|
Bobby Deluxe posted:Anyone know anything about this? It's a very good idea to have a collar with contact details on it on your dog at all times in case they get out. Obviously microchips make this a bit less essential but it does mean that if, say, a near neighbour finds your dog you can get them back possibly before you even notice they've gone, as opposed to it having to go via a vets or the RSPCA/old bill. e: Can't ignore this snipe opportunity Here is my cat patiently explaining to me that collars are against his religion which is why he tears them off within seconds of getting one on. He also wishes me to know that this shelf is now his and he'll tolerate the clock but the other stuff that was there had to go. goddamnedtwisto fucked around with this message at 16:27 on Sep 22, 2021 |
# ? Sep 22, 2021 16:25 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 02:27 |
|
Bobby Deluxe posted:Anyone know anything about this? The law is that you have to have an id tag attached to a collar but I dunno who’s ever take you to court over it anyway tbh, we didn’t know the law until we’d had our dog for 12 months already and nobody ever said anything. We have both anyway because we our Twin Peaks fandom wouldn’t let us pass up a black and white chevron collar with red trim, she always has the collar on and the harness is for walks
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 16:25 |
|
Flayer posted:That line from Starmer can be interpreted both ways depending on your angle, the perfect middle ground. One interpretation (the TERF one) would be that trans women would be excluded from women only spaces, the more charitable explanation that you would hope is correct is that women only spaces should be available to all women. Kieth will carefully avoid making it clear as much as he possibly can. I vaguely respect the political move of telling journalists stuff like 'we have not changed our position from our 2019 position' in the full knowledge that no journalist will ever check what that position was
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 16:34 |
https://twitter.com/genderbroth/status/1379021957379809285?s=20
|
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 16:39 |
|
Bobby Deluxe posted:Anyone know anything about this? My dog has a tag on her harness and a tag on her collar. I don't clip the lead on to her collar but I keep the collar on in case she slips her harness (we used to have one of those Julius K9 ones and she managed to escape from it once). I don't have a collar on her round the house because we've got a very secure garden but I probably should do just in case. e: and the story is definitely more about people who don't bother putting a tag ont he harness.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 17:08 |
|
OwlFancier posted:I find it difficult to interpret it very charitably: https://twitter.com/cj_bellwether/status/1440678474952310785 So the default is that trans women should have access to women-only spaces, which is the opposite of what the Indy was trying to suggest. Lungboy fucked around with this message at 17:49 on Sep 22, 2021 |
# ? Sep 22, 2021 17:46 |
|
a pipe smoking dog posted:My dog has a tag on her harness and a tag on her collar. I don't clip the lead on to her collar but I keep the collar on in case she slips her harness (we used to have one of those Julius K9 ones and she managed to escape from it once). Mostly I'm worried some dickhead is going to insist it has to be a collar like the law says. It's his 5th birthday today by the way:
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 17:56 |
|
Happy birthday United Mine Workers dog
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 18:18 |
|
My Energy suppler, Avro, has gone tits up.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 18:45 |
|
Lungboy posted:https://twitter.com/cj_bellwether/status/1440678474952310785 So what was the purpose of this? Is this the Independent attempting to poison the conference, drive more of the left from the party, or a sop to terfs / plain old transphobia from the Indi staff themselves. Or just plain old shoddy journalism and stupidity. Questions, I am sure, will not be asked.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 18:48 |
|
Desiderata posted:So what was the purpose of this? Is this the Independent attempting to poison the conference, drive more of the left from the party, or a sop to terfs / plain old transphobia from the Indi staff themselves. Rosie Duffield has opened the door to the next festering wound that will split labour apart and now its all people are going to focus on. Starmers refusal to either deal with Duffield properly or just outright support her is just easy pickings for the journos.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 18:55 |
|
I just got an email from So Energy to say that as I'm in the last 7 weeks of my contract I can switch without additional fees lol
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 18:56 |
|
Pablo Bluth posted:My Energy suppler, Avro, has gone tits up. The pivot from nuclear bombers to gas retailers was always going to be a tricky one.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 19:01 |
|
I expect we'll lose another few tomorrow too. Its literally the wild west out there.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 19:08 |
|
some exceptionally normal Starmering going on, you love to see it https://twitter.com/OwenJones84/status/1440716290537111553 https://twitter.com/AaronBastani/status/1440722954363437061?s=19
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 19:23 |
|
Pablo Bluth posted:My Energy suppler, Avro, has gone tits up. I'm with them and I was expecting this, specially considering how little I was paying.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 19:25 |
|
Do GMB have a history of being really crap? Also what did Ed do to get such a target painted on him?
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 19:32 |
|
Failed Imagineer posted:Do GMB have a history of being really crap? Also what did Ed do to get such a target painted on him? Caused chaos.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 19:33 |
|
Failed Imagineer posted:Do GMB have a history of being really crap? Also what did Ed do to get such a target painted on him? They've always been on the melty side but this seems weird.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 19:34 |
|
Failed Imagineer posted:Do GMB have a history of being really crap? Also what did Ed do to get such a target painted on him? He's the closest thing to a left-winger still in the shadow cabinet
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 19:34 |
|
goddamnedtwisto posted:The pivot from nuclear bombers to gas retailers was always going to be a tricky one. I'd take a marginally increased risk of lymphoma and a tiny tiny chance of my house becoming a superfund site for a much reduced risk of carbon monoxide poisoning or my house becoming a crater, especially if it meant no gas bills.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 19:37 |
|
It's weird that one person's position, positions these people come and go from every 15 mins anyway, is something they seem bothered about bargaining over with something that would have much bigger ramifications and they would surely either support or not support regardless of what Ed is doing.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 19:40 |
|
serious gaylord posted:I expect we'll lose another few tomorrow too. Its literally the wild west out there. It’s funny that we have thousands of pages of complex regulation on capital reserves for financial services companies to make sure they can weather extreme market stress, and meanwhile OFGEM has apparently been running the entire energy market on the basis of “well gas prices can never go up that much can they? It’ll be fine”.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 19:43 |
|
Can we not just go into space and get some more gas from there?
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 19:54 |
|
we really do require more vespene gas
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 19:55 |
|
Protass Assimilator
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 19:57 |
|
Desiderata posted:So what was the purpose of this? Is this the Independent attempting to poison the conference, drive more of the left from the party, or a sop to terfs / plain old transphobia from the Indi staff themselves. It's cracking the issue open. Starmer wants to remain ambiguous, so report he's called for one side and maybe he'll think "well, damage done" and go with it.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 20:03 |
|
Failed Imagineer posted:Do GMB have a history of being really crap? Also what did Ed do to get such a target painted on him? labourism, what can you do
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 20:06 |
|
Bobby Deluxe posted:we really do require more vespene gas Boris heard a voice in the mid 90's that said "Spawn More Overlords!" and that's why he has so many children.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 20:07 |
|
Maybe Starmer wants to step down but wants to ensure the PLP get to pick his replacement instead of the membership
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 20:08 |
|
Wait Ed Millibands now in favour of changing his own rules, sacking himself and abandoning his areas big policy? WHY? JoylessJester fucked around with this message at 20:12 on Sep 22, 2021 |
# ? Sep 22, 2021 20:09 |
|
JoylessJester posted:Wait Ed Millibands now in favour of changing his own rules, sacking himself and abandoning his areas big policy? WHY? Nah he's abandoning his own policy to keep the sweet shadow post rather than be sacked.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 20:15 |
|
Gort posted:Maybe Starmer wants to step down but wants to ensure the PLP get to pick his replacement instead of the membership Either way it has to be done, it's pretty obvious they've done a great job of discrediting the labour right and if they did things the same way as before we'd all just rejoin to vote in whichever candidate they hate the most It's probably their most important move tbh, they'd have to be completely stupid not to. It'd be like if we hadn't implemented open primaries or made any effort to prevent the right wing taking over aga
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 20:16 |
|
JoylessJester posted:Wait Ed Millibands now in favour of changing his own rules, sacking himself and abandoning his areas big policy? WHY? I was confused too but is Ed opposing his own rules to try and stop himself from being sacked from GMB pressure? It's all a clusterfuck either way.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 20:17 |
|
JoylessJester posted:Wait Ed Millibands now in favour of changing his own rules, sacking himself and abandoning his areas big policy? WHY? Electoralism is a fool's game.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 20:17 |
|
lol people confused as to why Ed Miliband would act spinelessly for no gain obviously forgot the Coalition years.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 20:20 |
|
Gort posted:Maybe Starmer wants to step down but wants to ensure the PLP get to pick his replacement instead of the membership
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 20:22 |
|
Who do the right even have as their next candidate? Or the left for that matter
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 20:36 |
|
I think the focus for them is just institutional control, doesn't matter who it is if you can just appoint them.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 20:42 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 02:27 |
|
Gonzo McFee posted:lol people confused as to why Ed Miliband would act spinelessly for no gain obviously forgot the Coalition years. Is anyone confused by ed? I thought it was the union's position people found odd?
|
# ? Sep 22, 2021 20:55 |