|
Real hurthling! posted:lmao that lawyer that got shot a couple weeks ago hired a hitman to kill him so his kid could collect 10 million after most likely using another hitman to kill his wife and other son a couple months ago yowza bagged https://twitter.com/MandyMatney/status/1438530806817898500
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 18:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 03:48 |
|
|
kennedy interns would never serve their natural predators, the cia
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 18:28
|
|
|
The Kingfish posted:I don’t think AOC is CIA and I don’t think the CIA uses undergrad volunteers to foment coups on its behalf. Dumbass
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 18:34
|
|
|
The Kingfish posted:I don’t think AOC is CIA and I don’t think the CIA uses undergrad volunteers to foment coups on its behalf. you ever hear the phrase "stochastic terrorism"? somebody inciting violence without being specific, a bit like "will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?" and so on. very similar thing here. the hoover slaughterhouse shovels blood money into anything and everything that might be useful in entrenching its position no matter how inane - the CIA funding modern art, for example. so by sheer volume - the sheer number of people who end up adjacent to that money, often without realizing where it's from because this system is designed to obfuscate that - that outputs people who are beholden to it, who actively uphold its agenda, without ever having a handler or holding a check that isn't plausibly deniable. someone who went on a USAID funded trip abroad and interned for ted kennedy is going to try to protect the system that enveloped them without severe introspection that aoc is clearly not interested in. so, yeah, I'm confident in claiming that there's a meaningful sense in which she wasn't an "op" before her election. nobody had her attend secret meetings with cigarette-smoking men as they discussed how to best coup niger. but that's a naive pop culture framing, and definitely not necessary to be something bad - an asset, maybe, or co-opted, or some other phrase. she definitely is one of those, and if someone wants to call that an "op" I sure ain't gonna stop them.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 18:52
|
|
|
All those left behind in afghanistan are students, ngo people (doctors and nursed probably I bet!), helpful local translators and Definitely No Spooks or opportunists, Biden has b l o o d on his hands
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 18:54
|
|
|
wasn't AOC recruited by some pac through an audition event? i feel like i'm making it up. Also, someone should point 2 PMJ's posts about AOC funding forever ago cuz they were good...
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 19:00
|
|
|
I spent the last two hours on usaids website. I feel worse than when I read the climate thread.    based on the shared love of nonsense charts and this stuff I’m pretty sure Discendo works for USAID or something adjacent   They’re onto us. special thanks to Brown Moses   I’m going to throw up now.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 19:09
|
|
|
The Kingfish posted:I don’t think AOC is CIA and I don’t think the CIA uses undergrad volunteers to foment coups on its behalf. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 19:24
|
|
|
The Kingfish posted:I don’t think AOC is CIA and I don’t think the CIA uses undergrad volunteers to foment coups on its behalf. that is because you are historically illiterate
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 19:36
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/JurassicDunk/status/1438368040446537729
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 20:08
|
|
|
World War Mammories posted:you ever hear the phrase "stochastic terrorism"? somebody inciting violence without being specific, a bit like "will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?" and so on. very similar thing here. the hoover slaughterhouse shovels blood money into anything and everything that might be useful in entrenching its position no matter how inane - the CIA funding modern art, for example. so by sheer volume - the sheer number of people who end up adjacent to that money, often without realizing where it's from because this system is designed to obfuscate that - that outputs people who are beholden to it, who actively uphold its agenda, without ever having a handler or holding a check that isn't plausibly deniable. someone who went on a USAID funded trip abroad and interned for ted kennedy is going to try to protect the system that enveloped them without severe introspection that aoc is clearly not interested in. I largely agree with this but also sometimes I remember how Gloria Steinem was an open paid informant for the CIA and wonder
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 20:15
|
|
|
World War Mammories posted:you ever hear the phrase "stochastic terrorism"? somebody inciting violence without being specific, a bit like "will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?" and so on. very similar thing here. the hoover slaughterhouse shovels blood money into anything and everything that might be useful in entrenching its position no matter how inane - the CIA funding modern art, for example. so by sheer volume - the sheer number of people who end up adjacent to that money, often without realizing where it's from because this system is designed to obfuscate that - that outputs people who are beholden to it, who actively uphold its agenda, without ever having a handler or holding a check that isn't plausibly deniable. someone who went on a USAID funded trip abroad and interned for ted kennedy is going to try to protect the system that enveloped them without severe introspection that aoc is clearly not interested in. The tendency of individuals to defend systems of power/patronage they benefit from is uncontroversial and plainly applies to AOC. It’s also obvious that AOC is less of a outsider than she lets on. But the obvious implication of OP’s Twitter thread is that AOC is a knowing CIA asset who played some significant role in a coup d’etat. Maybe, but I’d need to see more evidence before I take that too seriously.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 20:22
|
|
|
nut posted:wasn't AOC recruited by some pac through an audition event? i feel like i'm making it up. Also, someone should point 2 PMJ's posts about AOC funding forever ago cuz they were good... Yes. I'll point them out! Perry Mason Jar posted:No, AOC's initial bid was supported through a lot of billionaire contributions that were hidden. Perry Mason Jar posted:No it wasn't, I was talking about my Q1 2017 Biden nom and subsequent loss prediction. I've been banging the gong against AOC since her bid in 2019, for what it's worth. It's actually not that much fun to be ahead of the curve, but here we are. Edit: by the way Ilhan Omar is also CIA. See: Global Village work for starters. Definitely a spook. I thought Omar a spook more than I did and for longer than AOC who I thought was just a malign DNC operative playing an Obama-type role for the receipt and blunting of socialist messaging but turns out is actually also a spook plainly (given these new revelations; I was caught up to Bolivian fascist support but not USAID that's new info to me). So I'm not perfect, sue me. Perry Mason Jar has issued a correction as of 20:33 on Sep 16, 2021 |
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 20:30
|
|
|
The Kingfish posted:The tendency of individuals to defend systems of power/patronage they benefit from is uncontroversial and plainly applies to AOC. It’s also obvious that AOC is less of a outsider than she lets on. But the obvious implication of OP’s Twitter thread is that AOC is a knowing CIA asset who played some significant role in a coup d’etat. Maybe, but I’d need to see more evidence before I take that too seriously. sure, she merely worked with an organization that has worldwide reach and historically just happens to leave coups & other upheavals in its wake
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 20:36
|
|
|
Okay what caused Nikki to snap and start spamming her twitter with literal white supremacy spewed from Tucker Ballson? https://twitter.com/cryptonomaly/status/1437751722818949124 OOOOOHH RIGHT TO DISTRACT FROM THAT 
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 20:40
|
|
|
I think I also pointed this out in some other post here - I've brought up AOC plenty in this thread - but I don't feel like trawling through my posts for it so I'll just reiterate quickly, simply: AOC's first assignment was to kill M4A. This was accomplished, first of all, by unseating Crowley who was himself a proponent of M4A (Crowley, fwiw, is not a 'good guy' and has done plenty, plenty I disagree with, however his support for M4A was real). Next it was some mealy-mouthed stuff about how M4A is not possible "right now". Soon thereafter AOC was supporting Pelosi's bid for Speaker. Now, Pelosi is and always has been among the loudest M4A-opponents in the Democratic party - this is not a secret and probably she is plainly proud of this fact. AOC said some bullshit about Pelosi being a radical (seriously! laughable, hilarious, but true! She said this, you remember?) and about not splitting the party or whatever the gently caress. She had the option, you know, of supporting instead Barbara Lee for Speaker but this never happened. Of course Barbara Lee is to her left and of congresspersons she is the most left by voting record. Absolute proponent of M4A. Mind you, M4A was an AOC campaign promise. Next you have AOC's role in ensuring the border camps would stay in place. She headed the committee that was meant to investigate. Result? A photo op and a tale of AOC's (!) discomfort and fear while touring the ICE facility. Seriously! She did not issue a single subpoena. She did not do anything, anything at all to advocate for the abused at those camps. The committee's existence and the photo op were sufficient. Horrid. Of course that whole affair regarding the camps was a stupid ruse and she helped no one except herself. But I'd be remiss not to mention, also, that AOC voted to fund DHS (and therefore ICE) during this same period. Remember that she ran on an "Abolish ICE" platform! That was the bulk of her platform! It was her largest slogan and biggest boon to relevancy. What has she done to abolish ICE? No no no everything she's done has assured ICE's funding and existence, you know. Edit: As for other things not mentioned in that twitter thread: financing her boyfriend's life through campaign contributions, her campaign manager sporting a Subhas Chandra Bose shirt, funding Israel, and more! She's Nixonian. Forget socialist she is not even left of most Democrats. Perry Mason Jar has issued a correction as of 20:51 on Sep 16, 2021 |
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 20:43
|
|
|
staticman posted:Okay what caused Nikki to snap and start spamming her twitter with literal white supremacy spewed from Tucker Ballson? Funny that everyone has a lot more smoke for her forwarding COVID heterodoxy than they do for marrying and defending a known pedophile. I'm sorry but this is not a new story. This is well known stuff, for years now. Not to mention her brother, who is also a pedophile and whom she has also defended - including paying for his attorneys and other fees.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 20:47
|
|
|
Perry Mason Jar posted:I'm sorry but this is not a new story. This is well known stuff, for years now. idk her music or anything and everyone who I ever brought this stuff up 2 has had no idea about it beforehand. The same about Drake. These aren't well known things to people, in my experience. e: the book isn't called "passively observing consent"
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 20:53
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 20:57
|
|
|
It's known in the hip hop community, same as Drake being a pedophile is known. It's simply ignored. I'm less aware of the various pop-punk and emo-songwriter musicians who turned out to be pedos or who likely are pedos than people in hip-hop since I'm more into hip hop. I guess it's possible Nicki deliberately intended to the wag the pedo dog with this tail stunt but it would seriously only be news to people just really learning of her by way of the COVID heterodoxy in the first. Eh, so yes, possible, but people think in a clique-fashion so I have a hard time swallowing it - that is, Nicki probably assumes she is only ever addressing her own audience (who know about her husband, brother) with no expectation that anyone else is paying attention. Like you say, it took this controversy for you to even know of it - meaning it had the opposite of its intended effect if that was in fact its intent. No I don't buy it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 20:58
|
|
|
Perry Mason Jar posted:No I don't buy it. not tryin 2 sell you on anything, just saying my experience 
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 21:06
|
|
|
Oh I know, sorry if I came off aggro. In my view, there is generally not much cause for people to hide their pedophile apologia, which is itself (horrifically) pretty routine.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 21:14
|
|
|
dead gay comedy forums posted:ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahhaha
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 21:20
|
|
|
while we're on the subject of met gala publicity stunts and the deep state https://mobile.twitter.com/punchedmonet_/status/1437693983413596163
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 22:51
|
|
|
StashAugustine posted:while we're on the subject of met gala publicity stunts and the deep state ayyyy i'm crackin' an' pingin' ovah heah!
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 22:59
|
|
|
https://youtu.be/doegoa3spKo
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 23:05
|
|
|
Perry Mason Jar posted:AOC's first assignment was to kill M4A. This was accomplished, first of all, by unseating Crowley who was himself a proponent of M4A (Crowley, fwiw, is not a 'good guy' and has done plenty, plenty I disagree with, however his support for lol I looked it up and crowley did co-sponsor a m4a bill, though obviously sponsoring a bill means jack poo poo. that said, pelosi has not always been an opponent of m4a. she was real big on the idea in 1993, thirty years ago. of course, though I can't find a source right now, this is extra hilarious given aoc's comments a bit ago in which she hoped her kids would have universal health care in thirty years anyway the purpose of a system is what it does and I don't agree with the charges of intentional sheepdogging - the power of self-deception is a potent thing, and I think ignoring it is a real bad idea - but the effect is the same so lmao
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2021 23:12
|
|
|
World War Mammories posted:you ever hear the phrase "stochastic terrorism"? somebody inciting violence without being specific, a bit like "will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?" and so on. very similar thing here. the hoover slaughterhouse shovels blood money into anything and everything that might be useful in entrenching its position no matter how inane - the CIA funding modern art, for example. so by sheer volume - the sheer number of people who end up adjacent to that money, often without realizing where it's from because this system is designed to obfuscate that - that outputs people who are beholden to it, who actively uphold its agenda, without ever having a handler or holding a check that isn't plausibly deniable. someone who went on a USAID funded trip abroad and interned for ted kennedy is going to try to protect the system that enveloped them without severe introspection that aoc is clearly not interested in.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2021 00:02
|
|
|
She scarcely says a sincere word, don't worry about it. Crowley ouster was very deliberate and allowed, made possible, by the historical situation. You'd think a grassroots organizer organic candidate nobody wouldn't have a Netflix crew tailing her going back to 2018, no? Lol
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2021 00:04
|
|
|
Her best photo op that totally wasn't staged was the meanie face at joe manchin being a big meanie when they were doing sensible legislating together
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2021 00:10
|
|
|
StashAugustine posted:while we're on the subject of met gala publicity stunts and the deep state i looked this up the other day and this is actually FALSE! FOUR PINOCCHIOS! it was her GREAT granddad
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2021 00:12
|
|
|
Wraith of J.O.I. posted:i looked this up the other day and this is actually FALSE! FOUR PINOCCHIOS! https://twitter.com/punchedmonet_/status/1437736594203561984
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2021 00:16
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:didn't Tulsi Gabbard also just get back from doing a stint with AFRICOM to overthrow Guinea? I don't think we know where she was specifically. Probably the Sahel. Although someone with a Hindutva background provides interesting opportunities for AFRICOM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_diaspora_in_Southeast_Africa
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2021 00:19
|
|
|
Perry Mason Jar posted:It's known in the hip hop community, same as Drake being a pedophile is known. It's simply ignored. I'm less aware of the various pop-punk and emo-songwriter musicians who turned out to be pedos or who likely are pedos than people in hip-hop since I'm more into hip hop. I guess it's possible Nicki deliberately intended to the wag the pedo dog with this tail stunt but it would seriously only be news to people just really learning of her by way of the COVID heterodoxy in the first. Eh, so yes, possible, but people think in a clique-fashion so I have a hard time swallowing it - that is, Nicki probably assumes she is only ever addressing her own audience (who know about her husband, brother) with no expectation that anyone else is paying attention. Like you say, it took this controversy for you to even know of it - meaning it had the opposite of its intended effect if that was in fact its intent. No I don't buy it. Can we talk about how the new Drake album cover is an Epstein style impregnation fantasy and idk why people are cool with it. Like, if we knew he had a bunch of kids with adult women it'd be something, but this is a man famous for talking to 13 year olds. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2021 00:24
|
|
|
Atrocious Joe posted:Can we talk about how the new Drake album cover is an Epstein style impregnation fantasy and idk why people are cool with it. Like, if we knew he had a bunch of kids with adult women it'd be something, but this is a man famous for talking to 13 year olds. reminded me of how good lil nas x's version of this is https://www.instagram.com/p/CTNUEIIJeWx/
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2021 00:25
|
|
|
Atrocious Joe posted:I don't think we know where she was specifically. Probably the Sahel. her tweet is pretty  https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1437728072715825152
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2021 00:28
|
|
|
Atrocious Joe posted:Can we talk about how the new Drake album cover is an Epstein style impregnation fantasy and idk why people are cool with it. Like, if we knew he had a bunch of kids with adult women it'd be something, but this is a man famous for talking to 13 year olds. Designed by Damien Hirst lol
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2021 00:29
|
|
|
AOC can't be CIA she did a funny dance and the chuds didn't like it 
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2021 00:49
|
|
|
Horizon Burning posted:AOC can't be CIA she did a funny dance and the chuds didn't like it They've done an incredible job of boosting her profile, haven't they? Even Trump did. Some "no-name" representing a city district being mentioned in public speeches by the President... like, as a fiction it doesn't even rise to the level of good TV. People are really insanely bored without community, huh?
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2021 01:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 03:48 |
|
|
StashAugustine posted:while we're on the subject of met gala publicity stunts and the deep state Why is it people like her and Helena Bonham Carter (all from conservative families) seem to become celebrities so easily in the UK, and very few people seem to notice or care. At least HBC is a decent actor. Also, Cara's mother and father are horrible TERFs, yet she never addresses those issues.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2021 01:54
|
|