torpedo planes...

Uncle Enzo
Apr 28, 2008

I always wanted to be a Wizard
I don't see anything in Federation ethics or technology that would prevent turning Earth's moon into a fuckoff big orbital defense platform. You could have a standing policy that all ships must enter orbit around the moon with shields down and get scanned and ok'd before they're allowed to orbit earth or transport or send anything there.

You don't need engines, so you just make the largest antimatter reactor(s) physics will allow coupled to giant shield generators and phaser banks and photon torpedo batteries. The defenses would have been started back during the first interstellar war Earth found itself in, then improved and added to during every major war since. You'd have concealed underground mass drivers evenly distributed around its equator. Ancient solar-powered chemical lasers at the poles, left over from asteroid deflection in the pre-warp era. Nuclear-tipped missiles but only on the dark side of the moon so the previous non-planetary governments couldn't threaten each other with them.

The moon has no natives or flora and fauna and and as long as the changes aren't too visible from Earth with the naked eye no one will NIMBY anything. Starfleet could go hog wild underground building in secret.

You'd also need a corresponding stationary platform in the Lagrange point on the other side of earth to allow for line-of-sight. This would end up being an ugly monstrosity as it was added to and modified and expanded over the years.

I'm getting really into this, I should write up my Federation HQ defense-in-depth plan somewhere else and link it

Mulaney Power Move
Dec 30, 2004

Zesty posted:

what?

No, physically at Earth. Why not go back in time 1000 LY away where no one could stop them and then travel 1000 LYs to 2060's Earth?

and what is up with soran's space rocket? it breaks through the atmosphere and blows up the sun in like 10 seconds? what is this, wiley e coyote logic?

Brawnfire
Jul 13, 2004

🎧Listen to Cylindricule!🎵
https://linktr.ee/Cylindricule

Zesty posted:

what?

No, physically at Earth. Why not go back in time 1000 LY away where no one could stop them and then travel 1000 LYs to 2060's Earth?

It would be great if they went back to the 1960s and got stopped by the TOS crew doing their own time travel shenanigans and just happening upon the Borg in the 60s in space

Winifred Madgers
Feb 12, 2002

Uncle Enzo posted:

I don't see anything in Federation ethics or technology that would prevent turning Earth's moon into a fuckoff big orbital defense platform. You could have a standing policy that all ships must enter orbit around the moon with shields down and get scanned and ok'd before they're allowed to orbit earth or transport or send anything there.

You don't need engines, so you just make the largest antimatter reactor(s) physics will allow coupled to giant shield generators and phaser banks and photon torpedo batteries. The defenses would have been started back during the first interstellar war Earth found itself in, then improved and added to during every major war since. You'd have concealed underground mass drivers evenly distributed around its equator. Ancient solar-powered chemical lasers at the poles, left over from asteroid deflection in the pre-warp era. Nuclear-tipped missiles but only on the dark side of the moon so the previous non-planetary governments couldn't threaten each other with them.

The moon has no natives or flora and fauna and and as long as the changes aren't too visible from Earth with the naked eye no one will NIMBY anything. Starfleet could go hog wild underground building in secret.

You'd also need a corresponding stationary platform in the Lagrange point on the other side of earth to allow for line-of-sight. This would end up being an ugly monstrosity as it was added to and modified and expanded over the years.

I'm getting really into this, I should write up my Federation HQ defense-in-depth plan somewhere else and link it

Reminding me of one of the Man-Kzin Wars stories where a Kzinti soldier has PTSD over seeing Sol system's peaceful solar power transmission lasers filling the void of space when used as weapons against their fleet.

Uncle Enzo
Apr 28, 2008

I always wanted to be a Wizard
A tiny ship that would make sense in Star Trek would be cloaked infiltration, mining and boarding pods. When a ship is distracted by a major fight and its shields and sensors are all over the place, a couple of these try and slip through during the shield modulation intervals. Then they land a boarding party or plant a mine or even just do an ultra low power scan and leave the same way they came in. Kind of like how infantry is really dangerous to a tank if they can get up close to it where it's weapons can't hit them.

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


gimme the GOD drat candy posted:

fighters don't make sense in trek because targeting with phasers is always 100% accurate. even if they were somehow threats to larger ships, they'd still get instantly popped like balloons. as odd as it sounds, they would have to be like in beyond, which featured a massive all-encompassing swarm of tiny ships.

Phasers miss all the time in the shows though.

Also, fighters would still make sense because they can deliver a heavy payload for a smaller risk. If each runabout has 4 torpedos they can salvo in a few seconds, and you have 10 runabouts, that's a lot more torpedos than even a galaxy class can spit out in the same timeframe, for a much smaller investment in materiel.

Neddy Seagoon
Oct 12, 2012

"Hi Everybody!"
What they really need is something like the Pods in Thunderbirds Are Go!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sY4Zmv7-AtE

Just a simple standardized one-man craft they can replicate parts onto to do Science Stuff or Combat Stuff with.

Applewhite
Aug 16, 2014

by vyelkin
Nap Ghost

Uncle Enzo posted:


The moon has no natives or flora and fauna and and as long as the changes aren't too visible from Earth with the naked eye no one will NIMBY anything. Starfleet could go hog wild underground building in secret.



All the folks living in Tycho City, New Berlin and Lake Armstrong(?) might raise a fuss.

Mulaney Power Move
Dec 30, 2004

they should create space trebuchets that hurl asteroids

MikeJF
Dec 20, 2003




The General posted:

Go back in time before you leave home. And if you have travel time, go back that much further.

They didn't decide to go back in time until they were exploding. They wanted to assimilate the Federation. Being stopped twice changed the equation: once might be a fluke, but twice was a pattern, since we're here already and have 0.448 seconds until we finish exploding we may as well launch a sphere to do a time thing to get rid of them as a potential threat. Then that failed for unknown reasons so for now they're just biding their time a bit.

If I were doing the effects these days with computers I'd totally make it so instead of launching a sphere the cube kind of extrudes a sphere out of its own structure.

kdrudy
Sep 19, 2009

Mulaney Power Move posted:

they should create space trebuchets that hurl asteroids

If we don't do it the bugs will.

gimme the GOD DAMN candy
Jul 1, 2007
going back in time was a fear response when they were confronted with such a strong manly action star who rides dune buggies.

Facebook Aunt
Oct 4, 2008

wiggle wiggle




Neddy Seagoon posted:

I'd assume it'd take the Defiant to the next logical conclusion; scaling down to a one-man craft that's just all engine, shields and weapons. Runabouts can eat a hit or two from capital ship phasers, and if you cut out all the science equipment, living quarters, transporter, etc, you probably have a fair amount of surplus power to play with for a one/two man craft.

But you'd have even more surplus power if they were unmanned drones. More power, more maneuverability, and completely expendable. If you have a tiny expendable ship a live pilot doesn't add much (anything?) compared to an automated targeting system.

Unless they tried that and the drones kept becoming sapient and loving off.

Hollismason
Jun 30, 2007
An alright dude.
I just finished my Voyager watch and it was fine I guess. Kind of ended rather abruptly.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

CaptainSkinny
Apr 22, 2011

You get it?
No.


Facebook Aunt posted:

But you'd have even more surplus power if they were unmanned drones. More power, more maneuverability, and completely expendable. If you have a tiny expendable ship a live pilot doesn't add much (anything?) compared to an automated targeting system.

Unless they tried that and the drones kept becoming sapient and loving off.

I think that's just a photon torpedo.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply