Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
Which horse film is your favorite?
This poll is closed.
Black Beauty 2 1.06%
A Talking Pony!?! 4 2.13%
Mr. Hands 2x Apple Flavor 117 62.23%
War Horse 11 5.85%
Mr. Hands 54 28.72%
Total: 188 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Post
  • Reply
Petey
Nov 26, 2005

For who knows what is good for a person in life, during the few and meaningless days they pass through like a shadow? Who can tell them what will happen under the sun after they are gone?
So Alina Chan definitely has a dog in this fight, but she (re)posted a link to this leaked putative grant proposal from 2018 today: https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1440279120861024264

that — apparently, taken on face value, which, again, should be cautious, and as I read it as an inexpert layperson — seems to be a group of US + Chinese scientists approaching DARPA in 2018 to fund a program by which they would engineer a novel, highly-contagious coronavirus (as/or a spike protein that they would inject into other viruses) and infect wild bats in caves in Yunnan in the hopes of developing broad cross-immunity that would prevent more dangerous unknown coronaviruses from spilling over.

None of this, of course, proves or even really suggests that cov-2 came from a lab; indeed, this is the kind of approach that would be implemented to prevent such a spillover. But it appears that DARPA turned it down for being too risky, and I have to say, it really did make my eyebrows go up as I read it, in terms of the kind of thing that would be seriously proposed within the vein of gain of function.

It has already widely become seized on by the right as proof of the plandemic and bioweaponry, and again, I don't think it shows that. But, if true, it startled me on the kind of stuff that these groups were working on.

e: looks like it originally was sourced from an Intercept FOIA, perhaps? https://theintercept.com/2021/09/06/new-details-emerge-about-coronavirus-research-at-chinese-lab/

Petey fucked around with this message at 18:56 on Sep 22, 2021

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.
The root sourcing of this is Ebright, who is the same person with the medium rant that I dissected in the "how conspiracy theories operate" effortpost I linked earlier. I don't have time to dig in now, but it's probably going to be conflating different research programs and/or different definitions of gain of function.

Discendo Vox fucked around with this message at 19:10 on Sep 22, 2021

Morrow
Oct 31, 2010
There's a lot of people with a lot of money and influence invested in different aspects of the bioweapon theory, so be skeptical of any source pushing it. A denied research grant is hardly evidence. Indeed, it shows that scientists were concerned about a coronavirus such as this long before Covid-19.

Sometimes bad things happen by random chance and there's no grand conspiracy behind it.

UCS Hellmaker
Mar 29, 2008
Toilet Rascal
Bioweapons are a spook story from the cold war era, they honestly are poo poo and no country realistically looks into them in this day and age because the cost to benefit risks are to high, along with the fact that you need it to be able to spread rapidly, but not burn out faster then it can spread. While there was massive research programs on it in the 1960s-1980s the US and soviets all found that it was not beneficial and caused to many issues along with the threat of accidental release being almost impossible to stop. The majority of bioweapon tests also utilized the use of bacteria and not viruses, because viruses mutate way to easily and can easily change to a form that is neither as infectious or deadly in the long run (covid surprisingly has done this at times but other strains just are spreading faster in some cases, viral evolution is weird!) Bacteria that are infectious that bioweapons focused on tended to be spore bacteria like anthrax or botulism, stuff that you can grow and store (viruses tend to be difficult as poo poo to store long term especially in a form that can be used as a weapon). Smallpox would likely be something that bioweapons would focus on, or a genetically modified measles virus that bypasses the current vaccine. The reason for that is both are INSANELY infectious and spread by airborne spread, measles in particular is insane and spreads like wildfire much faster then covid does. Again though, this ties into the fact that doing so is a major risk because the ability to accidently be released is huge, and a level 5 biolab is needed for even testing some of this poo poo. Small pox in particular. Ideally smallpox would be what a true viral bioweapon would utilize, because you can spread it from the fluid from the lesions or dried blisters, and almost no living person has any immunity to it because its been eradicated.

Covid isn't a bioweapon, its just morons on twitter spreading misinformation to make it seem like random viral evolution didn't play a part in this. Its also just dumb xenophobic garbage to say that china caused this and asians are the reason your loved one is dying. Stop spreading it. Twitter is a cancer and spreading this poo poo is just spreading right wing propaganda to justify that its all a ploy by the government to hurt people and blah blah blah insert loving alt right comments because thats all it is

Like, chemical weapons are more realistic then bioweapons are, the efficiency is greater, the colleterial damage is much less and its easy to prevent accidental spread to allied forces. No country is realistically looking at bioweapons as a serious offensive power because the risk is to high for it backfiring. There are a number of solid books that detail the coldwar era bioweapon projects (both soviet EU and American that are declassified to some degree) that highlight alot of this.

UCS Hellmaker fucked around with this message at 20:45 on Sep 22, 2021

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



Petey posted:

So Alina Chan definitely has a dog in this fight, but she (re)posted a link to this leaked putative grant proposal from 2018 today: https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1440279120861024264

that — apparently, taken on face value, which, again, should be cautious, and as I read it as an inexpert layperson — seems to be a group of US + Chinese scientists approaching DARPA in 2018 to fund a program by which they would engineer a novel, highly-contagious coronavirus (as/or a spike protein that they would inject into other viruses) and infect wild bats in caves in Yunnan in the hopes of developing broad cross-immunity that would prevent more dangerous unknown coronaviruses from spilling over.

None of this, of course, proves or even really suggests that cov-2 came from a lab; indeed, this is the kind of approach that would be implemented to prevent such a spillover. But it appears that DARPA turned it down for being too risky, and I have to say, it really did make my eyebrows go up as I read it, in terms of the kind of thing that would be seriously proposed within the vein of gain of function.

It has already widely become seized on by the right as proof of the plandemic and bioweaponry, and again, I don't think it shows that. But, if true, it startled me on the kind of stuff that these groups were working on.

e: looks like it originally was sourced from an Intercept FOIA, perhaps? https://theintercept.com/2021/09/06/new-details-emerge-about-coronavirus-research-at-chinese-lab/

I think we should probably let this one simmer until there's more to it than just a bad source and paper older than even the last GoF controversy source.

Also, pet tax people!

Chadzok
Apr 25, 2002

virtualboyCOLOR posted:

Speaking of liberal logic:

https://twitter.com/Quinnae_Moon/status/1440444302518149121?s=20

It’s incredibly frustrating to see the fingers wagging and people trying to spread the word about vaccinations because it lacks the decorum liberals desperately crave. Who is this article for and what benefit does it provide?

What's the issue with this article? It describes the subreddit, makes the obvious point that it's sickly sweet with schadenfreude, says you can learn a lot about the actual disease, and also highlights that hey - maybe it's changing some minds - and maybe it's good thing to have around, actually.

The concluding line:

quote:

It is an anti-persuasive venue, a place that dispenses with rational appeals for people to behave better in favor of something much more primal and horrifying. And who knows? Maybe it’s persuading people specifically because it’s not trying to.

I mean, did you actually read it? Funny and good.

Stickman
Feb 1, 2004

Professor Beetus posted:

Hey uh, I am pretty sure I know the answer, but those things people wear around their necks for "air filtration" are just stupid hokum right? The packaging literally sounds like snake oil. "Just clip this to your clothing or wear around your neck and you'll have a 4 ft shield around your person that will stop deadly viruses!"

Like WTF.



Just don't use lasCOVID.

gninjagnome
Apr 17, 2003

My company just announced anyone not vaccinated by Nov will be fired for cause (barring limited exemptions). That means no severance, losing all unvestedbenefits, and no unemployment. Curious to see what they'll accept as exemptions, but they seemed pretty serious about reviewing them.

Fritz the Horse
Dec 26, 2019

... of course!
I was very pleasantly surprised that my employer required vaccinations starting August 1st. Before we could sign our annual contract we had to submit proof of vaccination to HR.

The reservation is only 30% fully vaccinated which is very concerning because of many factors: remote location, lack of healthcare availability, underlying conditions (obesity, diabetes, smoking), many multigenerational households etc. Thankfully my employer is taking the pandemic very seriously.

Coldrice
Jan 20, 2006


Alright all, COVID SIMULATOR v3 IS LIVE! This update focuses on improving the systems/realism to spreading Covid




you can get it free at https://coldrice.itch.io/covid-simulator


patch notes: https://coldrice.itch.io/covid-simulator/devlog/296832/version-3-is-live

Professor Beetus
Apr 12, 2007

They can fight us
But they'll never Beetus

Coldrice posted:

Alright all, COVID SIMULATOR v3 IS LIVE! This update focuses on improving the systems/realism to spreading Covid




you can get it free at https://coldrice.itch.io/covid-simulator


patch notes: https://coldrice.itch.io/covid-simulator/devlog/296832/version-3-is-live

Hey, would you like to supply me with a perma link to whatever the latest version is? That way I can link it directly to the OP and anyone who clicks can get the latest version on demand. Thanks!

Stickman
Feb 1, 2004

That Itch.io link is the project page so it should always have the latest version!

E: or do you mean a direct download link?

Stickman fucked around with this message at 01:46 on Sep 23, 2021

Stickman
Feb 1, 2004

E not Q :(

Professor Beetus
Apr 12, 2007

They can fight us
But they'll never Beetus

Stickman posted:

That Itch.io link is the project page so it should always have the latest version!

E: or do you mean a direct download link?

Oh no, as long as that's the up to date product page, that works for me. Thanks again for sharing here.

cr0y
Mar 24, 2005



Professor Beetus posted:

This makes me feel pretty conflicted. On one hand, it seems kinda lovely that people who chose to spit (cough?) in the face of public health shouldn't get priority, but otoh if the treatments are largely unnecessary for most vaccinated people and still being prioritized for immunocompromised vaccinated people, this does seem fairly ethical?

I'm curious to see what y'all make of it in here.

The issue is that we are again going out of our way to accommodate those who haven't lifted a finger to contribute to helping solve the problem and in most cases have put energy forward to make things worse.

I'm pretty fash on this topic though, mostly out of anger. If it were upto me the willingly unvaxxed would automatically be ineligible to any medical care aside from a complimentary body bag.

Buckwheat Sings
Feb 9, 2005
Yeah losing family members and loved ones literally because of a bunch of obese red faced fucks can't take a 5 minute visit to Walgreens and wear something over their loving noses during it.

Bar is practically rolling on the ground and they can't even reach it.

Professor Beetus
Apr 12, 2007

They can fight us
But they'll never Beetus

cr0y posted:

The issue is that we are again going out of our way to accommodate those who haven't lifted a finger to contribute to helping solve the problem and in most cases have put energy forward to make things worse.

I'm pretty fash on this topic though, mostly out of anger. If it were upto me the willingly unvaxxed would automatically be ineligible to any medical care aside from a complimentary body bag.

I can understand why you feel that way and you are welcome to have your opinion, but I think bolded crosses a line and I'd like you to please consider at least not going that far in this thread, there's all kinds of people who have struggled to get friends and family vaccinated and may have lost someone along the way. I have one single family member left who refuses to get vaccinated, and we press her on it as much as we can in the hopes it will eventually change her mind. I am not willing to say that human beings should be denied basic human rights, because they've had 30 years of Murdoch media pumping worms into their brain and 60 years of the federal government being stripped for parts in every facet except war funding. This pandemic wasn't made this way because of individual choices but rather a pretty apparent societal failure.

Venting is what it is and I am not here to tone police, but if you need to scream into the void in here, please pair it with a pet pic or something. This is not the thread for spiraling into outright nihilism.

Coldrice
Jan 20, 2006


Yeah the game page always has the most recent download link. That’s the nice thing about it itch.io makes it wayyy easier to have an easy base of operations

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

So with the announcement that boosters have been approved for people with jobs that put them at high risk of exposure that include grocery workers, teachers, and healthcare workers, does that mean basically anyone can claim they have a high-risk job?

Natty Ninefingers
Feb 17, 2011
It’ll probably work out to be an honor system, more of less.

Professor Beetus
Apr 12, 2007

They can fight us
But they'll never Beetus
To be fair, that's a fuckton of people who mostly don't have any choice but to put themselves in harm's way, and would have described me if I was still employed, instead of getting high and playing Sea of Thieves. Definitely seems like a good time to look into it if you are in that job category, depending on your circumstances.

Fairly significant news from an extremely vanilla source.

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.

Professor Beetus posted:

To be fair, that's a fuckton of people who mostly don't have any choice but to put themselves in harm's way, and would have described me if I was still employed, instead of getting high and playing Sea of Thieves. Definitely seems like a good time to look into it if you are in that job category, depending on your circumstances.

Fairly significant news from an extremely vanilla source.

Here's the direct, full FDA announcement linked in the above article.

FDA Authorizes Booster Dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for Certain Populations

quote:

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration amended the emergency use authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to allow for use of a single booster dose, to be administered at least six months after completion of the primary series in:

  • individuals 65 years of age and older;
  • individuals 18 through 64 years of age at high risk of severe COVID-19; and
  • individuals 18 through 64 years of age whose frequent institutional or occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2 puts them at high risk of serious complications of COVID-19 including severe COVID-19.

Today’s authorization applies only to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.

“Today’s action demonstrates that science and the currently available data continue to guide the FDA’s decision-making for COVID-19 vaccines during this pandemic. After considering the totality of the available scientific evidence and the deliberations of our advisory committee of independent, external experts, the FDA amended the EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to allow for a booster dose in certain populations such as health care workers, teachers and day care staff, grocery workers and those in homeless shelters or prisons, among others,” said Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock, M.D. “This pandemic is dynamic and evolving, with new data about vaccine safety and effectiveness becoming available every day. As we learn more about the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines, including the use of a booster dose, we will continue to evaluate the rapidly changing science and keep the public informed.”

The Process for Assessing the Available Data

Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA), was approved by the FDA on Aug. 23, for the prevention of COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 in individuals 16 years of age and older. On Aug. 25, 2021, the FDA received a supplement from Pfizer Inc. to their biologics license application for Comirnaty seeking approval of a single booster dose to be administered approximately six months after completion of the primary vaccination series for individuals 16 years of age and older.

As part of the FDA’s commitment to transparency, the agency convened a public meeting of its Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) on Sept. 17 to solicit input from independent scientific and public health experts on the data submitted in the application. During the meeting, the vaccine manufacturer presented information and data in support of its application. The FDA also presented its analysis of clinical trial data submitted by the vaccine manufacturer. Additionally, the public was also given an opportunity to provide comment; and FDA invited international and U.S. agencies and external groups, including representatives from the Israeli Ministry of Health, the University of Bristol, U.K. and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, to present recent data on the use of vaccine boosters, epidemiology of COVID-19, and real-world evidence on vaccine effectiveness.

The FDA considered the data that the vaccine manufacturer submitted, information presented at the VRBPAC meeting, and the committee’s discussion, and has determined that based on the totality of the available scientific evidence, a booster dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine may be effective in preventing COVID-19 and that the known and potential benefits of a booster dose outweigh the known and potential risks in the populations that the FDA is authorizing for use. The booster dose is authorized for administration to these individuals at least six months following completion of their primary series and may be given at any point after that time.

It’s important to note that the FDA-authorized Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is the same formulation as the FDA-approved Comirnaty and the vaccines may be used interchangeably.

“We’re grateful for the advice of the doctors, scientists, and leading vaccine experts on our advisory committee and the important role they have played in ensuring transparent discussions about COVID-19 vaccines. We appreciate the robust discussion, including the vote regarding individuals over 65 years of age and individuals at high risk for severe disease, as well as the committee’s views regarding the use of a booster dose for those with institutional or occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2,” said Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. “The FDA considered the committee’s input and conducted its own thorough review of the submitted data to reach today’s decision. We will continue to analyze data submitted to the FDA pertaining to the use of booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines and we will make further decisions as appropriate based on the data.”

Data Supporting Authorization for Emergency Use

To support the authorization for emergency use of a single booster dose, the FDA analyzed safety and immune response data from a subset of participants from the original clinical trial of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. In addition, consideration was given to real-world data on the vaccine’s efficacy over a sustained period of time provided by both U.S. and international sources, including the CDC, the UK and Israel. The immune responses of approximately 200 participants 18 through 55 years of age who received a single booster dose approximately six months after their second dose were assessed. The antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 virus one month after a booster dose of the vaccine compared to the response one month after the two-dose primary series in the same individuals demonstrated a booster response.

Additional analysis conducted by the manufacturer, as requested by the FDA, compared the rates of COVID-19 accrued during the current Delta variant surge among original clinical trial participants who completed the primary two-dose vaccination series early in the clinical trial to those who completed a two-dose series later in the study. The analysis submitted by the company showed that during the study period of July and August 2021, the incidence of COVID-19 was higher among the participants who completed their primary vaccine series earlier, compared to participants who completed it later. The FDA determined that the rate of breakthrough COVID-19 reported during this time period translates to a modest decrease in the efficacy of the vaccine among those vaccinated earlier.

Safety was evaluated in 306 participants 18 through 55 years of age and 12 participants 65 years of age and older who were followed for an average of over two months. The most commonly reported side effects by the clinical trial participants who received the booster dose of the vaccine were pain, redness and swelling at the injection site, as well as fatigue, headache, muscle or joint pain and chills. Of note, swollen lymph nodes in the underarm were observed more frequently following the booster dose than after the primary two-dose series.

Since Dec. 11, 2020, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine has been available under EUA for individuals 16 years of age and older. The authorization was expanded on May 10, 2021 to include those 12 through 15 years of age, and again on Aug. 12, 2021 to include the use of a third dose of a three-dose primary series in certain immunocompromised individuals 12 years of age and older. EUAs can be used by the FDA during public health emergencies to provide access to medical products that may be effective in preventing, diagnosing, or treating a disease, provided that the FDA determines that the known and potential benefits of a product, when used to prevent, diagnose, or treat the disease, outweigh the known and potential risks of the product.

The amendment to the EUA to include a single booster dose was granted to Pfizer Inc.

Petey
Nov 26, 2005

For who knows what is good for a person in life, during the few and meaningless days they pass through like a shadow? Who can tell them what will happen under the sun after they are gone?

Fritz the Horse posted:

I was very pleasantly surprised that my employer required vaccinations starting August 1st. Before we could sign our annual contract we had to submit proof of vaccination to HR.

The reservation is only 30% fully vaccinated which is very concerning because of many factors: remote location, lack of healthcare availability, underlying conditions (obesity, diabetes, smoking), many multigenerational households etc. Thankfully my employer is taking the pandemic very seriously.

That's surprising. I know some reservations were fully vaccinated very quickly. Do you know why the rate is so low at yours?

Tiny Timbs
Sep 6, 2008

So we went from "not even sure it helps people under 65" to "18 year olds should get one if they work in public"?

Fighting Trousers
May 17, 2011

Does this excite you, girl?

Petey posted:

That's surprising. I know some reservations were fully vaccinated very quickly. Do you know why the rate is so low at yours?

Not Fritz, but I'm gonna guess because South(?) Dakota. The rezzes up north are SUPER rural.

Potato Salad
Oct 23, 2014

nobody cares


Petey posted:

So Alina Chan definitely has a dog in this fight, but she (re)posted a link to this leaked putative grant proposal from 2018 today: https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1440279120861024264

that — apparently, taken on face value, which, again, should be cautious, and as I read it as an inexpert layperson — seems to be a group of US + Chinese scientists approaching DARPA in 2018 to fund a program by which they would engineer a novel, highly-contagious coronavirus (as/or a spike protein that they would inject into other viruses) and infect wild bats in caves in Yunnan in the hopes of developing broad cross-immunity that would prevent more dangerous unknown coronaviruses from spilling over.

None of this, of course, proves or even really suggests that cov-2 came from a lab; indeed, this is the kind of approach that would be implemented to prevent such a spillover. But it appears that DARPA turned it down for being too risky, and I have to say, it really did make my eyebrows go up as I read it, in terms of the kind of thing that would be seriously proposed within the vein of gain of function.

It has already widely become seized on by the right as proof of the plandemic and bioweaponry, and again, I don't think it shows that. But, if true, it startled me on the kind of stuff that these groups were working on.

e: looks like it originally was sourced from an Intercept FOIA, perhaps? https://theintercept.com/2021/09/06/new-details-emerge-about-coronavirus-research-at-chinese-lab/

I support the administration of research on coronaviruses in parrots and small mammals that dates back to the 1980s.

None of this is new or remotely radical.

Potato Salad
Oct 23, 2014

nobody cares


Coldrice posted:

Alright all, COVID SIMULATOR v3 IS LIVE! This update focuses on improving the systems/realism to spreading Covid




you can get it free at https://coldrice.itch.io/covid-simulator


patch notes: https://coldrice.itch.io/covid-simulator/devlog/296832/version-3-is-live

would you be interested in keeping track of R0 in the current playthrough?

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.

Fallom posted:

So we went from "not even sure it helps people under 65" to "18 year olds should get one if they work in public"?

We didn’t go anywhere; it’s the same as recommended by the expert committee.

Omnikin
May 29, 2007

Press 'E' for Medic
So can I book an appointment for Pfizer booster? I qualify. Second shot was March 23.

edit - and apologies for sparse content, I would just prefer to ask a knowledgeable group of folks who pay attention to this vs Googling through that sea of data

kiimo
Jul 24, 2003

I'm not sure how many of you care about this but apparently a bunch of players in the NFL have fake vaccine cards which would explain all the "breakthrough cases"

NFL players are loving stupid, pretending they aren't has never worked out for me.


quote:

Based on what that agent learned from his conversation with this player and others similarly shut down as close contacts in 2021, he estimates that 10–15 percent of players have a fake vaccine card. “I think it is a lot more common than people realize,” he said. “Look, you’re talking about the NFL. These guys do anything they can to fudge a weed test or a PED test.”

A third NFL agent told Defector that he hadn’t directly heard of any players using fakes but assumed it was probably happening. We spoke in the morning and that same night, the agent texted me back with an update: “Was told by a player tonight that a big-name guy on his team has a fake card. Players know.”


https://defector.com/fake-vaccine-cards-are-a-real-problem-for-the-nfl/

HelloSailorSign
Jan 27, 2011

Omnikin posted:

So can I book an appointment for Pfizer booster? I qualify. Second shot was March 23.

edit - and apologies for sparse content, I would just prefer to ask a knowledgeable group of folks who pay attention to this vs Googling through that sea of data

Yeah, if you’re part of the groups that should get it, do it.

Some areas might be slow to update their systems to follow the recommendation, so don’t be surprised if you call a local drug store and get a, “oh we don’t know about that, we will have to ask corporate.”

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



Just to put my MOD HAT on for just a moment, I'd like to reiterate that there are currently no active threadbans for posters in this new thread, as elaborated upon in the OP. Sorry for not emphasizing this further and any confusion some people may have had jumping in recently.

As for actual content, Coldrice you need to start applying for NIH grants for the project lol

empty whippet box
Jun 9, 2004

by Fluffdaddy

Epic High Five posted:

Just to put my MOD HAT on for just a moment, I'd like to reiterate that there are currently no active threadbans for posters in this new thread, as elaborated upon in the OP. Sorry for not emphasizing this further and any confusion some people may have had jumping in recently.

Oh my sweet summer child. You will regret this soon enough.

Epic High Five posted:



As for actual content, Coldrice you need to start applying for NIH grants for the project lol

Feigl-Ding been tweetin' about it, I hope he's getting lots of money from people paying what they feel for it. poo poo owns

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



empty whippet box posted:

Oh my sweet summer child. You will regret this soon enough.

Feigl-Ding been tweetin' about it, I hope he's getting lots of money from people paying what they feel for it. poo poo owns

It seems to be working out well enough so far, it's been an interesting experiment considering how much has changed over how much time since the old thread

Hope somebody managed to get the updated version to the Feigl-Ding and the others that have been tinkering with it, it's nuts how much it's changed since it was just differently colored pixels lol

Tiny Timbs
Sep 6, 2008

HelloSailorSign posted:

Yeah, if you’re part of the groups that should get it, do it.

Some areas might be slow to update their systems to follow the recommendation, so don’t be surprised if you call a local drug store and get a, “oh we don’t know about that, we will have to ask corporate.”

"Over 18 with frequent occupational exposure to covid" is a mighty big bucket if pharmacists don't try to restrict it to people working in social services or Healthcare. I'll be looking into it as an office worker/non-homer.

brugroffil
Nov 30, 2015


My teacher wife was double vaxxed with Pfizer back in February and caught covid at the end of last month. Wonder if she should still get a third shot or not

Fritz the Horse
Dec 26, 2019

... of course!

Petey posted:

That's surprising. I know some reservations were fully vaccinated very quickly. Do you know why the rate is so low at yours?

Fighting Trousers posted:

Not Fritz, but I'm gonna guess because South(?) Dakota. The rezzes up north are SUPER rural.

IHS did a great job rolling out vaccinations--I got my first dose in early February and was fully vaxxed by March. They did free-for-all walk-in mass vaccination clinics every Sunday and then by appointment during the week and also had mobile vaccination setups going out to the communities.

Yes it's very rural but so is the Navajo Nation afaik. That's an issue but it doesn't explain the low vaccination rate and tbh I don't know why it's so low. All the tribes around here have been enforcing mask mandates and other measures since March 2020 even when the GOP state governments were full open 'er up.

Part of it is the tremendous amount of mis/disinformation on Facebook which is a primary means of communication around here. I think part of it is also age demographics--life expectancy is quite short and birth rate is high so the population is fairly young overall and they might have a hard time convincing younger folks of the need to be vaccinated.

There's a deep-seated distrust of the federal government which goes back more than a century and is very justified.

Someone told me (can't recall if it was on the forums or elsewhere) that the Navajo Nation was both hit very hard early on in the pandemic and had an excellent PR/advertising push which got them to >90% rapidly.

Deviant
Sep 26, 2003

i've forgotten all of your names.


fuckin' get 50 vaccine doses who cares any more

vax cards folding out of my wallet like grandkid pictures

Pasha
Nov 9, 2017
Dumb question, but does the recommendation for the Pfizer booster dose only apply to people who had their primary vaccines from Pfizer, or is the recommendation that anyone who is in those high risk categories get the Pfizer booster dose (even if they received their primary vaccines from Moderna or Johnson and Johnson)?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

HelloSailorSign
Jan 27, 2011

brugroffil posted:

My teacher wife was double vaxxed with Pfizer back in February and caught covid at the end of last month. Wonder if she should still get a third shot or not

There's not going to be data on this, but catching it and recovering likely functioned as well as a 3rd shot for long term immunity.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply