Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: Nuns with Guns)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Ibblebibble
Nov 12, 2013

BrianWilly posted:

The point being it's really nice, for instance, as a Chinese-American to see Shang-Chi being good and cool without ten thousand white people telling me that it's actually secretly bad somehow because, gasp, a corporation decided to make this movie. As opposed to...I dunno, movies that aren't made by corporations.

I still remember when SA posters told me I was racist against Asians when I said I didn't like Tilda Swinton being cast as a character that was Asian in the comics.

My personal amusing story along that vein was when I was lectured by a non-Asian goon about the sins of Crazy Rich Asians when I said that I enjoyed it. For the record, I am Malaysian Chinese. I was told that a) the movie didn't show any super-rich ethnically Indian/Malay people (Singapore is like 80% ethnically Chinese so it's not really weird that the ultra-rich ghoul community there is 99% Chinese) and b) that the movie should show more "real Singaporeans". Implying that ethnically Chinese people aren't local/real citizens is like, the biggest local right-wing talking point and ignores the fact that Singapore has been majority Chinese since the 1700s, and this guy was trying to outlefty me with this point? I get that the movie is downplaying how bad the ultra-rich really act and upselling their lifestyle. It's still a fun romcom to watch.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Sarcopenia
May 14, 2014

BrianWilly posted:

I’m assuming whiteness and straightness on your part which I apologize if I’m wrong about, though the general sentiment applies nonetheless.
Hmmm. Maybe don't do this.


Matt Baume talks about the larger than life character Hollywood Montrose from the Movie Mannequin.
"Hollywood Montrose: Mannequin’s Gay Hero"
https://youtu.be/sWC8r5v1i-w

Argas
Jan 13, 2008
SRW Fanatic




Sounds like the RLM problem is that their casual chatter and shorthanding amongst friends makes them look like douches when a longer explanation might not.

Mr Phillby
Apr 8, 2009

~TRAVIS~
To use a recent example Psychonauts 2 has a group of character that I've seen refered to by multiple people online as 'the burgerking kids club'. They don t get much time in the story which is a shame. However the game also just straight up has a gay relationship which is just treated as normal. These two characters are in love and got married, you visit their brains and discover their histories and zero of their personal trauma has anything to do with their sexuality. There wasn't any marketing bollocks about 'the first gay couple in a double fine game' or anything like that either.

I'm not quite sure how to square that really good wholesome representation with the black intern who shows up to use his yoyo powers like twice or the kid in a wheelchair who literally turns up and gets thanked in the final boss battle despite not actually doing anything at all. It feels like a waste for those characters.

I think a reason 'tokenism' as a critism tends to get my back up is I'm used to seeing it used by people who's answer to the problem is 'don't ever put minorities in media' rather than from the perspective of 'give minority characters an actual character and role in the story'.

Neddy Seagoon
Oct 12, 2012

"Hi Everybody!"
While I get what you mean, Psychonauts 2 use of the Interns reads more like an unfortunate accident of script changes rather than on purpose. The game's second and act have a very different tone to the first act and finale, and it comes across like they had more planned, or multiple disparate script drafts, and had to consolidate that down to get the game done.

The Interns just noticeably disappear into the background as a result for most of the game past the first act of the story, just to reappear acting like they've always been present helping/hindering Raz throughout the game.

Jamie Faith
Jan 13, 2020

fun hater posted:

i find it hard to imagine anyone normal feeling anything toward a character that was a total non-entity in the script and as a person.

I loved Rose :colbert:

fun hater posted:

anyone normal

oh

Augus
Mar 9, 2015



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjgCoBgF1hA
that detail about the color of Isshin's fingernails is crazy lol. sekiro kicks rear end

Mr Phillby
Apr 8, 2009

~TRAVIS~

Neddy Seagoon posted:

While I get what you mean, Psychonauts 2 use of the Interns reads more like an unfortunate accident of script changes rather than on purpose. The game's second and act have a very different tone to the first act and finale, and it comes across like they had more planned, or multiple disparate script drafts, and had to consolidate that down to get the game done.

The Interns just noticeably disappear into the background as a result for most of the game past the first act of the story, just to reappear acting like they've always been present helping/hindering Raz throughout the game.
its kind of a weird situation in that I feel like they still got more time in the spotlight than most of the campers from Psychonauts 1 but by virtue of them being realistically diverse instead of just lumpy oddly coloured people (and a russian) they felt more shoehorned in? I feel like media has trained me to be cynical about diverse but shallow characters in a way that I'm not about just shallow characters in general.

Ariong
Jun 25, 2012

Get bashed, platonist!

What do you mean shoehorned in? I do not feel that is the case at all. They are a central part of the plot of the game.

Karloff
Mar 21, 2013

Jamie Faith posted:

I loved Rose :colbert:

I also really liked Rose and the entire really good film. Was gutted she was pretty much excised from the next one.

fun hater
May 24, 2009

its a neat trick, but you can only do it once
that is fascinating to me because she could have been replaced with a spunky dog in the script and i dont think anything would have changed. they wrote a total non-character for an actress who deserved better or not to be dragged into that poo poo movie trilogy at all

Karloff
Mar 21, 2013

I fundamentally disagree that her character - who out of everyone in the film most clearly elucidates the idealism and moral framework at the core of the film's point of view, doing so in both dialogue and action - could be replaced by a dog.

Zedd
Jul 6, 2009

I mean, who would have noticed another madman around here?



She was clearly partially there to avoid having Finn and Poe interact too much with their obvious chemistry. Same with the bounty hunter and other ex stormtrooper in ROS.

Andrast
Apr 21, 2010


They should have replaced every character with a dog

Dire Lemming
Jan 19, 2016
If you don't coddle Nazis flat Earthers then you're literally as bad as them.
Dogs are too good to start a star war so there wouldn't be a movie.

Sephyr
Aug 28, 2012

Zedd posted:

She was clearly partially there to avoid having Finn and Poe interact too much with their obvious chemistry. Same with the bounty hunter and other ex stormtrooper in ROS.

Partially. Her main role was still showing Finn that people in the rebellion were driven by more than survival; they -cared- about what they fought for, enough to live for it and fight another day.

Now, helmet-girl from the next movie was 100% "Poe is all about the ladies, folks". And the renega stormtrooper lass Finn meets later is 90% that, and 10% "Ehh not all troopers are bad, some feel the Force and it's a moral power we guess, whatever."

Doctor Spaceman
Jul 6, 2010

"Everyone's entitled to their point of view, but that's seriously a weird one."

Sephyr posted:

Now, helmet-girl from the next movie was 100% "Poe is all about the ladies, folks".

Also about Abrams giving Keri Russell a paycheck.

Famethrowa
Oct 5, 2012

Sephyr posted:

Partially. Her main role was still showing Finn that people in the rebellion were driven by more than survival; they -cared- about what they fought for, enough to live for it and fight another day.

Now, helmet-girl from the next movie was 100% "Poe is all about the ladies, folks". And the renega stormtrooper lass Finn meets later is 90% that, and 10% "Ehh not all troopers are bad, some feel the Force and it's a moral power we guess, whatever."

it's incredible that I can't tell if you are inventing characters or if they actually were in the movies

Dawgstar
Jul 15, 2017

Sephyr posted:

Partially. Her main role was still showing Finn that people in the rebellion were driven by more than survival; they -cared- about what they fought for, enough to live for it and fight another day.

Although it still is very weird that Rose needed to show Finn The Child Soldier that the New Order is bad, actually, although that's more on Johnson and the script than anything to do with Tran.

achillesforever6
Apr 23, 2012

psst you wanna do a communism?

nine-gear crow posted:

Jack is unironically the best (and only good) member of RLM now.
Everyone forgets Josh smh; the best RLM content is HITB for smaller indy movies, re:view, and BOTW

KingKalamari
Aug 24, 2007

Fuzzy dice, bongos in the back
My ship of love is ready to attack

Karloff posted:

I fundamentally disagree that her character - who out of everyone in the film most clearly elucidates the idealism and moral framework at the core of the film's point of view, doing so in both dialogue and action - could be replaced by a dog.

Yeah, I thought Rose herself was a pretty good character: She had a solid motivation, an interesting implied backstory and a pretty decent niche within the main cast. It was more the plot thread that she was most heavily involved in in that movie (The casino planet) felt largely extraneous to the main thrust of the film, which I think a lot of people conflated with the character herself being bad for some reason?

Arc Hammer
Mar 4, 2013

Got any deathsticks?

Andrast posted:

They should have replaced every character with a dog

I mean the next movie did add a Droid who was analogous to an abused dog.

Augus
Mar 9, 2015


Dawgstar posted:

Although it still is very weird that Rose needed to show Finn The Child Soldier that the New Order is bad, actually, although that's more on Johnson and the script than anything to do with Tran.

?
finn knows the first order is bad, that’s why at the start of the movie he tries to get as far away from them as humanly possible. rose convinces him to stand and fight instead of ditching everyone

Augus fucked around with this message at 16:54 on Sep 10, 2021

Jamie Faith
Jan 13, 2020

star war

Argas
Jan 13, 2008
SRW Fanatic




stars war

Mr Phillby
Apr 8, 2009

~TRAVIS~

Ariong posted:

What do you mean shoehorned in? I do not feel that is the case at all. They are a central part of the plot of the game.
They disapear for most of the game outside of some side content. They admittedly did a good job with little background details like claivoyance but they don't really get involved in the second half of the game until the very end. Thats the part where they felt shoehorned in to me, i got that their appearance was meant to mirror you saving them during the first boss fight but it didn't really feel that earned to me. I really liked the game but I wish we got more from the interns honestly.

I also acknowledge that I'm being harsher on them than the camper characters from Psychonauts 1 who also don't really have a role in the second half of the game. It also sucks that Its way too easy to see a character in a wheelchair or whatever and write the group off as 'token' inclusions. Like why do we only seem to care about 'pandering' when minorities are the target?

I dunno I have mixed feelings on it, but i don't think the game would have been better if the interns didn't exist or were more abstract like the campers largely were. The burger king kids club comparasons hit home a little but ultimately isn't a kids game an appropriate place for that kind of shallow inclusiveness anyway?

The 7th Guest
Dec 17, 2003

I literally did not care when I saw the kid in a wheelchair, it didn't even register to me that people would be bothered by it, or that I'm supposed to be concerned about tokenism

I just thought it was cool how they fashioned a chair around their orb. it's really more of a trackball with armrests and backing

the only weird thing about Psychonauts 2 was the timing of having "Chinese wet markets sure are sleazy!" jokes in the year 2021

but gently caress the game is so good otherwise

Sephyr
Aug 28, 2012

Dawgstar posted:

Although it still is very weird that Rose needed to show Finn The Child Soldier that the New Order is bad, actually, although that's more on Johnson and the script than anything to do with Tran.

I don't think the point was that the Order was bad; he knew that bone-deep. It was that they had to do -more- about it than just gathering their loved ones and running away.

SteelMentor
Oct 15, 2012

TOXIC
The rules can't say a Dog can't fight a star war

Alaois
Feb 7, 2012

hbomberguy you loving coward unprivate star tre

thetoughestbean
Apr 27, 2013

Keep On Shroomin

Sudden Loud Noise posted:

Speaking of Marvel, Lindsey Ellis's latest video on narcissism and Loki is a nice look into where Loki failed in it's characterization and narrative, and a pretty abysmal and factually inaccurate explanation and examination of narcissistic personality disorder.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2Tg-OmOztM

The horrors of watching a Youtube Video Essayist talk about something you've actually studied.

Am I reading this right; she tried to explain narcissistic personality disorder and just failed miserably?

Sydin
Oct 29, 2011

Another spring commute

Argas posted:

stars war

Mandalore already released this cut and completely broke Shammy's brain.

Terrible Opinions
Oct 18, 2013



Mandalore is a criminal for not releasing his star wars 3 cut.

Alaois
Feb 7, 2012

Sydin posted:

Mandalore already released this cut and completely broke Shammy's brain.

arthur fleck is not on the jedi council!

Sudden Loud Noise
Feb 18, 2007

thetoughestbean posted:

Am I reading this right; she tried to explain narcissistic personality disorder and just failed miserably?

Kinda yeah. One of her main messages is that he's poorly written because (according to her) someone with NPD can't acknowledge that they have NPD, and the moment that they acknowledge it, and want to be better they no longer qualify as having NPD. Which is just....false.

Overall, her point suffers because Loki is an archetype, and not a real person with an actual disorder. So examining him through the lens of the real disorder unravels pretty quickly. Also, a huge amount of personality disorder research and understanding is Western White Male biased to the extent that applying it to other cultures (real or imagined) starts to unravel pretty quickly. The basic ideas of narcissism and selfish motivation are universal, but that's not really what her essay was on, it was on the clinical idea of NPD.

Famethrowa
Oct 5, 2012

Sudden Loud Noise posted:

Kinda yeah. One of her main messages is that he's poorly written because (according to her) someone with NPD can't acknowledge that they have NPD, and the moment that they acknowledge it, and want to be better they no longer qualify as having NPD. Which is just....false.


did she write that after reading a NPD subreddit or something because lol

Booky
Feb 21, 2013

Chill Bug


is that ellis video.... like, good? :psyduck:

Grondoth
Feb 18, 2011

Sudden Loud Noise posted:

Kinda yeah. One of her main messages is that he's poorly written because (according to her) someone with NPD can't acknowledge that they have NPD, and the moment that they acknowledge it, and want to be better they no longer qualify as having NPD. Which is just....false.

That's not what I got outta that point. I thought it was "we don't like narcissists in real life, so as soon as a character acknowledges it by name, they can no longer act that way because they can't be likable after they identify their behavior as narcissistic."

KingKalamari
Aug 24, 2007

Fuzzy dice, bongos in the back
My ship of love is ready to attack

Sudden Loud Noise posted:

Kinda yeah. One of her main messages is that he's poorly written because (according to her) someone with NPD can't acknowledge that they have NPD, and the moment that they acknowledge it, and want to be better they no longer qualify as having NPD. Which is just....false.

I thought the point was more along the lines of "Sufferers of NPD require some form of outside intervention to trigger the type of introspection required to properly contextualize and confront their disorder" and "NPD, like other personality disorders, are not ones that can be 'cured' in the way we traditionally think and the tendency of media to treat narcissism as a character flaw to be overcome through PLOT stigmatizes the conditions and its sufferers in the public consciousness"

There's definitely room to discuss and disagree with these points, but your original presentation seems like a gross oversimplification of the points actually brought up in the video at best?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Sudden Loud Noise
Feb 18, 2007

KingKalamari posted:

There's definitely room to discuss and disagree with these points, but your original presentation seems like a gross oversimplification of the points actually brought up in the video at best?

That’s fair. I don’t think her points were entirely invalid, but I think her focus on NPD took away from her more valid takes on the character.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply