Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Julio Cruz
May 19, 2006

Dead Goon posted:

Pounds, pence and shillings sure, but then there are guineas and what the gently caress are they for?

livestock

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
Is there even a reason (beyond EU spite) to go back to imperial measurements after 30+ years on metric? Has there been some pent-up demand for it or system that desperately needs it?

Noxville
Dec 7, 2003

Crankit posted:

The spoons to cup ratios in that image seem all hosed up

A cup is 240ml and a teaspoon is 5ml so it checks out. Unless you’re reading the 1s as 7s which I can see with that font

Oh dear me
Aug 14, 2012

I have burned numerous saucepans, sometimes right through the metal

OwlFancier posted:

Hogsheads and furlongs are one thing but nobody knows how loving shillings work.

I'm not 60 yet and I remember shillings. I got a 10 shilling note (50p) from my great aunt for a birthday present, and was filled with awe.

I'm not sure many people were ever acquainted with hogsheads, other than David Cameron obviously.

Noxville
Dec 7, 2003

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Is there even a reason (beyond EU spite) to go back to imperial measurements after 30+ years on metric? Has there been some pent-up demand for it or system that desperately needs it?

Tory voters are mostly old dickheads who are nostalgic for the days when they used nonsense measurements

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

It is entirely spite.

Like, I can use lbs and oz for stuff like cooking because it's round numbers and the scales do the conversion, same as feet for height or stone for weight (I also can't remember how many smaller units are in those) but like, if I am doing actual maths I would use metric.

You can replace imperial measurements with handfuls and cubits and it would work just as well, it just has some decent "lump" units while metric can sometimes be either too big or too small.

But I think the pure metric countries just use stuff like deciliters to get round that. So I guess it's that we have been socialized to use imperial as lump units and also they have decent names.

OwlFancier fucked around with this message at 20:50 on Sep 16, 2021

CancerCakes
Jan 10, 2006

Twisto the thing you want is a Sony a6000, they are cheap and you can get adapters for nearly any SLR lens.

kecske
Feb 28, 2011

it's round, like always

my car gets forty rods to the hogshead

Julio Cruz
May 19, 2006

kecske posted:

my car gets forty rods to the hogshead

rods to the hogshead is Boris's favourite hobby

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

WhatEvil posted:

Ehhhh I dunno. I'd still rather have an old DSLR vs a camera sensor. There's only so much you can make up for having a bigger sensor and proper optics. Up until late 2018 I was using a fixed-lens DSLR from 2003, which cost something like £200 at the time, with a ~4mp sensor and a 10x zoom lens, and still getting much better photos than my fancy 12MP smartphone camera.
Yeah sensor size means gently caress all most of the time - a DSLR from 10 years ago can still produce much more beautiful photos than a modern cameraphone can, no matter how good the iPhone's 'work out the outline and blur the background' filter gets, or how many extra lenses they add.

But megapixel count still seems to be the thing that people recognise in reviews and focus on. I used to have a Konica Minolta 5D, the colours it used to turn out were incredible, and it was supposedly only a 6mp sensor.

Still makes me mad that Sony are sitting on the natural+ processing and seem to be doing nothing with it.

Bobstar
Feb 8, 2006

KartooshFace, you are not responding efficiently!

Oh dear me posted:

I'm not 60 yet and I remember shillings. I got a 10 shilling note (50p) from my great aunt for a birthday present, and was filled with awe.

See this is the stuff that messed with my head as a kid. Changing the currency + inflation = :aaaaa:

Like kids in old books would be keen to get a shilling, half a crown would be a generous aunt, and as you say 10 bob would be unimaginable riches.

I think it was a Just William book that referenced "rollerskates that cost a WHOLE POUND!!". So naturally I assumed the pound had been changed or revalued somehow along with the other denominations.

Nope, just inflation :sigh:

Comrade Fakename
Feb 13, 2012


Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Is there even a reason (beyond EU spite) to go back to imperial measurements after 30+ years on metric? Has there been some pent-up demand for it or system that desperately needs it?

It is EU spite, but it’s also been something that old people/the tabloids have been complaining about since the early 90s.

Also, this only allowing shops to use imperial measures, not enforcing it. I doubt many places will abandon metric since no one under 50 even understands that poo poo.

Gambrinus
Mar 1, 2005
Time for that Pratchett quote again.

Footnote from Good Omens, by Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman:
"NOTE FOR YOUNG PEOPLE AND AMERICANS: One shilling = Five Pee. It helps to understand the antique finances of the Witchfinder Army if you know the original British monetary system:

Two farthings = One Ha'penny. Two ha'pennies = One Penny. Three pennies = A Thrupenny Bit. Two Thrupences = A Sixpence. Two Sixpences = One Shilling, or Bob. Two Bob = A Florin. One Florin and one Sixpence = Half a Crown. Four Half Crowns = Ten Bob Note. Two Ten Bob Notes = One Pound (or 240 pennies). One Pound and One Shilling = One Guinea.

The British resisted decimalized currency for a long time because they thought it was too complicated."

Jaeluni Asjil
Apr 18, 2018

Sorry I thought you were a landlord when I gave you your old avatar!

Bobstar posted:

See this is the stuff that messed with my head as a kid. Changing the currency + inflation = :aaaaa:

Like kids in old books would be keen to get a shilling, half a crown would be a generous aunt, and as you say 10 bob would be unimaginable riches.

I think it was a Just William book that referenced "rollerskates that cost a WHOLE POUND!!". So naturally I assumed the pound had been changed or revalued somehow along with the other denominations.

Nope, just inflation :sigh:

My first pay for being a Saturday girl in Peacocks was £3.29 for an 8 hour day. (75-77)
I had done potato picking on farms during school hols (74/75) for a whole 20p a day. Parents just used to dump us at entrance to farm and come back 9 hours later to fetch us after picking approx 300lb of spuds each. (Goal was 6*50lb sacks per day to get paid).

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
The one thing most of the old dominions did right was giving loving off the penny and pound entirely when decimalizing, thus making the handful of people who want to undo it sound even more unhinged.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZTeWLA1LAs

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Dead Goon posted:

Pounds, pence and shillings sure, but then there are guineas and what the gently caress are they for?
Paying doctors for a diagnosis, which will be the next step.

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

On the other hand, it's probably simpler to just let them have their inches and pints back than have them obstinately selling 30.48m lengths of wood and then smarming at you in B&Q.

Saros
Dec 29, 2009

Its almost like we're a Bureaucracy, in space!

I set sail for the Planet of Lab Requisitions!!

Bobby Deluxe posted:

Yeah sensor size means gently caress all most of the time - a DSLR from 10 years ago can still produce much more beautiful photos than a modern cameraphone can, no matter how good the iPhone's 'work out the outline and blur the background' filter gets, or how many extra lenses they add.

But megapixel count still seems to be the thing that people recognise in reviews and focus on. I used to have a Konica Minolta 5D, the colours it used to turn out were incredible, and it was supposedly only a 6mp sensor.

Still makes me mad that Sony are sitting on the natural+ processing and seem to be doing nothing with it.

Sensor size is massively important for any serious photography but sensor size and pixel count are not the same thing. Megapixels are relatively useless as a measure of sensor quality.

happyhippy
Feb 21, 2005

Playing games, watching movies, owning goons. 'sup
Pillbug
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yE-wA24xJ8

Decimalisation video.

No loving way will Boris change the money, changing everything back to bushrods and wanklesprockets will cost and Tories won't do that.
He's already devaluing it as much as he can, don't need to change it when zero = zero however you measure it.

BalloonFish
Jun 30, 2013



Fun Shoe

Dead Goon posted:

Pounds, pence and shillings sure, but then there are guineas and what the gently caress are they for?

The pound (£) was made up of 20 shillings and represented a fixed and real weight of silver - literally a pound of silver was divided into 240 parts. Each part was the weight of a penny, and twelve pennies was a shilling.

The guinea came along several centuries later and was a gold coin weighing a quarter of an ounce. It was introduced to restore a 'real' value to the pound (£) since a pound (lb) of silver was no longer deemed worth 20 shillings. So the new golden guinea was worth £1 (or 20 shillings).

But this immediately ran into problems as the values of gold and silver diverged and went up and down at different rates, meaning that the guinea was worth a varying number of shillings. Finally, in the 1800s, the value of the guinea was fixed...but at the time the value of the guinea in silver was 21 shillings. So 20 shillings made up £1 and the guinea was worth one shilling more.

Being Britain, there was of course a class element to all of this. Expensive stuff was sold in guineas, moderately expensive stuff was sold in pounds and everyday stuff was sold in shillings and pence. So the aristocracy paid for land, furniture, horses, livestock and medical bills in guineas. The middle classes received their salaries, paid their mortgages, settled their tradesmens' bills and made their investments in pounds and the working class received their weekly wage, paid their rent and bought their food in shillings.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Guavanaut posted:

The one thing most of the old dominions did right was giving loving off the penny and pound entirely when decimalizing, thus making the handful of people who want to undo it sound even more unhinged.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZTeWLA1LAs

Lmao that old timey aussie TV is just english people.

goddamnedtwisto
Dec 31, 2004

If you ask me about the mole people in the London Underground, I WILL be forced to kill you
Fun Shoe

CancerCakes posted:

Twisto the thing you want is a Sony a6000, they are cheap and you can get adapters for nearly any SLR lens.

It (along with most modern DSLRs) doesn't have a diaphragm actuator[1] so it would make most of my lenses unusable other than for extremely narrow purposes (narrow DoF that is, little camera humour for you there), even though I'm happy with manual focus and zoom. I suppose it's not quite as bad for video but I'd assume stopping right down would completely baffle the auto exposure.

Some (really loving expensive) adaptors for K-mount to non-diaphragm bodies pull power from the AF connectors and use a little solenoid to kick the diaphragm, but there doesn't seem to be one available for this one (and just eyeballing the adaptors that are available I guess they're going to be cropping which is another pain in the arse but that's only a small annoyance).

(Also until they go back to making cameras out of steel and leather - real steel and leather, not just plastic painted to look like it - I'm going to stick with my stone-aged poo poo, ta)

[1] All interchangeable lenses (apart from really silly specialist stuff) have an iris at the back of the lens to restrict the amount of light coming through. Apart from in certain circumstances (e.g. wanting to intentionally motion-blur a scene) this isn't used as much for actually darkening the scene but for controlling the depth of field. The more you close the iris, the wider the depth of field (so the more things will be in focus either side of the thing you're actually focusing on) - this is a really important thing to control. However because you want the maximum possible amount of light coming into the viewfinder when you're composing (and also the narrowest possible DoF when focusing) the iris is normally open, and is only closed when you actually take the shot (or on older cameras when you're setting the exposure). On old cameras this is done by a little pin that sticks out of the back of the diaphragm that closes the iris to the selected amount, which is in turn kicked by a little pin (or a paddle on screw-type lenses) inside the camera body.

Without some way of actuating the diaphragm you have to either cope with the iris being WFO all the time, which is a massive pain in the arse for anything apart from portraiture (and even then that hyper-narrow DoF is a really over-used effect that I've always hated) or try to cope with a too-dark viewfinder when you're trying to focus.

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

Saros posted:

Sensor size is massively important for any serious photography but sensor size and pixel count are not the same thing. Megapixels are relatively useless as a measure of sensor quality.
This, I used the terms interchangeably but yes, they're different things.

A 6mp DSLR will probably still produce much better photos than a 20mp phone, and that's not taking into account things like ISO sensitivity.

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


serious gaylord posted:

What the gently caress is the pounds and ounces thing for? Even my grandma in her 80's uses kg.

Culture war bay bay, but only over the most stupid and meaningless poo poo.

Next up? Bring back Farenheit

Dead Goon
Dec 13, 2002

No Obvious Flaws



BalloonFish posted:

The pound (£) was made up of 20 shillings and represented a fixed and real weight of silver - literally a pound of silver was divided into 240 parts. Each part was the weight of a penny, and twelve pennies was a shilling.

The guinea came along several centuries later and was a gold coin weighing a quarter of an ounce. It was introduced to restore a 'real' value to the pound (£) since a pound (lb) of silver was no longer deemed worth 20 shillings. So the new golden guinea was worth £1 (or 20 shillings).

But this immediately ran into problems as the values of gold and silver diverged and went up and down at different rates, meaning that the guinea was worth a varying number of shillings. Finally, in the 1800s, the value of the guinea was fixed...but at the time the value of the guinea in silver was 21 shillings. So 20 shillings made up £1 and the guinea was worth one shilling more.

Being Britain, there was of course a class element to all of this. Expensive stuff was sold in guineas, moderately expensive stuff was sold in pounds and everyday stuff was sold in shillings and pence. So the aristocracy paid for land, furniture, horses, livestock and medical bills in guineas. The middle classes received their salaries, paid their mortgages, settled their tradesmens' bills and made their investments in pounds and the working class received their weekly wage, paid their rent and bought their food in shillings.

Thank you :thumbsup:

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

OwlFancier posted:

Lmao that old timey aussie TV is just english people.
It's funny that even their most space cadet monarchist (the one that ate raw onions like apples iirc) proposed changing the dollar to the 'royal' because saying 'I think we should go back to pounds' would appeal to like one 80 year old who exclusively tenders in opals and ammunition anyway.

Private Speech
Mar 30, 2011

I HAVE EVEN MORE WORTHLESS BEANIE BABIES IN MY COLLECTION THAN I HAVE WORTHLESS POSTS IN THE BEANIE BABY THREAD YET I STILL HAVE THE TEMERITY TO CRITICIZE OTHERS' COLLECTIONS

IF YOU SEE ME TALKING ABOUT BEANIE BABIES, PLEASE TELL ME TO

EAT. SHIT.


OwlFancier posted:

So I guess it's that we have been socialized to use imperial as lump units and also they have decent names.

Well I mean they are just called "decis" and "decas" where I'm from (as in 2 deci, 10 deca, etc.), for volume and weight respectively, so it's not too bad.

Also there's metric cups and spoons and whatnot, but I don't know how much they are (I think 200 or 250ml for a cup, 15ml for a spoon? something like that)

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
A metric cup is 250ml, which is sometimes useful for cooking being neither too large like a litre nor too small like a ml, but the UK tended to ignore cups entirely until fairly recently, and any measuring thing that's not an antique will usually have fl oz, ml, and fractions of a pint rather than actually being a set of measuring cups/spoons.

Jakabite
Jul 31, 2010
Fahrenheit actually is quite a good system imo. I had it explained to me by an American once that 100 is hot, 0 is really cold. That seems to make sense to me. That said I like centigrade because a few degrees is actually significant.

I just treated myself to an EOS850D. I now need to learn to take actually good photos. It’s quite nifty though, and the touch screen isn’t a massive pain in the arse like on a GoPro. I’d forgotten how satisfying the little clicky noise cameras make is.

Antigravitas
Dec 8, 2019

Die Rettung fuer die Landwirte:
If you ever wonder how all this poo poo relates to each other, GNU Units has a large definition file that lists lots of utterly obscure units along with comments. It's pretty well researched and the units equivalent of the insane tzdata file that powers something like 80% (wild guess) of all date conversions.

Here's the section on fluid volumes on a (woefully outdated) mirror, that I am linking only because linking directly to lines in that file is hard otherwise:

https://github.com/ryantenney/gnu-units/blob/e7ded0943323b0bea083190d2676eed5277fe90d/units.dat#L1745

It has some utterly insane poo poo like:


drybarrel 7056 in^3 # Used in US for fruits, vegetables,
# and other dry commodities except for
# cranberries.


Or different length measurements:


UKlength_B 0.9143992 meter / yard # Benoit found the yard to be
# 0.9143992 m at a weights and
# measures conference around
# 1896. Legally sanctioned
# in 1898.
UKlength_SJJ 0.91439841 meter / yard # In 1922, Seers, Jolly and
# Johnson found the yard to be
# 0.91439841 meters.
# Used starting in the 1930's.
UKlength_K meter / 39.37079 inch # In 1816 Kater found this ratio
# for the meter and inch. This
# value was used as the legal
# conversion ratio when the
# metric system was legalized
# for contract in 1864.
UKlength_C meter / 1.09362311 yard # In 1866 Clarke found the meter
# to be 1.09362311 yards. This
# conversion was legalized
# around 1878.

Antigravitas fucked around with this message at 22:01 on Sep 16, 2021

Arsenic Lupin
Apr 12, 2012

This particularly rapid💨 unintelligible 😖patter💁 isn't generally heard🧏‍♂️, and if it is🤔, it doesn't matter💁.


Jakabite posted:

Fahrenheit actually is quite a good system imo. I had it explained to me by an American once that 100 is hot, 0 is really cold. That seems to make sense to me. That said I like centigrade because a few degrees is actually significant.
Originally, 100 was human body temperature (bit of an oops) and 0 was as cold as Mr. Fahrenheit could get by salting ice water.

learnincurve
May 15, 2014

Smoosh

keep punching joe posted:

AAAaaahhh does anyone under 50 understand these stupid measuring systems?

https://twitter.com/thetimes/status/1438548409636556800

His maths is wrong 25p a lb is not 55p a kilo

Edit: oh I see they want to make it legal to sell kilos at a higher price because hateful gammons

learnincurve fucked around with this message at 22:11 on Sep 16, 2021

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Antigravitas posted:

If you ever wonder how all this poo poo relates to each other, GNU Units has a large definition file that lists lots of utterly obscure units along with comments. It's pretty well researched and the units equivalent of the insane tzdata file that powers something like 80% (wild guess) of all date conversions.

Here's the section on fluid volumes on a (woefully outdated) mirror, that I am linking only because linking directly to lines in that file is hard otherwise:

https://github.com/ryantenney/gnu-units/blob/e7ded0943323b0bea083190d2676eed5277fe90d/units.dat#L1745

It has some utterly insane poo poo like:


drybarrel 7056 in^3 # Used in US for fruits, vegetables,
# and other dry commodities except for
# cranberries.


Or different length measurements:


UKlength_B 0.9143992 meter / yard # Benoit found the yard to be
# 0.9143992 m at a weights and
# measures conference around
# 1896. Legally sanctioned
# in 1898.
UKlength_SJJ 0.91439841 meter / yard # In 1922, Seers, Jolly and
# Johnson found the yard to be
# 0.91439841 meters.
# Used starting in the 1930's.
UKlength_K meter / 39.37079 inch # In 1816 Kater found this ratio
# for the meter and inch. This
# value was used as the legal
# conversion ratio when the
# metric system was legalized
# for contract in 1864.
UKlength_C meter / 1.09362311 yard # In 1866 Clarke found the meter
# to be 1.09362311 yards. This
# conversion was legalized
# around 1878.


Does this not suggest that you can simply keep legally converting between yards and meters using the legal conversion method until you have legally infinite of anything? Which proves that I could not have been breaking the speed limit officer so you have to let me go now.

Jakabite
Jul 31, 2010

Arsenic Lupin posted:

Originally, 100 was human body temperature (bit of an oops) and 0 was as cold as Mr. Fahrenheit could get by salting ice water.

This is nice. I think Fahrenheit for outdoor temperature, centigrade for cooking and the like, and Kelvin for anything scientific or technical makes sense. They’re such different contexts I think it’s okay to have multiple systems.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Jakabite posted:

Fahrenheit actually is quite a good system imo. I had it explained to me by an American once that 100 is hot, 0 is really cold. That seems to make sense to me. That said I like centigrade because a few degrees is actually significant.
Fahrenheit/Celsius is slightly removed from all the other metric/imperials chat but gets dragged in because it's got the same sense of "what we used to use when Britain was [good/bad]" and "what we use now because of [Europe/ease of use]" but there's uses for both, neither are SI, and everyone with a gas cooker is likely using an even crazier conversion of Fahrenheit without thinking about it, but cooking doesn't have to be that numerically precise anyway, whereas everything with chemistry or electronics will only be in Celsius now. (e: except the sort of chemistry or electronics that uses Kelvin and something bad is about to happen, either mathematically or in general)

But Fahrenheit is as Continental as it gets, and makes more sense for Northern Europe than it does for the US, going from 'about as cold as it ever gets in Copenhagen' to 'about as hot as it ever gets in Copenhagen' which also mostly works for Britain, whereas the US is like -40 (both F and C) up to like 120+ (F but maybe C in the near future).

Doesn't help that Radio 1 spent decades drilling the perfect mnemonic for body temperature into our heads for decades either.

Antigravitas
Dec 8, 2019

Die Rettung fuer die Landwirte:

OwlFancier posted:

Does this not suggest that you can simply keep legally converting between yards and meters using the legal conversion method until you have legally infinite of anything? Which proves that I could not have been breaking the speed limit officer so you have to let me go now.

Pretty much. It also suggests that it was complete chaos before some people standardised things in a sane way.

Seriously, read the comments in that document, there's just so much insane poo poo. I recommend the section on abrasive grit size. But every time there's a large comment block it's guaranteed to be incredibly hosed up.

Skarsnik
Oct 21, 2008

I...AM...RUUUDE!




goddamnedtwisto posted:

https://twitter.com/alistaircoleman/status/1438556908827381760

RIP Sir Clive, who never had an internet connection because he considered it a pointless distraction, truly the hero our times needed.

We passed someone in a c5 out on the bikes tonight, I did think it was a bit random at the time but makes sense now. :rip:

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

Jakabite posted:

I just treated myself to an EOS850D. I now need to learn to take actually good photos. It’s quite nifty though, and the touch screen isn’t a massive pain in the arse like on a GoPro. I’d forgotten how satisfying the little clicky noise cameras make is.
850D is supported by the webcam utility, apparently:

https://www.canon.co.uk/cameras/eos-webcam-utility/

CancerCakes
Jan 10, 2006

goddamnedtwisto posted:

It (along with most modern DSLRs) doesn't have a diaphragm actuator[1] so it would make most of my lenses unusable other than for extremely narrow purposes (narrow DoF that is, little camera humour for you there), even though I'm happy with manual focus and zoom. I suppose it's not quite as bad for video but I'd assume stopping right down would completely baffle the auto exposure.

Some (really loving expensive) adaptors for K-mount to non-diaphragm bodies pull power from the AF connectors and use a little solenoid to kick the diaphragm, but there doesn't seem to be one available for this one (and just eyeballing the adaptors that are available I guess they're going to be cropping which is another pain in the arse but that's only a small annoyance).

(Also until they go back to making cameras out of steel and leather - real steel and leather, not just plastic painted to look like it - I'm going to stick with my stone-aged poo poo, ta)

[1] All interchangeable lenses (apart from really silly specialist stuff) have an iris at the back of the lens to restrict the amount of light coming through. Apart from in certain circumstances (e.g. wanting to intentionally motion-blur a scene) this isn't used as much for actually darkening the scene but for controlling the depth of field. The more you close the iris, the wider the depth of field (so the more things will be in focus either side of the thing you're actually focusing on) - this is a really important thing to control. However because you want the maximum possible amount of light coming into the viewfinder when you're composing (and also the narrowest possible DoF when focusing) the iris is normally open, and is only closed when you actually take the shot (or on older cameras when you're setting the exposure). On old cameras this is done by a little pin that sticks out of the back of the diaphragm that closes the iris to the selected amount, which is in turn kicked by a little pin (or a paddle on screw-type lenses) inside the camera body.

Without some way of actuating the diaphragm you have to either cope with the iris being WFO all the time, which is a massive pain in the arse for anything apart from portraiture (and even then that hyper-narrow DoF is a really over-used effect that I've always hated) or try to cope with a too-dark viewfinder when you're trying to focus.

Fair enough, I'm happy with manual focus and zoom so it works for me, and I just take pictures of friends and family for fun so if I miss focus its no biggy. APS sensors are seriously good, and you can also use fringing settings and quick point zoom for focussing, so you can get near as dammit pretty easily.

Re the diaphragm actuator I think there is probably a setting to digitally brighten the scene (blow the iso up) when not taking the picture and then move it down to what you set on firing the (non-existant) shutter. I highly recommend having a body you can use with your lenses - I get a lot more joy from mine now on the a6000 than I did when they were sitting in an old camera bag next to my canon a1 collecting dust.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jakabite
Jul 31, 2010

Bobby Deluxe posted:

850D is supported by the webcam utility, apparently:

https://www.canon.co.uk/cameras/eos-webcam-utility/

Awesome, I’m doing all my communicating with friends and family via video right now so that’s super handy

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply